Okay, time to put your money where your mouth is, RnR

[waterproof]

If one goes to Egypt now and looks around he or she will see how Egyptians looked 4,000 years ago. Egypt has always been one of the most populate placed in the ancient world. While many people immigrated there no mass replacement event ever happened. The Arab 'invasion' was primarily cultural. It is somewhat absurd to think that a desert produced enough people to overwhelm such a massive population center as Egypt.

There is no real reason to believe that the people living in Egypt today look that much different than the people living in Egypt 4,000 years ago.

wow, yall is real serious about this.

Gerald Massey, English writer and author of the book, Egypt the Light of the World, wrote, "The dignity is so ancient that the insignia of the Pharaoh evidently belonged to the time when Egyptians wore nothing but the girdle of the Negro." (p 251)

Sir Richard Francis Burton, a 19th century English explorer, writer and linguist in 1883 wrote to Gerald Massey, "You are quite right about the "AFRICAN" origin of the Egyptians. I have 100 human skulls to prove it."

Scientist, R. T. Prittchett, states in his book The Natural History of Man, "In their complex and many of the complexions and in physical peculiarities the Egyptians were an "AFRICAN" race (p 124-125).

The Ancient Greek historian Herodotus, who visited Egypt in the 5th century B.C.E., saw the Egyptians face to face and described them as black-skinned with woolly hair.

Anthropologist, Count Constatin de Volney (1727-1820),spoke about the race of the Egyptians that produced the Pharaohs. He later paid tribute to Herodotus' discovery when he said:


The ancient Egyptians were true Negroes of the same type as all native born Africans. That being so, we can see how their blood mixed for several centuries with that of the Romans and Greeks, must have lost the intensity of it's original color, while retaining none the less the imprint of it's original mold. We can even state as a general principle that the face (referring to The Sphinx) is a kind of monument able, in many cases, to attest to or shed light on historical evidence on the origins of the people."

The fact that the ancient Egyptians were black-skin prompted Volney to make the following statement:
"What a subject for meditation, just think that the race of black men today our slaves and the object of our scorn, is the very race to which we owe our arts, science and even the use of our speech."

 

[bambu]

Since I'm an immortal and lived for thousands of years and yes I'm Nimrod. I never died cause I'm real nigga. The ancient egyptians looked like ethopians and somalians of today. Point blank. Bow bow bow - I created that word when I use to destroy weak mofos.

Ive been waiting here for you... I knew you would turn up...You are blessed...You've been lucky....I wish I got you last time...I'd like to test your immorality...lets begin then

 

[And Step]

The native Americans went through a massive depopulation/genocide from disease and warfare. No similar event occurs in Egyptian history.[

That is all fine and dandy. But none of these things change your physical appearance. Mixing with other people do though. Besides those wars with Nubia, Alexander, and Arabs did occur. These are what gave the pretext for the intermixing thus changing of the physical appearance. And actually you need to check the Tablets of Narmer which describe a war that took place that resulted in the losers being vanquished(deported). Alexander's MO was to kill the men and spare the women. That lays a fertile backdrop for physical appearance change.

University of Cairo sampled DNA from remains of 2600BC workers. They matched closely to modern Egyptians. ABO blood testing has shown ancient Egyptians again match modern Egyptians.

Who is questioning that, Wharf? Your original point was they look like they did 4000 years ago. In this early portion of the thread, Ktulu surmised that Egyptians had the same DNA strain as Western Europeans. Surely Egyptians don't now or then look like Frenchmen or the British. I am sure there is a whiteman in Southern Italy that shares the same, DNA strain that I do, but that is not relevant to the point you made.

Nothing in the historical record suggest ancient Egyptians looked that much different from modern Egyptians.

What historical record? I have seen part of that history up close and personal on the pyramids, heiroglphics and artifacts and what I have seen would disagree with you. Those pyramids in Sudan kind of squash who those people were. Did the Ancient Egyptians ever look as varied as they do now? Of course, but it was way later down the time track. That history is still being uncovered today.

Painting by the Egyptian JJ Evans

 

[@My_nameaintearl]

I don't see any money being put where anybody's mouth is.

Could it be that all these racist idiots that come to RnR every day to blab on and on about how the original Seinfeld, Kramer, George and Elaine were Black Afrikans are all just uneducated BROKE losers who live with their aunties in public housing?

Money. Mouths.

 

[And Step]

No we are just not stupid enough to give our money to some anonymous crackers to tell us that all human beings can be traced back to Black people.

 

[@My_nameaintearl]

You don't have any money, I wasn't talking to you, peasant.

Know your place, you're in the court of a pharaoh. Don't make me go to the trunk and get the Stargate.

 

[garv]

Lmao i thought we left this shit in the 20th century, Egypt is an indigenous Black Afrikan civilization, the proof is there, you put your money where your mouth is and prove the opposite.

 

[garv]

Lol this shit was refuted like a year ago, Ktulu loses again, try harder next time.

 

[@My_nameaintearl]

Garv, rep your money. I know you ain't embroidered in solid gold like my kingly self, but you must have some change in the couch.

 

[garv]

Garv, rep your money. I know you ain't embroidered in solid gold like my kingly self, but you must have some change in the couch.

http://www.igenea.com/forum/threads/the-tutankhamun-dna-project.20/..............................

 

[garv]

Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III,based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel.

 

[garv]

Smh at anybody who takes IGENEA seriously, seriously are you that foolish Ktulu?

 

[@My_nameaintearl]

The DNA evidence came from the mummies themselves, not a tv show. Damn, are you retarded?

Money, bruh.

 

[garv]

The DNA evidence came from the mummies themselves, not a tv show. Damn, are you retarded?

Money, bruh.

Nope it came from a discovery channel documentary based on a screenshot rather than an actual DNA sample, why don't you do your research before you post articles, you can't be that stupid?

 

[@My_nameaintearl]

Bruh, I read both of the DNA studies with the hard data taken from the mummies last night. My money is where my mouth is. Your money doesn't exist.

 

[garv]

Bruh, I read both of the DNA studies with the hard data taken from the mummies last night. My money is where my mouth is. Your money doesn't exist.

Post them otherwise this is a troll thread, because i've already been through this bullshit like a year ago.

Look what Dienkes has to say about it

http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2011/08/igeneas-king-tut-claims.html

Now, they have done it again, pretending to be able to link men with a particular R1b1a2 haplotype with King Tut. Note that the Y-chromosome of King Tut has never been published, and speculation about it is based on some screencaps from a Discovery Channel documentary that may or may not belong to the Pharaoh:
iGENEA was able to reconstruct the Y-DNA profile of Tutankhamun, his father Akhenaten and his grandfather Amenhotep III with the help of a recording of the Discovery Channel. The astonishing result:

It seems everybody seems to get it but you.

 

[garv]

Zawi Hawass is also a prejudiced man who can not be taken seriously/

 

[@My_nameaintearl]

Wow, your source is a blog. Mine is DNA.

But I shouldn't brag, I am a privileged member of royalty, after all.

 

[garv]

Wow, your source is a blog. Mine is DNA.

But I shouldn't brag, I am a privileged member of royalty, after all.

Really Ktulu, this is from the very article you posted.

Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III, based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel.

 

[And Step]

This is true.

As a a member of the royal bloodlines of the Jewish Samoans called the Boo-Yalmuke tribe.