MGTOWrama : A FEMINIZM CONSEQUENCE

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

lol

because those things are a given ...

while compatibility is most important

why wouldn't an established person want someone who is also equally yoked at the very least? or at least close to it
 
Last edited:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086974 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

lol

because those things are given ...

while compatibility is most important

why wouldn't an established person want someone who is also equally yoked at the very least? or at least close to it

So after centuries of men being the provider and having to take care of women, women who claim to want an even playing field only want to date a man that make as much or more than them? Basically don't no woman wanna take car of a man. But equality tho right?

But men supposed to wife sluts and 7th babies mommas tho. And dont act like thats not the case with all thus slut shamming bs and excuses for single moms
 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086974 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

lol

because those things are a given ...

while compatibility is most important

why wouldn't an established person want someone who is also equally yoked at the very least? or at least close to it

Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086974 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

lol

because those things are a given ...

while compatibility is most important

why wouldn't an established person want someone who is also equally yoked at the very least? or at least close to it

This is why things dont work nowadays.

Nothing is GRANTED

nothing is GIVEN

WE DONT DESERVE TO HAVE IT ALL.

We are not supposed to GET IT ALL. WIN IT ALL.

We are so narcissistic and childish god dammit.

If you hear people talking about what they SHOULD HAVE, GE, BE with a blindfold you would think that you are talking to a bunch of SUPERMEN / SUPERWOMEN. Then you open your eyes and all you see is a bunch of HUMAN BEINGS with their flaws and imperfections.

 
LordZuko;c-10086867 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

Don't set yourself up like that. Those are character traits. Numerous studies and dating coaches have revealed that Black women in particular do not consider character or principles when considering a partner. First they consider his fashion, then anatomy then his sexual performance then his finances. But fashion sort of clues them in on fashion. If he spends money on high end clothes for himself it indicates his financial level, but also that he'll do the same for her.

shit this is far from the truth in my case.....wife got all this high priced shit an i wear $40 sneakers.

@blakfiya
 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086974 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

lol

because those things are a given ...

while compatibility is most important

why wouldn't an established person want someone who is also equally yoked at the very least? or at least close to it

but what is considered equal?

when women want someone equal that means making more money and taking care of her and she saving her money for herself.

women pop that mental stimulation stuff.....if he aint got money it dont matter.
 
Women are cornered by neo feminism. They have to woman up. The sex dolls are the GREAT EQUALIZER. Why ? Most women will discover that they have been chased for their puss and ass and nothing else. Women will discover that some men were very kind in spite of their attitude BECAUSE THEY WERE THE ONLY SEXUAL OPTIONS.

NOW THERE IS A SOLID SEX ALTERNATIVE FOR MEN. All the average and unattractive women who got 2000 simps in their pages will be left alone. The good looking women will get attention still, however they better be CIVIL AND DEVELOPP A SOCIABLE PERSONALITY if they dont want to be put aside.

They will have to go to the gym, stop getting fat after marriage if they dont want to be put aside. They will have to bring something else to the table. Because LOOKS AND PUSS is owned by the ever evolving android industry.

Will they adapt or keep on acting childish and weeping?

 
gorilla;c-10087000 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086974 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

lol

because those things are given ...

while compatibility is most important

why wouldn't an established person want someone who is also equally yoked at the very least? or at least close to it

So after centuries of men being the provider and having to take care of women, women who claim to want an even playing field only want to date a man that make as much or more than them? Basically don't no woman wanna take car of a man. But equality tho right?

But men supposed to wife sluts and 7th babies mommas tho. And dont act like thats not the case with all thus slut shamming bs and excuses for single moms

Date, fuck, marry who u want to...lol

There are women young and old who dont mind marrying and dating down

And the women who insist upon dating and marrying up and subscribe to traditional gender roles may not believe in feminism...that's their prerogative

But more times then not when given the opportunity men and women today marry and date someone of equal or similar yolk ...especially now that women have made big strides in the job force

I'll admit there is a such thing as a "conditional feminist." Women grow up equating a man taking care of them financially with romance and being swept off their feet. And that is what they feel entitled to. Does it make it right? No. It's an inconsistency that needs to be addressed

That said, this idea that for centuries women have just had to sit back and not do shit is bs bruh and just illustrates how womens work is usually devalued. Not to mention for most women, the luxury of being a housewife was never a reality. We had to work too...Yet we were paid less; hired last; fired first; high wage jobs were reserved for men; and denied any positions of authority. Then yes we had to come home where we were expected to be subservient to our husbands, clean, raise the children, care for the old, etc

This has been the story for blk women in america especially. From slavery to the present day. Especially considering blk men have had a harder time finding work or have been historically underemployed and underpaid. Women have had to step up to be the breadwinner. We were really the first women in america to demand equal rights
 
Last edited:
LEMZIMUS_RAMSEY;c-10087394 said:
Women are cornered by neo feminism. They have to woman up. The sex dolls are the GREAT EQUALIZER. Why ? Most women will discover that they have been chased for their puss and ass and nothing else. Women will discover that some men were very kind in spite of their attitude BECAUSE THEY WERE THE ONLY SEXUAL OPTIONS.

NOW THERE IS A SOLID SEX ALTERNATIVE FOR MEN. All the average and unattractive women who got 2000 simps in their pages will be left alone. The good looking women will get attention still, however they better be CIVIL AND DEVELOPP A SOCIABLE PERSONALITY if they dont want to be put aside.

They will have to go to the gym, stop getting fat after marriage if they dont want to be put aside. They will have to bring something else to the table. Because LOOKS AND PUSS is owned by the ever evolving android industry.

Will they adapt or keep on acting childish and weeping?

i call this white girling....but it dont work with black chicks.

some of these women are just to gotdamn aggressive then want to fall back.

they want to challenge you for head of the household, challenge you on decision making, fight you over how you drive, what groceries you bought and what socks t wear with your tie.... scream she wants to be equal, she wants to be heard,,,then get in the bed an want you to make her feel sexy be making the first move an being aggressive.

kinda shit?

always falling back into the gender role when convenient.
 
2stepz_ahead;c-10087399 said:
LEMZIMUS_RAMSEY;c-10087394 said:
Women are cornered by neo feminism. They have to woman up. The sex dolls are the GREAT EQUALIZER. Why ? Most women will discover that they have been chased for their puss and ass and nothing else. Women will discover that some men were very kind in spite of their attitude BECAUSE THEY WERE THE ONLY SEXUAL OPTIONS.

NOW THERE IS A SOLID SEX ALTERNATIVE FOR MEN. All the average and unattractive women who got 2000 simps in their pages will be left alone. The good looking women will get attention still, however they better be CIVIL AND DEVELOPP A SOCIABLE PERSONALITY if they dont want to be put aside.

They will have to go to the gym, stop getting fat after marriage if they dont want to be put aside. They will have to bring something else to the table. Because LOOKS AND PUSS is owned by the ever evolving android industry.

Will they adapt or keep on acting childish and weeping?

i call this white girling....but it dont work with black chicks.

some of these women are just to gotdamn aggressive then want to fall back.

they want to challenge you for head of the household, challenge you on decision making, fight you over how you drive, what groceries you bought and what socks t wear with your tie.... scream she wants to be equal, she wants to be heard,,,then get in the bed an want you to make her feel sexy be making the first move an being aggressive.

kinda shit?

always falling back into the gender role when convenient.

Still some men had to swallow it to get some pussy. MGTOW was the first sign of the chift, sex androids are puting the nail in the coffin.

A ton of women will be left aside and lose asset, money and attention.

This might get scary
 
2stepz_ahead;c-10087390 said:
LordZuko;c-10086867 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

Don't set yourself up like that. Those are character traits. Numerous studies and dating coaches have revealed that Black women in particular do not consider character or principles when considering a partner. First they consider his fashion, then anatomy then his sexual performance then his finances. But fashion sort of clues them in on fashion. If he spends money on high end clothes for himself it indicates his financial level, but also that he'll do the same for her.

shit this is far from the truth in my case.....wife got all this high priced shit an i wear $40 sneakers.

@blakfiya

LOL SMH but who's fault is that at the bolded, if u really the leader in ur house as a man is allegedly supposed to be?

lemme find out it's really ur wife who makes all the money in ur house......that would make sense that u would be nothing more than just a dependent on her taxes

or are u just admitting to us all that u just a simp of the highest degree? grow some balls and man up my nigga, don't let wifey play u like that :joy:
 
blakfyahking;c-10087417 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10087390 said:
LordZuko;c-10086867 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

Don't set yourself up like that. Those are character traits. Numerous studies and dating coaches have revealed that Black women in particular do not consider character or principles when considering a partner. First they consider his fashion, then anatomy then his sexual performance then his finances. But fashion sort of clues them in on fashion. If he spends money on high end clothes for himself it indicates his financial level, but also that he'll do the same for her.

shit this is far from the truth in my case.....wife got all this high priced shit an i wear $40 sneakers.

@blakfiya

LOL SMH but who's fault is that at the bolded, if u really the leader in ur house as a man is allegedly supposed to be?

lemme find out it's really ur wife who makes all the money in ur house......that would make sense that u would be nothing more than just a dependent on her taxes

or are u just admitting to us all that u just a simp of the highest degree? grow some balls and man up my nigga, don't let wifey play u like that :joy:

she secured her position by holding me down. so shoes and shit dont mean nothing to me..its when it mattered that she stood tall next to me that matters. if that whats she asks for ....she deserves it.

you need to man up an give a nigga credit. you still want to try to prove i aint got what i say even tho its been proven for years. you the only nigga focused on that.

gotta let it go bruh.

an what man would not give his wife the world if he could?

you bitter for nothing
 
Last edited:
LEMZIMUS_RAMSEY;c-10087415 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10087399 said:
LEMZIMUS_RAMSEY;c-10087394 said:
Women are cornered by neo feminism. They have to woman up. The sex dolls are the GREAT EQUALIZER. Why ? Most women will discover that they have been chased for their puss and ass and nothing else. Women will discover that some men were very kind in spite of their attitude BECAUSE THEY WERE THE ONLY SEXUAL OPTIONS.

NOW THERE IS A SOLID SEX ALTERNATIVE FOR MEN. All the average and unattractive women who got 2000 simps in their pages will be left alone. The good looking women will get attention still, however they better be CIVIL AND DEVELOPP A SOCIABLE PERSONALITY if they dont want to be put aside.

They will have to go to the gym, stop getting fat after marriage if they dont want to be put aside. They will have to bring something else to the table. Because LOOKS AND PUSS is owned by the ever evolving android industry.

Will they adapt or keep on acting childish and weeping?

i call this white girling....but it dont work with black chicks.

some of these women are just to gotdamn aggressive then want to fall back.

they want to challenge you for head of the household, challenge you on decision making, fight you over how you drive, what groceries you bought and what socks t wear with your tie.... scream she wants to be equal, she wants to be heard,,,then get in the bed an want you to make her feel sexy be making the first move an being aggressive.

kinda shit?

always falling back into the gender role when convenient.

Still some men had to swallow it to get some pussy. MGTOW was the first sign of the chift, sex androids are puting the nail in the coffin.

A ton of women will be left aside and lose asset, money and attention.

This might get scary

its already scary for them. thats why they mad and lashing out.
 
Mgtow is scary for women simply because women depend on wealth transfer from men to get by.

Alimony

Child support

Prostitution

Strip clubs

Tindr

IG

Web cam models

All these are mediums that women use to get money from men.

If men make it popular to have an AI sexbot as a companion then the amount of broke bitches will skyrocket.

There will still be females getting paid on all these mediums but they will have to be bad.
 
LordZuko;c-10087494 said:
Mgtow is scary for women simply because women depend on wealth transfer from men to get by.

Alimony

Child support

Prostitution

Strip clubs

Tindr

IG

Web cam models

All these are mediums that women use to get money from men.

If men make it popular to have an AI sexbot as a companion then the amount of broke bitches will skyrocket.

There will still be females getting paid on all these mediums but they will have to be bad.

than they will try to call dudes out on their manhood. cant handle a real woman so you get a bitch that will put up with your shit to fukk. you fukking toys.

but they forget....vibrators and that bedroom candy shit sold high amounts. an who are at sextoy parties more than woman? got bitches buying shit in front of they man saying its for us...unless the nigga gay it aint for them..its for her. but watch when this sexbot shit come out...watch how women act if a nigga try to buy it in front of his lady.

man i can wait to see this shit.
 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10087395 said:
gorilla;c-10087000 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086974 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

lol

because those things are given ...

while compatibility is most important

why wouldn't an established person want someone who is also equally yoked at the very least? or at least close to it

So after centuries of men being the provider and having to take care of women, women who claim to want an even playing field only want to date a man that make as much or more than them? Basically don't no woman wanna take car of a man. But equality tho right?

But men supposed to wife sluts and 7th babies mommas tho. And dont act like thats not the case with all thus slut shamming bs and excuses for single moms

Date, fuck, marry who u want to...lol

There are women young and old who dont mind marrying and dating down

And the women who insist upon dating and marrying up and subscribe to traditional gender roles may not believe in feminism...that's their prerogative

But more times then not when given the opportunity men and women today marry and date someone of equal or similar yolk ...especially now that women have made big strides in the job force

I'll admit there is a such thing as a "conditional feminist." Women grow up equating a man taking care of them financially with romance and being swept off their feet. And that is what they feel entitled to. Does it make it right? No. It's an inconsistency that needs to be addressed

That said, this idea that for centuries women have just had to sit back and not do shit is bs bruh and just illustrates how womens work is usually devalued. Not to mention for most women, the luxury of being a housewife was never a reality. We had to work too...Yet we were paid less; hired last; fired first; high wage jobs were reserved for men; and denied any positions of authority. Then yes we had to come home where we were expected to be subservient to our husbands, clean, raise the children, care for the old, etc

This has been the story for blk women in america especially. From slavery to the present day. Especially considering blk men have had a harder time finding work or have been historically underemployed and underpaid. Women have had to step up to be the breadwinner. We were really the first women in america to demand equal rights

You know exactly what I meant by that don't even try it. You been in here talking about women marrying down like it's an epidemic when historically men married women who either didn't even have a job or earned less yet it wasn't called "marrying down". See that's what I mean. Women get a little this and that and hop on the tallest horse they can find. You get a degree so you only checking for dudes with PhD's. You make six figures so you only checking for millionaires. The average man out here don't give a fuck about a woman degrees or salary as much as they do her character.

Far as devaluing "womens work" , thank the feminist movement you so passionately align yourself with. It was they who saw raising children as demeaning. It was they who saw taking care of the family home so as to fulfill the role of help mate to a hard working husband as boring and unfulfilling. That's what devalued the contributions of women historically. Women rejecting the very things that were so important to a thriving society. Now look at us. Our children suffer from attention whore mothers who'd rather be half naked on the gram than cook them a good meal and help with homework.

 


gorilla;c-10087510 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10087395 said:
gorilla;c-10087000 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086974 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

lol

because those things are given ...

while compatibility is most important

why wouldn't an established person want someone who is also equally yoked at the very least? or at least close to it

So after centuries of men being the provider and having to take care of women, women who claim to want an even playing field only want to date a man that make as much or more than them? Basically don't no woman wanna take car of a man. But equality tho right?

But men supposed to wife sluts and 7th babies mommas tho. And dont act like thats not the case with all thus slut shamming bs and excuses for single moms

Date, fuck, marry who u want to...lol

There are women young and old who dont mind marrying and dating down

And the women who insist upon dating and marrying up and subscribe to traditional gender roles may not believe in feminism...that's their prerogative

But more times then not when given the opportunity men and women today marry and date someone of equal or similar yolk ...especially now that women have made big strides in the job force

I'll admit there is a such thing as a "conditional feminist." Women grow up equating a man taking care of them financially with romance and being swept off their feet. And that is what they feel entitled to. Does it make it right? No. It's an inconsistency that needs to be addressed

That said, this idea that for centuries women have just had to sit back and not do shit is bs bruh and just illustrates how womens work is usually devalued. Not to mention for most women, the luxury of being a housewife was never a reality. We had to work too...Yet we were paid less; hired last; fired first; high wage jobs were reserved for men; and denied any positions of authority. Then yes we had to come home where we were expected to be subservient to our husbands, clean, raise the children, care for the old, etc

This has been the story for blk women in america especially. From slavery to the present day. Especially considering blk men have had a harder time finding work or have been historically underemployed and underpaid. Women have had to step up to be the breadwinner. We were really the first women in america to demand equal rights

You know exactly what I meant by that don't even try it. You been in here talking about women marrying down like it's an epidemic when historically men married women who either didn't even have a job or earned less yet it wasn't called "marrying down". See that's what I mean. Women get a little this and that and hop on the tallest horse they can find. You get a degree so you only checking for dudes with PhD's. You make six figures so you only checking for millionaires. The average man out here don't give a fuck about a woman degrees or salary as much as they do her character.

Far as devaluing "womens work" , thank the feminist movement you so passionately align yourself with. It was they who saw raising children as demeaning. It was they who saw taking care of the family home so as to fulfill the role of help mate to a hard working husband as boring and unfulfilling. That's what devalued the contributions of women historically. Women rejecting the very things that were so important to a thriving society. Now look at us. Our children suffer from attention whore mothers who'd rather be half naked on the gram than cook them a good meal and help with homework.

giphy.gif


giphy.gif


giphy.gif


end the thread for goodness sake
 
Last edited:
2stepz_ahead;c-10087436 said:
blakfyahking;c-10087417 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10087390 said:
LordZuko;c-10086867 said:
deadeye;c-10086860 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-10086254 said:
2stepz_ahead;c-10086208 said:
why do you keep saying this?

change aint a bad thing as long as its benefiting you.

these chicks going to college an shit just want options.

if i find a man great..i can fall back an dont have to use my degree and can have him pay for the loan

or

if i dont find a man, great..i can sleep around and be free and young an have simps pay for my loan

but if they can find a man...then its because its not men that meet their standards or just not enough of them.

nah thats crap....maybe its because these women dont hold themselves like women but more like objects that can be manipulated with a dream thats sold.

how many women be on that..."i aint got time for a man" when they building or getting money or enjoying life? yet want to be apart of someone whos established.

nah lady...its a fly in your soup.

Fact is for many single women under 30 with no children they will have a hard time meeting a male counterpart their age whose earning ability meets or exceeds their own

For college educated blk women who want a college educated blk man the dating pool is even smaller



Will women have to adjust there standards yes. But this idea that taking a persons financial situation into consideration is objectifying or should discouraged is bunk

The bolded is part of the problem

You keep mentioning earning ability and level of education.......but nothing at all about compatibility and/or how well the man treats/respects you.

Don't set yourself up like that. Those are character traits. Numerous studies and dating coaches have revealed that Black women in particular do not consider character or principles when considering a partner. First they consider his fashion, then anatomy then his sexual performance then his finances. But fashion sort of clues them in on fashion. If he spends money on high end clothes for himself it indicates his financial level, but also that he'll do the same for her.

shit this is far from the truth in my case.....wife got all this high priced shit an i wear $40 sneakers.

@blakfiya

LOL SMH but who's fault is that at the bolded, if u really the leader in ur house as a man is allegedly supposed to be?

lemme find out it's really ur wife who makes all the money in ur house......that would make sense that u would be nothing more than just a dependent on her taxes

or are u just admitting to us all that u just a simp of the highest degree? grow some balls and man up my nigga, don't let wifey play u like that :joy:

she secured her position by holding me down. so shoes and shit dont mean nothing to me..its when it mattered that she stood tall next to me that matters. if that whats she asks for ....she deserves it.

you need to man up an give a nigga credit. you still want to try to prove i aint got what i say even tho its been proven for years. you the only nigga focused on that.

gotta let it go bruh.



an what man would not give his wife the world if he could?



you bitter for nothing

@ the bold...look at the name of the group in the thread title...
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
1,235
Views
56
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…