The OTTB Wrestling News thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Back in the day watching the upsets were exciting. You were shocked to see 123 kid beat Razor Ramon, it gave the kid the push he needed. I remember Bob Holly pinning Owen Hart, that shocked the hell out of me. That Austin loss would have been a big moment for Raw that we didn't get.
 
I get that, none of them meant a tenth of what Austin meant, u comparing midcarders n a 49 year old man to the top draw of that decade. If we were talking about him walking out on a heavily promoted match cuz Vince said job, y'all's point would be way more valid
 
Austin wasn't happy with the company at the time, plus he had a lot of personal/health issues

he was looking for a way out, and vince wanting him to lost to lesnar on raw without any build was the straw that broke the camels back
 
I woulda treated Stone Cold vs Brock the same way WCW did Sting vs Goldberg basically which kept both guys looking strong. No need for Brock even at that time to streamroll everyone who wasnt Triple H.
 
There are major cutbacks going on all over WWE right now, including the cancellation of WWE Network programs and no longer doing the pyro at shows.

Dave Meltzer stated on the latest episode of Wrestling Observer Radio that WWE "promised everyone" they were going to have bigger profits in 2017 than they had in 2016 and they're not anywhere close.

"So last year's profits were about $30 million," said Meltzer on the August 1, 2017 episode of Wrestling Observer Radio. "And this year we're about halfway through and — I don't have the exact numbers in front of me - but it's like five or six million, which means there's a lot of catching up to do."

This is believed to be the reason why there is no longer a pyro at WWE shows and a lot of shows on the WWE Network are getting canceled, in an attempt to lower production costs.

"They're not in any financial trouble but the Network subscriber number is a genuine disappointment," explained Meltzer. "The growth coming out of WrestleMania that would have been expected wasn't there."

One thing that has not helped the growth of the WWE Network is doing brand specific pay-per-views for RAW and SmackDown but it's not expected that WWE is going to go back to just one pay-per-view a month.

"The one thing that we have learned is that the two pay-per-views a month, that has not helped," said Meltzer. "The Network number is not growing the way they expected it to so that's been a bad situation. But I don't think they want to drop one of the pay-per-views because I think that would hurt ratings a little bit."

More cutbacks are expected in WWE and it's one of the reasons why the company has been slow on the United Kingdom show. Dave Meltzer noted their tournament to crown a WWE United Kingdom Champion earlier this year cost a lot of money and the show will mean spending a lot of money for more tapings every month.

 
If Brock loses and "leaves", we know he's going to get ready for his UFC return. What if he wins the UFC Heavyweight, or even Light Heavyweight championship? Is he allowed on WWE tv? If so, will he have the title on RAW? I would like to see how that works.

 
VIBE;c-9914697 said:
If Brock loses and "leaves", we know he's going to get ready for his UFC return. What if he wins the UFC Heavyweight, or even Light Heavyweight championship? Is he allowed on WWE tv? If so, will he have the title on RAW? I would like to see how that works.

Brock couldn't make the LHW limit if you gave him 20 years. he couldn't make it without dying.
 
VIBE;c-9914306 said:
Cena headed to RAW after SS..

Yup, like i said yesterday cena vs roman at wm, they aint bout to waste him beating rick flairs record at summerslam, that shit is definatly a "wrestlemania" moment
 
p0f611crgc8n.jpg


 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
20,950
Views
3,701
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…