Do You Believe In God?

[Jabu_Rule]

But you have no evidence. You jumped from the idea that if something exists it must be created to saying that God is that creator. How do you know that it is God and not something else? What makes that view more probable?

because everything else is in the universe and therefore must be a creation.

Or it could have created itself like the ability of your God to just exist..

where does it say god created himself...

Um, you said God always but the same principles can be applied to the Universe or not. Doesn't dismiss everything else i said about coming to grand conclusions. What's your proof that God always was and the Universe wasn't or doesn't exist within a cycle or in multitudes? Basically, just saying it is doesn't make it so. I'm speaking on mans conceptualization of this deity btw.

where does it say god always was?

In this very forum from statements made. What is your angle? Maybe it says it in your holy book, maybe not. Who gives a fuck? We are arguing the concept. What's yours?

i said "it" as in the bible.. also how can u argue a thought when u dont kno the opposite side.. jus from the few posts i read u seem more aggy then objective.. thats why i asked those questions because u are assuming some things are in the bible that you dont kno if they are actually there or not..

Objective? Really. People making statements that God exist with no evidence. I don't need your bible to get statements that people are making. I don't recall passages but I've seen plenty asserting to either concept of God. What is there to be Objective about when I'm not making any grand statements that something specific created the universe? You need your bible to argue these concepts? I'm sure you can do a good job presenting the evidence from your book. Looks like no one else has. Like i said, people on this board have made these grand statements and many don't follow the bible. Your book is flawed from it's inception and these grand statements have penetrated society and it's been shown that there isn't even proper translation of your book in the first place. I needed to read your Bible to get that info?

tryna prove that the bible is flawed is not a hard task given the fact that it was made from plenty of different books.. from different times.. some books were omitted.. ( even to this day some bibles omit "songs of Solomon ") and thru the years and thru translations of course it will be hard 2 have it in its original form.. Christians know this.. but that does not change the fact that the root beliefs have not changed and are biblically and historically facts. jesus did walk the earth. he was believed to be the son of god. he died on the cross and he believed that he was dying for our sins.. everything else honestly don't matter...

but about the "god exists with no evidence" that's actually subjective because what can be evidence to me might not be evidence for you.. I can go off the facts that the laws of physics are not absolute proves that god exists.. somebody else could say the fact that we can learn teach and wonder outside of basic instincts proves god exists.. somebody else could have gone thru a personal situation in they life that proved to them that god exists.. "miracles" happen all the time..

Christians know their book is flawed yet they believe regardless everything in it? Wait know they don't most cherry pick and mistranslates the mistranslations which is the reason for the numerous denomination and the denial that Catholics are Christians at all. It the same for every religion though. There may be competing theories in science, but non is considered absolute because new evidence may broaden the scope and change course. Evidence that i can't tangibly prove using the scientific methods that your provided isn't proper evidence. Are you telling me that there is reproducible evidence outside of people's delusions and unproven statements or evidence derived for a different approach to the same issue proves God? Tesla and Edison both discovered various means of using electricity but applied in differently. Only Edison succeeded financially because he was able to villianize the other. Tesla was proven to be more astute because his discoveries provided more far reaching tangible benefits. The thing is, we actually use scientific discoveries to adapt more advanced tools to deal with our world. This is why i don't require direct hands on knowledge of most discoveries. People don't care anyway until it creates a product or cure which is the ultimate proof of concept. Learning about gravity allowed us to create skyscrapers. No you can't just say if we don't have a complete working of a theory, it has to be the other thing. It doesn't work that way. The other thing has to meet the same burden of proof.

lol that's long ass titian graph you jus wrote jus proved my point... that's all subjective.. I gave examples of things that people can say " proved" to them god exists and you proves nothing.. you cant change a persons true beliefs.. only they can..

I like to write and discuss. You wrote as much as me so why are you casting stones? I actually wrote more then that. I never claimed that i was trying to change any belief. I'm asking you to prove a statement that is so handily passed off as factual. That's not how proof or facts work no matter how you attempt to present it. People say if i don't believe as they do, I'm going to hell. Show me the evidence since you so sure. Oh right, gotta get there first. Then how you know? I see you didn't really read what i wrote.

 

[damobb2deep]

But you have no evidence. You jumped from the idea that if something exists it must be created to saying that God is that creator. How do you know that it is God and not something else? What makes that view more probable?

because everything else is in the universe and therefore must be a creation.

Or it could have created itself like the ability of your God to just exist..

where does it say god created himself...

Um, you said God always but the same principles can be applied to the Universe or not. Doesn't dismiss everything else i said about coming to grand conclusions. What's your proof that God always was and the Universe wasn't or doesn't exist within a cycle or in multitudes? Basically, just saying it is doesn't make it so. I'm speaking on mans conceptualization of this deity btw.

where does it say god always was?

In this very forum from statements made. What is your angle? Maybe it says it in your holy book, maybe not. Who gives a fuck? We are arguing the concept. What's yours?

i said "it" as in the bible.. also how can u argue a thought when u dont kno the opposite side.. jus from the few posts i read u seem more aggy then objective.. thats why i asked those questions because u are assuming some things are in the bible that you dont kno if they are actually there or not..

Objective? Really. People making statements that God exist with no evidence. I don't need your bible to get statements that people are making. I don't recall passages but I've seen plenty asserting to either concept of God. What is there to be Objective about when I'm not making any grand statements that something specific created the universe? You need your bible to argue these concepts? I'm sure you can do a good job presenting the evidence from your book. Looks like no one else has. Like i said, people on this board have made these grand statements and many don't follow the bible. Your book is flawed from it's inception and these grand statements have penetrated society and it's been shown that there isn't even proper translation of your book in the first place. I needed to read your Bible to get that info?

tryna prove that the bible is flawed is not a hard task given the fact that it was made from plenty of different books.. from different times.. some books were omitted.. ( even to this day some bibles omit "songs of Solomon ") and thru the years and thru translations of course it will be hard 2 have it in its original form.. Christians know this.. but that does not change the fact that the root beliefs have not changed and are biblically and historically facts. jesus did walk the earth. he was believed to be the son of god. he died on the cross and he believed that he was dying for our sins.. everything else honestly don't matter...

but about the "god exists with no evidence" that's actually subjective because what can be evidence to me might not be evidence for you.. I can go off the facts that the laws of physics are not absolute proves that god exists.. somebody else could say the fact that we can learn teach and wonder outside of basic instincts proves god exists.. somebody else could have gone thru a personal situation in they life that proved to them that god exists.. "miracles" happen all the time..

Christians know their book is flawed yet they believe regardless everything in it? Wait know they don't most cherry pick and mistranslates the mistranslations which is the reason for the numerous denomination and the denial that Catholics are Christians at all. It the same for every religion though. There may be competing theories in science, but non is considered absolute because new evidence may broaden the scope and change course. Evidence that i can't tangibly prove using the scientific methods that your provided isn't proper evidence. Are you telling me that there is reproducible evidence outside of people's delusions and unproven statements or evidence derived for a different approach to the same issue proves God? Tesla and Edison both discovered various means of using electricity but applied in differently. Only Edison succeeded financially because he was able to villianize the other. Tesla was proven to be more astute because his discoveries provided more far reaching tangible benefits. The thing is, we actually use scientific discoveries to adapt more advanced tools to deal with our world. This is why i don't require direct hands on knowledge of most discoveries. People don't care anyway until it creates a product or cure which is the ultimate proof of concept. Learning about gravity allowed us to create skyscrapers. No you can't just say if we don't have a complete working of a theory, it has to be the other thing. It doesn't work that way. The other thing has to meet the same burden of proof.

lol that's long ass titian graph you jus wrote jus proved my point... that's all subjective.. I gave examples of things that people can say " proved" to them god exists and you proves nothing.. you cant change a persons true beliefs.. only they can..

I like to write and discuss. You wrote as much as me so why are you casting stones? I actually wrote more then that. I never claimed that i was trying to change any belief. I'm asking you to prove a statement that is so handily passed off as factual. That's not how proof or facts work no matter how you attempt to present it. People say if i don't believe as they do, I'm going to hell. Show me the evidence since you so sure. Oh right, gotta get there first. Then how you know? I see you didn't really read what i wrote.

don't take what I said ass a diss.. but real shyt you right iv never been 2 hell.. and that's between you and god on that day..

btw I have stated the only facts that matter in this whole discussion.. everything else is subjective like ive already said..

 

[zombie]

Without the idea of Lucifer, none of you devout followers of God would know God.

Maybe your God is the biggie of the universe and without the only relevant God, your God wouldn't exist.

If Tupac were the one true God tho.

God was known before the devil. Read genesis 1 and 2.

The devil showed up after God had already established relationships with our first parents Adam and Eve. Amen.

Nah nigga. God was nobody but the landlord until Lucifer woke their asses up.

Niggas don't respect God like they respect Lucifer. If they did, the tree of knowledge would never have been touched.

Face it bro. Everything you believe in is based on a nigga that is second place in everything he does.

God didn't save you. You're natural sense of self preservation did. YOU got tired of the drugs and alcohol. God just so happened to be your outlet. Ummm your crutch.

Drop that crutch and enlighten yourself.

they did not eat that apple because they respected lucifer they ate it because they wanted to eat it. All lucifer did was TELL them the half truth of what would happen as a result of them eating it

Yet you call yourself zombie.

Last time I checked, a zombie was the living dead. And correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Lucifer say "you shall not surely die?"

So ummm aren't you an example of what Lucifer was talking about?

You are for God but underneath it all, you are one with Lucifer.

I could be wrong tho.

I call myself zombie because when a zombie bites you you become a zombie i want people to think the way i do so i try to convince them. Get it. That's the explanation for my name now but i just picked this name at random ONE Night after watching night of the living dead.

nigga please

nigga i answered your fucking dumbass question if you don't like it go fuck your mother and when your done go fuck your faggot father batty man

you follow God yet speak with the tongue of Lucifer.

That's wassup bro

I follow god but i am not perfect so i'll break your fucking jaw if you spoke to me like that in real life.

Then pray and hope god forgives me Now fuck off i am finished with you.

you'd prolly be asking me for a job if you saw me in person.

I wouldn't hire you tho bcuz you seem like a flake. I only have dependable guys on payroll.

No thank you i started my own business years 10 ago now i am good so you can keep your job.

 

[Jabu_Rule]

But you have no evidence. You jumped from the idea that if something exists it must be created to saying that God is that creator. How do you know that it is God and not something else? What makes that view more probable?

because everything else is in the universe and therefore must be a creation.

Or it could have created itself like the ability of your God to just exist..

where does it say god created himself...

Um, you said God always but the same principles can be applied to the Universe or not. Doesn't dismiss everything else i said about coming to grand conclusions. What's your proof that God always was and the Universe wasn't or doesn't exist within a cycle or in multitudes? Basically, just saying it is doesn't make it so. I'm speaking on mans conceptualization of this deity btw.

where does it say god always was?

In this very forum from statements made. What is your angle? Maybe it says it in your holy book, maybe not. Who gives a fuck? We are arguing the concept. What's yours?

i said "it" as in the bible.. also how can u argue a thought when u dont kno the opposite side.. jus from the few posts i read u seem more aggy then objective.. thats why i asked those questions because u are assuming some things are in the bible that you dont kno if they are actually there or not..

Objective? Really. People making statements that God exist with no evidence. I don't need your bible to get statements that people are making. I don't recall passages but I've seen plenty asserting to either concept of God. What is there to be Objective about when I'm not making any grand statements that something specific created the universe? You need your bible to argue these concepts? I'm sure you can do a good job presenting the evidence from your book. Looks like no one else has. Like i said, people on this board have made these grand statements and many don't follow the bible. Your book is flawed from it's inception and these grand statements have penetrated society and it's been shown that there isn't even proper translation of your book in the first place. I needed to read your Bible to get that info?

tryna prove that the bible is flawed is not a hard task given the fact that it was made from plenty of different books.. from different times.. some books were omitted.. ( even to this day some bibles omit "songs of Solomon ") and thru the years and thru translations of course it will be hard 2 have it in its original form.. Christians know this.. but that does not change the fact that the root beliefs have not changed and are biblically and historically facts. jesus did walk the earth. he was believed to be the son of god. he died on the cross and he believed that he was dying for our sins.. everything else honestly don't matter...

but about the "god exists with no evidence" that's actually subjective because what can be evidence to me might not be evidence for you.. I can go off the facts that the laws of physics are not absolute proves that god exists.. somebody else could say the fact that we can learn teach and wonder outside of basic instincts proves god exists.. somebody else could have gone thru a personal situation in they life that proved to them that god exists.. "miracles" happen all the time..

Christians know their book is flawed yet they believe regardless everything in it? Wait know they don't most cherry pick and mistranslates the mistranslations which is the reason for the numerous denomination and the denial that Catholics are Christians at all. It the same for every religion though. There may be competing theories in science, but non is considered absolute because new evidence may broaden the scope and change course. Evidence that i can't tangibly prove using the scientific methods that your provided isn't proper evidence. Are you telling me that there is reproducible evidence outside of people's delusions and unproven statements or evidence derived for a different approach to the same issue proves God? Tesla and Edison both discovered various means of using electricity but applied in differently. Only Edison succeeded financially because he was able to villianize the other. Tesla was proven to be more astute because his discoveries provided more far reaching tangible benefits. The thing is, we actually use scientific discoveries to adapt more advanced tools to deal with our world. This is why i don't require direct hands on knowledge of most discoveries. People don't care anyway until it creates a product or cure which is the ultimate proof of concept. Learning about gravity allowed us to create skyscrapers. No you can't just say if we don't have a complete working of a theory, it has to be the other thing. It doesn't work that way. The other thing has to meet the same burden of proof.

lol that's long ass titian graph you jus wrote jus proved my point... that's all subjective.. I gave examples of things that people can say " proved" to them god exists and you proves nothing.. you cant change a persons true beliefs.. only they can..

I like to write and discuss. You wrote as much as me so why are you casting stones? I actually wrote more then that. I never claimed that i was trying to change any belief. I'm asking you to prove a statement that is so handily passed off as factual. That's not how proof or facts work no matter how you attempt to present it. People say if i don't believe as they do, I'm going to hell. Show me the evidence since you so sure. Oh right, gotta get there first. Then how you know? I see you didn't really read what i wrote.

don't take what I said ass a diss.. but real shyt you right iv never been 2 hell.. and that's between you and god on that day..

btw I have stated the only facts that matter in this whole discussion.. everything else is subjective like ive already said..

Yet you seem to know that i'm going to discuss this issue with God. You never been there either. How do you know? What facts? There aren't any presented. Or are you referring the fact that people believe without facts. Well you got me there.

 

[damobb2deep]

But you have no evidence. You jumped from the idea that if something exists it must be created to saying that God is that creator. How do you know that it is God and not something else? What makes that view more probable?

because everything else is in the universe and therefore must be a creation.

Or it could have created itself like the ability of your God to just exist..

where does it say god created himself...

Um, you said God always but the same principles can be applied to the Universe or not. Doesn't dismiss everything else i said about coming to grand conclusions. What's your proof that God always was and the Universe wasn't or doesn't exist within a cycle or in multitudes? Basically, just saying it is doesn't make it so. I'm speaking on mans conceptualization of this deity btw.

where does it say god always was?

In this very forum from statements made. What is your angle? Maybe it says it in your holy book, maybe not. Who gives a fuck? We are arguing the concept. What's yours?

i said "it" as in the bible.. also how can u argue a thought when u dont kno the opposite side.. jus from the few posts i read u seem more aggy then objective.. thats why i asked those questions because u are assuming some things are in the bible that you dont kno if they are actually there or not..

Objective? Really. People making statements that God exist with no evidence. I don't need your bible to get statements that people are making. I don't recall passages but I've seen plenty asserting to either concept of God. What is there to be Objective about when I'm not making any grand statements that something specific created the universe? You need your bible to argue these concepts? I'm sure you can do a good job presenting the evidence from your book. Looks like no one else has. Like i said, people on this board have made these grand statements and many don't follow the bible. Your book is flawed from it's inception and these grand statements have penetrated society and it's been shown that there isn't even proper translation of your book in the first place. I needed to read your Bible to get that info?

tryna prove that the bible is flawed is not a hard task given the fact that it was made from plenty of different books.. from different times.. some books were omitted.. ( even to this day some bibles omit "songs of Solomon ") and thru the years and thru translations of course it will be hard 2 have it in its original form.. Christians know this.. but that does not change the fact that the root beliefs have not changed and are biblically and historically facts. jesus did walk the earth. he was believed to be the son of god. he died on the cross and he believed that he was dying for our sins.. everything else honestly don't matter...

but about the "god exists with no evidence" that's actually subjective because what can be evidence to me might not be evidence for you.. I can go off the facts that the laws of physics are not absolute proves that god exists.. somebody else could say the fact that we can learn teach and wonder outside of basic instincts proves god exists.. somebody else could have gone thru a personal situation in they life that proved to them that god exists.. "miracles" happen all the time..

Christians know their book is flawed yet they believe regardless everything in it? Wait know they don't most cherry pick and mistranslates the mistranslations which is the reason for the numerous denomination and the denial that Catholics are Christians at all. It the same for every religion though. There may be competing theories in science, but non is considered absolute because new evidence may broaden the scope and change course. Evidence that i can't tangibly prove using the scientific methods that your provided isn't proper evidence. Are you telling me that there is reproducible evidence outside of people's delusions and unproven statements or evidence derived for a different approach to the same issue proves God? Tesla and Edison both discovered various means of using electricity but applied in differently. Only Edison succeeded financially because he was able to villianize the other. Tesla was proven to be more astute because his discoveries provided more far reaching tangible benefits. The thing is, we actually use scientific discoveries to adapt more advanced tools to deal with our world. This is why i don't require direct hands on knowledge of most discoveries. People don't care anyway until it creates a product or cure which is the ultimate proof of concept. Learning about gravity allowed us to create skyscrapers. No you can't just say if we don't have a complete working of a theory, it has to be the other thing. It doesn't work that way. The other thing has to meet the same burden of proof.

lol that's long ass titian graph you jus wrote jus proved my point... that's all subjective.. I gave examples of things that people can say " proved" to them god exists and you proves nothing.. you cant change a persons true beliefs.. only they can..

I like to write and discuss. You wrote as much as me so why are you casting stones? I actually wrote more then that. I never claimed that i was trying to change any belief. I'm asking you to prove a statement that is so handily passed off as factual. That's not how proof or facts work no matter how you attempt to present it. People say if i don't believe as they do, I'm going to hell. Show me the evidence since you so sure. Oh right, gotta get there first. Then how you know? I see you didn't really read what i wrote.

don't take what I said ass a diss.. but real shyt you right iv never been 2 hell.. and that's between you and god on that day..

btw I have stated the only facts that matter in this whole discussion.. everything else is subjective like ive already said..

Yet you seem to know that i'm going to discuss this issue with God. You never been there either. How do you know? What facts? There aren't any presented. Or are you referring the fact that people believe without facts. Well you got me there.

yes you can believe in something with out "facts".. you and I both do it..

 

[Jabu_Rule]

yes you can believe in something with out "facts".. you and I both do it..

That's a bit of a grand belief isn't it? I don't believe anything to be so finite without knowing that to be the case without cryptic case studies based on rhetoric and suspect supernatural conclusions tacked onto historical facts. There are too many possibilities and none have been ultimately proven. People give they all for something that can't be proven and tell me i can't disprove what they believe yet tell me in the same breath that i better believe too cuz they know I'm gonna suffer. That's contradictory. You can't tell me what to believe either. People front like they came up with the theory on their own as if others didn't convince them to believe using the fear of the unknown. Bottom line is, if i can't know what's in your head, i can't know what's in the head of the people that wrote the bible either. Your taking a leap of faith based on another mans word. It's more then hopping though, you changing your entire lifestyle based on what's in another mans head but the ultimate presentation of what that man claims has never been proven. You can't compare that to science which only observes what others can easily observe. You jump off a bridge, that's gravity. Hope the preacher don't ask you to jump on faith.

 

[damobb2deep]

yes you can believe in something with out "facts".. you and I both do it..

That's a bit of a grand belief isn't it? I don't believe anything to be so finite without knowing that to be the case without cryptic case studies based on rhetoric and suspect supernatural conclusions tacked onto historical facts. There are too many possibilities and none have been ultimately proven. People give they all for something that can't be proven and tell me i can't disprove what they believe yet tell me in the same breath that i better believe too cuz they know I'm gonna suffer. That's contradictory. You can't tell me what to believe either. People front like they came up with the theory on their own as if others didn't convince them to believe using the fear of the unknown. Bottom line is, if i can't know what's in your head, i can't know what's in the head of the people that wrote the bible either. Your taking a leap of faith based on another mans word. It's more then hopping though, you changing your entire lifestyle based on what's in another mans head but the ultimate presentation of what that man claims has never been proven. You can't compare that to science which only observes what others can easily observe. You jump off a bridge, that's gravity. Hope the preacher don't ask you to jump on faith.

thats the thing you are doing alot of assuming yo self.. lots of people are not "changing" they lifestyle off another.. like i said you may not believe but there are more reasons why people believe then u an i will ever kno.. plus u are trying 2 use "logic" on something that is not ment 2 be totally logical... also as a Christian i dont push my beliefs on another person.. never have.. it seems 2 me you have more of a disdain 4 them as people.. I cant make you believe in god frankly idgaf if u do or don't.. my thing is tolerance on both sides and seeing both sides because the both have flaws.. truthfuly there is nothing that's says both cant work hand in hand (givin the fact that the origin of science comes from religion)

 

[Slowsteel3]

Look at the Sun... Why not Believe?

 

[A1000MILES]

That's a funny thing too...Some folk act as if they're losing for simply believing in God, and I think it almost always comes from their negative experiences with religion...Believing in God doesn't mean you have to be ignorant on current events around the world...Doesn't mean you have to be religious...Doesn't mean you have to judge all others who believe differently...Doesn't mean you have to reject logic or science...Doesn't mean you can't get money...Doesn't mean you have to constantly live in fear...DEFINITELY doesn't mean you're never gonna do anything that could be seen as evil or hypocritical...It just means you believe that there is something much more powerful than you and that your existence is more than a coincidence, so you try to go about life in an honorable way, as if that higher being is watching you and willing for you to walk a certain path...Een if you die and find out there isn't a God...What have you lost for believing?...That's not to say you can't behave in a righteous way without believing, but what is the point in actually fighting against the belief?

 

[MasterJayN100]

Yes!!! if you dont believe in God I feel sorry for you.Man can destroy the body but God can kill the body and SOUL

 

[jetlifebih]

What does the Bible say about life on other planets

 

[A1000MILES]

Nothing...

 

[jetlifebih]

So what would life form on other planets mean in terms of the bible?

 

[Ajackson17]

I believe in super saiyan goku

 

[A1000MILES]

So what would life form on other planets mean in terms of the bible?

Nothing...The bible is about Earth, and God's creations on it...So are most other religious texts...The existence of life on other planets wouldn't necessarily rule out the things in our texts here...It would simply mean that other beings on other planets had/have a different set of experiences with God...

 

[damobb2deep]

I believe in super saiyan goku

well he is a cartoon so technically you dont have to believe he exists... its fact...

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

Without the idea of Lucifer, none of you devout followers of God would know God.

Maybe your God is the biggie of the universe and without the only relevant God, your God wouldn't exist.

If Tupac were the one true God tho.

God was known before the devil. Read genesis 1 and 2.

The devil showed up after God had already established relationships with our first parents Adam and Eve. Amen.

Nah nigga. God was nobody but the landlord until Lucifer woke their asses up.

Niggas don't respect God like they respect Lucifer. If they did, the tree of knowledge would never have been touched.

Face it bro. Everything you believe in is based on a nigga that is second place in everything he does.

God didn't save you. You're natural sense of self preservation did. YOU got tired of the drugs and alcohol. God just so happened to be your outlet. Ummm your crutch.

Drop that crutch and enlighten yourself.

Where are you going to spend eternity at my friend?

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

It would be pretty bad ass that we end up finding out aliens from another universe created our universe and everything in it.

Scientists have thought about creating small universes in a lab, and if this curiosity is here right now, who's to say we can never create one in the future?

Well when the beast is revealed he will deceive the world into thinking that he is the creator of the universe and everything in it. He will declare himself to be god and will force everyone to receive his mark in their right hand or in their forehead. All who resist will be slaughtered. Amen.

 

[Neophyte Wolfgang]

Why can't religious people just take the L and admit their religion is just the most popular cult trending right now?

Why do we have to explain GOD through religious text when the universe is billions or years older then the bible? What is another catastrophe happens on earth and almost everything is wiped out except by chance a few texts from Scientology and the surviving/new generation picks that up as the "gospel?" Why does GOD have to take after human form?

 

[A1000MILES]

Why can't religious people just take the L and admit their religion is just the most popular cult trending right now?

Some can...

Why do we have to explain GOD through religious text when the universe is billions or years older then the bible?

We don't have to...But these are the various scriptures that have been passed down to teach lessons and guide us...No handwritten book could be more absolute than God itself...It's widely known that edits have been made over the years...Your whole faith shouldn't just be in the book...

What is another catastrophe happens on earth and almost everything is wiped out except by chance a few texts from Scientology and the surviving/new generation picks that up as the "gospel?"

Again...No book is more absolute than God...If people make up a religion today and redefine God...We will still never know the true form or power or history of God until we hopefully come in contact with it...

Why does GOD have to take after human form?

To set a living example for humans, and to physically absolve his followers of their sins and old ways...