Trayvon Martin Case.... the plot thickens

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
apocalyptica;4227485 said:
211umw1.png

c'mon man...that shit is really gettin ridiculous

btw where is the blood on his clothes?

 
-Vincenzo-;4227444 said:
http://nancygrace.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/28/funeral-director-saw-no-signs-of-fight-on-trayvons-hands/?hpt=ng_mid

Funeral director saw no signs of fight on Trayvon’s hands

The funeral director who prepared Trayvon Martin’s body for burial told HLN’s Nancy Grace Wednesday that he did not see any cuts or bruises on the teen’s hands that would have been indicative of a struggle with George Zimmerman.

Richard Kurtz of Roy Mizell and Kurtz Funeral Home in Fort Lauderdale said there appeared to be a gunshot wound in Martin’s upper chest area, but he received the body after the autopsy was completed so it was difficult to tell whether he had other injuries. He also could not determine the bullet’s entry or exit point.

“As for his hands and knuckles, I didn’t see any evidence he had been fighting anybody,” Kurtz said.

Citing police sources, the Orlando Sentinel reported that Zimmerman told investigators Martin punched him and slammed his head into the ground repeatedly before he fired the shot that killed the unarmed 17-year-old. He claimed he shot Martin in self-defense, and he has not been charged in the case at this point.

While Kurtz is not a forensics expert, the funeral director said he has handled the bodies of many homicide victims in his career. This case in particular affected him as he learned more about what happened to Trayvon Martin and how the case was handled.

“I think the police investigation was the most unprofessional one I've ever seen in my lifetime,” Kurtz said.

For the latest on the Trayvon Martin case, watch "Nancy Grace" Wednesday at 8 pm and 10 p.m. ET on HLN.
It'd have to be assumed that his hands should have bruising/cuts for this to be significant.

-Vincenzo-;4227495 said:
apocalyptica;4227485 said:

c'mon man...that shit is really gettin ridiculous

btw where is the blood on his clothes?
Were there reports that there was blood on his clothes?
 
fiat_money;4227516 said:
-Vincenzo-;4227444 said:
http://nancygrace.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/28/funeral-director-saw-no-signs-of-fight-on-trayvons-hands/?hpt=ng_mid

Funeral director saw no signs of fight on Trayvon’s hands

The funeral director who prepared Trayvon Martin’s body for burial told HLN’s Nancy Grace Wednesday that he did not see any cuts or bruises on the teen’s hands that would have been indicative of a struggle with George Zimmerman.

Richard Kurtz of Roy Mizell and Kurtz Funeral Home in Fort Lauderdale said there appeared to be a gunshot wound in Martin’s upper chest area, but he received the body after the autopsy was completed so it was difficult to tell whether he had other injuries. He also could not determine the bullet’s entry or exit point.

“As for his hands and knuckles, I didn’t see any evidence he had been fighting anybody,” Kurtz said.

Citing police sources, the Orlando Sentinel reported that Zimmerman told investigators Martin punched him and slammed his head into the ground repeatedly before he fired the shot that killed the unarmed 17-year-old. He claimed he shot Martin in self-defense, and he has not been charged in the case at this point.

While Kurtz is not a forensics expert, the funeral director said he has handled the bodies of many homicide victims in his career. This case in particular affected him as he learned more about what happened to Trayvon Martin and how the case was handled.

“I think the police investigation was the most unprofessional one I've ever seen in my lifetime,” Kurtz said.

For the latest on the Trayvon Martin case, watch "Nancy Grace" Wednesday at 8 pm and 10 p.m. ET on HLN.
It'd have to be assumed that his hands should have bruising/cuts for this to be significant.

-Vincenzo-;4227495 said:
apocalyptica;4227485 said:

c'mon man...that shit is really gettin ridiculous

btw where is the blood on his clothes?
Were there reports that there was blood on his clothes?

How do you shoot someone on top of you and not get blood on your clothes?
 
SuperstarCole;4227543 said:
fiat_money;4227516 said:
-Vincenzo-;4227444 said:
http://nancygrace.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/28/funeral-director-saw-no-signs-of-fight-on-trayvons-hands/?hpt=ng_mid

Funeral director saw no signs of fight on Trayvon’s hands

The funeral director who prepared Trayvon Martin’s body for burial told HLN’s Nancy Grace Wednesday that he did not see any cuts or bruises on the teen’s hands that would have been indicative of a struggle with George Zimmerman.

Richard Kurtz of Roy Mizell and Kurtz Funeral Home in Fort Lauderdale said there appeared to be a gunshot wound in Martin’s upper chest area, but he received the body after the autopsy was completed so it was difficult to tell whether he had other injuries. He also could not determine the bullet’s entry or exit point.

“As for his hands and knuckles, I didn’t see any evidence he had been fighting anybody,” Kurtz said.

Citing police sources, the Orlando Sentinel reported that Zimmerman told investigators Martin punched him and slammed his head into the ground repeatedly before he fired the shot that killed the unarmed 17-year-old. He claimed he shot Martin in self-defense, and he has not been charged in the case at this point.

While Kurtz is not a forensics expert, the funeral director said he has handled the bodies of many homicide victims in his career. This case in particular affected him as he learned more about what happened to Trayvon Martin and how the case was handled.

“I think the police investigation was the most unprofessional one I've ever seen in my lifetime,” Kurtz said.

For the latest on the Trayvon Martin case, watch "Nancy Grace" Wednesday at 8 pm and 10 p.m. ET on HLN.
It'd have to be assumed that his hands should have bruising/cuts for this to be significant.

-Vincenzo-;4227495 said:
apocalyptica;4227485 said:

c'mon man...that shit is really gettin ridiculous

btw where is the blood on his clothes?
Were there reports that there was blood on his clothes?

How do you shoot someone on top of you and not get blood on your clothes?
fiat_money;4216927 said:
A contact shot through thick cloth (hoodie) doesn't necessarily mean there will be noticeable blood on the shooter, especially if Treyvon rolled off of Zimmerman after being shot.

 
Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying
 
bow to royalty;4227600 said:
Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy;4227623 said:
Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat:http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-ma...orge-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA
 
Bando Calrissian;4228085 said:
bow to royalty;4227600 said:
Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy;4227623 said:
Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat:http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-ma...orge-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA
Alright this seems to show a bit more:

 
fiat_money;4228145 said:
Bando Calrissian;4228085 said:
bow to royalty;4227600 said:
Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy;4227623 said:
Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat:http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-ma...orge-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA
Alright this seems to show a bit more:


Looks like an old scar at best or thinning hair, not a gash that was just treated 30 minutes ago.
 
Last edited:
SuperstarCole;4228135 said:
Wait a minute, i thought four hours passed before he got to the station. Now it's just 30 minutes?
What was the source of this claim?

SuperstarCole;4228167 said:
fiat_money;4228145 said:
Bando Calrissian;4228085 said:
bow to royalty;4227600 said:
Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy;4227623 said:
Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat:http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-ma...orge-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA
Alright this seems to show a bit more:


Looks like an old scar at best or thinning hair, not a gash that was just treated 30 minutes ago.
I wouldn't think that the video is clear enough to determine the age of the wound.

All I can tell is that there appear to be multiple reddish abrasions.
 
fiat_money;4228198 said:
SuperstarCole;4228135 said:
Wait a minute, i thought four hours passed before he got to the station. Now it's just 30 minutes?
What was the source of this claim?

SuperstarCole;4228167 said:
fiat_money;4228145 said:
Bando Calrissian;4228085 said:
bow to royalty;4227600 said:
Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy;4227623 said:
Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat:http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-ma...orge-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA
Alright this seems to show a bit more:


Looks like an old scar at best or thinning hair, not a gash that was just treated 30 minutes ago.
I wouldn't think that the video is clear enough to determine the age of the wound.

All I can tell is that there appear to be multiple reddish abrasions.

Shit, every officer with low cut hair in that vid looks to have reddish abrasions.

 
Im not even worried about this video and I only care to know if he has wounds to prove his people are liars, because him having wounds doesn't mean a killing is justified. The broken nose/head wound situation should come out when the pictures that police are supposed to take come out, if they even exist.
 
If you say so.
SuperstarCole;4228242 said:
fiat_money;4228198 said:
SuperstarCole;4228135 said:
Wait a minute, i thought four hours passed before he got to the station. Now it's just 30 minutes?
What was the source of this claim?

SuperstarCole;4228167 said:
fiat_money;4228145 said:
Bando Calrissian;4228085 said:
bow to royalty;4227600 said:
Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy;4227623 said:
Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat:http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-ma...orge-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA
Alright this seems to show a bit more:


Looks like an old scar at best or thinning hair, not a gash that was just treated 30 minutes ago.
I wouldn't think that the video is clear enough to determine the age of the wound.

All I can tell is that there appear to be multiple reddish abrasions.

Shit, every officer with low cut hair in that vid looks to have reddish abrasions.
Must be a rough city yo.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
1,094
Views
2
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…