blakfyahking;c-9776623 said:Qiv_Owan;c-9776315 said:blakfyahking;c-9776199 said:2stepz_ahead;c-9775143 said:blakfyahking;c-9775087 said:Rozetta5tone;c-9774900 said:The upper middle class/ upper class blacks often sacrifice their voice and identity to be accepted into the wealth of America.
this statement is worthy of a thread on its own..........how many black folks really make it without compromising themselves in some way/somehow
yes...let's make the thread...an then you an I will fight nigga.
the fukk is compromise. you said it before.
what act more white?
less black?
hold ya pinky out while drinking rose'?
I can't wait for this fight
an dont get "busy" an not show up nigga
I think the definition of compromise is obvious
I just think whether or not it's required in order to be financially successful is what is debatable
I think it's funny u claim u want that debate when u in the Lavar Ball thread talking shit like a hating ass CAC cuz u don't think he's acting "acceptable" enough in order to sell shoes
Its not obvious bruh, i was wondering what exactly u mean by compromise
And Ball is acting like a Jew with his fuckery
how is Ball acting like a "Jew", and why is it considered fuckery? he doing the exact same shit other large businesses already been doing
and as far as compromise in the sense that everybody can agree what "compromise" as a term means
ie. u give up a part of ur true self in order to gain some type of acceptance........like giving up ur religion, or talking a certain way, wearing certain clothes, cutting ur hair a certain way, participating in certain actions that u don't truly believe in all just to get paid
but whether ur compromising urself, or if u even have to compromise urself at all to get money is the real question
In order to honestly have this discussion there needs to be a clear and understood difference between code switching, which we all do in certain especially professional environments, and actually compromising a part of who you are to achieve certain things.