zzombie;c-9569870 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9569861 said:
zzombie;c-9569848 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9569826 said:
@zzombie I've given you the benefit of the doubt with some of the shit you've said in the past, but if you think there is any benefit to a Trump presidency, you're an idiot. This isn't the day after he got elected when he hadn't done anything and people could say "Let's give him a chance." The man has selected a cadre of people for high positions who we know will fuck shit up, and we know that because they've already been part of systems that have fucked shit up in the past or they've gone on the record saying things that we know will fuck shit up.
The status quo hasn't been great for black people, so it's fine to say that Hillary wouldn't have done anything for us, but to say that a guy who is basically enabling people who want specifically to hurt us and other groups will be better is just stupid.
Donald Trump being president is better for black people even when he hires people others have characterize as " fucking" other shit up. I only have a problem with one of the people he's enlisted..... and how do you know they will fuck shit up anyway???? They haven't taken office yet
Go look at the histories of the people he's putting in place.
His picks for secretary of finance and secretary of treasury have built their careers on hurting people. His pick for the head of the EPA has gone on record denouncing the EPA. And I don't mean the way it's currently run. He basically doesn't believe in what the EPA stands for. You don't have to wait for people like that to take office. You think they will get in there and pull a 180 on everything they've stood for or will they use their new power to do even more of what they've always done.
And you keep on saying Trump is better for black people. How? Give some examples of something Trump is going to do that will definitely be better for blacks.
You're being over dramatic.... and you have Mischaracterized the trump picke for epa... while I personally don't agree with his position it does make perfect sense. The man isn't against protecting the environment he's against using the EPA to block industry unnecessarily.
Like i said before it's not what trump will do it's what he most likely won't do that will benefit us.
lol Come on my dude. Mnuchin is the pick for Secretary of Treasury, and dude basically made his name running a foreclosure scam. On top of that he spent 17 years at Goldman Sachs during the time that they were basically contributing the to creation of the recession. People like you bashed the hell out of Hillary for her connections to Goldman Sachs and rightfully so. How the hell are you going to then turn around and think it's ok for Trump to pick people from that camp? Especially, when dude has a history of taking actions specifically to hurt poor and middle class people.
And the EPA pick is against regulations of industry for the purpose of environmental protection. If he's against that, he's against the EPA. His definition of "unnecessarily" is broad as hell.