Voters Are Beginning To Regret Voting For Adolf Cheeto

[zzombie]

i don't know why niggas bother arguing with Zombie

The nigga said social security is unsustainable, the very social security that is so well funded that the right can't keep borrowing from it to make up for cuts they've made in other areas

The same well funded social security system that the right salivating over because they want to take those trillions and play with them on the stock market, but it's unsustainable

You just gave reasons why ss should be phased out.... it has negative cash flows and by 2030http://www.heritage.org/research/re...-39-billion-deficit-in-2014-insolvent-by-2035

social security takes in more than it gives out thus leading to a 2 trillion dollar surplus

What are you talking about, you people on the right always making up shit to fit your narrative
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...e-lies-no-social-security-is-not-going-broke/

Fool that article doesn't deny ss is adding large numbers to the deficit..... the term broke is subjective less definitive language using words like that is how they fool people.

All that article really does is present other ways to solve the problem of ss.... solutions I don't think will work.

naw fool, the article is proven the point that ss will never go broke, even in a fucked up economy the worst it would do is pay out 77%, so stop the nonsense already

But I never said it was broke I said it was unsustainable.

 

[blackrain]

I'm happy as fuck trump beat Hillary.

Social Security needs to be phased out

taxes need be lowered

And ObamaCare needs to be reformed.

And the best thing about Trump becoming president is that it saves the Supreme Court from going left and May God willing turn it more to the right

You enjoy President Trump...see just how many of those promises he keeps

I don't want him to keep any promises I will be happy if trump just stops/slows down the leftist liberal agenda

Then you want Mike Pence not Trump because if it's left up to Pence we'll be back in the 1500's in no time

Another ridiculous liberal Mischaracterization of conservative socioeconomic perspectives.

You m************ will turn America into Cuba if given the chance

Pence thinks you can electrocute gayness out of people and hates abortion even if the mothers life is in danger. That's about as conservative as you can get

 

[zzombie]

You know how many people in government have connections to the big banks??? Just about all of them.... Therefore I suspect people would be using the same criticism no matter who he picked.

And I don't blame the people at Goldman Sachs for making money that's what they were supposed to do it's the government's fault for creating an environment in which things got out of hand. And stop being overdramatic it's not like one man intentionally caused the recession

And I disagree that the Pick for epa has a very Broad definition of "unnecessarily" when it comes to Environmental Protection.

This dude didn't just have connections with big banks. He was a lead official in a big bank and he was a person creating other banks with the specific intention of conning people out of their money. And sure Goldman Sachs is supposed to make money and the government is supposed to provide the regulations that keeps them from doing that at the undue expense of the citizens. How exactly will the government do that when the people in charge are loyal to the people they are supposed to regulate? You believe this dude is going to magically change his stripes and be a responsible government official that looks out for the people? That would be a very stupid thing to believe.

And stop exaggerating what I'm saying and then saying I'm overdramatic. Nowhere did I say or imply that one person caused the recession. I said that he was part of the system that caused the recession, and it's not like he was an unwitting or unwilling participant. He knew exactly what his company was doing and what he was doing. Again, the man set up banks for the sole purpose of running a foreclosure scam. He made a lot of money preying on citizens. In what world, is that a good pick.

And we can agree to disagree with the EPA guy. When he gets in office and starts stripping away all the regulations that keep these companies from poisoning everything around them, we'll see what you say then.

Look I just don't have a problem guess who Trump picked. What the man did while he ran Goldman Sachs he did because it was profitable if he runs his government agency with that same profitable mindset I think he will be a success and we will benefit..... I don't see the problem with having a pro-business government to be honest it was sounds great.

And he did not run a scam you are mischaracterizing what he did

 

[a.mann]

I think i kind of get it. There are people who think a President can like magically save them and do all kinds of fantastical things. They thought as soon as Trump gets elected, their life would automatically be better. Like the "what has Obama did for us" people really they are saying what has Obama did for me. Like the President is supposed to save them and hold their hand through life or something. Bizarre and unrealistic thinking, I know.

......................

 

[zzombie]

I'm happy as fuck trump beat Hillary.

Social Security needs to be phased out

taxes need be lowered

And ObamaCare needs to be reformed.

And the best thing about Trump becoming president is that it saves the Supreme Court from going left and May God willing turn it more to the right

You enjoy President Trump...see just how many of those promises he keeps

I don't want him to keep any promises I will be happy if trump just stops/slows down the leftist liberal agenda

Then you want Mike Pence not Trump because if it's left up to Pence we'll be back in the 1500's in no time

Another ridiculous liberal Mischaracterization of conservative socioeconomic perspectives.

You m************ will turn America into Cuba if given the chance

Pence thinks you can electrocute gayness out of people and hates abortion even if the mothers life is in danger. That's about as conservative as you can get

Okay so he's a little extreme. But abortion is evil and should be stopped in most cases plus it's possible that homosexuality is some kind of psychological aberration

 

[Ajackson17]

Man if we was this immerse in pan-African movement a lot of our problems would be solved.

 

[Stomp Johnson]

Trump and Pence are some real niggas

In every negative sense

 

[The Lonious Monk]

You know how many people in government have connections to the big banks??? Just about all of them.... Therefore I suspect people would be using the same criticism no matter who he picked.

And I don't blame the people at Goldman Sachs for making money that's what they were supposed to do it's the government's fault for creating an environment in which things got out of hand. And stop being overdramatic it's not like one man intentionally caused the recession

And I disagree that the Pick for epa has a very Broad definition of "unnecessarily" when it comes to Environmental Protection.

This dude didn't just have connections with big banks. He was a lead official in a big bank and he was a person creating other banks with the specific intention of conning people out of their money. And sure Goldman Sachs is supposed to make money and the government is supposed to provide the regulations that keeps them from doing that at the undue expense of the citizens. How exactly will the government do that when the people in charge are loyal to the people they are supposed to regulate? You believe this dude is going to magically change his stripes and be a responsible government official that looks out for the people? That would be a very stupid thing to believe.

And stop exaggerating what I'm saying and then saying I'm overdramatic. Nowhere did I say or imply that one person caused the recession. I said that he was part of the system that caused the recession, and it's not like he was an unwitting or unwilling participant. He knew exactly what his company was doing and what he was doing. Again, the man set up banks for the sole purpose of running a foreclosure scam. He made a lot of money preying on citizens. In what world, is that a good pick.

And we can agree to disagree with the EPA guy. When he gets in office and starts stripping away all the regulations that keep these companies from poisoning everything around them, we'll see what you say then.

Look I just don't have a problem guess who Trump picked. What the man did while he ran Goldman Sachs he did because it was profitable if he runs his government agency with that same profitable mindset I think he will be a success and we will benefit..... I don't see the problem with having a pro-business government to be honest it was sounds great.

And he did not run a scam you are mischaracterizing what he did

lol The bold is my whole fucking point. Goldman Sachs made money at the expense of the people. The company made money knowing it would hurt American citizens. Who the fuck wants that kind of mindset in the government. The whole purpose of the government is to serve the people. He can't possibly take the methodology he used in his previous roles into the government and help Americans. That line of thinking doesn't even make sense.

The thing you're not understanding is that no one has a problem with putting a pro-business guy into office. The problem is with putting these people who, based on their past, will only be interested in using their position to increase their profits or the profits of their cohorts.

 

[ms.jones]

It does reek of fraudy-ness when an investment firm as big as Goldman Sachs underwrites mortgages to borrowers with cruddy credit. Their daily job is to assess the risks involved in dealing with such individuals and companies; to willfully and purposefully allow said persons and companies to take on more than they can chew is a trap, a setup, a Boston.

 

[zzombie]

You know how many people in government have connections to the big banks??? Just about all of them.... Therefore I suspect people would be using the same criticism no matter who he picked.

And I don't blame the people at Goldman Sachs for making money that's what they were supposed to do it's the government's fault for creating an environment in which things got out of hand. And stop being overdramatic it's not like one man intentionally caused the recession

And I disagree that the Pick for epa has a very Broad definition of "unnecessarily" when it comes to Environmental Protection.

This dude didn't just have connections with big banks. He was a lead official in a big bank and he was a person creating other banks with the specific intention of conning people out of their money. And sure Goldman Sachs is supposed to make money and the government is supposed to provide the regulations that keeps them from doing that at the undue expense of the citizens. How exactly will the government do that when the people in charge are loyal to the people they are supposed to regulate? You believe this dude is going to magically change his stripes and be a responsible government official that looks out for the people? That would be a very stupid thing to believe.

And stop exaggerating what I'm saying and then saying I'm overdramatic. Nowhere did I say or imply that one person caused the recession. I said that he was part of the system that caused the recession, and it's not like he was an unwitting or unwilling participant. He knew exactly what his company was doing and what he was doing. Again, the man set up banks for the sole purpose of running a foreclosure scam. He made a lot of money preying on citizens. In what world, is that a good pick.

And we can agree to disagree with the EPA guy. When he gets in office and starts stripping away all the regulations that keep these companies from poisoning everything around them, we'll see what you say then.

Look I just don't have a problem guess who Trump picked. What the man did while he ran Goldman Sachs he did because it was profitable if he runs his government agency with that same profitable mindset I think he will be a success and we will benefit..... I don't see the problem with having a pro-business government to be honest it was sounds great.

And he did not run a scam you are mischaracterizing what he did

lol The bold is my whole fucking point. Goldman Sachs made money at the expense of the people. The company made money knowing it would hurt American citizens. Who the fuck wants that kind of mindset in the government. The whole purpose of the government is to serve the people. He can't possibly take the methodology he used in his previous roles into the government and help Americans. That line of thinking doesn't even make sense.

The thing you're not understanding is that no one has a problem with putting a pro-business guy into office. The problem is with putting these people who, based on their past, will only be interested in using their position to increase their profits or the profits of their cohorts.

I don't believe that I think that's you're over dramatic mischaracterization of what happened.

 

[zzombie]

People are afraid that some of the people Trump nominated will just get into office and use their position to benefit themselves well guess what what do you think all the other politicians have been doing???

 

[zzombie]

Man if we was this immerse in pan-African movement a lot of our problems would be solved.

We can't effectively mov toward pan-africanist perspectives if we have this attitude that the government has to provide us with everything or even anything..... which is exactly what leftism/ socialism indoctrinates us to believe.

 

[ms.jones]

People are afraid that some of the people Trump nominated will just get into office and use their position to benefit themselves well guess what what do you think all the other politicians have been doing???

It's not so much about how it will be beneficial to them now, it's how the crap will play out much further down the line. You can't keep with the 'Worry about it later' mindset that his cabinet picks seem to live by, and apply that to all of America. It's as plain as the nose on a face that the shit is disastrous, with long term implications that can never be corrected.

 

[The Lonious Monk]

I don't believe that I think that's you're over dramatic mischaracterization of what happened.

lol The shit is documented. You conservatives love denying reality. \
https://www.thenation.com/article/w...e-great-foreclosure-machine-go-to-washington/

What that meant for homeowners was they were rubble to be plowed so Mnuchin could profit. Borrowers got few options to modify loans, as OneWest dashed to foreclosure. The bank pursued all of the tricks of the era—servicer-driven defaults (where servicing companies tell homeowners they must miss payments to get help, and when they do, they move to foreclose), dual tracking (when servicers negotiate modifications and pursue foreclosures at the same time), and more. Activists ended up on this guy’s lawn demanding that the foreclosures stop.

 

[zzombie]

I don't believe that I think that's you're over dramatic mischaracterization of what happened.

lol The shit is documented. You conservatives love denying reality. \
https://www.thenation.com/article/w...e-great-foreclosure-machine-go-to-washington/

The dude basically created a bank for the sole purpose of giving out mortgage loans that they knew people couldn't payback. They wanted those people to foreclose so they could get all the late fees and penalties without worrying about any losses because the FDIC covered foreclosure losses up to 20%. That's why it was a scam. The intent of his bank was never to fulfill the typical role of a bank. It was solely to use the FDIC foreclosure default coverage to make money off of people's misfortune.

^^^^^ that's the fault of the government.... the profiteers only did the smart thing if the FDIC wouldn't have interfered then the opportunities to game the system wouldn't have been created.

You really hold it against this guy that he saw an opportunity and took it???

 

[not_osirus_jenkins]

Yes it does. Red Republican states take more money than they pay in federal money. As I mentioned they are the worse for education and other metrics for Black people. They turned red and Republican due to Racism. The civil rights bill and Southern strategy 50 years ago. There's nothing to argue in that regard and I wont it is what it is.

I'm aware of the history..... black people do not achieve educationally at the same levels that everyone else does because the priorities of our children are trash.... how many hours do you think black students study after school vs how many there White ,asian or Jewish counterparts study???

A lot of the metrics in the black community are bad not because of the political party in power in that state but because of other internal factors within the black community and family

Oh yeah and one more thing. The crime rate reached historic lows, the economy experienced a steady recovery, jobs were created monthly, the economy grew, more Black people went to college, etc. During Obama's (Democrat) term. Compare to Bush Republican term. I aint even mad this is part of the way yall won this round through misinformation but now the Republicans are on the hook lets see what they actually do. People are definitely watching. And true, the political party cant do everything to save everybody in every way but they can obviously help.

Those Trends have nothing to do with Obama or Republicans or Democrats more and more people have been going to college just in general greater college enrollment is a trend that has been happening for decades.

you're a fucking liar @zzombie
https://www.google.com/amp/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/423285/?client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us

 

[R.D.]

I been telling niggas every since Trump suggested that Russia should hack Hilary that anyone who voted for him is a treasonous dog who most likely deserves to be lined up against a wall. Fucking commies and commies lover. In the pit of my soul I hate you and wish you death.

You are what's wrong with this country.

Yeah, that's what's wrong with this country

 

[zzombie]

Yes it does. Red Republican states take more money than they pay in federal money. As I mentioned they are the worse for education and other metrics for Black people. They turned red and Republican due to Racism. The civil rights bill and Southern strategy 50 years ago. There's nothing to argue in that regard and I wont it is what it is.

I'm aware of the history..... black people do not achieve educationally at the same levels that everyone else does because the priorities of our children are trash.... how many hours do you think black students study after school vs how many there White ,asian or Jewish counterparts study???

A lot of the metrics in the black community are bad not because of the political party in power in that state but because of other internal factors within the black community and family

Oh yeah and one more thing. The crime rate reached historic lows, the economy experienced a steady recovery, jobs were created monthly, the economy grew, more Black people went to college, etc. During Obama's (Democrat) term. Compare to Bush Republican term. I aint even mad this is part of the way yall won this round through misinformation but now the Republicans are on the hook lets see what they actually do. People are definitely watching. And true, the political party cant do everything to save everybody in every way but they can obviously help.

Those Trends have nothing to do with Obama or Republicans or Democrats more and more people have been going to college just in general greater college enrollment is a trend that has been happening for decades.

you're a fucking liar @zzombie
https://www.google.com/amp/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/423285/?client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us

And you can't f****** read my statement says that the enrollment in college has gone up over the decades. Not that college graduation is up so in other words more people are going to college but not all of them are graduating.

Compare how many people went to college in the sixties, seventies and eighties to the amount that go today.... the trend is Clear even if there's been a slight dip

 

[Shizlansky]

What is worst for black ppl @zzombie

white supremacists or liberals

They're not mutually exclusive.

True

But I didn't ask that.

Leftist ideology is the worse

Without a shadow of doubt

White supremacist has been more detrimental to black ppl in American than liberal ideology

We can go blow for blow with this one and you will get washed.

 

[zzombie]

http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=98