Should Kobe be the MVP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
angry-at-computer-o.gif
..............
 
Last edited:
Bottom line is, both of them are getting a lot of credit for stacking up wins since the All Star break based on Defensive efforts that have little to do with either of them.

That being said, Id say Rose. Kobe fans are just bitter he only has 1 MVP award and are going into overdrive based on the fact that Rose isnt putting up gaudy numbers.
 
Last edited:
KeepOnPushing;2324652 said:
128962803667262043.jpg


Fuck Outta here Bitch Nigga......

SMH at you conveniently ignoring the fact where i said the Bulls where gonna finish 3rd in the east, clearly they are not and exceeded my expectations, which further convinced me that Rose deserve the MVP.

Use some common sense nigga, damn. If a nigga took a team that isn't suppose to finish number one, what does that tell you?
 
Last edited:
MR.CJ;2324614 said:
your team has to be one of the top teams in the nba, to win the mvp.
So if Rose was suddenly traded to the Clippers he wouldnt be MVP anymore? Hell his numbers would be better since he'd always have the ball.

"You have to be one of the top teams" is retarded and goes right along with the t/s theory about how letting the idiot media decide fucks things up.

Your record means your TEAM is good. Not you. In that case give Manu Ganobli the MVP. After all they have the best record right? Why stop at "one of the top teams" when you just just go right to the top team?

Once again, not saying he dont deserve it. But the logic people are using is off to me. Either he's the best player in the league or he isnt.
 
Last edited:
If you would of said, I thought The Bulls where suppose to finish 3rd i would get your point. Your quote only further legitimize why Rose should win mvp.

Niggas just salty, Beans is only gonna have 1 regular season mvp in his whole career.

2n9ewrk.jpg
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2324739 said:
So if Rose was suddenly traded to the Clippers he wouldnt be MVP anymore? Hell his numbers would be better since he'd always have the ball.

"You have to be one of the top teams" is retarded and goes right along with the t/s theory about how letting the idiot media decide fucks things up.

Your record means your TEAM is good. Not you. In that case give Manu Ganobli the MVP. After all they have the best record right? Why stop at "one of the top teams" when you just just go right to the top team?

Once again, not saying he dont deserve it. But the logic people are using is off to me. Either he's the best player in the league or he isnt.

no he wouldn't. the clippers have a losing record
 
Last edited:
Tommy bilfiger;2324592 said:
You get mvp for how you play the whole season not after the all star break

Rose led the bulls to the 1st winning west coast trip since 98,Led the bulls to the top of the east without boozer and noah for chunks of the season

Has outplayed or was even wit every pg he matched up wit

odom,bynum etc are also reasons the lakers been ballin too

and the bulls and lakers have the Same record dont know what makes kobe jump ahead all of a sudden

rose has equal to slightly better numbers
LOL Oh u wanna talk about numbers now? Well Westbrook has equal numbers.

So I guess Westbrook is the MVP now.

And here we go with the "Kobe has good teammates" song & dance: Like Magic didnt have Kareem, Like Jordan didnt have Pippen and Rodman, Like Shaq didnt have Kobe. Nobody says "ohhh well Jordan only won cuz....." "Well Larry Bird only won cuz..." but with Kobe we always gotta demenish accomplishments.

"now I know exactly how it feel to be a Laker" :(
 
Last edited:
usmarin3;2324748 said:
If you would of said, I thought The Bulls where suppose to finish 3rd i would get your point. Your quote only further legitimize why Rose should win mvp.

usmarin3;2324736 said:
SMH at you conveniently ignoring the fact where i said the Bulls where gonna finish 3rd in the east, clearly they are not and exceeded my expectations, which further convinced me that Rose deserve the MVP.

Use some common sense nigga, damn. If a nigga took a team that isn't suppose to finish number one, what does that tell you?

The-Wrap-It-Up-Box.gif
...................
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2324739 said:
So if Rose was suddenly traded to the Clippers he wouldnt be MVP anymore? Hell his numbers would be better since he'd always have the ball.

"You have to be one of the top teams" is retarded and goes right along with the t/s theory about how letting the idiot media decide fucks things up.

Your record means your TEAM is good. Not you. In that case give Manu Ganobli the MVP. After all they have the best record right? Why stop at "one of the top teams" when you just just go right to the top team?

Once again, not saying he dont deserve it. But the logic people are using is off to me. Either he's the best player in the league or he isnt.

It's called "Most Valuable" and not "Best" for a reason. There's a lot of guys who pad stats on mediocre teams that they wouldnt on an elite squad.
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2324758 said:
LOL Oh u wanna talk about numbers now? Well Westbrook has equal numbers.



So I guess Westbrook is the MVP now.


And here we go with the "Kobe has good teammates" song & dance: Like Magic didnt have Kareem, Like Jordan didnt have Pippen and Rodman, Like Shaq didnt have Kobe. Nobody says "ohhh well Jordan only won cuz....." "Well Larry Bird only won cuz..." but with Kobe we always gotta demenish accomplishments.

"now I know exactly how it feel to be a Laker" :(

no because westbrook isn't the #1 option. durant is.

westbrook won't win the mvp, as long as durant is the #1 option.
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2324758 said:
LOL Oh u wanna talk about numbers now? Well Westbrook has equal numbers.

So I guess Westbrook is the MVP now.

And here we go with the "Kobe has good teammates" song & dance: Like Magic didnt have Kareem, Like Jordan didnt have Pippen and Rodman, Like Shaq didnt have Kobe. Nobody says "ohhh well Jordan only won cuz....." "Well Larry Bird only won cuz..." but with Kobe we always gotta demenish accomplishments.

"now I know exactly how it feel to be a Laker" :(
1. Rose is clearly the best player on his team and it's not even close.

2. Westbrook simply isnt the best player on his team.
 
Last edited:
PanchoYoSancho;2324763 said:
It's called "Most Valuable" and not "Best" for a reason. There's a lot of guys who pad stats on mediocre teams that they wouldnt on an elite squad.

yep...............
 
Last edited:
PanchoYoSancho;2324763 said:
It's called "Most Valuable" and not "Best" for a reason. There's a lot of guys who pad stats on mediocre teams that they wouldnt on an elite squad.
OK fine.

D. Howard is the most VALUABLE player to his team :unno.

It's clear that people are just mesmerized by the young kid with the exciting moves and the speed of the dribble, plus the fact that he's the spark that the Bulls have been missing to put asses in the seats since Jordan.

People like to OOO and AHHHH and the MVP award has become the "who can make me say wow the most on a playoff team."

If people were to vote minus emotion (which they obviously dont) Kobe would have two MVP awards, Nash would have one less and the media would not be crowning D. Rose league MVP as if D. Howard, Lebron and Kobe are just out there throwing up stinkers every game night.

MEH...I'm done. If he gets it good. But Im just mad people acting like its obvious he deserves it. Cuz its really not. Its just a popularity contest these days.
 
Last edited:
should Chris Paul have won the MVP a few years ago? his numbers are very similar to Rose's and the Hornets nearly won the west that year
 
Last edited:
matt-;2324795 said:
should Chris Paul have won the MVP a few years ago? his numbers are very similar to Rose's and the Hornets nearly won the west that year

wat year was that?
 
Last edited:
Tommy bilfiger;2324796 said:
Westbrook is not the best player on the thunder

Westbrook is not the main reason the thunder are winning

Bulls have 55 W's just like the lakers and lets be real dog if bynum,odom or gasol were on the bulls any of them would be the 2nd best player on the bulls

Boozer JUST came back from yet his 3rd stint this year missing games and Noah is hurt again and the bulls keep winning

the fuck happened to him now?
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2324789 said:
OK fine.

D. Howard is the most VALUABLE player to his team :unno.

It's clear that people are just mesmerized by the young kid with the exciting moves and the speed of the dribble, plus the fact that he's the spark that the Bulls have been missing to put asses in the seats since Jordan.

People like to OOO and AHHHH and the MVP award has become the "who can make me say wow the most on a playoff team."

If people were to vote minus emotion (which they obviously dont) Kobe would have two MVP awards, Nash would have one less and the media would not be crowning D. Rose league MVP as if D. Howard, Lebron and Kobe are just out there throwing up stinkers every game night.

MEH...I'm done. If he gets it good. But Im just mad people acting like its obvious he deserves it. Cuz its really not. Its just a popularity contest these days.

true. kobe and dwight make a strong case and rose still got my vote, but this is true.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
301
Views
601
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…