If adam and eve only had two sons and no daughters where did humanity come from?

[purecomp]

here we go with the "you dont know what your talkin bout man! the bible is the truth man!" shit..yall need a new gimic

the question was half way answered..

if you wouldve read you wouldve known i brought up the various races. if adam and eve were lets assume white, there children would all be white by nature

not chinese, black, indian, etc

also if two people have children and their children have children those kids will be mentally unstable...thats just nature

next time read before you comment

When did I say anything even remotely like "you don't know what you're talking about"? I never said anything similar. I didn't even attempt to answer any question. The three "colors" are attributed to Noah's sons Ham, Seth, and Japeth. Climate, environment, diet, etc. can alter your appearance. Adapting to your surroundings. Colder climate makes for lighter skin. Diet can determine things from height, build, and other physical characteristics. People change over time. Evolution.

 

[major pain]

When did I say anything even remotely like "you don't know what you're talking about"? I never said anything similar. I didn't even attempt to answer any question. The three "colors" are attributed to Noah's sons Ham, Seth, and Japeth. Climate, environment, diet, etc. can alter your appearance. Adapting to your surroundings. Colder climate makes for lighter skin. Diet can determine things from height, build, and other physical characteristics. People change over time. Evolution.

Now, he will say you just admitted the bible is a lie etc etc. He just wants to be validated, but like you said he makes himself look very idiotic by not having the core concepts of the subject down, so he brings up another "topic" because he has no ground to stand on with the first.

 

[Hyde Parke]

yeah, that seems to be the MO, jumping from one thing to the next, never learning in the process.

 

[TX_Made713]

yeah, that seems to be the MO, jumping from one thing to the next, never learning in the process.

Now, he will say you just admitted the bible is a lie etc etc. He just wants to be validated, but like you said he makes himself look very idiotic by not having the core concepts of the subject down, so he brings up another "topic" because he has no ground to stand on with the first.

When did I say anything even remotely like "you don't know what you're talking about"? I never said anything similar. I didn't even attempt to answer any question. The three "colors" are attributed to Noah's sons Ham, Seth, and Japeth. Climate, environment, diet, etc. can alter your appearance. Adapting to your surroundings. Colder climate makes for lighter skin. Diet can determine things from height, build, and other physical characteristics. People change over time. Evolution.

lmao..dude is a grown man he can speak for himself...just like yall can

yall are like christian hyspanic gang members..you cant take one of us by yourself so you jump

 

[TX_Made713]

When did I say anything even remotely like "you don't know what you're talking about"? I never said anything similar. I didn't even attempt to answer any question. The three "colors" are attributed to Noah's sons Ham, Seth, and Japeth. Climate, environment, diet, etc. can alter your appearance. Adapting to your surroundings. Colder climate makes for lighter skin. Diet can determine things from height, build, and other physical characteristics. People change over time. Evolution.

RLLY NOW? You cant believe in evolution if you believe in the word of god..there is no inbetween, no evolution

 

[purecomp]

RLLY NOW? You cant believe in evolution if you believe in the word of god..there is no inbetween, no evolution

Like I said earlier, where in the Bible does it say that evolution is not real? It doesn't, so that statement is invalid.

 

[VIBE]

RLLY NOW? You cant believe in evolution if you believe in the word of god..there is no inbetween, no evolution

I believe in the word of God, I believe in the "christian" bible. Thing is, I also believe in evolution but not the evolution as ape to man. I believe from animal - animal having to adapt and evolve into their surroundings.

Adam and Eve and their children all committed incest. It wasn't wrong then, it wasn't a sin. I brought that up earlier. God could've created all races, but he decided to let THEM be "fruitful and multiply". The Tower of Babel explains why different languages were given. As for the races? That's a good question. Evolution, or ADAPTATION had to have taken place. It doesn't say He created different people, just 2 and from those 2 people multiplied.

The bible doesn't DISPROVE evolution. There is NO verse that says this cannot happen. It says, "God created everything". Good. He did, I agree. But from that HAS to come some type of evolving.

 

[TX_Made713]

Like I said earlier, where in the Bible does it say that evolution is not real? It doesn't, so that statement is invalid.

why ask such a stupid question, the bible doesnt specifically speak on evolution

Romans 1:25 declares, “They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.”

“For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse” (Romans 1:20).

Evolution denies the need for God to be involved in the universe. Evolution is the “creation theory” for the religion of atheism

either you believe in the word or you believe in evolution, even heavanru can attest to that

 

[ThaChozenWun]

The bible was written during a time when evolution wasnt even thought of, so why is it even relevant to the book, if they didnt know about it then they couldnt of wrote it down. In the book it clearly says god made man... MANNNN and LAND MAMMALS on the same day. CLEARLY TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. It says god made man in likeness of himself, if we evolved are you saying god looks like an animal? If god isnt an animal in your opinion then we couldnt have evolved according to the bible. Theres a reason its still called the THEORY OF EVOLUTION even though we have alot of evidence to make it law, because of the bible they haven't. The majority of Christians dont believe the evolution shit for a reason, If you do congratualtions your posessed in their mind and going to hell so have fun.

Its a shame that all arugments from the Christian side always has to flip flop "Oh the bible isnt the literal word of god so of course there will be mistakes", oh wait whats this "the bible doesnt say it so its not true" What happened to not being the literal word of god?

 

[purecomp]

why ask such a stupid question, the bible doesnt specifically speak on evolution

Romans 1:25 declares, “They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.”

“For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse” (Romans 1:20).

Evolution denies the need for God to be involved in the universe. Evolution is the “creation theory” for the religion of atheism

either you believe in the word or you believe in evolution, even heavanru can attest to that

Neither one of those have anything to do with evolution. The first one is about idolatry. The second is about giving God his glory for creating everything. You trying to tell me God couldn't have created people with the ability to eveolve? If He made us he had to make us one way with no ability to progress? Sure. He might as well have created us without the ability to grow mentally also then.

 

[TX_Made713]

The bible was written during a time when evolution wasnt even thought of, so why is it even relevant to the book, if they didnt know about it then they couldnt of wrote it down. In the book it clearly says god made man... MANNNN and LAND MAMMALS on the same day. CLEARLY TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. It says god made man in likeness of himself, if we evolved are you saying god looks like an animal? If god isnt an animal in your opinion then we couldnt have evolved according to the bible. Theres a reason its still called the THEORY OF EVOLUTION even though we have alot of evidence to make it law, because of the bible they haven't. The majority of Christians dont believe the evolution shit for a reason, If you do congratualtions your posessed in their mind and going to hell so have fun.

Its a shame that all arugments from the Christian side always has to flip flop "Oh the bible isnt the literal word of god so of course there will be mistakes", oh wait whats this "the bible doesnt say it so its not true" What happened to not being the literal word of god?

glad im not the only one that see this...

evolution speaks against the bible

 

[VIBE]

I don't think anyone here is disagreeing that God created MAN and ALL animals on land and in water. There's no debate there for us here. Now it's about evolution.

My evolution isn't about a rock to fish to ape to man type thing. That isn't the bull I believe. I believe that evolution has to exist to an extent. Animals had to have evolved. IF NOT, then that means God is STILL creating today then. It doesn't make sense, dude did His work in 6 days, boom done. He knew there had to be an ability to evolve because he gave it to them. Humans as well, how are there different races if he didn't create them? He gave us language, so with that language there had to be an evolved progression with that. They couldn't speak to each other anymore! They had to move, live differently. Therefore ADAPT to a different lifestyle now.

As for animals, it's obvious. Unless like I said, he is still creating.

 

[purecomp]

The bible was written during a time when evolution wasnt even thought of, so why is it even relevant to the book, if they didnt know about it then they couldnt of wrote it down. In the book it clearly says god made man... MANNNN and LAND MAMMALS on the same day. CLEARLY TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. It says god made man in likeness of himself, if we evolved are you saying god looks like an animal? If god isnt an animal in your opinion then we couldnt have evolved according to the bible. Theres a reason its still called the THEORY OF EVOLUTION even though we have alot of evidence to make it law, because of the bible they haven't. The majority of Christians dont believe the evolution shit for a reason, If you do congratualtions your posessed in their mind and going to hell so have fun.

Its a shame that all arugments from the Christian side always has to flip flop "Oh the bible isnt the literal word of god so of course there will be mistakes", oh wait whats this "the bible doesnt say it so its not true" What happened to not being the literal word of god?

Y'all keep saying shit about Christian point of view like I care. If a preacher heard what I am saying to y'all, he would call me a heretic. So stop acting like I'm defending the church or some shit. I can give a fuck if Christians doom me to "Hell".

Man being made in God's image doesn't have to mean physical image. It can mean anything from spirit, dominion over other aspects of creation, the ability to reproduce, love, etc. And not once did I flip flop from anything. Everything I said I said from the start.

 

[purecomp]

Smh @ people actin like God can't give us the ability to evolve.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

I don't think anyone here is disagreeing that God created MAN and ALL animals on land and in water. There's no debate there for us here. Now it's about evolution.

My evolution isn't about a rock to fish to ape to man type thing. That isn't the bull I believe. I believe that evolution has to exist to an extent. Animals had to have evolved. IF NOT, then that means God is STILL creating today then. It doesn't make sense, dude did His work in 6 days, boom done. He knew there had to be an ability to evolve because he gave it to them. Humans as well, how are there different races if he didn't create them? He gave us language, so with that language there had to be an evolved progression with that. They couldn't speak to each other anymore! They had to move, live differently. Therefore ADAPT to a different lifestyle now.

As for animals, it's obvious. Unless like I said, he is still creating.

To fully understand evolution you have to really study it and have a good knowledge about cell structure. IMO we came from single celled organisms which lived in the water for billions of years until the Earth cooled enough and the air became what it is today (we went through a global flood and ice age before all this), at that time stromatolites formed on the outside. With more time these single celled organisms turned to multi celled organisms to better adapt to the universe. We started to see more complex creatures, as life goes the weakest were always being killed an eaten. Evolution continued on with creatures changing and adapting and finding new ways to protect themselves, you do this over more billions of years and you have us.

DNA evidence for one is startling how we are so closely related to certain animals. Some can argue God made us so duh our DNA will look close, but then comes fossils ... oooohhhhhh yes those things die hard christians hate. They prove man over time has evolved, the further and further back we find fossils the more and more man takes the shape of apes. Then when we are as close looking to an ape man as we could be those fossils stop!!!!!, Now why would there be no fossils of man before then? If god created MEN and LAND MAMMALS on the same day, we should have fossils dating back to the age of dinosaurs which we dont. It clearly says MEN and LAND MAMMALS I remind you which means definently two different things.So if we didnt evolve over these billions of years, where did all our fossils go before that time we most looked like apes?

 

[Hyde Parke]

To fully understand evolution you have to really study it and have a good knowledge about cell structure. IMO we came from single celled organisms which lived in the water for billions of years until the Earth cooled enough and the air became what it is today (we went through a global flood and ice age before all this), at that time stromatolites formed on the outside. With more time these single celled organisms turned to multi celled organisms to better adapt to the universe. We started to see more complex creatures, as life goes the weakest were always being killed an eaten. Evolution continued on with creatures changing and adapting and finding new ways to protect themselves, you do this over more billions of years and you have us.

DNA evidence for one is startling how we are so closely related to certain animals. Some can argue God made us so duh our DNA will look close, but then comes fossils ... oooohhhhhh yes those things die hard christians hate. They prove man over time has evolved, the further and further back we find fossils the more and more man takes the shape of apes. Then when we are as close looking to an ape man as we could be those fossils stop!!!!!, Now why would there be no fossils of man before then? If god created MEN and LAND MAMMALS on the same day, we should have fossils dating back to the age of dinosaurs which we dont. It clearly says MEN and LAND MAMMALS I remind you which means definently two different things.So if we didnt evolve over these billions of years, where did all our fossils go before that time we most looked like apes?

what is the age that dates back to the dinosaur?

 

[VIBE]

To fully understand evolution you have to really study it and have a good knowledge about cell structure. IMO we came from single celled organisms which lived in the water for billions of years until the Earth cooled enough and the air became what it is today (we went through a global flood and ice age before all this), at that time stromatolites formed on the outside. With more time these single celled organisms turned to multi celled organisms to better adapt to the universe. We started to see more complex creatures, as life goes the weakest were always being killed an eaten. Evolution continued on with creatures changing and adapting and finding new ways to protect themselves, you do this over more billions of years and you have us.

DNA evidence for one is startling how we are so closely related to certain animals. Some can argue God made us so duh our DNA will look close, but then comes fossils ... oooohhhhhh yes those things die hard christians hate. They prove man over time has evolved, the further and further back we find fossils the more and more man takes the shape of apes. Then when we are as close looking to an ape man as we could be those fossils stop!!!!!, Now why would there be no fossils of man before then? If god created MEN and LAND MAMMALS on the same day, we should have fossils dating back to the age of dinosaurs which we dont. It clearly says MEN and LAND MAMMALS I remind you which means definently two different things.So if we didnt evolve over these billions of years, where did all our fossils go before that time we most looked like apes?

Dinosaurs weren't ANIMALS. They were DINOSAURS. If there is a debate of, IN A or IN THE beginning then there is another beginning. If it's, "IN A" then it's a 2nd beginning (or 3rd, 4th etc) but if it's "IN THE" beginning, it's the beginning of HUMANITY. That's the ONLY explanation. Because man didn't walk with the dinos.

As for all that single celled organism or them stromatolites on the beaches, I don't believe we EVOLVED from that or came from that or any of that. I just believe an animal ALREADY CREATED BY GOD evolves to better it's life, it's chances of survival.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

what is the age that dates back to the dinosaur?

About 230 million years ago

 

[ThaChozenWun]

Dinosaurs weren't ANIMALS. They were DINOSAURS. If there is a debate of, IN A or IN THE beginning then there is another beginning. If it's, "IN A" then it's a 2nd beginning (or 3rd, 4th etc) but if it's "IN THE" beginning, it's the beginning of HUMANITY. That's the ONLY explanation. Because man didn't walk with the dinos.

As for all that single celled organism or them stromatolites on the beaches, I don't believe we EVOLVED from that or came from that or any of that. I just believe an animal ALREADY CREATED BY GOD evolves to better it's life, it's chances of survival.

Dinosaurs were land mammals where do you get they arent? Thats like sayin COWS ARENT ANIMALS THEY ARE COWS, or HORSES ARENT ANIMALS THEYRE HORSES. They are land mammals the same as dinosaurs. And are you trying to say god made 4 different begginings? Truth is there is more than enough evidence we evolved directly from single celled organisms, the proof is out there for everyone to see, which is why I dont roll with the bibles god because he in a way blinds peoples thought process and has a way of making people question proof.

 

[VIBE]

Dinosaurs were land mammals where do you get they arent? Thats like sayin COWS ARENT ANIMALS THEY ARE COWS, or HORSES ARENT ANIMALS THEYRE HORSES. They are land mammals the same as dinosaurs. And are you trying to say god made 4 different begginings? Truth is there is more than enough evidence we evolved directly from single celled organisms, the proof is out there for everyone to see, which is why I dont roll with the bibles god because he in a way blinds peoples thought process and has a way of making people question proof.

Well, when I stated a 3rd or 4th it was just an example. I believe there had to have been 2 beginnings. We didn't walk with dinos, where's that proof?