Fair or Foul: Stephen A Smith's Comments About Domestic Violence

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
I believe no one should lays hands and have the expectation that no one will hit them back

But that does not negate that Stephen, a person who is paid to articulate his thoughts like he went to college, instead of a Twitter nigga or even worse like some of you, and FAILED at it.

 
Yes it's typical for me to expect an educated professional to speak like one when they're at their job

Sorry if you can't relate

Wait I'm not sorry

Grow up

 
so men have to say what they feel the right way or we can not protect ourselves from being attacked.

or

men have to use their words and not their hands but women can use their hands and not their words.

but we all don't have to grow up only the people who want fairness across the board.

chicks starting to sound like white folk
 
Fuck all that!

A man who fights a woman he can undoubtedly beat is no more cowardly than a woman who hits a man who she thinks/knows won't hit her back.
 
haute;7263808 said:
I believe no one should lays hands and have the expectation that no one will hit them back

But that does not negate that Stephen, a person who is paid to articulate his thoughts like he went to college, instead of a Twitter nigga or even worse like some of you, and FAILED at it.


Forget being articulate, the point is......................is the point getting across, that's all people really want to know:

If you put hands on anybody..........expect that person to defend/hit back.

It's that simple.
 
haute;7263510 said:
D0wn;7263072 said:
haute;7263022 said:
If you can't articulate your thoughts

Then Stfu

I get what Stephen was saying

But it was said poorly and thats why it left room for interpretation

Oh well tough break nigga

No it wasnt, what he stated didnt leave room for misinterpretation.

If you possesed common sense, like i thought you did, then you would of known he articulated himself cleary.

She took his words, and twisted them. She said, he said things he neither stated or implied.

And instead of countering her agenda, which he could of simply done, he folded like laundry.

Its funny how all the men understood exactly what he said. But all the women didnt.

May be he used to much logic, for the average women.... And not enough irrationality and emotion.

And if you possessed basic reading comprehension above am 8th grade level

Not your half assed version of 'common sense'

You'd get it too

Words mean things

So use the right nouns, pronouns, verbs, and adjectives

And you'll never have to say I'm sorry

What he said was clear.Only emotional women caught feelings.
 
bull6599;7263960 said:
Fuck all that!

A man who fights a woman he can undoubtedly beat is no more cowardly than a woman who hits a man who she thinks/knows won't hit her back.

That's not the discussion though bruh.
 
haute;7263510 said:
D0wn;7263072 said:
haute;7263022 said:
If you can't articulate your thoughts

Then Stfu

I get what Stephen was saying

But it was said poorly and thats why it left room for interpretation

Oh well tough break nigga

No it wasnt, what he stated didnt leave room for misinterpretation.

If you possesed common sense, like i thought you did, then you would of known he articulated himself cleary.

She took his words, and twisted them. She said, he said things he neither stated or implied.

And instead of countering her agenda, which he could of simply done, he folded like laundry.

Its funny how all the men understood exactly what he said. But all the women didnt.

May be he used to much logic, for the average women.... And not enough irrationality and emotion.

And if you possessed basic reading comprehension above am 8th grade level

Not your half assed version of 'common sense'

You'd get it too

Words mean things

So use the right nouns, pronouns, verbs, and adjectives

And you'll never have to say I'm sorry

Anyways if thats so, why was he aplogizing for things that he did not imply or stated?

A white woman caught feelings, all of a sudden, its a womens right issue.

Black women are up in arms about this. Yet black women have been getting smacked up and shot up all year, by WHITE MALE police and white supremacists, but wheres the white wimmenz at to defend yall???

 
too many chicks fighting a battle they know nothing about.

and if they know about abuse then they know the difference between getting your ass kicked just because and starting a fight.

at least I would hope so.
 
Haute already admitted she like to get tied up and roleplay with deviant white men ...so logic, commonsense and pride is lost on her
 
Copper;7264091 said:
Haute already admitted she like to get tied up and roleplay with deviant white men ...so logic, commonsense and pride is lost on her

Funny

black feminist will gang up on a black man, to aid her white women "friend", all in the name of "Womenhood". Cool

But where is the white wimmenz at?

when black women are getting mma moves, put on them by white male officers??

What happen to women hood then??

That story falls by the wayside, and them loud mouth black feminist bitches dont say shit.

Ex: Eric Gardner gets killed, but the black feminist wanna push that aside ,to talk about how they dont feel safe around black men...because he say hi when they walk down the street, or he stares at them 2 seconds to long....

But when they're getting pummeled by white male officers, no peep, nothing..

Hilarious
 
Bruh I just read an article on Huffington Post about how white men spoke out against the NFL 2 game suspension but no black male have ...shits clearly a lie ...I can name about 7 who spoke against it just last week

When did these supercoons convince themselves the whites have third best interest in mind?
 
D0wn;7264063 said:
haute;7263510 said:
D0wn;7263072 said:
haute;7263022 said:
If you can't articulate your thoughts

Then Stfu

I get what Stephen was saying

But it was said poorly and thats why it left room for interpretation

Oh well tough break nigga

No it wasnt, what he stated didnt leave room for misinterpretation.

If you possesed common sense, like i thought you did, then you would of known he articulated himself cleary.

She took his words, and twisted them. She said, he said things he neither stated or implied.

And instead of countering her agenda, which he could of simply done, he folded like laundry.

Its funny how all the men understood exactly what he said. But all the women didnt.

May be he used to much logic, for the average women.... And not enough irrationality and emotion.

And if you possessed basic reading comprehension above am 8th grade level

Not your half assed version of 'common sense'

You'd get it too

Words mean things

So use the right nouns, pronouns, verbs, and adjectives

And you'll never have to say I'm sorry

Anyways if thats so, why was he aplogizing for things that he did not imply or stated?

See this is where that 8th grade reading comprehension is so important

I have clearly stated that Stephen spoke of the matter poorly and that is why it left room for interpretation

I also stated I agree with Stephen and his only downfall is talking like an idiot

And yet here you are in your feelings getting way off topic

Lemme guess you've let a woman whoop your ass? That is the only logical reason I see to be this irrational with someone who agrees with you.


 
Last edited:
The sadest part of all this is even though she knows she's wrong, the white bitch michelle beadle is probably smiling at expense of a black man. This is more about power than any other thing. The reason why SAS can sit on tv and blatantly disrespect his own ppl without consequence is because black ppl don't have the power (or say so) to threaten anybody's job. White ppl laugh at Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson. But if you disrespect gays or white women, it's another story..... X

 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
451
Views
3
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…