The robbery of Juan Manuel Marquez...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
im not usually one to bitch about the judging, but that was marquez's fight. Easily.

Pure politics, arum isn't done riding the paquaio gravy train. Makes the sport look like a joke.
 
Last edited:
Zig Zag Zigga;3701381 said:
Just watched the Spanish broadcast which is about an hour delay and them dudes were going bat shit crazy. They thought Marquez was robbed but that's coming from a Mexican bias. I don't know, I just didn't feel that you can give Marquez a win. He had some great shots but just didn't throw enough and once again didn't show the judges that he clearly deserved the win. Which he should of known going into this fight he had to do when facing a guy like Pacquiao who judges seem to favor when it comes into making decisions.

I agree, a draw would be the correct ruling in my opinion.

So you're saying that because Pacqiao is a celebrity that he should get the benefit of the doubt and therefore Marquez should have worked harder to offset the bias against him??? What's the point of the sport if it's a popularity contest anyway?
 
Last edited:
bignorm73;3701382 said:
its clear that you are mad. maybe when you wake up, you will feel better.

why am I mad because I spoke to u in a manner that clearly represents how you've acted in this thread ?
 
Last edited:
BoYBe$T;3701409 said:
why am I mad because I spoke to u in a manner that clearly represents how you've acted in this thread ?

your posts show the emotion that you cant suppress before you press the "quick reply" button. That's fine, i cant be mad on the net. My life is too good.

Maybe i lost because i paid for the fight. Then again, maybe i won because i can afford it. Either way, stay mad.
 
Last edited:
Mr.Burns;3701408 said:
So you're saying that because Pacqiao is a celebrity that he should get the benefit of the doubt and therefore Marquez should have worked harder to offset the bias against him??? What's the point of the sport if it's a popularity contest anyway?

Its just how the sport is now, I'd love for Marquez to win but I'm just looking at it how the judges are looking at it. And its clear that's how they function.
 
Last edited:
Zig Zag Zigga;3701452 said:
Its just how the sport is now, I'd love for Marquez to win but I'm just looking at it how the judges are looking at it. And its clear that's how they function.

it aint got nothin to do with how aggressive marquez was in the last 4 rounds, it has to do with $ and not putting the biggest fight ever in jeapordy, he won most of if not all of the last 4 rounds
 
Last edited:
its....JOHN B;3701474 said:
it aint got nothin to do with how aggressive marquez was in the last 4 rounds, it has to do with $ and not putting the biggest fight ever in jeapordy, he won most of if not all of the last 4 rounds

the only rd of the last four I gave to Manny is 11
 
Last edited:
Marquez put on a clinic dictated the pace and tempo, landed clean shots then dipped out. I knew they were gonna bs and give it to Pacquiao but 116-112? GTFOH should have at least been a draw... i feel like boxing will be irrelevant after the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight.
 
Last edited:
383031_2669389258123_1357838126_3162641_1693437302_n.jpg


...............................................
 
Last edited:
The whole "controlled the ring" argument is kinda bunk. That should really only come into play if all things are considered equal, and in this case, they aren't. Marquez clearly got more quality hits in the fight. So what if Manny was more aggressive. That's his style. Marquez is more of a counter puncher so he relies and drawing the opponent in and countering. He play his game a lot better than Manny played his. If you're saying Manny should have gotten the win because he pushed forward more, then you're basically just saying he should get the win because he has a more aggressive style. That kinda works in MMA, but not so much in boxing because boxing has a greater variety of styles by design.
 
Last edited:
MR.CJ;3701562 said:
there will be a 4th fight between marquez and pacquiao

Only if Pac beats Mayweather, if he loses I'm pretty sure he'll retire like he has wanted to for a couple years now.
 
Last edited:
those ESPN spin doctors got the highlights looking like Pacman served Marquez but anyone who actually watched the fight can see it was the other way around.
 
Last edited:
zoomzoomp5;3701619 said:
378039_2669458499854_1357838126_3162662_2092233281_n.jpg


........................

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, LOL...........COLD BLOODED.

YO I SWEAR I ALMOST CANCELLED MY HBO because of these cheating muthafuckas and the dick riding commentary.
 
Last edited:
This is fucking retarded. Just finished watching the fight, and Marquez is clearly not a student of history. He lost the same way Oscar did against Trinidad. He beat ass and then coasted into the fucking finish line like a dumb-ass.

Nacho is too old to see the fights correctly because even though Marquez was winning in spots, it wasn't visually impressive enough when you factor in aggression and generalship. Nacho's advice and Marquez's decision to stop going HAM lost him the fight.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
97
Views
1
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…