The Lonious Monk;4648657 said:Regardless of what you think the answer to this question is. There is one undeniable truth. Many media outlets backtracked and tried to build Vick up afterwards as some kind of redemption story. Sandusky will never get that treatment.
Well Vick was sentenced to 2 years, whereas Sandusky was sentenced to 442 years. So Vick had the opportunity to come home and get his life 'back'.
Secondly, Vick harmed dogs, not children. HUGE difference.