The Official Jay-Z's "Tidal" Streaming Service Thread (New Stand Up Comedy Series Added)

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Monizzle14;8092838 said:
soul rattler;8092795 said:
Let these people tell it, Jay should have launched Tidal with Gucci Mane and Fetty Wap or Talib Kweli and Mos Def, because then and only then would he have proven himself to be down for the cause.

All jokes aside having a Talib or Big Krit wouldn't have hurt. He went full hipster with Jack White/DaftPunk/Chris Martin then played a radio head song for a part of the conference.

well, you bloody wanker, it is a music streaming site. it's not just for hip-hop
 
So let me see if I understand this correctly. Tidal is on only supposed to be for black ppl and hip hop artist alone? And why wouldn't he pander or reach out to hipsters and their ilk. Those motherfuckers buy music. It is business right. Last I checked record sales were at an all time low. Streaming is the way to go. But mother fuckers only want free shit.

Look at this way. If you buy one cd a month every month regardless of the genre why not support a premium streaming service? Instead of getting only on cd with 12 to 15 songs you get unlimited music and a little better sound quality.

Like a few people on here have spoken before me. It's not the brand more so the face representing the brand.
 
JDSTAYWITIT.;8092750 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092688 said:
soul rattler;8092429 said:
One more thing...

To think that anyone would invest 56 million dollars without a long term plan is complete idiocy. You don't get that kind of money being a dumbass and you don't spend that kind of money like a dumbass. (Insert Phil Jackson/Knicks joke here)

The long term plan is a cash grab...look how he owned 0.5% of the nets but made it seem like he owned 50%...n sold it

He had to sell after opening up his sports agency ...cant be both

Why did anyone think he owned 50%? Do you think spike lee owns the Knicks because he sits court side and wears big ass Jeremy Lin jerseys?

-Bcuz he brought up owning the nets all the time

- "lucky I ain't have jay drop him from the team"

-
pg2_e_nets-billboard01_576.jpg


N of course not.,. spike movies have been trash for years,,he just has enough for them court side seats
 
Louis Devinear;8092880 said:
So let me see if I understand this correctly. Tidal is on only supposed to be for black ppl and hip hop artist alone? And why wouldn't he pander or reach out to hipsters and their ilk. Those motherfuckers buy music. It is business right. Last I checked record sales were at an all time low. Streaming is the way to go. But mother fuckers only want free shit.

Look at this way. If you buy one cd a month every month regardless of the genre why not support a premium streaming service? Instead of getting only on cd with 12 to 15 songs you get unlimited music and a little better sound quality.

Like a few people on here have spoken before me. It's not the brand more so the face representing the brand.

No trust me i listen to many different genres myself including blues classic rock alternative rock etc. But the mindset of Jay was to get a crowd that loves HQ music which is mostly young and hipster (regardless of race). That crowd pretty much said were not buying your bullshit. So then Hov pretty much called out black folk talm bout yall buy Jordans and I phones but you won't sign up for tidal?
 
Monizzle14;8093006 said:
Louis Devinear;8092880 said:
So let me see if I understand this correctly. Tidal is on only supposed to be for black ppl and hip hop artist alone? And why wouldn't he pander or reach out to hipsters and their ilk. Those motherfuckers buy music. It is business right. Last I checked record sales were at an all time low. Streaming is the way to go. But mother fuckers only want free shit.

Look at this way. If you buy one cd a month every month regardless of the genre why not support a premium streaming service? Instead of getting only on cd with 12 to 15 songs you get unlimited music and a little better sound quality.

Like a few people on here have spoken before me. It's not the brand more so the face representing the brand.

No trust me i listen to many different genres myself including blues classic rock alternative rock etc. But the mindset of Jay was to get a crowd that loves HQ music which is mostly young and hipster (regardless of race). That crowd pretty much said were not buying your bullshit. So then Hov pretty much called out black folk talm bout yall buy Jordans and I phones but you won't sign up for tidal?

I didn't think he was just calling out black folks. He was calling out anyone who will spend money on those things but complains his service was too expensive buy will still spend money on and make big corporations bigger.

I know people who won't use the service simply because it's jay z

 
The hilarious part about tjat teoll is he,STILL
_Goldie_;8062054 said:
Dame Dash and Dr.Boyce Watkins talk about the "Spotify diss freestyle"


Gotta call a spade a spade:

Dame was speaking about "lets have ceo beef and diss the establishment " months before we were aware of Tidal.

Ffwd Jay is dissing corporate.

Its a pure coincidence, but i give the old man props for that
 
L.O.S.T.;8093030 said:
Monizzle14;8093006 said:
Louis Devinear;8092880 said:
So let me see if I understand this correctly. Tidal is on only supposed to be for black ppl and hip hop artist alone? And why wouldn't he pander or reach out to hipsters and their ilk. Those motherfuckers buy music. It is business right. Last I checked record sales were at an all time low. Streaming is the way to go. But mother fuckers only want free shit.

Look at this way. If you buy one cd a month every month regardless of the genre why not support a premium streaming service? Instead of getting only on cd with 12 to 15 songs you get unlimited music and a little better sound quality.

Like a few people on here have spoken before me. It's not the brand more so the face representing the brand.

No trust me i listen to many different genres myself including blues classic rock alternative rock etc. But the mindset of Jay was to get a crowd that loves HQ music which is mostly young and hipster (regardless of race). That crowd pretty much said were not buying your bullshit. So then Hov pretty much called out black folk talm bout yall buy Jordans and I phones but you won't sign up for tidal?

I didn't think he was just calling out black folks. He was calling out anyone who will spend money on those things but complains his service was too expensive buy will still spend money on and make big corporations bigger.

I know people who won't use the service simply because it's jay z

"I dont need to middle man to talk to all my niggas" first line of the freestyle

"niggas is skeptical cause its their own shit"

"The only one they hating on look the same as you"

It was clearly geared toward black folks especially since many of them questioned him doing the #tidalfacts campaign during the baltimore riot.
 
Do you see Apple running a smear campaign against spotify or pandora. Do you see spotify sending jabs at beats music. Cause I don't. But I see these same companies doing that to tidal. Black ppl aren't the only race of people who listen to jay. And music is to be viewed and interpreted buy the buying public. So if I'm listening to the music and not worried about if the artist is a multi millionaire. Then the message still resonates the same. Just cause your wealthy doesn't mean you lose the right to speak to the poor.
 
Louis Devinear;8093140 said:
Do you see Apple running a smear campaign against spotify or pandora. Do you see spotify sending jabs at beats music. Cause I don't. But I see these same companies doing that to tidal. Black ppl aren't the only race of people who listen to jay. And music is to be viewed and interpreted buy the buying public. So if I'm listening to the music and not worried about if the artist is a multi millionaire. Then the message still resonates the same. Just cause your wealthy doesn't mean you lose the right to speak to the poor.

The biggest smear campaign against Jay is his own lackluster Launch. Sure Spotify and Google and the powers that be are taking advantage of the situation to grow their brands and are taking indirect shots. But its not like they have commercials right now attaching jay or tweeting about jay z. Most critisizm was from journalist and bloggers who saw flaws in the initial launch that were valid. The launch was tone deaf to musicians who are filthy rich like those that were on stage.

Jays promises to help the "fan" and the artist in a half assed way put music streaming in a brighter light. So Spotify used it to grow their brand which at one point during the first few weeks of tidal spotify saw a groth spurt. But Jays promise to cut the middle man but the fan has to pay more (no free version) or just as much was a terrible mistake. Not tom mention at the launch Tidal did not explain from a users perspective what made them different outside hq music. It was o
 
jamiefoxxhairline;8092983 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8092750 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092688 said:
soul rattler;8092429 said:
One more thing...

To think that anyone would invest 56 million dollars without a long term plan is complete idiocy. You don't get that kind of money being a dumbass and you don't spend that kind of money like a dumbass. (Insert Phil Jackson/Knicks joke here)

The long term plan is a cash grab...look how he owned 0.5% of the nets but made it seem like he owned 50%...n sold it

He had to sell after opening up his sports agency ...cant be both

Why did anyone think he owned 50%? Do you think spike lee owns the Knicks because he sits court side and wears big ass Jeremy Lin jerseys?

-Bcuz he brought up owning the nets all the time

- "lucky I ain't have jay drop him from the team"

-
pg2_e_nets-billboard01_576.jpg


N of course not.,. spike movies have been trash for years,,he just has enough for them court side seats

You say HE brought up owning the team all the time and then you quote a kanye verse?

Wtf? .......Lololololoool

What's wrong with you niggas cuhz ...lol

 
JDSTAYWITIT.;8093249 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092983 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8092750 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092688 said:
soul rattler;8092429 said:
One more thing...

To think that anyone would invest 56 million dollars without a long term plan is complete idiocy. You don't get that kind of money being a dumbass and you don't spend that kind of money like a dumbass. (Insert Phil Jackson/Knicks joke here)

The long term plan is a cash grab...look how he owned 0.5% of the nets but made it seem like he owned 50%...n sold it

He had to sell after opening up his sports agency ...cant be both

Why did anyone think he owned 50%? Do you think spike lee owns the Knicks because he sits court side and wears big ass Jeremy Lin jerseys?

-Bcuz he brought up owning the nets all the time

- "lucky I ain't have jay drop him from the team"

-
pg2_e_nets-billboard01_576.jpg


N of course not.,. spike movies have been trash for years,,he just has enough for them court side seats

You say HE brought up owning the team all the time and then you quote a kanye verse?

Wtf? .......Lololololoool

What's wrong with you niggas cuhz ...lol

So u sayn jay z didn't act like he owned more than 0.5 % of the nets?

 
Tidal is flopping period...the premier was trash..,that freestyle where he said riggghht? At the end of every line was trash..

If tidal was a hit he would a sold it n made profit ..he doesn't care about y'all n music lol..its about $$$$
 
Louis Devinear;8093140 said:
Do you see Apple running a smear campaign against spotify or pandora. Do you see spotify sending jabs at beats music. Cause I don't. But I see these same companies doing that to tidal. Black ppl aren't the only race of people who listen to jay. And music is to be viewed and interpreted buy the buying public. So if I'm listening to the music and not worried about if the artist is a multi millionaire. Then the message still resonates the same. Just cause your wealthy doesn't mean you lose the right to speak to the poor.

Do you know what a smear campaign is? Or are you just exaggerating to make a point that otherwise wouldn't exist?

 
jamiefoxxhairline;8093302 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8093249 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092983 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8092750 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092688 said:
soul rattler;8092429 said:
One more thing...

To think that anyone would invest 56 million dollars without a long term plan is complete idiocy. You don't get that kind of money being a dumbass and you don't spend that kind of money like a dumbass. (Insert Phil Jackson/Knicks joke here)

The long term plan is a cash grab...look how he owned 0.5% of the nets but made it seem like he owned 50%...n sold it

He had to sell after opening up his sports agency ...cant be both

Why did anyone think he owned 50%? Do you think spike lee owns the Knicks because he sits court side and wears big ass Jeremy Lin jerseys?

-Bcuz he brought up owning the nets all the time

- "lucky I ain't have jay drop him from the team"

-
pg2_e_nets-billboard01_576.jpg


N of course not.,. spike movies have been trash for years,,he just has enough for them court side seats

You say HE brought up owning the team all the time and then you quote a kanye verse?

Wtf? .......Lololololoool

What's wrong with you niggas cuhz ...lol

So u sayn jay z didn't act like he owned more than 0.5 % of the nets?

He acted like he was a part owner, which he was. It's dumb niggas who found out YEARS later that were surprised at the percentage he owned, which is why he never had to address the criticism until his latest album.
 
Haha at people being butt hurt because he messed up the launch by making it artist instead of consumer centric.

Apple coming out soon and we'll see what "marketing dollars" [50 Cents voice] can get you.

It's way to early to call TiDal a flop though, he can always change course
 
jamiefoxxhairline;8093302 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8093249 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092983 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8092750 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092688 said:
soul rattler;8092429 said:
One more thing...

To think that anyone would invest 56 million dollars without a long term plan is complete idiocy. You don't get that kind of money being a dumbass and you don't spend that kind of money like a dumbass. (Insert Phil Jackson/Knicks joke here)

The long term plan is a cash grab...look how he owned 0.5% of the nets but made it seem like he owned 50%...n sold it

He had to sell after opening up his sports agency ...cant be both

Why did anyone think he owned 50%? Do you think spike lee owns the Knicks because he sits court side and wears big ass Jeremy Lin jerseys?

-Bcuz he brought up owning the nets all the time

- "lucky I ain't have jay drop him from the team"

-
pg2_e_nets-billboard01_576.jpg


N of course not.,. spike movies have been trash for years,,he just has enough for them court side seats

You say HE brought up owning the team all the time and then you quote a kanye verse?

Wtf? .......Lololololoool

What's wrong with you niggas cuhz ...lol

So u sayn jay z didn't act like he owned more than 0.5 % of the nets?

Nigga I'm asking YOU how did he "act like he owned 50%"

That's what YOUR said ...so I'm asking YOU to tell me how?

Lol ..shit ain't hard Jamie
 
soul rattler;8093383 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8093302 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8093249 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092983 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8092750 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092688 said:
soul rattler;8092429 said:
One more thing...

To think that anyone would invest 56 million dollars without a long term plan is complete idiocy. You don't get that kind of money being a dumbass and you don't spend that kind of money like a dumbass. (Insert Phil Jackson/Knicks joke here)

The long term plan is a cash grab...look how he owned 0.5% of the nets but made it seem like he owned 50%...n sold it

He had to sell after opening up his sports agency ...cant be both

Why did anyone think he owned 50%? Do you think spike lee owns the Knicks because he sits court side and wears big ass Jeremy Lin jerseys?

-Bcuz he brought up owning the nets all the time

- "lucky I ain't have jay drop him from the team"

-
pg2_e_nets-billboard01_576.jpg


N of course not.,. spike movies have been trash for years,,he just has enough for them court side seats

You say HE brought up owning the team all the time and then you quote a kanye verse?

Wtf? .......Lololololoool

What's wrong with you niggas cuhz ...lol

So u sayn jay z didn't act like he owned more than 0.5 % of the nets?

He acted like he was a part owner, which he was. It's dumb niggas who found out YEARS later that were surprised at the percentage he owned, which is why he never had to address the criticism until his latest album.

Lolz at the dumb nigga logic .....ohhhhhh uhhhhh he got a nets hat on so he must own the whole thing!!

The story was all over espn about the Russian cat owning that team from day one ...I can't see how that was ever in question
 
MarcusGarvey;8093412 said:
Haha at people being butt hurt because he messed up the launch by making it artist instead of consumer centric.

Apple coming out soon and we'll see what "marketing dollars" [50 Cents voice] can get you.

It's way to early to call TiDal a flop though, he can always change course

Apple could drop beats the same exact way and I could promise you that you won't hear the same uproar..... Leis not act like the outcry would be the same.....beats finna be $10 and the only free thing you gonna get is radio stations DJ'ed by Drake and I can promise you niggas won't make a peep about it....
 
JDSTAYWITIT.;8093459 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8093302 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8093249 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092983 said:
JDSTAYWITIT.;8092750 said:
jamiefoxxhairline;8092688 said:
soul rattler;8092429 said:
One more thing...

To think that anyone would invest 56 million dollars without a long term plan is complete idiocy. You don't get that kind of money being a dumbass and you don't spend that kind of money like a dumbass. (Insert Phil Jackson/Knicks joke here)

The long term plan is a cash grab...look how he owned 0.5% of the nets but made it seem like he owned 50%...n sold it

He had to sell after opening up his sports agency ...cant be both

Why did anyone think he owned 50%? Do you think spike lee owns the Knicks because he sits court side and wears big ass Jeremy Lin jerseys?

-Bcuz he brought up owning the nets all the time

- "lucky I ain't have jay drop him from the team"

-
pg2_e_nets-billboard01_576.jpg


N of course not.,. spike movies have been trash for years,,he just has enough for them court side seats

You say HE brought up owning the team all the time and then you quote a kanye verse?

Wtf? .......Lololololoool

What's wrong with you niggas cuhz ...lol

So u sayn jay z didn't act like he owned more than 0.5 % of the nets?

Nigga I'm asking YOU how did he "act like he owned 50%"

That's what YOUR said ...so I'm asking YOU to tell me how?

Lol ..shit ain't hard Jamie

I just told u on music.,billboards., interviews..

Jay making moves! He owns a team like mj!
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
1,254
Views
3
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…