fiat_money
New member
What reports say he "chased down" Treyvon?Jamaica;4232891 said:fiat_money;4231291 said:Can't be used against him if there was nothing legally wrong with it.Jamaica;4231250 said:fiat_money;4231103 said:The bolded is not illegal, and the underlined is conjecture.Jamaica;4231052 said:riddlerap;4228911 said:yeah, make sure you dont take into account any facts or details. good call.
The fact that Zimmerman followed Trayvon even though he was told not to. Then chased him down and shot him? The only thing that should be investigated is whether it's manslaughter or not. There should be no discussion of whether the shooting was justified.
I never said it was illegal to follow somebody, the facts are that Zimmerman followed him when he was told not to. Which could be used against him.
Besides, he was told "We don’t need you to do that."; so that doesn't even count as being told not to follow Treyvon.
Furthermore, according to the 911 recording, within 15 seconds of being told "We don’t need you to do that.", he was no longer following Treyvon.
Ok then explain why it can't be used against him. The reason he was told to not follow him was because the police would be there to investigate. If he had turned back around and went home this thread wouldn't exist.
If he stopped following him how did Zimmerman manage to shoot Trayvon? When reports said he chased down the kid?
By "chased down" are you saying that he chased Treyvon until he caught up to him?
There's a disclaimer way at the bottom of the post.SuperstarCole;4232895 said:Dead @ that info graph. How the fuck did they know treyvon was hiding on a patio? Also it doesn't explain how supposedly treyvon decked zimmerman from behind. Unless treyvon appeared out of ninja dust behind him.