kingblaze84;9240738 said:
zzombie;9239885 said:
kingblaze84;9239784 said:
Videos now?? Lol aight put up the biased, Christian made videos if you want, but religious scholars from around the world have already proved how Zoroastrinism and the Egyptian gods influenced Judaism and Christianity. I can put up videos that show the exact opposite of all that, but I'll stick to SCHOLAR articles and research.
No they have not, The scholarship that says that Judaism comes from Zoroastrianism had been discredited and debunked for the reason i already gave you. Zoroaster was not even born when the foundations of Judaism were already in existence if you want me to pull up accredited scholars that prove you wrong i can do that .
Zoroastrinism is older according to MOST scholars, Zoroaster is the "prophet" who made Zoroastrinist beliefs popular and most scholars agree he may be much older then previously thought. Remember, the Avesta was written fairly late in AD times but even the
Jewish Encyclopedia admits most Jewish scholars agree Judaism was strongly influenced by Zoroastrinism.....even if you don't believe Zoroastrinism is older, you have already admitted the Egyptian gods influenced Jewish thought on gods and divine intervention
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/15283-zoroastrianism
It is known, of course, as a historic fact that the Jews and the Persians came in contact with each other at an early period in antiquity and remained in more or less close relation throughout their history (see Avesta; Media; Persia). Most scholars, Jewish as well as non-Jewish, are of the opinion that Judaism was strongly influenced by Zoroastrianism in views relating to angelology and demonology, and probably also in the doctrine of the resurrection, as well as in eschatological ideas in general, and also that the monotheistic conception of Yhwh may have been quickened and strengthened by being opposed to the dualism or quasi-monotheism of the Persians.
No i've looked into this issue and there is much confusion surrounding the claims you are making, most scholars don't say zoroastorism is older than jusdiasm, they say that the religion that predated zoroastorism is older... zoroastor was born well after moses was supposed to have been born SO the RELGION he created LOGICALLY COULD NOT HAVE COME BEFORE JUDAISM, what he did was create his own religion based on a pervious persian religion... HOWEVER WE DON'T KNOW WHAT ELEMENTS ZOROASTOR KEPT FROM THAT RELGION OR WHAT HE MADE innovated because there are no records of that relgion that survived through time.
The bible records well that the jews had contact with persia and since judaism was already well established among them it is more likely that elements of judaism went into zoroastorism than the other
way around.
Lol stop selectively reading read the whole thing that you post and apply logic
"It is difficult to account for these analogies. It is known, of course, as a historic fact that the Jews and the Persians came in contact with each other at an early period in antiquity and remained in more or less close relation throughout their history (see Avesta; Media; Persia). Most scholars, Jewish as well as non-Jewish, are of the opinion that Judaism was strongly influenced by Zoroastrianism in views relating to angelology and demonology, and probably also in the doctrine of the resurrection, as well as in eschatological ideas in general,
and also that the monotheistic conception of Yhwh may have been quickened and strengthened by being opposed to the dualism or quasi-monotheism of the Persians. But, on the other hand, the late James Darmesteter advocated exactly the opposite view, maintaining that early Persian thought was strongly influenced by Jewish ideas. He insisted that the Avesta, as we have it, is of late origin and is much tinctured by foreign elements, especially those derived from Judaism, and also those taken from Neoplatonism through the writings of Philo Judæus. These views, put forward shortly before the French scholar's death in 1894, have been violently combated by specialists since that time, and can not be said to have met with decided favor on any side.
At the present time it is impossible to settle the question; the truth lies probably somewhere between the radical extremes, and it is possible that when knowledge of the Assyrian and Babylonian religion is more precise in certain details, additional light may be thrown on the problem of the source of these analogies, and may show the likelihood of a common influence at work upon both the Persian and Jewish cults."