USC Student Says She Was Raped, The Nightclub Video Determined That Was A Lie

[Young_Chitlin]

Its fucked up that they would conceal this bitches identity

@reddit @4chan

 

[7figz]

@Westie

@Madame_CJSkywalker

Not that serious right?

They'll avoid talking about shit like this.

 

[7figz]

And to be clear, this ain't about "hating women", promoting "rape-culture", or none of that bullshit.

It's about having balanced discussions.

 

[Westie]

@Westie

@Madame_CJSkywalker

Not that serious right?

They'll avoid talking about shit like this.

Please don't requote me with that stalker attached to it. I don't have a problem with talking about this shit when i feel like it. I've never said these claims don't exist. Aint nobody scared of shit yall say, stop @ing me to every single rape thread, i post when i want.

 

[Shizlansky]

Dude still my get kicked out of school.

 

[rickmogul]

@"pachá12" .... She's helping 2 pave the smooth road 2 rape being classified as a misdemeanor until proven otherwise. Courts R gonna start getting tired of this and that's when charges for the lying ass accusers will be implemented as well. Seems like handing out time is discretionary depending on the judges mood.

 

[pachá12]

@"pachá12" .... She's helping 2 pave the smooth road 2 rape being classified as a misdemeanor until proven otherwise. Courts R gonna start getting tired of this and that's when charges for the lying ass accusers will be implemented as well. Seems like handing out time is discretionary depending on the judges mood.

I can get with it. These false accusations are flaring up lately, too serious of a crime to be playin...

 

[7figz]

@Westie

@Madame_CJSkywalker

Not that serious right?

They'll avoid talking about shit like this.

Please don't requote me with that stalker attached to it. I don't have a problem with talking about this shit when i feel like it. I've never said these claims don't exist. Aint nobody scared of shit yall say, stop @ing me to every single rape thread, i post when i want.

So what should happen to this chick ?

Any legal penalties for lying ?

What about this dude's reputation and possibly still being expelled from school ? Any comment ?

Same questions to you @Madame_CJSkywalker.

 

[Will Munny]

I remember when Lena Dunham said women don't lie about rape LOL

 

[blackrain]

and somehow we still don't know "her" name.

There should be legal consequences for her.

Some white girl just got charged with lying about being raped and kidnapped by 3 black dudes last week. As said before it all depends on what that department and that DA wants to pursue. It's not hard to find stories of women being charged for filing false rape claims.

 

[deadeye]

and somehow we still don't know "her" name.

There should be legal consequences for her.

Some white girl just got charged with lying about being raped and kidnapped by 3 black dudes last week. As said before it all depends on what that department and that DA wants to pursue. It's not hard to find stories of women being charged for filing false rape claims.

That's part of the problem.

It shouldn't have to "depend" on anything.

If a woman is proven to have intentionally lied about being raped/sexually assaulted...........she needs to be prosecuted for it.

And her name and identity should be made public.

 

[Westie]

*

 

[AggieLean.]

Man, it sucks for that boy. Even though he didn't do it, the situation will follow him throughout his life and he's still possibly going to be expelled. That girls identity needs to most definitely be made public, and she should go to jail as well. He also needs to try and get some money out of her or her parents.

 

[jono]

I don't see how this proves she lied about rape. This is the judges opinion based on events from a different time of the night.

 

[7figz]

I don't see how this proves she lied about rape. This is the judges opinion based on events from a different time of the night.

I'm assuming she accused him of rape, said she was too drunk to consent, but the video shows not only that she initiated the encounter (pulling him out of the bar and everywhere else), with a predetermined motive to have sex with him (the sex gesture to her friend), couldn't be too drunk (signing him into the building), etc...

She wanted it to be one way... but the video showed it to be the other way.

 

[jono]

I don't see how this proves she lied about rape. This is the judges opinion based on events from a different time of the night.

I'm assuming she accused him of rape, said she was too drunk to consent, but the video shows not only did that she initiated the encounter (pulling him out of the bar and everywhere else), with a predetermined motive to have sex with him (the sex gesture to her friend), couldn't be too drunk (signing him into the building), etc...

She wanted it to be one way... but the video showed it to be the other way.

The video doesn't contradict lack of consent. Even if she led him to her room it still doesn't equal consent.

 

[Recaptimus_Prime360]

This hefa getting jail time or nah?

 

[7figz]

I don't see how this proves she lied about rape. This is the judges opinion based on events from a different time of the night.

I'm assuming she accused him of rape, said she was too drunk to consent, but the video shows not only did that she initiated the encounter (pulling him out of the bar and everywhere else), with a predetermined motive to have sex with him (the sex gesture to her friend), couldn't be too drunk (signing him into the building), etc...

She wanted it to be one way... but the video showed it to be the other way.

The video doesn't contradict lack of consent. Even if she led him to her room it still doesn't equal consent.

I'm guessing the evidence contradicted either her story or the prosecution's charges.

Think about it like this, either she said he raped her or the prosecution says he raped her and she doesn't deny it. They ask if she gave consent and she says "I don't remember anything" - essentially go ahead and charge him with rape. The prosecutor says well we'll prove you didn't give consent and and charge him with getting you drunk and raping you.

Then this video comes out. Now it's clear that she was already drunk, and lead him to her room with intent to have sex (consenting and initiating). Now they have to prove that she revoked consent because clearly she originally gave it, not to mention they originally charged him with drugging and raping her. After seeing the video, what reasonable jury is going to believe that ? Shit, at that point - the judge probably just came to terms that she simply wasn't raped.

Bottom line, the video probably proved consent.

 

[jono]

I don't see how this proves she lied about rape. This is the judges opinion based on events from a different time of the night.

I'm assuming she accused him of rape, said she was too drunk to consent, but the video shows not only did that she initiated the encounter (pulling him out of the bar and everywhere else), with a predetermined motive to have sex with him (the sex gesture to her friend), couldn't be too drunk (signing him into the building), etc...

She wanted it to be one way... but the video showed it to be the other way.

The video doesn't contradict lack of consent. Even if she led him to her room it still doesn't equal consent.

I'm guessing the evidence contradicted either her story or the prosecution's charges.

Think about it like this, either she said he raped her or the prosecution says he raped her and she doesn't deny it. They ask if she gave consent and she says "I don't remember anything" - essentially go ahead and charge him with rape. The prosecutor says well we'll prove you didn't give consent and and charge him with getting you drunk and raping you.

Then this video comes out. Now it's clear that she's drunk, leading him to her room with intent to have sex (consenting and initiating). Now they have to prove that she revoked consent because clearly she originally gave it, not to mention they originally charged him with drugging and raping her. After seeing the video, what reasonable jury is going to believe that ? Shit, at that point - the judge probably just came to terms that she simply wasn't raped.

Bottom line, the video probably proved consent.

The video does not contradict her statement of lack of consent.

 

[7figz]

I don't see how this proves she lied about rape. This is the judges opinion based on events from a different time of the night.

I'm assuming she accused him of rape, said she was too drunk to consent, but the video shows not only did that she initiated the encounter (pulling him out of the bar and everywhere else), with a predetermined motive to have sex with him (the sex gesture to her friend), couldn't be too drunk (signing him into the building), etc...

She wanted it to be one way... but the video showed it to be the other way.

The video doesn't contradict lack of consent. Even if she led him to her room it still doesn't equal consent.

I'm guessing the evidence contradicted either her story or the prosecution's charges.

Think about it like this, either she said he raped her or the prosecution says he raped her and she doesn't deny it. They ask if she gave consent and she says "I don't remember anything" - essentially go ahead and charge him with rape. The prosecutor says well we'll prove you didn't give consent and and charge him with getting you drunk and raping you.

Then this video comes out. Now it's clear that she's drunk, leading him to her room with intent to have sex (consenting and initiating). Now they have to prove that she revoked consent because clearly she originally gave it, not to mention they originally charged him with drugging and raping her. After seeing the video, what reasonable jury is going to believe that ? Shit, at that point - the judge probably just came to terms that she simply wasn't raped.

Bottom line, the video probably proved consent.

The video does not contradict her statement of lack of consent.

So you're saying the video doesn't show that she consented ?