Who is the best NBA Player to never win a ring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
I watched both play and I'm taking Malone. The Mailman is #1 on my PF list. His lack of titles is why he's not given what I believe to be his proper respect. Gave you points, rebounds and above-average D. I don't know how many players can match his consistency either.
 
Jonah 2.0;8090273 said:
I watched both play and I'm taking Malone. The Mailman is #1 on my PF list. His lack of titles is why he's not given what I believe to be his proper respect. Gave you points, rebounds and above-average D. I don't know how many players can match his consistency either.

Disagree with the bold. Malone is not looked at as clutch see missed shots at end of games. Getting the ball stolen by Jordan in game 6. Also most feel Malone had it easy by playing with Stockton.
 
Barkley was better than Malone when both were in their prime, Malone was only better post '96... Malone had two chances at a ring, i think Barkley gets it done if he gets one more chance no matter who he's facing...
 
Barkleys individual dominance on the court is also greater than Malones as well as his handles and playmaking..

Since the 1985-86 Season...

40+ Pts, 20+ Reb, 50+%FG:

1) Shaquille O'Neal 4

2) Charles Barkley 3

3) Patrick Ewing 2

4) Five others with one 

30+ Pts, 20+ Reb on 50+%FG:

1) Charles Barkley 20

2) Shaquille O'Neal 16

3) Hakeem Olajuwon 11

4) Patrick Ewing 6

5) Kevin Willis 6

20+ Pts, 20+ Reb, 50+%FG:

1) Charles Barkley 40

2) Shaquille O'Neal 29

3) Dwight Howard 26

4) Hakeem Olajuwon 25

5) Kevin Garnett 14

30+ Pts, 15+ Reb on 50+%FG:

1) Shaquille O'Neal 100

2) Charles Barkley 80

3) Hakeem Olajuwon 62

4) Karl Malone 54

5) David Robinson 43
 
one_manshow;8114772 said:
Malone was part of the elite during his prime his work ethic and consistency made him better than Barkley.

You're making no argument for Malone over Barkley at all. You're just saying shit withiut backing it up.
 
blu197;8114792 said:
Barkley was better than Malone when both were in their prime, Malone was only better post '96... Malone had two chances at a ring, i think Barkley gets it done if he gets one more chance no matter who he's facing...

Facts
 
D. Morgan;8092477 said:
Jonah 2.0;8090273 said:
I watched both play and I'm taking Malone. The Mailman is #1 on my PF list. His lack of titles is why he's not given what I believe to be his proper respect. Gave you points, rebounds and above-average D. I don't know how many players can match his consistency either.

Disagree with the bold. Malone is not looked at as clutch see missed shots at end of games. Getting the ball stolen by Jordan in game 6. Also most feel Malone had it easy by playing with Stockton.

Stockton last 5 minutes vs The Rockets of Olujuwan, Barkley and Drexler in game 6 in '97. Malone fills up stat sheets, but Stockton is the clutch.
 
Last edited:
iKingGodGivBiz;8114813 said:
one_manshow;8114772 said:
Malone was part of the elite during his prime his work ethic and consistency made him better than Barkley.

You're making no argument for Malone over Barkley at all. You're just saying shit withiut backing it up.

No need to make an argument when the real heads who watched both players in their prime know who's better.

 
KNiGHTS;8122903 said:
https://youtu.be/mu3vkwP3GHQ

Got Damn fucking monster yo... Wish he played in this era, nigga would be King of tecs, flagrants, taunts, and show niggas how to bang
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
75
Views
4
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…