Django Unchained 2012

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
this post is useless unless someone inbox me a link of the movie so i can give a valid and unbias opinion. please.

dont make no sense that ive watched lincoln, cloud atlas, and prometheus, clear as a hd 4d online, but django cant get a run.
 
almighty breeze;5311879 said:
Django was incredibly offensive, insensitive and outrageous......and I loved every minute. Loved the near totality of the slave experience captured. Brough up more aspects than "whipping" & "runaways." You could dig up an Aubrey Skinned House slave and he wouldnt be as much a coon as Samuel Jackson was.

"Nigger" wasnt used ENOUGH. More slaves should have been whipped. More families destroyed. More mental destruction and taught mistrust. Show everything or not at all. You're Tarantino if anyones going overboard & getting a pass for it it's you. Dont get mushy on me Quentin.

These kind of comments are always so striking to me. Why does he get a pass? Like seriously, in his coke-hazed way, I'm certain he's laughing all the way to the bank. Tarantino makes decent films but he is a cultural tourist of the worse kind and I wouldn't spend a single red penny on a self indulgent movie like Django. He is a one trick pony who thinks stomach churning violence likens him to Billy Wilder and Alfred Hitchcock which he has actually fixed his lips to say, and sweetheart you are certainly no Alfred Hitchcock. He's not even (hardly) Steven Spielberg. I just cannot begin to fathom how many black people can sit and enjoy a movie about slavery that has garnered virtually universal acclaim from white folks. That should be unsettling to people on its face. He knows very well which audiences he can offend and who is the least likely to even realize they're being insulted.

 
obnoxiouslyfresh;5316988 said:
almighty breeze;5311879 said:
Django was incredibly offensive, insensitive and outrageous......and I loved every minute. Loved the near totality of the slave experience captured. Brough up more aspects than "whipping" & "runaways." You could dig up an Aubrey Skinned House slave and he wouldnt be as much a coon as Samuel Jackson was.

"Nigger" wasnt used ENOUGH. More slaves should have been whipped. More families destroyed. More mental destruction and taught mistrust. Show everything or not at all. You're Tarantino if anyones going overboard & getting a pass for it it's you. Dont get mushy on me Quentin.

I just cannot begin to fathom how many black people can sit and enjoy a movie about slavery that has garnered virtually universal acclaim from white folks. That should be unsettling to people on its face.

the nerve of these niggas....
 
KingJamal;5316762 said:
Yall still talkin bout this

Yeah we are the movie just came out last week and making good money at the boxoffice and up for major awards. Would you rather us talk about some shitty Martin Lawrence movie? Oh wait he doesn't have a movie nor a shitty one out and hasn't for a while.

 
[Trillmatic];5310849 said:
Why is everyone's ass so hurt by this movie?

The setting is pre-civil war. Black black americans aka regular black were property back then.

This movie reflects that.

fixed Annnnnd cosigned
 
Movie was cool. Got a lot of thoughts:

-Its eye-opening how people are COMPLETELY putting it past Tarrantino having even a little racism in him. Like it's not even possible. Yes the N-word was used in those times so its legit to a point, but after a while the word was being used in the movie COMEDICALLY, by white people and for white people.

-Sam Jackson was hilarious. Exagerated, but still accurate

-Jamie's acting was just OK. A better actor would have got Best Actor nominations.

-The Schultz guy basically played the EXACT same role he did in Inglorius. Takes away from the movie.

-The shooting toward the end was cartoonish

 
AYE..

BACK IN SLAVERY DAYS.. DID THEY REALLY HAVE NIGGAZ FIGHTING EACH OTHER LIKE THAT?

IVE NEVER HEARD OF THIS UNTIL I SAW THE MOVIE
 
A movie based on real events, Twelve Years a Slave, is beng made by a black director and will drop later this year. The story itself looks way better than Django, and it will probably sweep next year's award season. I'm pluggin it b/c it's just weird people are championing and awarding a Slave Comedy

Twelve Years a Slave is a memoir of a black man who was born free in New York state but kidnapped, sold into slavery and kept in bondage for 12 years in Louisiana before the American Civil War. He provided details of slave markets in Washington, DC, as well as describing at length cotton cultivation on major plantations in Louisiana.

Published soon after Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel, Uncle Tom's Cabin, Northup's book sold 30,000 copies and was considered a bestseller.[1] It went through several editions in the nineteenth century.

Twelve Years a Slave (2013) Drama |

A man living in New York during the mid-1800s is kidnapped and sold into slavery in the deep south.

Director: Steve McQueen

Stars: Brad Pitt, Michael Fassbender, Chiwetel Ojiofor, Paul Giamatti, Benedict Cumberbatch, Micheal K. Williams
 
Last edited:
Ok now its official: A situation isnt truely a sign of the times and low-key racism until you have blacks going out of their way AGAINST other blacks...FOR a white man!

You had it with people defending Eminem back in the day

You had Mr. Fab defending Kreayshawn (still smh)

You had Nas threatening to 'slap the shyt outta somebody' for precious Gwenyth Paltrow Lol

Now you have Antoine Fuqua and others telling Spike Lee to chill w/ his view of this movie Lol smh

Wake Upppppppppp! *School Daze voice*
 
Last edited:
DROSODAMFUNNY;5318665 said:
AYE..

BACK IN SLAVERY DAYS.. DID THEY REALLY HAVE NIGGAZ FIGHTING EACH OTHER LIKE THAT?

IVE NEVER HEARD OF THIS UNTIL I SAW THE MOVIE

yes , even after slavery. they'd have these underground bare boxing matches, where niggaz would fight till death or near death. and they'd gamble on em.

this was big in metropolitan areas .

and it's also symbolic to how whites enjoy and love putting niggaz against one another.
 
Last edited:
8aw$3Man3;5318876 said:
DROSODAMFUNNY;5318665 said:
AYE..

BACK IN SLAVERY DAYS.. DID THEY REALLY HAVE NIGGAZ FIGHTING EACH OTHER LIKE THAT?

IVE NEVER HEARD OF THIS UNTIL I SAW THE MOVIE

yes , even after slavery. they'd have these underground bare boxing matches, where niggaz would fight till death or near death. and they'd gamble on em.

this was big in metropolitan areas .

and it's also symbolic to how whites enjoy and love putting niggaz against one another.

THATS CRAZY CAUSE THAT SIDE OF SLAVERY HAD NEVER BEEN TALKED ABOUT..OR ATLEAST TO MY KNOWLEDGE
 
Ms Southern;5318962 said:
Saw it this week ....liked the movie

I'm curious: As a causcasian, how did you feel about the slavery in the movie? Did you view it as a depiction of real historical events and perhaps it 'enlightened' you, or did the way it was portrayed make it seem like any other violent movie?

 
obnoxiouslyfresh;5316988 said:
almighty breeze;5311879 said:
Django was incredibly offensive, insensitive and outrageous......and I loved every minute. Loved the near totality of the slave experience captured. Brough up more aspects than "whipping" & "runaways." You could dig up an Aubrey Skinned House slave and he wouldnt be as much a coon as Samuel Jackson was.

"Nigger" wasnt used ENOUGH. More slaves should have been whipped. More families destroyed. More mental destruction and taught mistrust. Show everything or not at all. You're Tarantino if anyones going overboard & getting a pass for it it's you. Dont get mushy on me Quentin.

These kind of comments are always so striking to me. Why does he get a pass? Like seriously, in his coke-hazed way, I'm certain he's laughing all the way to the bank. Tarantino makes decent films but he is a cultural tourist of the worse kind and I wouldn't spend a single red penny on a self indulgent movie like Django. He is a one trick pony who thinks stomach churning violence likens him to Billy Wilder and Alfred Hitchcock which he has actually fixed his lips to say, and sweetheart you are certainly no Alfred Hitchcock. He's not even (hardly) Steven Spielberg. I just cannot begin to fathom how many black people can sit and enjoy a movie about slavery that has garnered virtually universal acclaim from white folks. That should be unsettling to people on its face. He knows very well which audiences he can offend and who is the least likely to even realize they're being insulted.

That's happened before though. Roots got universal acclaim and still does...Denzel's performance in Glory won him an Oscar and the scene where he gets whooped for leaving the camp is still said to be one of his best scenes in his career and to some one of the best in film history. The Color Purple as well...films with slavery/slaves as the topic or part of the story can garner universal acclaim simply based on the performance of the actors.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
677
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…