Marriage: Is Marriage For White People?

[BEAM]

Today feminist indoctrination has created a "MAN" that is honor less, duty less, responsibility fleeing coward. A weak willed, un-masculine, borderline androgynous, sensitive like 80 year old teeth semi-man that is stuck in his adolescence.

Yo, how old are you? Because all this anger seems to be coming from a typical, generational gap. Older niggas can't wait to say some sly shit about younger people, it's always been that way..

The women fear responsiblity just as much if not more than the "men" hence the high as fuck abortion rate, more women are sluts. Today they don't respect themselves they don't carry themselves like ladies. In many respects they act just like the "men". In 2014 a woman will actually start a physical fight with a man.

Really? You're one of those pro-life asshole? Yeah, that actually explains a lot.

Just because sex can result in conception, doesn't mean that a person ( or pair ) is obligated to potentially inconvenience their entire life in order to honor your warped ideas about conception anywhere life begins. Niggas over here taking pride in adhering to consequences that are avoidable, gtfoh.

Sex for pleasure is a thing now, and accidents happen even when precautions are in place. But to when principality conflicts with practicality, I'm sorry practicality wins..

 

[Shizlansky]

If you with someone long enough you don't have to sign papers.

You're married.

No difference.

What kind of....?

Common law

 

[ohhhla]

Oh god. It's a tradcon vs a mangina. Both sides are toxic but I agree with the tradcon slightly.

 

[zombie]

Today feminist indoctrination has created a "MAN" that is honor less, duty less, responsibility fleeing coward. A weak willed, un-masculine, borderline androgynous, sensitive like 80 year old teeth semi-man that is stuck in his adolescence.

Yo, how old are you? Because all this anger seems to be coming from a typical, generational gap. Older niggas can't wait to say some sly shit about younger people, it's always been that way..

The women fear responsiblity just as much if not more than the "men" hence the high as fuck abortion rate, more women are sluts. Today they don't respect themselves they don't carry themselves like ladies. In many respects they act just like the "men". In 2014 a woman will actually start a physical fight with a man.

Really? You're one of those pro-life asshole? Yeah, that actually explains a lot.

Just because sex can result in conception, doesn't mean that a person ( or pair ) is obligated to potentially inconvenience their entire life in order to honor your warped ideas about conception anywhere life begins. Niggas over here taking pride in adhering to consequences that are avoidable, gtfoh.

Sex for pleasure is a thing now, and accidents happen even when precautions are in place. But to when principality conflicts with practicality, I'm sorry practicality wins..

I am not very old, only 32 but what i said also goes for my generation only to a lesser extent because as time goes one the new generations have only gotten more bitch made.

I am against abortion but for many different reasons, morally i think it's wrong but legally i think it should be allowed however since the laws surrounding abortion and child support are abusive and anti-male i think they should be revised. the rest on your post is just your own uninformed opinion about what i think

 

[ohhhla]

zombie, aren't you married?

 

[StillFaggyAF]

So now society limits men lmaooooo

Yo off top, are you man or a woman? Serious question, I can never tell..

And yes, while men may have always had more workplace trajectory / social liberty, we've also been expected to suppress many, many aspects of our potential to fit the definition of what "men" are to Western society.

I'm not understanding why this is so incomprehensible to supposedly grown, dynamic, thinking adults..

I shoukd be askibg yiu if your a woman honestly. All your posts reek of fatherlessness and bitchassness its hilarious

 

[BEAM]

I disagree. I was just talking to my 13 year old Sun about this yesterday. It's nothing wrong with young boys being told not cry. There are other ways to display and deal with emotion. More importantly the question has to be asked, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU CRYING FOR? If, there is no logical answer such as extreme emotional distress, i.e. death, or extreme pain then crying isn't an acceptable response. Our boys need to be encouraged to think logically and then illicit the appropriate emotional or physical response.

I'm sorry, but the bolded is a stupid question / line of thinking.

Throwing a tantrum is one thing, but crying simply to release stress / emotion ( hopefully segueing into a constructive conversation to help bolster maturity and understanding ) is something else.

Emotion isn't logical, but that doesn't make it useless. We are not robots, and there are still may things about our emotions we have yet to understand. Being logically and emotionally mature aren't mutually exclusive. Holding in all that shit has been proven to take toll on the body.

I am not contradicting myself i said the over sensitive men were not the ideal and that being like that was shunned. all things have levels

you just want to hold on to the lie that you have chosen for whatever reason that men never showed emotions, and that feminist values freed them from that and i am not being emotional i am just expressing the reality

Of course oversensitivity is disruptive, I've never suggested otherwise. But more times than not, sensitivity is considered to be synonymous with the former, indoctrinating men into this cold, shallow existence rooted in systems and task completion, like machines.

And bruh, why you tryna blame everything on feminism? How is accessing deeper human faculties previously suppressed by limiting societal models / roles is "feminist?"

 

[BEAM]

I shoukd be askibg yiu if your a woman honestly. All your posts reek of fatherlessness and bitchassness its hilarious

Qualify that statement; Because all I've ever seen you do is name call.

 

[ohhhla]

I agree with that. Feminism isn't to blame. Women are naturally seeking for protection and why wouldn't they?

 

[zombie]

If a woman can go out and fuck 10 men in one week and get an abortion it's not just sex for pleasure it's a sign of a deep mental sickness. I know women who have had so many abortions that they have to get surgery just so they can have children in the future.

and these are some of the same women when they do choose to actually keep a child end up raising little monsters in our community, the social effect of ok-ing men and especially women to be sluts are real.

 

[Shizlansky]

Is there a study in Which it shows the rise of women in the workforce and decline of marriage?

 

[BEAM]

If a woman can go out and fuck 10 men in one week and get an abortion it's not just sex for pleasure it's a sign of a deep mental sickness. I know women who have had so many abortions that they have to get surgery just so they can have children in the future.

Why are you resorting to such extreme ( perceivably, albeit personal ) examples to make your case tho?

I know women who have been with their s/o for years, accidentally get pregnant, and get a abortion because the two simply aren't ready for a child. So this shit isn't some black and white, "my way is the right way" issue. It's cool to have principles, but people and their individual lives are more important..

and these are some of the same women when they do choose to actually keep a child end up raising little monsters in our community, the social effect of ok-ing men and especially women to be sluts are real.

Rampant promiscuity is an issue, true. But as I've told you before, sexual liberty isn't linked to character, or one's ability to raise a child.

 

[Kwan Dai]

I disagree. I was just talking to my 13 year old Sun about this yesterday. It's nothing wrong with young boys being told not cry. There are other ways to display and deal with emotion. More importantly the question has to be asked, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU CRYING FOR? If, there is no logical answer such as extreme emotional distress, i.e. death, or extreme pain then crying isn't an acceptable response. Our boys need to be encouraged to think logically and then illicit the appropriate emotional or physical response.

I'm sorry, but the bolded is a stupid question / line of thinking.

Throwing a tantrum is one thing, but crying simply to release stress / emotion ( hopefully segueing into a constructive conversation to help bolster maturity and understand ) is something else.

Emotion isn't logical, but that doesn't make it useless. We are not robots, and there are still may things about our emotions we have yet to understand. Being logically and emotionally mature aren't mutually exclusive. Holding in all that shit has been proven to take toll on the body.[/b]

I am not contradicting myself i said the over sensitive men were not the ideal and that being like that was shunned. all things have levels

you just want to hold on to the lie that you have chosen for whatever reason that men never showed emotions, and that feminist values freed them from that and i am not being emotional i am just expressing the reality

Of course oversensitivity is disruptive, I've never suggested otherwise. But more times than not, sensitivity is considered to be synonymous with the former, indoctrinating men into this cold, shallow existence rooted in systems and task completion, like machines.

And bruh, why you tryna blame everything on feminism? How is accessing deeper human faculties previously suppressed by limiting societal models / roles is "feminist?"

LMAO!!! You are seriously suggesting men use crying for stress relief? That's some bitch shit family. There are literally thousands of ways men can relieve stress. Crying not being one of them.

There are things about YOUR emotions that you have yet to understand. Men should pride themselves on control. When it's the proper time to illicit the proper emotion, we should. To use crying as a stress reliever is indeed useless. This is robotic behavior. We should be more creative and open to using other methods to reduce stress and deal with life's challenges.

 

[zombie]

I disagree. I was just talking to my 13 year old Sun about this yesterday. It's nothing wrong with young boys being told not cry. There are other ways to display and deal with emotion. More importantly the question has to be asked, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU CRYING FOR? If, there is no logical answer such as extreme emotional distress, i.e. death, or extreme pain then crying isn't an acceptable response. Our boys need to be encouraged to think logically and then illicit the appropriate emotional or physical response.

I'm sorry, but the bolded is a stupid question / line of thinking.

Throwing a tantrum is one thing, but crying simply to release stress / emotion ( hopefully segueing into a constructive conversation to help bolster maturity and understanding ) is something else.

Emotion isn't logical, but that doesn't make it useless. We are not robots, and there are still may things about our emotions we have yet to understand. Being logically and emotionally mature aren't mutually exclusive. Holding in all that shit has been proven to take toll on the body.

I am not contradicting myself i said the over sensitive men were not the ideal and that being like that was shunned. all things have levels

you just want to hold on to the lie that you have chosen for whatever reason that men never showed emotions, and that feminist values freed them from that and i am not being emotional i am just expressing the reality

Of course oversensitivity is disruptive, I've never suggested otherwise. But more times than not, sensitivity is considered to be synonymous with the former, indoctrinating men into this cold, shallow existence rooted in systems and task completion, like machines.

And bruh, why you tryna blame everything on feminism? How is accessing deeper human faculties previously suppressed by limiting societal models / roles is "feminist?"

I am not blaming everything on feminism a lot of this bullshit is human weakness but feminism seems to support and bolster these weaknesses. AnD let me say for the 4th time i don't believe men 50 years ago did not access their feelings we have always had emotions we just expressed them like men and we did not cry over ever little thing.

what proof do you have that men of the past did not show emotions??? because i can look at the art and cultural expressions of 70 years ago and find men writing love songs,sad songs and happy songs. i can look at the Literature of the time period and find the same things.

 

[BEAM]

Is there a study in Which it shows the rise of women in the workforce and decline of marriage?

A rise in adultery, yes.

Mainly because married male adultery has always linked to such a simple thing as leaving the house, when women have always been at home, traditionally. Now that women are leaving to work as well, and consequently cheating in rising numbers, we're coming to different conclusions.

 

[Kwan Dai]

If a woman can go out and fuck 10 men in one week and get an abortion it's not just sex for pleasure it's a sign of a deep mental sickness. I know women who have had so many abortions that they have to get surgery just so they can have children in the future.

Why are you resorting to such extreme ( perceivably, albeit personal ) examples to make your case tho?

I know women who have been with their s/o for years, accidentally get pregnant, and get a abortion because the two simply aren't ready for a child. So this shit isn't some black and white, "my way is the right way" issue. It's cool to have principles, but people and their individual lives are more important..

and these are some of the same women when they do choose to actually keep a child end up raising little monsters in our community, the social effect of ok-ing men and especially women to be sluts are real.

Rampant promiscuity is an issue, true. But as I've told you before, sexual liberty isn't linked to character, or one's ability to raise a child.

Your opinion right?

 

[Kwan Dai]

I disagree. I was just talking to my 13 year old Sun about this yesterday. It's nothing wrong with young boys being told not cry. There are other ways to display and deal with emotion. More importantly the question has to be asked, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU CRYING FOR? If, there is no logical answer such as extreme emotional distress, i.e. death, or extreme pain then crying isn't an acceptable response. Our boys need to be encouraged to think logically and then illicit the appropriate emotional or physical response.

I'm sorry, but the bolded is a stupid question / line of thinking.

Throwing a tantrum is one thing, but crying simply to release stress / emotion ( hopefully segueing into a constructive conversation to help bolster maturity and understanding ) is something else.

Emotion isn't logical, but that doesn't make it useless. We are not robots, and there are still may things about our emotions we have yet to understand. Being logically and emotionally mature aren't mutually exclusive. Holding in all that shit has been proven to take toll on the body.

I am not contradicting myself i said the over sensitive men were not the ideal and that being like that was shunned. all things have levels

you just want to hold on to the lie that you have chosen for whatever reason that men never showed emotions, and that feminist values freed them from that and i am not being emotional i am just expressing the reality

Of course oversensitivity is disruptive, I've never suggested otherwise. But more times than not, sensitivity is considered to be synonymous with the former, indoctrinating men into this cold, shallow existence rooted in systems and task completion, like machines.

And bruh, why you tryna blame everything on feminism? How is accessing deeper human faculties previously suppressed by limiting societal models / roles is "feminist?"

I am not blaming everything on feminism a lot of this bullshit is human weakness but feminism seems to support and bolster these weaknesses. AnD let me say for the 4th time i don't believe men 50 years ago did not access their feelings we have always had emotions we just expressed them like men and we did not cry over ever little thing.

what proof do you have that men of the past did not show emotions??? because i can look at the art and cultural expressions of 70 years ago and find men writing love songs,sad songs and happy songs. i can look at the Literature of the time period and find the same things.

 

[zombie]

If a woman can go out and fuck 10 men in one week and get an abortion it's not just sex for pleasure it's a sign of a deep mental sickness. I know women who have had so many abortions that they have to get surgery just so they can have children in the future.

Why are you resorting to such extreme ( perceivably, albeit personal ) examples to make your case tho?

I know women who have been with their s/o for years, accidentally get pregnant, and get a abortion because the two simply aren't ready for a child. So this shit isn't some black and white, "my way is the right way" issue. It's cool to have principles, but people and their individual lives are more important..

and these are some of the same women when they do choose to actually keep a child end up raising little monsters in our community, the social effect of ok-ing men and especially women to be sluts are real.

Rampant promiscuity is an issue, true. But as I've told you before, sexual liberty isn't linked to character, or one's ability to raise a child.

The sad thing is my example was not extreme i said 10 not 100, there are many many women fucking anywhere from 4-10 different men in one week. hell even one month should be considered too much. You are right abortion should not be seen as a black or white issue but you best believe there is a whole lot more black than white then you want to believe. SOME women will have slip ups but if you are having an abortion once a year that would suggest something is wrong with you.

sexual liberty is linked to character because what you do with your body is an expression of who you are at the deepest core. especially since SEX can be dangerous

 

[Copper]

marriage rates decline but you negroes do love your illegitimate kids

 

[Focal Point]

No, marriage isn't for Whites. The issue is, Blacks need to define marriage for ourselves. Once again Blacks have adopted the oppressors version and ideas of marriage.

Intriguing point