If adam and eve only had two sons and no daughters where did humanity come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
One Spliff;446745 said:
you're so dumb thats it actually hurts when i read your posts...

why do you post here ?

the symbolism in the bible quite clearly goes waaaaaaaaay over your head, and in turn you just make yourself look so stupid...

ok i get it...u get kicks out of postin on a religious forum and making fun of christians, but dont you ever get bored of looking dumb ?

lol @ u believing the 6 days is literal, or anything in the bible is literal...

seriously...just stop.

so you dont believe in the bible being the 100% true word of god?
 
Last edited:
ether-i-am;449053 said:
And Step you have a follower. Lol

Never that. I follow scripture. Just so happens that I be tellin niggaz the same thing and I never met anyone else that studies and researches independently with a nonbiased mind and comes up with the same conclusions.
 
Last edited:
TX_Made713;449544 said:
is this backwards land?

Whatever, my G. If someone blindly follows what they have been spoonfed, then they are brainwashed. When somebody studies and teaches different interpretations than standard mainstream dogma, they are quite the opposite. I hate when niggaz say shit like that.
 
Last edited:
And Step answered this question for you all, and when you couldnt argue with the facts, you jumped on to something else. Real immature behavior. If you are really and truly interested in finding the truth, then go off and discover it on your own. Its so much more fulfilling that way. If you are really interesting in finding out if God is real, you wouldnt approach this in a biased manner, you would greatly humble and rid yourself of your egos to allow the truth to present itself.
 
Last edited:
ether-i-am;449836 said:
So if some one does research on there own and come to a different conclusion than you and ol' boy are they wrong?

See, that's where humanity stays fuckin up at. Everybody wants to be right. Everybody wants to prove somebody wrong. It causes division. When scripture is studied without the interference of mistranslation, individual interpretation doesn't really matter. The Bible has literal parts, symbolic parts, metaphoric parts, etc. That's what makes it so great. The key is to seperate them and use the teachings to better yourself and those around you. Even if the Bible was a fake (which it isn't), no one can deny the validity of the moral teachings.
 
Last edited:
TX_Made713;449541 said:
so you dont believe in the bible being the 100% true word of god?

he believes in that reptilian/alien god stuff, as far as I've read in other topics. *shrugs*
 
Last edited:
TX_Made713;449535 said:
did you get the from an article?

it translates "In beginning" the the/or a is implied.....if you've read hebrew you would know that

No, it wasn't an article. I am studying Hebrew and have many partners who speak it fluently. It doesn't say In Beginning. Besides, even if it was, there is nothing definitive about the word "A", so your point is moot. There is no implication because there is no need because it is definitive in it's assertion. Besides this is not English,there is no implied nothing. The Semitic languages are much more mathematically precise, you just have to know the language. Implications in languages is another tool for people to deceive the unlearned. Say what you mean and mean what you say.

Study to show thy ass approved.
 
Last edited:
ether-i-am;449053 said:
And Step you have a follower. Lol

Please. Real recognize real. We are witnesses to each other.

You all think that all people who acknowledge the creator are somehow unlearned ignoramuses and rely on rhetoric and juvenile fairytale understanding of scriptures to prove their point. Some of us can get up in that ass like a bike seat because we have secular knowledge coupled with spiritually mature insight. Everything I learned in school helps me see clearer.

Keep playing an you will find yourself in a precarious situation that you didn't count on.

God is not mocked.
 
Last edited:
And Step, earlier you said the scripture alludes to the idea that Adam and Eve were not the first. Where is that passage?
 
Last edited:
major pain;450447 said:
And Step, earlier you said the scripture alludes to the idea that Adam and Eve were not the first. Where is that passage?

Basically it says God created man and land animal on the sixth day and rested on the seventh, it isnt until after the creation of animal and man that adam was sent to the garden of eden. If God really sent Adam at the time the bible alludes to, then men would have already been created before adam.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/pers01.htm ... Read this it is written by a pastor and goes into all the verses and scriptures that point to this.
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;450502 said:
Basically it says God created man and land animal on the sixth day and rested on the seventh, it isnt until after the creation of animal and man that adam was sent to the garden of eden. If God really sent Adam at the time the bible alludes to, then men would have already been created before adam.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/pers01.htm ... Read this it is written by a pastor and goes into all the verses and scriptures that point to this.

Gotcha, overlooked that before.
 
Last edited:
TX_Made713;445869 said:
who wants to take a stab at it

Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Gen 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Gen 1:26-28 describes the creation of humanity not Adam and Eve.

Textual notes:

"man" (Genesis 1:26-27) - Though the word for "man" is in the singular, when in the text a pronoun is used, it is rendered by the plural "them", indicating that the word is used generically to cover "man and woman", and that a rendition of "mankind" or "human beings" is not out of place.[3]
 
Last edited:
purecomp;449834 said:
Whatever, my G. If someone blindly follows what they have been spoonfed, then they are brainwashed. When somebody studies and teaches different interpretations than standard mainstream dogma, they are quite the opposite. I hate when niggaz say shit like that.

by this definition how can u assume he isnt and we are?
 
Last edited:
And Step;450000 said:
No, it wasn't an article. I am studying Hebrew and have many partners who speak it fluently. It doesn't say In Beginning. Besides, even if it was, there is nothing definitive about the word "A", so your point is moot. There is no implication because there is no need because it is definitive in it's assertion. Besides this is not English,there is no implied nothing. The Semitic languages are much more mathematically precise, you just have to know the language. Implications in languages is another tool for people to deceive the unlearned. Say what you mean and mean what you say.

Study to show thy ass approved.

whatever you say buddy

http://www.read-the-bible.org/Beginning.html

The first word (reading right-to-left) is be-re-SHIYT. It is from the Hebrew root resh-aleph-shin, meaning "head, start, beginning," with the preposition bet on the front, meaning "in, on, at." So this word could be translated "in beginning" or "at start" or "at the head." The Hebrew name for the Jewish holiday Rosh HaShanah is from this same root, and means "head of the year" or "beginning of the year" -- Ha is the definite article "the" and Shanah is "year."
 
Last edited:
cwill 420;450977 said:
Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Gen 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Gen 1:26-28 describes the creation of humanity not Adam and Eve.

Textual notes:

"man" (Genesis 1:26-27) - Though the word for "man" is in the singular, when in the text a pronoun is used, it is rendered by the plural "them", indicating that the word is used generically to cover "man and woman", and that a rendition of "mankind" or "human beings" is not out of place.[3]

this doesnt prove anything...he meant them in a future tense
 
Last edited:
Hyde Parke;449870 said:
And Step answered this question for you all, and when you couldnt argue with the facts, you jumped on to something else. Real immature behavior. If you are really and truly interested in finding the truth, then go off and discover it on your own. Its so much more fulfilling that way. If you are really interesting in finding out if God is real, you wouldnt approach this in a biased manner, you would greatly humble and rid yourself of your egos to allow the truth to present itself.

dont you just love a dick rider?

in case you wonder why we "mock" on this board...cause its the internet. we come here for entertainment and yall feed it to us. but we actually have something valuable to say, yall are jsut too brainwashed to hear it
 
Last edited:
TX_Made713;451131 said:
this doesnt prove anything...he meant them in a future tense

He was speaking of them in the 6th day creation sense, it still wasnt until well after man was created that Adam was dropped in the Garden though. Adam wasnt the first man, he wasnt made in the 6th day day as were other humans and land mammals. Funny though how alot of churches will preach that Adam and Eve are responsible for all of us
 
Last edited:
TX_Made713;451141 said:
dont you just love a dick rider?

in case you wonder why we "mock" on this board...cause its the internet. we come here for entertainment and yall feed it to us. but we actually have something valuable to say, yall are jsut too brainwashed to hear it

You didnt even realize that Adam and Eve had 3 named children. You want people to look foolish, but all you accomplished was making yourself look foolish.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
166
Views
8
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…