Spinoff: And what would be the problem with itemized child support payments

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

Bwoahmizzee

New member
the only time the shit gets outta control is when people get shit like 10,000 dollars a month in child support just because the person is rich

you know damn well that money isn't going to the child, if anything the bulk of that should be put in a bank for the child when he/she gets older

as far as niggas paying a few hundred dollars a month that aint shit, especially if the child is with the other parent all the time
 
Last edited:
Im all for taking portions of that money and funneling ti into a trust fund.

I woudl also lvoe to see int eh future that moeny being taken out of the parents hands and given right to the child.
 
Last edited:
WOuld the court turn down putting the money on a debit card so you can moniter the purchases? And can the court reduce payment if the money isn't being spent how its suppose to be? I know theres a fine line since you can use that money on certain shit and it wouldn't matter but maybe just the idea that it is being monitered will have females spend it right.
 
Last edited:
Djunior;1644896 said:
Whether or not your seed is takin care of should be the only concern.

Cop out answer, say the person you paying child support too has an income of $80k and yours is $30k and you giving up 1/3 of that. The childs needs are exceeded before your payment is even submitted, your payment pays her new boyfriends car note.

Presteezh;1644910 said:
WOuld the court turn down putting the money on a debit card so you can moniter the purchases? And can the court reduce payment if the money isn't being spent how its suppose to be? I know theres a fine line since you can use that money on certain shit and it wouldn't matter but maybe just the idea that it is being monitered will have females spend it right.

Good point, if you get food stamps, they monitor what you buy and in a way limit where you shop. Also, the amount you receive is instantly adjusted based on your income. Something like this would be a stretch but possible.
 
Last edited:
powerman 5000;1644949 said:
Cop out answer, say the person you paying child support too has an income of $80k and yours is $30k and you giving up 1/3 of that. The childs needs are exceeded before your payment is even submitted, your payment pays her new boyfriends car note.

QUOTE]

So cause yo BM caked up and you not you aint supposed to do your part? What you can? If that aint weak I don't know what is. Be a father to your kids nigga. And why is you worried about her boyfriend? Like I said make sure yo seed straight. That is your only concern. You should be able to tel if the lil bit of dollars you contribute is being put to good use. If it aint and only then should you have an issue.
 
Last edited:
Djunior;1644989 said:
powerman 5000;1644949 said:
Cop out answer, say the person you paying child support too has an income of $80k and yours is $30k and you giving up 1/3 of that. The childs needs are exceeded before your payment is even submitted, your payment pays her new boyfriends car note.

QUOTE]

So cause yo BM caked up and you not you aint supposed to do your part? What you can? If that aint weak I don't know what is. Be a father to your kids nigga. And why is you worried about her boyfriend? Like I said make sure yo seed straight. That is your only concern. You should be able to tel if the lil bit of dollars you contribute is being put to good use. If it aint and only then should you have an issue.

If you really want to be a father to the kid, you'd have him more often then not. Giving somebody money isn't being a parent. That's the whole message this thread is trying to dispel. "Oh i'm the man cuz I pay my child support." The whole time the kid is getting life lessons from whoever will talk to him on the street. That right there is weak. You want to make sure he straight, sit him down and ask him if he straight instead of trusting other people to spend your parenting money correctly. And hell yeah i'd worry about her boyfriend, being a parent also includes knowing who your kid is around and what he is receiving with your parenting money.
 
Last edited:
thehonorable;1644869 said:
Im all for taking portions of that money and funneling ti into a trust fund.

I woudl also lvoe to see int eh future that moeny being taken out of the parents hands and given right to the child.

nah. the little dumb ninja will spend all the money on jordans or lipgloss and wont have food for the rest of the month. some responsible adult needs to handle that. whether its the father or mother is up to them but no kid under 20 is gonna handle that money right
 
Last edited:
Nigga worried about what the mother do with the money when they have no control over the matter. Stop payment cause you feel she isn't doing what she suppose to do, ang you go to jail. Spending time with your kid should be the only thing that matter. If he or she is not being taken care of then get yoour proof and take it to cour and get custoody. If you don't want custody then shut the fuck up and pay for the nigga J's and XBOX Live.
 
Last edited:
The first time a state pass legislation to regulate how a women spend child support money is when every women would demand a condom no matter who she fucking. Child support is a lot of woman's end game.
 
Last edited:
I think the court should also put in mandatory time the father needs to spend with his kids. I say this because SOME women will not allow the father to see the kids and SOME guys have to fight and struggle to get to see their kids. I think it would mean more to the kid to spend time with his or her father than him being represented only by a pay check.
 
Last edited:
all the cats in here talking slick havent had to deal with the system...

keep living lil niggas...your turn is coming

a law like this would never pass, becuz it would be portrayed as anti-woman/child, and no politician would want that label...the women lobbies would have a field-day with this shit....

it does make sense tho
 
Last edited:
to some of you niggas wtf... did I say you sign off parental rights when you do this

... it's a simple and fair way to deal with child support

I agree though with louis. womens lobby would never let this go. too fair.

@blaque

... thy goes both ways...hell. thwere are more deadbeat moms then dads
 
Last edited:
Nas pay 50,000 a month and niggas is talkin bout itemizing 350 beans? LMAO

If you pay and are involved in the childs life you will easily be able to tell if the money is properly being utilized.

And no this will NEVER happen.
 
Last edited:
^^^ I agree with you. I just don't think a person who wants to take care of their children and want to see them should have to fight about it. Of course that would be in a perfect world. I just think people do not look at how everything effects the child or children involved. I have always had conflicting feelings about child support. Oh and I have met some women I will not keep company with because of how they treat their kids.
 
Last edited:
Presteezh;1644910 said:
WOuld the court turn down putting the money on a debit card so you can moniter the purchases? And can the court reduce payment if the money isn't being spent how its suppose to be? I know theres a fine line since you can use that money on certain shit and it wouldn't matter but maybe just the idea that it is being monitered will have females spend it right.

i actually think that is a good idea.
 
Last edited:
Djunior;1645654 said:
Nas pay 50,000 a month and niggas is talkin bout itemizing 350 beans? LMAO

If you pay and are involved in the childs life you will easily be able to tell if the money is properly being utilized.

And no this will NEVER happen.

bruh...the avg cat dont even make $50k/yr...so $350 beans is a lot of dough to some people

i fail to see whats so funny
 
Last edited:
WTF @djunior

Aight money bags. It aint about the money, its about whats fair. Getting an account of whats going on for the child.

I hate this strawman people are throwing...like this means I am saying once you pay this you aint going to spend no time with the child... WTF...

All this is a theory on how to make child support about the child in stead of a revenge mechanism.
 
Last edited:
thehonorable;1645802 said:
WTF @djunior

Aight money bags. It aint about the money, its about whats fair. Getting an account of whats going on for the child.

I hate this strawman people are throwing...like this means I am saying once you pay this you aint going to spend no time with the child... WTF...

All this is a theory on how to make child support about the child in stead of a revenge mechanism.

How is it revenge when it is dictated by someone esle, ie a judge? Ya'll need to get yall emotions out of it. Mad about providing for a child you helped create. And I'm going to go back and look real hard at my posts and try to find where I said anything about not bein involved in the childs life.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
81
Views
2
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…