Lou Cypher
New member
Same just copped BP issue one. Shit cost 5 bucks and a big issue. Bout to enjoy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
iron man1;8915893 said:Them racist nerds are going to off themselves if that happens....I can't wait.
Lou_Cypher;8914035 said:Marvel Studios President Says Inhumans Film Likely to be Delayed Again
![]()
Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige did some press at the Captain America: Civil War junket this weekend, and he finally addressed one particular elephant in the room: that pesky Inhumans release date. While acknowledging that the movie is very likely to shift away from its current July 12, 2019 date (itself the second date for the film, initially announced for November 2, 2018), he did double down that it's at least still on the docket.
"Since we made our initial phase three announcement, we added Spider-Man, which was a big, joyous coup for us. We added Ant-Man and the Wasp, which was a big, fun continuation of that story for us," Feige told Collider. "Walt Disney Company has announced an Indiana Jones film for right around that same time. So I think it will shuffle off the current date that it's on right now. How far down it shuffles, I'm not sure yet."
When followed up about the conflict with the TV interpretation of the Inhumans on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., he said that won't prevent them from making their big screen take, saying "It's a question of when."
For regular readers, this is exactly what we predicted at Comicbook.com a month ago when Indiana Jones 5 was announced for July 19, 2019, one week after Inhumans' planned date. With both films being produced and distributed by Disney, and their history showing they've never released films closer than three weeks apart, it was a no-brainer that Inhumans wouldn't be coming out on that original release date.
It is new, however, for Feige to openly address it, and assure fans of Black Bolt, Medusa, and the rest of the Inhumans royal family that they're still hitting the silver screen... just not on July 12, 2019.
http://comicbook.com/2016/04/11/marvel-studios-president-says-inhumans-film-likely-to-be-delayed/
CottonCitySlim;8915765 said:According to Deadline Tessa Thompson (Creed, Selma, Annihilation) has joined the cast of Thor: Ragnarok in an unannounced superhero role. What's interesting is that it's being said that she will be a new love interest (Poor Jane) for Thor and will be "a kind of superhero that will appear in other Marvel films as well."
Could her role possibly be Valkyrie? We'll have to wait and see when it's announced.
http://deadline.com/2016/04/tessa-thompson-joins-the-marvel-universe-thor-ragnarok-1201735551/
Natalie Portman May Not Be Returning As Jane Foster
In an interesting turn of events, it looks as though Natalie Portman will not be returning as Jane Foster in Thor: Ragnarok. During their reveal of Tessa Thompson being cast, The Hollywood Reporter reveals that Natalie Portman will not be returning to the franchise. Natalie Portman finally gets her wish of being out of the franchise. It also makes sense as it's been said that Ragnarok will mostly be set in space and on Asgard.
Without Jane being in the film does that mean we won't have Darcy either? We'll just have to wait and find out.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/creed-star-tessa-thompson-joining-876760
Tessa as Valkyrie would be a good look but shes not a thor love interest so it has to be Enchantress. Either way black excellence
The Lonious Monk;8916293 said:That would be smart, but the GotG director is against tying his movies to any other MCU properties.
Broddie;8916397 said:The Lonious Monk;8916293 said:That would be smart, but the GotG director is against tying his movies to any other MCU properties.
I wish more MCU directors adopted that philosophy.
sapp08_2001;8916423 said:Broddie;8916397 said:The Lonious Monk;8916293 said:That would be smart, but the GotG director is against tying his movies to any other MCU properties.
I wish more MCU directors adopted that philosophy.
Wrong. They just announced Star Lord will be in the upcoming Avengers filmshttp://m.ign.com/articles/2016/04/11/guardians-of-the-galaxys-star-lord-will-be-in-marvels-avengers-infinity-war
Broddie;8916432 said:sapp08_2001;8916423 said:Broddie;8916397 said:The Lonious Monk;8916293 said:That would be smart, but the GotG director is against tying his movies to any other MCU properties.
I wish more MCU directors adopted that philosophy.
Wrong. They just announced Star Lord will be in the upcoming Avengers filmshttp://m.ign.com/articles/2016/04/11/guardians-of-the-galaxys-star-lord-will-be-in-marvels-avengers-infinity-war
And?
James Gunn doesn't direct The Avengers.
If GoTG 2 was to have Hulk and Thor all over the place while also setting up a Black Widow solo movie then you'd have a point.
sapp08_2001;8916520 said:Broddie;8916432 said:sapp08_2001;8916423 said:Broddie;8916397 said:The Lonious Monk;8916293 said:That would be smart, but the GotG director is against tying his movies to any other MCU properties.
I wish more MCU directors adopted that philosophy.
Wrong. They just announced Star Lord will be in the upcoming Avengers filmshttp://m.ign.com/articles/2016/04/11/guardians-of-the-galaxys-star-lord-will-be-in-marvels-avengers-infinity-war
And?
James Gunn doesn't direct The Avengers.
If GoTG 2 was to have Hulk and Thor all over the place while also setting up a Black Widow solo movie then you'd have a point.
Its marvel it can happen
The Lonious Monk;8916293 said:That would be smart, but the GotG director is against tying his movies to any other MCU properties.