Was Jesus referring to Yahweh/Jehovah or someone else???

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
bambu;4415971 said:
beenwize;4415754 said:
bambu;4415695 said:
The only reason I posted that video is because you act like you cannot read any referenced materials. And if it is not your interpretation, why do you keep spilling all over this board?

I do not have any questions to be answered, again...you post views that are not yours with no references.

It appears that you should be looking for answers, you support a Christian doctrine, but jumped subjects when brother samurais brought it up.

and that goofball who attempted to refute Acharya's research failed miserably.

If you don't believe any of the New Testament gospels then that's 'your truth.' I could care less what you believe is accurate according to history. And yes, I've already read referenced materials, you should try looking up some yourself if you are seeking information, that's what I do. You found a video that attempts to debunk the New Testament so nothing should be stopping you from conducting other research. But hey Acharya S also teaches that Yahweh was known as Baal and teaches against the Old Testament being accurate to history as well. So much for who you rely on.

And that goofball is not the only one who refuted the atheist Acharya, that was part 1 of his video first of all and many others have refuted her as well.

You are a fool if you think that Acharya has "my truth." I told you I only posted the video because you do not read well.

I am a historian, so any historical inaccuracies surrounding any religion are on my radar.

And I see what you did there..... Attempting to divert the historical heat away from your anointed one. How dare you attack my Hebrew brothers when you uphold a faulty doctrine. We have already had several discussions concerning Hebrew beliefs. Defend your research and beliefs or GTFOHWTBS!!!!

I don't doubt the possibility of you being an alias account of 'waterproof.' As he has been caught by myself in past time with an alias account cosigning himself. Is that you again waterproof?

You had to run to your other account just to cosign yourself? how childish for someone that has been posting on this forum for at least 10 years, LMBO.... Get a life, you not fooling me.

.
 
beenwize;4416106 said:
bambu;4415971 said:
beenwize;4415754 said:
bambu;4415695 said:
The only reason I posted that video is because you act like you cannot read any referenced materials. And if it is not your interpretation, why do you keep spilling all over this board?

I do not have any questions to be answered, again...you post views that are not yours with no references.

It appears that you should be looking for answers, you support a Christian doctrine, but jumped subjects when brother samurais brought it up.

and that goofball who attempted to refute Acharya's research failed miserably.

If you don't believe any of the New Testament gospels then that's 'your truth.' I could care less what you believe is accurate according to history. And yes, I've already read referenced materials, you should try looking up some yourself if you are seeking information, that's what I do. You found a video that attempts to debunk the New Testament so nothing should be stopping you from conducting other research. But hey Acharya S also teaches that Yahweh was known as Baal and teaches against the Old Testament being accurate to history as well. So much for who you rely on.

And that goofball is not the only one who refuted the atheist Acharya, that was part 1 of his video first of all and many others have refuted her as well.

You are a fool if you think that Acharya has "my truth." I told you I only posted the video because you do not read well.

I am a historian, so any historical inaccuracies surrounding any religion are on my radar.

And I see what you did there..... Attempting to divert the historical heat away from your anointed one. How dare you attack my Hebrew brothers when you uphold a faulty doctrine. We have already had several discussions concerning Hebrew beliefs. Defend your research and beliefs or GTFOHWTBS!!!!

I don't doubt the possibility of you being an alias account of 'waterproof.' As he has been caught by myself in past time with an alias account cosigning himself. Is that you again waterproof?

You had to run to your other account just to cosign yourself? how childish for someone that has been posting on this forum for at least 10 years, LMBO.... Get a life, you not fooling me.

.

You are a dumbass... check my account fool, I am a Knight of Imhotep.

Although my Hebrew brothers and I disagree on some issues, we are still brothers on a quest for knowledge.

You have displayed a low level of reading comprehension and that you are a youtube scholar that can not defend your own thoughts. You are not seeking knowledge, you are regurgitating the research of others without proper analysis.

Again.... Defend your research and beliefs or GTFOHWTBS!!!!

 
Fool, once again if you want to know the connection get off your ass and do the research. I don't hold any belief as the ultimate truth because their is no way of me verifying the authenticity of any religious literature, but that don't stop me from researching and formimg an opinion on what feels right to me at a.given time. And shut up about Hebrew brothers cuz Im not against it anyway. I'm for seeking deeper truth beyond the basic info that has been presented to the masses this far. I have ppl of the Hebrew faith in my family so I'm not againt it. But I am against deception, lies, and mental slavery. And I refuse to only rely on books the slave master used for indoctrinating the masses. So I research beyond what was presented. I did not stop at the New Testament canon, I researched beyond it into early Christaianity which is how I was introduced to the Gnostic gospels. Those are things that a real seeker of truth will do. I will never hold 1 book and say everything that does not agree with this book is automatically false.
 
beenwize;4416055 said:
bambu;4415971 said:
beenwize;4415754 said:
bambu;4415695 said:
The only reason I posted that video is because you act like you cannot read any referenced materials. And if it is not your interpretation, why do you keep spilling all over this board?

I do not have any questions to be answered, again...you post views that are not yours with no references.

It appears that you should be looking for answers, you support a Christian doctrine, but jumped subjects when brother samurais brought it up.

and that goofball who attempted to refute Acharya's research failed miserably.

If you don't believe any of the New Testament gospels then that's 'your truth.' I could care less what you believe is accurate according to history. And yes, I've already read referenced materials, you should try looking up some yourself if you are seeking information, that's what I do. You found a video that attempts to debunk the New Testament so nothing should be stopping you from conducting other research. But hey Acharya S also teaches that Yahweh was known as Baal and teaches against the Old Testament being accurate to history as well. So much for who you rely on.

And that goofball is not the only one who refuted the atheist Acharya, that was part 1 of his video first of all and many others have refuted her as well.

You are a fool if you think that Acharya has "my truth." I told you I only posted the video because you do not read well.

I am a historian, so any historical inaccuracies surrounding any religion are on my radar.

And I see what you did there..... Attempting to divert the historical heat away from your anointed one. How dare you attack my Hebrew brothers when you uphold a faulty doctrine. We have already had several discussions concerning Hebrew beliefs. Defend your research and beliefs or GTFOHWTBS!!!!

It appears you are only in this thread seeking some attention. If Acharya research is not your version of truth then don't post Acharya research in this thread or present it as a reliable source for someone to trust in. I could care less about her or your views on the historical accuracy of the New Testament or Yeshua. And nobody is in here attacking anyone, but you and others who don't agree with your version of truth. You slithering in here like a snake into an exchange between myself and someone else just to try to gain attention and to start an altercation. I smelled you a million miles away. Lol, I have my own views and they have their own views. This is my thread so I will continue to post my research, I'm not in your thread attempting to force my views on you am I? Now get your wack fake historian ass out of here with your faulty Yeshua/Horus connection doctrines. And once again for the real dummy that cannot read, Yaldabaoth being the hebrew god is not of any private interpretation or research.. THIS HAS BEEN TAUGHT EVER SENSE 2,000 YEARS AGO ACCORDING TO THE EARLY GNOSTIC GOSPELS. Again if you want to know the exact connection then simply do some RESEARCH into how they made the connection. How hard is that?

Nigga please..... you have yet to post evidence of the bolded and underlined, but you keep posting the shit.

You clearly do not understand that the archons correlated to the seven heavens.

 
Lol. Once again get off your silly ass and do research into how they made this connection 2,000 years ago. Are you really that slow?
 
beenwize;4416106 said:
bambu;4415971 said:
beenwize;4415754 said:
bambu;4415695 said:
The only reason I posted that video is because you act like you cannot read any referenced materials. And if it is not your interpretation, why do you keep spilling all over this board?

I do not have any questions to be answered, again...you post views that are not yours with no references.

It appears that you should be looking for answers, you support a Christian doctrine, but jumped subjects when brother samurais brought it up.

and that goofball who attempted to refute Acharya's research failed miserably.

If you don't believe any of the New Testament gospels then that's 'your truth.' I could care less what you believe is accurate according to history. And yes, I've already read referenced materials, you should try looking up some yourself if you are seeking information, that's what I do. You found a video that attempts to debunk the New Testament so nothing should be stopping you from conducting other research. But hey Acharya S also teaches that Yahweh was known as Baal and teaches against the Old Testament being accurate to history as well. So much for who you rely on.

And that goofball is not the only one who refuted the atheist Acharya, that was part 1 of his video first of all and many others have refuted her as well.

You are a fool if you think that Acharya has "my truth." I told you I only posted the video because you do not read well.

I am a historian, so any historical inaccuracies surrounding any religion are on my radar.

And I see what you did there..... Attempting to divert the historical heat away from your anointed one. How dare you attack my Hebrew brothers when you uphold a faulty doctrine. We have already had several discussions concerning Hebrew beliefs. Defend your research and beliefs or GTFOHWTBS!!!!

I don't doubt the possibility of you being an alias account of 'waterproof.' As he has been caught by myself in past time with an alias account cosigning himself. Is that you again waterproof?

You had to run to your other account just to cosign yourself? how childish for someone that has been posting on this forum for at least 10 years, LMBO.... Get a life, you not fooling me.

.

Lol another cop out I see, not only you is dumb, a lazy ass student with a reading problem but u is a coward, im not bambu maybe if ur dumb ass search past threads we had respectable disagreement. But how dare u disrespect the horus and yahushua connection, you don't know about how spirits work, know some nile valley brothers will school u
 
waterproof;4416318 said:
beenwize;4416106 said:
bambu;4415971 said:
beenwize;4415754 said:
bambu;4415695 said:
The only reason I posted that video is because you act like you cannot read any referenced materials. And if it is not your interpretation, why do you keep spilling all over this board?

I do not have any questions to be answered, again...you post views that are not yours with no references.

It appears that you should be looking for answers, you support a Christian doctrine, but jumped subjects when brother samurais brought it up.

and that goofball who attempted to refute Acharya's research failed miserably.

If you don't believe any of the New Testament gospels then that's 'your truth.' I could care less what you believe is accurate according to history. And yes, I've already read referenced materials, you should try looking up some yourself if you are seeking information, that's what I do. You found a video that attempts to debunk the New Testament so nothing should be stopping you from conducting other research. But hey Acharya S also teaches that Yahweh was known as Baal and teaches against the Old Testament being accurate to history as well. So much for who you rely on.

And that goofball is not the only one who refuted the atheist Acharya, that was part 1 of his video first of all and many others have refuted her as well.

You are a fool if you think that Acharya has "my truth." I told you I only posted the video because you do not read well.

I am a historian, so any historical inaccuracies surrounding any religion are on my radar.

And I see what you did there..... Attempting to divert the historical heat away from your anointed one. How dare you attack my Hebrew brothers when you uphold a faulty doctrine. We have already had several discussions concerning Hebrew beliefs. Defend your research and beliefs or GTFOHWTBS!!!!

I don't doubt the possibility of you being an alias account of 'waterproof.' As he has been caught by myself in past time with an alias account cosigning himself. Is that you again waterproof?

You had to run to your other account just to cosign yourself? how childish for someone that has been posting on this forum for at least 10 years, LMBO.... Get a life, you not fooling me.

.

Lol another cop out I see, not only you is dumb, a lazy ass student with a reading problem but u is a coward, im not bambu maybe if ur dumb ass search past threads we had respectable disagreement. But how dare u disrespect the horus and yahushua connection, you don't know about how spirits work, know some nile valley brothers will school u

There are no Nile Valley brothers in this thread retarded. And I still don't doubt that's your alias account. You been caught once before in your 10 year history of posting on this website.

Now gtfoh Yaldabaoth's son..
 
waterproof;4414673 said:
ascen2012;4414653 said:
The original Christians were esoteric Gnosticism

I see where you going at but the word esoteric is a greek word and it got a meaning to it that I don't agree with but I can see why they gave the hebrew who followed and was taught by Yahushua the essenes and ebonites that because they know and used hebrew science the same yahushua used to heal

not quite True Esoteric Christianity redeems churchianity

Please do not mix the exoteric (outer) teachings of the current catholic/evangelic church (St P) with the esoteric (inner) teachings of the current christian gnostic, theosophic and mystic community (St John).

The concept of the three big religion, Christianity, Judaism and Islam is exoteric, because the perception of God is outside ourselves.

The christian esoteric teachings exists as gnostic, theosophic and mystic communities like the Universal White Brotherhood (Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov, Peter Deunov ) which perceive God inside ourselves.

In Judaism the esoteric teaching is the kabbala.

In Islam the esoteric teaching is sufism.

As you can see, true christianity is not yet fully known to the mass, but soon will be. Therefore the current pope, Pat Robertson and other sadly mislead clerics are typically for exoteric christianity.

Its only a question of time until exoteric christianity will be history, redeemed by Esoteric Christianity.

That means according Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov:

When love comes, there will be no more religion

It is when one has no more love that laws and rules are needed; and even at this moment, laws and rules do not serve in much. As long as there is no love, there will be religions which will never be able to bring the human beings towards God. But when love will come, there will be no more religion. Religion will become internal and will show itself under shape of kindness, brilliance, sacrifice, sweetness and light. It is when love left the humanity that religion has come to compensate for it. But when love will come, religion will fade because it will have entered again the heart of the man.
 
Last edited:
ascen2012;4416385 said:
waterproof;4414673 said:
ascen2012;4414653 said:
The original Christians were esoteric Gnosticism

I see where you going at but the word esoteric is a greek word and it got a meaning to it that I don't agree with but I can see why they gave the hebrew who followed and was taught by Yahushua the essenes and ebonites that because they know and used hebrew science the same yahushua used to heal

not quite True Esoteric Christianity redeems churchianity

Please do not mix the exoteric (outer) teachings of the current catholic/evangelic church (St P) with the esoteric (inner) teachings of the current christian gnostic, theosophic and mystic community (St John).

The concept of the three big religion, Christianity, Judaism and Islam is exoteric, because the perception of God is outside ourselves.

The christian esoteric teachings exists as gnostic, theosophic and mystic communities like the Universal White Brotherhood (Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov, Peter Deunov ) which perceive God inside ourselves.

In Judaism the esoteric teaching is the kabbala.

In Islam the esoteric teaching is sufism.

As you can see, true christianity is not yet fully known to the mass, but soon will be. Therefore the current pope, Pat Robertson and other sadly mislead clerics are typically for exoteric christianity.

Its only a question of time until exoteric christianity will be history, redeemed by Esoteric Christianity.

That means according Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov:

When love comes, there will be no more religion

«It is when one has no more love that laws and rules are needed; and even at this moment, laws and rules do not serve in much. As long as there is no love, there will be religions which will never be able to bring the human beings towards God. But when love will come, there will be no more religion. Religion will become internal and will show itself under shape of kindness, brilliance, sacrifice, sweetness and light. It is when love left the humanity that religion has come to compensate for it. But when love will come, religion will fade because it will have entered again the heart of the man.»

Hebrews nevered practice the kabbala, that's what the jews practice which the pharisee followers of the talmud use, that's spells and socerey. Hebrews have hebrew science, our ancestors never cast spells, by knowing the connection of all things and know how the body works through the father and holy spirit things was done
 
beenwize;4416346 said:
waterproof;4416318 said:
beenwize;4416106 said:
bambu;4415971 said:
beenwize;4415754 said:
bambu;4415695 said:
The only reason I posted that video is because you act like you cannot read any referenced materials. And if it is not your interpretation, why do you keep spilling all over this board?

I do not have any questions to be answered, again...you post views that are not yours with no references.

It appears that you should be looking for answers, you support a Christian doctrine, but jumped subjects when brother samurais brought it up.

and that goofball who attempted to refute Acharya's research failed miserably.

If you don't believe any of the New Testament gospels then that's 'your truth.' I could care less what you believe is accurate according to history. And yes, I've already read referenced materials, you should try looking up some yourself if you are seeking information, that's what I do. You found a video that attempts to debunk the New Testament so nothing should be stopping you from conducting other research. But hey Acharya S also teaches that Yahweh was known as Baal and teaches against the Old Testament being accurate to history as well. So much for who you rely on.

And that goofball is not the only one who refuted the atheist Acharya, that was part 1 of his video first of all and many others have refuted her as well.

You are a fool if you think that Acharya has "my truth." I told you I only posted the video because you do not read well.

I am a historian, so any historical inaccuracies surrounding any religion are on my radar.

And I see what you did there..... Attempting to divert the historical heat away from your anointed one. How dare you attack my Hebrew brothers when you uphold a faulty doctrine. We have already had several discussions concerning Hebrew beliefs. Defend your research and beliefs or GTFOHWTBS!!!!

I don't doubt the possibility of you being an alias account of 'waterproof.' As he has been caught by myself in past time with an alias account cosigning himself. Is that you again waterproof?

You had to run to your other account just to cosign yourself? how childish for someone that has been posting on this forum for at least 10 years, LMBO.... Get a life, you not fooling me.

.

Lol another cop out I see, not only you is dumb, a lazy ass student with a reading problem but u is a coward, im not bambu maybe if ur dumb ass search past threads we had respectable disagreement. But how dare u disrespect the horus and yahushua connection, you don't know about how spirits work, know some nile valley brothers will school u

There are no Nile Valley brothers in this thread retarded. And I still don't doubt that's your alias account. You been caught once before in your 10 year history of posting on this website.

Now gtfoh Yaldabaoth's son..

Brother bambu is a nile valley spiritual brother, you is damn lie dat nigga jamal who became the laughing stock of the ic, im waterproof
 
ascen2012;4416385 said:
waterproof;4414673 said:
ascen2012;4414653 said:
The original Christians were esoteric Gnosticism

I see where you going at but the word esoteric is a greek word and it got a meaning to it that I don't agree with but I can see why they gave the hebrew who followed and was taught by Yahushua the essenes and ebonites that because they know and used hebrew science the same yahushua used to heal

not quite True Esoteric Christianity redeems churchianity

Please do not mix the exoteric (outer) teachings of the current catholic/evangelic church (St P) with the esoteric (inner) teachings of the current christian gnostic, theosophic and mystic community (St John).

The concept of the three big religion, Christianity, Judaism and Islam is exoteric, because the perception of God is outside ourselves.

The christian esoteric teachings exists as gnostic, theosophic and mystic communities like the Universal White Brotherhood (Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov, Peter Deunov ) which perceive God inside ourselves.

In Judaism the esoteric teaching is the kabbala.

In Islam the esoteric teaching is sufism.

As you can see, true christianity is not yet fully known to the mass, but soon will be. Therefore the current pope, Pat Robertson and other sadly mislead clerics are typically for exoteric christianity.

Its only a question of time until exoteric christianity will be history, redeemed by Esoteric Christianity.

That means according Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov:

When love comes, there will be no more religion

It is when one has no more love that laws and rules are needed; and even at this moment, laws and rules do not serve in much. As long as there is no love, there will be religions which will never be able to bring the human beings towards God. But when love will come, there will be no more religion. Religion will become internal and will show itself under shape of kindness, brilliance, sacrifice, sweetness and light. It is when love left the humanity that religion has come to compensate for it. But when love will come, religion will fade because it will have entered again the heart of the man.

Excellent post..

 
lostsamuraisotaku ;4413422 said:
PAUL WAS A DISCIPLE OF SIMON BAR JESUS (SIMON THE SORCERER ) FURTHER MORE THE 4 GOSPELS ALL HAVE DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS OF THE CRUCIFICTION AND LUKE WASNT EVEN A ISRAELITE HE WAS A GENTILE lol INSHA THIS HELPS

yes luke is a gentile, because paul followers was gentiles and he made gentiles disciples because no hebrews followed paul he even cried about that in acts. And there is a strong possibility that simon the sorcerer was his teacher, check my simon the sorcerer thread
 
waterproof;4416645 said:
lostsamuraisotaku ;4413422 said:
PAUL WAS A DISCIPLE OF SIMON BAR JESUS (SIMON THE SORCERER ) FURTHER MORE THE 4 GOSPELS ALL HAVE DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS OF THE CRUCIFICTION AND LUKE WASNT EVEN A ISRAELITE HE WAS A GENTILE lol INSHA THIS HELPS

yes luke is a gentile, because paul followers was gentiles and he made gentiles disciples because no hebrews followed paul he even cried about that in acts. And there is a strong possibility that simon the sorcerer was his teacher, check my simon the sorcerer thread

"Paul is the only one who had any apprehension of the real esoteric significance of the Christ Myth in its cosmic aspects, while at the same time he was obliged to base his teachings principally on the exoteric beliefs of his hearers which centred round the personal Jesus."

William Kingsland. The Gnosis or Ancient Wisdom in the Christian Scriptures

The original teaching of Jesus was thus passed on through Paul and those whom Paul and his immediate companions taught in the many cities they visited.

"The God that made the world and all things therein, he, being Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; neither is he served by men's hands, as though he needed anything, seeing he himself giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; and he made of one every nation of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed seasons, and the bounds of their habitation; that they should seek God, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he is not far from each one of us; for in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain even of your own poets have said."

 
Man the original teachings of yahushua was not passed to shaul that's an outright lie. yahushua passed his knowledge to his disciples, his ministry the essenes and the ebonites and to hebrews who can understand his teachings in the scripture. Yahushua brother carried on the ministry of yahushua. Shaul aint never walked, or talk or taught by yahushua. Shaul gave up his hebrew heritage to become a roman citizen and a pharisee, he hunted and killed yahushua followers like they done to the messiah. James and christ followers fought against shaul. Shaul changed his story on damcaus twice in his writings he pushed hellenist views to please rome
 
waterproof;4416996 said:
Man the original teachings of yahushua was not passed to shaul that's an outright lie. yahushua passed his knowledge to his disciples, his ministry the essenes and the ebonites and to hebrews who can understand his teachings in the scripture. Yahushua brother carried on the ministry of yahushua. Shaul aint never walked, or talk or taught by yahushua. Shaul gave up his hebrew heritage to become a roman citizen and a pharisee, he hunted and killed yahushua followers like they done to the messiah. James and christ followers fought against shaul. Shaul changed his story on damcaus twice in his writings he pushed hellenist views to please rome

it is not my place to argue or convince. i share my experiences. GOD calls whom HE will, and rejects whom HE will. only those who accept GOD and live in obedience to HIM will believe. GOD had many things put in the bible specifically as stumbling blocks to those who reject HIM. i do not expect anyone to believe as i do. they cant unless GOD teaches them. if people choose to reject GOD and twist HIS word then it's on you. you walk on dangerous ground when you put out theories that are meant to deceive people. should anyone be lost for believing what you write. their blood will be on your head.
 
ascen2012;4417141 said:
waterproof;4416996 said:
Man the original teachings of yahushua was not passed to shaul that's an outright lie. yahushua passed his knowledge to his disciples, his ministry the essenes and the ebonites and to hebrews who can understand his teachings in the scripture. Yahushua brother carried on the ministry of yahushua. Shaul aint never walked, or talk or taught by yahushua. Shaul gave up his hebrew heritage to become a roman citizen and a pharisee, he hunted and killed yahushua followers like they done to the messiah. James and christ followers fought against shaul. Shaul changed his story on damcaus twice in his writings he pushed hellenist views to please rome

it is not my place to argue or convince. i share my experiences. GOD calls whom HE will, and rejects whom HE will. only those who accept GOD and live in obedience to HIM will believe. GOD had many things put in the bible specifically as stumbling blocks to those who reject HIM. i do not expect anyone to believe as i do. they cant unless GOD teaches them. if people choose to reject GOD and twist HIS word then it's on you. you walk on dangerous ground when you put out theories that are meant to deceive people. should anyone be lost for believing what you write. their blood will be on your head.

The only false theories in this thread have come from the OP.

When challenged he reverts to attacking the beliefs of others....the definition of cowardice
 
Im just stating facts, that's it. It's all in paul letters and in the book of acts, writing from Christ brother james and the essenes and disciples. Christ made peter the apostle of the gentiles and the holy spirit gave them a sign who was to be the 12 disciple to replace judas. But remember This yah changed Not, his laws and words is set in stone if anything goes against it then its not from him, now that's in the scripture. Shalom, and your empty words do not put fear on me, the truth is in the tanach and the teachings of yah, his words tells me how to spot the false doctrine, not one word from the laws Shall pass
 
Last edited:
bambu;4417218 said:
ascen2012;4417141 said:
waterproof;4416996 said:
Man the original teachings of yahushua was not passed to shaul that's an outright lie. yahushua passed his knowledge to his disciples, his ministry the essenes and the ebonites and to hebrews who can understand his teachings in the scripture. Yahushua brother carried on the ministry of yahushua. Shaul aint never walked, or talk or taught by yahushua. Shaul gave up his hebrew heritage to become a roman citizen and a pharisee, he hunted and killed yahushua followers like they done to the messiah. James and christ followers fought against shaul. Shaul changed his story on damcaus twice in his writings he pushed hellenist views to please rome

it is not my place to argue or convince. i share my experiences. GOD calls whom HE will, and rejects whom HE will. only those who accept GOD and live in obedience to HIM will believe. GOD had many things put in the bible specifically as stumbling blocks to those who reject HIM. i do not expect anyone to believe as i do. they cant unless GOD teaches them. if people choose to reject GOD and twist HIS word then it's on you. you walk on dangerous ground when you put out theories that are meant to deceive people. should anyone be lost for believing what you write. their blood will be on your head.

The only false theories in this thread have come from the OP.

When challenged he reverts to attacking the beliefs of others....the definition of cowardice

i've addressed false theories i've seen concerning apostle Paul

 
waterproof;4417251 said:
Im just stating facts, that's it. It's all in paul letters and in the book of acts, writing from Christ brother james and the essenes and disciples. Christ made peter the apostle of the gentiles and the holy spirit gave them a sign who was to be the 12 disciple to replace judas. But remember This yah changed Not, his laws and words is set in stone if anything goes against it then its not from him, now that's in the scripture. Shalom, and your empty words do not put fear on me, the truth is in the tanach and the teachings of yah, his words tells me how to spot the false doctrine, not one word from the laws Shall pass

To be a Christian is to accept the books of the New Testament as divinely inspired. That includes the epistles of St. Paul, St. Peter, St. John, and St. Jude. To claim to be a Christian while at the same time trying to eliminate any of those epistles is, insofar as I'm concerned, a delibterate attempt to remold Christianity itself into something that supports their own agenda.

I have personally seen this attempted in the past. JW's attempted to convince us that we should ban all of his epistles when I was on another website a few years ago. They used the excuse that he had been a persecutor of Christians prior to his conversion. Of course, the actual reason that they were attempting to do so was due to his epistles being a barrier to their heirarchy's conspiring to gain absolute power over Christians. The doctrine of grace stood like Horatio At the Bridge against their attempts to convince us that we needed to obey their leaders unconditionally and absolutely in order to even have a chance of meriting salvation.

I recognize Paul as a true Apostle of the Lord, and the gospel Paul preached is that gospel of Jesus Christ. One that I am not ashamed to follow
 
then you can't read scripture, in the book of acts with the holy spirit giving the apostle peter a sign they found judas replacement, to be a discipline or one Of The 12 disciplesyou have to be taught and walk with yahushua, it's in the book of acts. After the death of the disciples there are no more apostles. In revelation the 12 disciples will have a seat over the 12 tribes, not 13. u do the math
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
659
Views
74
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…