Rewriting Evolution ~ Darwin was wrong

[Drew_Ali]

Because the have been trained by ignorant Darwinists......

 

[ohhhla]

Why hasn't Evolution failed any test?

Why is it is so applicable for most things in Science?

There are people who have debunk your claims

And there is the fossil record.

 

[Gold_Certificate]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

I am.....

You know what's going on here..............

But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.

You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?

This is where we get into semantics............

Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........

However......

Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........

And will be debunked in this thread.........

So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?

 

[ohhhla]

He thinks because we've never witness something drastic

It doesn't exist

 

[Drew_Ali]

Because the have been trained by ignorant Darwinists......

you use the term darwinists in an attempt to make evolution seem like some sort of religion, it's not. you also fallaciously seem to think that like religion, discrediting the author discredits the ideas. science doesn't work like that, darwin could be wrong, doesn't make the facts of evolution wrong.

I made none of these statements...............

What facts????????

 

[Drew_Ali]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

I am.....

You know what's going on here..............

But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.

You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?

This is where we get into semantics............

Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........

However......

Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........

And will be debunked in this thread.........

So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?

Yes.....

 

[Drew_Ali]

He thinks because we've never witness something

It doesn't exist

The irony.........

 

[ohhhla]

Do you don't accept humans are primates?

When tho they possess all of traits of a primate??

How dishonest is that?

 

[Drew_Ali]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

I am.....

You know what's going on here..............

But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.

You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?

This is where we get into semantics............

Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........

However......

Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........

And will be debunked in this thread.........

So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?

no, he seems to believe speciation does not occur at all, apparently because e.coli hasn't evolved into new species since we've been observing it (that's what he said)

Eureka.......

I was quite serious.......

What facts???????

If Darwin was wrong......

Some of the "facts of evolution" are also wrong.....

"The tree-of-life concept was absolutely central to Darwin's thinking, equal in importance to natural to natural selection, according to biologist W. Ford Doolittle of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Without it the theory of evolution would never have happened. The tree also helped carry the day for evolution. Darwin argued successfully that the tree of life was a fact of nature, plain for all to see though in need of explanation. The explanation he came up with was evolution by natural selection"

 

[ohhhla]

So, how were we created???

Even if you did disprove Evolution, doesn't mean we were created.

 

[Drew_Ali]

So, how were we created???

Even if you did disprove Evolution, doesn't mean we were created.

LOL......

U have a new theory???????

 

[Gold_Certificate]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

I am.....

You know what's going on here..............

But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.

You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?

This is where we get into semantics............

Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........

However......

Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........

And will be debunked in this thread.........

So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?

Yes.....

I see.

If that's the case, I have nothing to contribute here; since I prefer using words as defined.

 

[ohhhla]

So, how were we created???

Even if you did disprove Evolution, doesn't mean we were created.

LOL......

U have a new theory???????

I'm using reasons.

You doing a false dichotomy right now.

I asked you how did we get here and you said we were created.

I asked how and you resort to saying it's none of my business.

Basically I have to be gullible to believe that shit and go on faith.

When Evolution has tons of tons of tons of evidence.

You're doing this to push your beliefs and gullibility on others.

Too bad it ain't work.

 

[Drew_Ali]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

I am.....

You know what's going on here..............

But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.

You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?

This is where we get into semantics............

Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........

However......

Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........

And will be debunked in this thread.........

So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?

Yes.....

I see.

If that's the case, I have nothing to contribute here; since I prefer using words as defined.

Surely you can contribute....

We have been down this road before tho'.......

Diane Dodd's fruit fly experiment.........

Any more conclusive "examples" of speciation besides Drosophilia or Darwin's finches???????

 

[Drew_Ali]

So, how were we created???

Even if you did disprove Evolution, doesn't mean we were created.

LOL......

U have a new theory???????

I'm using reasons.

You doing a false dichotomy right now.

I asked you how did we get here and you said we were created.

I asked how and you resort to saying it's none of my business.

Basically I have to be gullible to believe that shit and go on faith.

When Evolution has tons of tons of tons of evidence.

You're doing this to push your beliefs and gullibility on others.

Too bad it ain't work.

He thinks because we've never witness something

It doesn't exist

The irony.........

 

[ohhhla]

I'm don't do faith, Bambu's doppelganger.

You do.

 

[Gold_Certificate]

So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?

This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......

And the engine of scientific racism................

I believe that this is a G&S topic........

But will move to the R&R in a few days.............

I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......

I see.

So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?

In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...um=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo

The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........

Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.

I am.....

You know what's going on here..............

But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.

You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?

This is where we get into semantics............

Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........

However......

Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........

And will be debunked in this thread.........

So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?

Yes.....

I see.

If that's the case, I have nothing to contribute here; since I prefer using words as defined.

Surely you can contribute....

We have been down this road before tho'.......

Diane Dodd's fruit fly experiment.........

Any more conclusive "examples" of speciation besides Drosophilia or Darwin's finches???????

It's a fruitless effort if we have differing definitions for "speciation".

 

[Drew_Ali]

@ohhhla ...... Et.al

I have no intentions of indoctrinating anyone into my "religion" or belief system.......

Again.....

This thread was created for scientific discussion

 

[ohhhla]

You cant believe in GOD and evolution and be a good Muslim, Jew, Christian, Buddhist in the strictest adherence of the word. Because it says that GOD created us in these religions, not that we evolved. If you believe in evolution it contradict your religious beliefs, so why believe in GOD?

This is sheer stupidity.

They're Christian, Muslims, Jews and etc who accept evolution.

For example: Kai is Muslim who accept evolution as fact.

Zombie accept evolution and he's a Christian.

 

[ohhhla]

@ohhhla ...... Et.al

I have no intentions of indoctrinating anyone into my "religion" or belief system.......

Again.....

This thread was created for scientific discussion

No, it isn't.

Not if it was about Climate changes, I would took this seriously.