NeighborhoodNomad. ;9223663 said:jono;9223638 said:NeighborhoodNomad. ;9223608 said:jono;9223307 said:The Lonious Monk;9223248 said:I think this is some revisionist history. I'm not saying there are no ties between the police and the slave watch, but to imply the police came into existence to catch slaves strikes me as BS. Agents of the law have existed for thousands of years. Are people really trying to claim that law enforcement in America only exists because of the desire to keep slaves in check?
Because it is. Slave catchers are more akin to bounty hunters not police officers. They're job was to catch runaways and return them for the money offered by the master/owner of property. No different than someone posting a picture of their missing dog.
"Law enforcement" is a big umbrella term and slave catcher falls under it because it enforced property laws but to say there was no policing or patrolling is to say nobody was responsible for watching out for simple crime like stealing and assault which we know is untrue.
Give us some examples of civilizations who policed/patrolled their people, or were "watching out for simple crime" as you put it.
Nigga everyone. You think there was no crime until slavery?
Other civilizations had warriors who were about defending the people, but there were not organizations or groups of people that were crime watchers. When an offense happened in a nation, tribe, etc., the people would bring them to trial though the rules of their culture by the people, chiefs and priests and would be dealt with accordingly.
Now give us a few or several examples of civilizations who policed/patrolled their people, or were "watching out for simple crime" as you put it. Since you say it's everyone, these examples should be easy for you to produce.
You ever heard of evolution, change over time? You just destroyed your own argument. The origins of policing come from what you just described.
One things leads to another or do you think this are two separate things?
All dogs are descendant of wolves.