Elzo69Renaissance
New member
so I was just reading that music streaming sites have not really been profitable anyway....
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Official Jay-Z's "Tidal" Streaming Service Thread (New Stand Up Comedy Series Added)
MeekMonizzLLLLLLe14
New member
Elzo69Renaissance;8139082 said:so I was just reading that music streaming sites have not really been profitable anyway....
not surprised in order to get access to music you have to make terrible deals with record companies to have their content. allot of the money even with tidal is gone to pay record companies and songwriters outside the main artist.
fuck gay-z
New member
Even niggaz w/ 1 eye can see fuk nigga Camel
is a hoe ass faggot & shittin on him & his god awful
streaming service...DEAD
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.mtv.com/news/2189964/fetty-wap-jay-z-nas/&sa=U&ei=Jg2EVcPUD8KbgwT4y6jYAQ&ved=0CDEQqQIoADAG&usg=AFQjCNFl7QClE5j73N8b8Egsu4O38q_AYA
is a hoe ass faggot & shittin on him & his god awful
streaming service...DEAD
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.mtv.com/news/2189964/fetty-wap-jay-z-nas/&sa=U&ei=Jg2EVcPUD8KbgwT4y6jYAQ&ved=0CDEQqQIoADAG&usg=AFQjCNFl7QClE5j73N8b8Egsu4O38q_AYA
paidinnfull
New member
Body bag
MeekMonizzLLLLLLe14
New member
This article actually does a good job of explaining the issues tidal has with making profits and their distribution to artists owning shares
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121421/jay-zs-new-music-streaming-service-tidal-has-many-flaws
Finally, it’s not clear how far this worker-ownership will extend. If the original 16 artists each received a 3 percent stake in Tidal, that’s nearly half the company already disbursed. Presumably, Jay Z intends to keep a large chunk as well. If Jay Z intends to allow all artists an ownership stake in Tidal, how much will less famous artists receive? I don’t expect those details to become public, at least not anytime soon. But it’s an important consideration. If Tidal ends up mostly owned by global music icons and leaves behind thousands of other artists, then it will not ensure artists are fairly compensated for their work. It’ll just be a way for the richest artists to get even richer.
Still, if the main problem with Tidal is that it unequally distributes profits, it will have succeeded. In that situation, the company would have both accumulated a big subscription base and made significant profits from those users. The latter point is far harder than it sounds. Streaming music services like Spotify are struggling to improve their profits even as the number of users grows rapidly. The real profits are instead flowing to the record labels.
Ultimately, Jay Z has set his sights on the wrong target. It's not companies like Spotify that are preventing music artists from receiving their just rewards. It's the record labels—and there's nothing inherent about Tidal that will break the record labels' stranglehold on the industry. Why does Jay Z think he'll be able to succeed in doing what Spotify and other streaming services have failed to do? There's no question that he has shown great savvy and success in the music business, but perhaps it's going to his head.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121421/jay-zs-new-music-streaming-service-tidal-has-many-flaws
Finally, it’s not clear how far this worker-ownership will extend. If the original 16 artists each received a 3 percent stake in Tidal, that’s nearly half the company already disbursed. Presumably, Jay Z intends to keep a large chunk as well. If Jay Z intends to allow all artists an ownership stake in Tidal, how much will less famous artists receive? I don’t expect those details to become public, at least not anytime soon. But it’s an important consideration. If Tidal ends up mostly owned by global music icons and leaves behind thousands of other artists, then it will not ensure artists are fairly compensated for their work. It’ll just be a way for the richest artists to get even richer.
Still, if the main problem with Tidal is that it unequally distributes profits, it will have succeeded. In that situation, the company would have both accumulated a big subscription base and made significant profits from those users. The latter point is far harder than it sounds. Streaming music services like Spotify are struggling to improve their profits even as the number of users grows rapidly. The real profits are instead flowing to the record labels.
Ultimately, Jay Z has set his sights on the wrong target. It's not companies like Spotify that are preventing music artists from receiving their just rewards. It's the record labels—and there's nothing inherent about Tidal that will break the record labels' stranglehold on the industry. Why does Jay Z think he'll be able to succeed in doing what Spotify and other streaming services have failed to do? There's no question that he has shown great savvy and success in the music business, but perhaps it's going to his head.
Monizzle14;8142410 said:This article actually does a good job of explaining the issues tidal has with making profits and their distribution to artists owning shares
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121421/jay-zs-new-music-streaming-service-tidal-has-many-flaws
Finally, it’s not clear how far this worker-ownership will extend. If the original 16 artists each received a 3 percent stake in Tidal, that’s nearly half the company already disbursed. Presumably, Jay Z intends to keep a large chunk as well. If Jay Z intends to allow all artists an ownership stake in Tidal, how much will less famous artists receive? I don’t expect those details to become public, at least not anytime soon. But it’s an important consideration. If Tidal ends up mostly owned by global music icons and leaves behind thousands of other artists, then it will not ensure artists are fairly compensated for their work. It’ll just be a way for the richest artists to get even richer.
Still, if the main problem with Tidal is that it unequally distributes profits, it will have succeeded. In that situation, the company would have both accumulated a big subscription base and made significant profits from those users. The latter point is far harder than it sounds. Streaming music services like Spotify are struggling to improve their profits even as the number of users grows rapidly. The real profits are instead flowing to the record labels.
Ultimately, Jay Z has set his sights on the wrong target. It's not companies like Spotify that are preventing music artists from receiving their just rewards. It's the record labels—and there's nothing inherent about Tidal that will break the record labels' stranglehold on the industry. Why does Jay Z think he'll be able to succeed in doing what Spotify and other streaming services have failed to do? There's no question that he has shown great savvy and success in the music business, but perhaps it's going to his head.
Gawd damn my nigga we get it you don't cosign tidal or think it will work for whatever reasons you have now can we move along lol...it seem like every time I think this thread gonna die here come you and fuck gay-z tryna force everybody to hate tidal again....its at the point now where it's all just repetitive becuz nobody is changing their stance at this point so it's all just beating a dead horse....now it's making your issue seem bigger then what you "claiming" it is lol
paidinnfull
New member
Niggas be heart broken when this thread gets upped
MeekMonizzLLLLLLe14
New member
GetoBoy;8142506 said:Monizzle14;8142410 said:This article actually does a good job of explaining the issues tidal has with making profits and their distribution to artists owning shares
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121421/jay-zs-new-music-streaming-service-tidal-has-many-flaws
Finally, it’s not clear how far this worker-ownership will extend. If the original 16 artists each received a 3 percent stake in Tidal, that’s nearly half the company already disbursed. Presumably, Jay Z intends to keep a large chunk as well. If Jay Z intends to allow all artists an ownership stake in Tidal, how much will less famous artists receive? I don’t expect those details to become public, at least not anytime soon. But it’s an important consideration. If Tidal ends up mostly owned by global music icons and leaves behind thousands of other artists, then it will not ensure artists are fairly compensated for their work. It’ll just be a way for the richest artists to get even richer.
Still, if the main problem with Tidal is that it unequally distributes profits, it will have succeeded. In that situation, the company would have both accumulated a big subscription base and made significant profits from those users. The latter point is far harder than it sounds. Streaming music services like Spotify are struggling to improve their profits even as the number of users grows rapidly. The real profits are instead flowing to the record labels.
Ultimately, Jay Z has set his sights on the wrong target. It's not companies like Spotify that are preventing music artists from receiving their just rewards. It's the record labels—and there's nothing inherent about Tidal that will break the record labels' stranglehold on the industry. Why does Jay Z think he'll be able to succeed in doing what Spotify and other streaming services have failed to do? There's no question that he has shown great savvy and success in the music business, but perhaps it's going to his head.
Gawd damn my nigga we get it you don't cosign tidal or think it will work for whatever reasons you have now can we move along lol...it seem like every time I think this thread gonna die here come you and fuck gay-z tryna force everybody to hate tidal again....its at the point now where it's all just repetitive becuz nobody is changing their stance at this point so it's all just beating a dead horse....now it's making your issue seem bigger then what you "claiming" it is lol
lol chill bruh did you sleep with tidal last night? did you tell tidal you love her the other day? you so emotionally attached to this music service lmao. chill chill hahaha.
Monizzle14;8142903 said:GetoBoy;8142506 said:Monizzle14;8142410 said:This article actually does a good job of explaining the issues tidal has with making profits and their distribution to artists owning shares
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121421/jay-zs-new-music-streaming-service-tidal-has-many-flaws
Finally, it’s not clear how far this worker-ownership will extend. If the original 16 artists each received a 3 percent stake in Tidal, that’s nearly half the company already disbursed. Presumably, Jay Z intends to keep a large chunk as well. If Jay Z intends to allow all artists an ownership stake in Tidal, how much will less famous artists receive? I don’t expect those details to become public, at least not anytime soon. But it’s an important consideration. If Tidal ends up mostly owned by global music icons and leaves behind thousands of other artists, then it will not ensure artists are fairly compensated for their work. It’ll just be a way for the richest artists to get even richer.
Still, if the main problem with Tidal is that it unequally distributes profits, it will have succeeded. In that situation, the company would have both accumulated a big subscription base and made significant profits from those users. The latter point is far harder than it sounds. Streaming music services like Spotify are struggling to improve their profits even as the number of users grows rapidly. The real profits are instead flowing to the record labels.
Ultimately, Jay Z has set his sights on the wrong target. It's not companies like Spotify that are preventing music artists from receiving their just rewards. It's the record labels—and there's nothing inherent about Tidal that will break the record labels' stranglehold on the industry. Why does Jay Z think he'll be able to succeed in doing what Spotify and other streaming services have failed to do? There's no question that he has shown great savvy and success in the music business, but perhaps it's going to his head.
Gawd damn my nigga we get it you don't cosign tidal or think it will work for whatever reasons you have now can we move along lol...it seem like every time I think this thread gonna die here come you and fuck gay-z tryna force everybody to hate tidal again....its at the point now where it's all just repetitive becuz nobody is changing their stance at this point so it's all just beating a dead horse....now it's making your issue seem bigger then what you "claiming" it is lol
lol chill bruh did you sleep with tidal last night? did you tell tidal you love her the other day? you so emotionally attached to this music service lmao. chill chill hahaha.
Nigga making it his life's mission to turn ppl away from a music streaming service and telling other ppl to chill and calling them emotional lmao...is that you Tim Cook lol
FishNChips
New member
Monizzle is lame as fuck
MeekMonizzLLLLLLe14
New member
GetoBoy;8143076 said:Monizzle14;8142903 said:GetoBoy;8142506 said:Monizzle14;8142410 said:This article actually does a good job of explaining the issues tidal has with making profits and their distribution to artists owning shares
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121421/jay-zs-new-music-streaming-service-tidal-has-many-flaws
Finally, it’s not clear how far this worker-ownership will extend. If the original 16 artists each received a 3 percent stake in Tidal, that’s nearly half the company already disbursed. Presumably, Jay Z intends to keep a large chunk as well. If Jay Z intends to allow all artists an ownership stake in Tidal, how much will less famous artists receive? I don’t expect those details to become public, at least not anytime soon. But it’s an important consideration. If Tidal ends up mostly owned by global music icons and leaves behind thousands of other artists, then it will not ensure artists are fairly compensated for their work. It’ll just be a way for the richest artists to get even richer.
Still, if the main problem with Tidal is that it unequally distributes profits, it will have succeeded. In that situation, the company would have both accumulated a big subscription base and made significant profits from those users. The latter point is far harder than it sounds. Streaming music services like Spotify are struggling to improve their profits even as the number of users grows rapidly. The real profits are instead flowing to the record labels.
Ultimately, Jay Z has set his sights on the wrong target. It's not companies like Spotify that are preventing music artists from receiving their just rewards. It's the record labels—and there's nothing inherent about Tidal that will break the record labels' stranglehold on the industry. Why does Jay Z think he'll be able to succeed in doing what Spotify and other streaming services have failed to do? There's no question that he has shown great savvy and success in the music business, but perhaps it's going to his head.
Gawd damn my nigga we get it you don't cosign tidal or think it will work for whatever reasons you have now can we move along lol...it seem like every time I think this thread gonna die here come you and fuck gay-z tryna force everybody to hate tidal again....its at the point now where it's all just repetitive becuz nobody is changing their stance at this point so it's all just beating a dead horse....now it's making your issue seem bigger then what you "claiming" it is lol
lol chill bruh did you sleep with tidal last night? did you tell tidal you love her the other day? you so emotionally attached to this music service lmao. chill chill hahaha.
Nigga making it his life's mission to turn ppl away from a music streaming service and telling other ppl to chill and calling them emotional lmao...is that you Tim Cook lol
Lol i done bashed apple the last 2 pages on their wishful ass thinking of "guest dj's" bringing cats in. You the nigga brand loyal tidal. I'm the nigga looking for the best deal not loyal to shit. Like i said let tidal get a $60 a year 1 year membership and my ass is signed up. Outside of that fuck 9.99 a month for some boring ass singles and extra content.
kingofkingz
New member
Not sure why yall niggas like paying for something that's free all over the net
fuck gay-z
New member
Drake's MILF bodying fuk nigga Camel...DEAD
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.inquisitr.com/2180558/should-madonna-leave-jay-zs-tidal-after-video-glitch/&sa=U&ei=cwOIVaWuKs3asATnsK6gDw&ved=0CBoQqQIoADACOAo&sig2=_nt3v88WRTUZbon5FvCsow&usg=AFQjCNF7Im3KQyaq_c85X5SZGKjA2i5PxQ
the gig is up, fuk nigga Camel....LMFAO
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2015/beyonce-jay-z-fans-turning-on-couple-outraged-over-tidal-music-subscription-and-beyonces-diet-plan-scam/&sa=U&ei=cwOIVaWuKs3asATnsK6gDw&ved=0CCMQqQIoADAEOAo&sig2=Y2Gs_8_uANH6KdSwAz0mGg&usg=AFQjCNFgxFWa09hxJP7v4VDyyj3Ue90K7g
Get this hoe ass nigga the fuk outta here....CTFU
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://fortune.com/2015/06/10/jay-z-beyonce-branding-backlash/&sa=U&ei=cwOIVaWuKs3asATnsK6gDw&ved=0CDMQqQIoADAIOAo&sig2=zZWpZlH1bWuNMUOBdKU-bg&usg=AFQjCNEwwxhQA-pvUjn_idaOD61e9QYAaQ
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.inquisitr.com/2180558/should-madonna-leave-jay-zs-tidal-after-video-glitch/&sa=U&ei=cwOIVaWuKs3asATnsK6gDw&ved=0CBoQqQIoADACOAo&sig2=_nt3v88WRTUZbon5FvCsow&usg=AFQjCNF7Im3KQyaq_c85X5SZGKjA2i5PxQ
the gig is up, fuk nigga Camel....LMFAO
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2015/beyonce-jay-z-fans-turning-on-couple-outraged-over-tidal-music-subscription-and-beyonces-diet-plan-scam/&sa=U&ei=cwOIVaWuKs3asATnsK6gDw&ved=0CCMQqQIoADAEOAo&sig2=Y2Gs_8_uANH6KdSwAz0mGg&usg=AFQjCNFgxFWa09hxJP7v4VDyyj3Ue90K7g
Get this hoe ass nigga the fuk outta here....CTFU
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://fortune.com/2015/06/10/jay-z-beyonce-branding-backlash/&sa=U&ei=cwOIVaWuKs3asATnsK6gDw&ved=0CDMQqQIoADAIOAo&sig2=zZWpZlH1bWuNMUOBdKU-bg&usg=AFQjCNEwwxhQA-pvUjn_idaOD61e9QYAaQ
Shawn Jay-Z Carter
New member
Damn let me check out them links
MeekMonizzLLLLLLe14
New member
Shawn JAY-Z Carter;8147629 said:Damn let me check out them links
hov i heard robinson cano already isn't feeling seattle you think he made the right move?
Apple Music has quickly reversed its position on royalties for artists in the wake of the high-profile protest from artist Taylor Swift.
The popular singer-songwriter had taken to Tumblr on Sunday to tell her fans in a blog post that she would be withdrawing her album "1989" from the Apple Music streaming servicewhen it launches next week. When the subscription-based streaming service was announced at Apple's recent WWDC, the iPhone maker said it was offering a three-month free trial of the service for users. Swift noted that during that trial Apple would not be paying royalties on any tracks that were streamed.
"I'm not sure you know that Apple Music will not be paying writers, producers, or artists for those three months," Swift wrote. "I find it to be shocking, disappointing, and completely unlike this historically progressive and generous company."
Swift said that her removal of her popular album was not about her own earnings:
"This is about the young songwriter who just got his or her first cut and thought that the royalties from that would get them out of debt."
While Apple was not initially making a comment, its senior VP of Internet Software and Services Eddy Cue later took to twitter to announce that the company was reversing its 'no pay' policy.
.....
She needs to call Jiggaman
The popular singer-songwriter had taken to Tumblr on Sunday to tell her fans in a blog post that she would be withdrawing her album "1989" from the Apple Music streaming servicewhen it launches next week. When the subscription-based streaming service was announced at Apple's recent WWDC, the iPhone maker said it was offering a three-month free trial of the service for users. Swift noted that during that trial Apple would not be paying royalties on any tracks that were streamed.
"I'm not sure you know that Apple Music will not be paying writers, producers, or artists for those three months," Swift wrote. "I find it to be shocking, disappointing, and completely unlike this historically progressive and generous company."
Swift said that her removal of her popular album was not about her own earnings:
"This is about the young songwriter who just got his or her first cut and thought that the royalties from that would get them out of debt."
While Apple was not initially making a comment, its senior VP of Internet Software and Services Eddy Cue later took to twitter to announce that the company was reversing its 'no pay' policy.
.....
She needs to call Jiggaman
fuck gay-z
New member
fuk nigga Camel got mufukaz abandonin his sinkin
ship by the boatload....DEAD
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33244740&sa=U&ei=0AeMVa3sGomiNv7ngKgO&ved=0CBsQqQIwAg&sig2=UWFkjVKe1Oaw8uENBvkoyA&usg=AFQjCNE69xmhq9MRn28V_aZgd1IXAWSrZA
ship by the boatload....DEAD
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33244740&sa=U&ei=0AeMVa3sGomiNv7ngKgO&ved=0CBsQqQIwAg&sig2=UWFkjVKe1Oaw8uENBvkoyA&usg=AFQjCNE69xmhq9MRn28V_aZgd1IXAWSrZA
fuck gay-z
New member
L's on Ls' on L's....CTFU
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.businessinsider.com/jay-z-music-streaming-service-tidal-peter-tonstad-ceo-let-go-2015-6&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CCkQqQIoADAD&sig2=Q7Q0w-9wxd_2_fsIoE128A&usg=AFQjCNF28MR8Lpk6ebWfxXQfU0lWPWf8pw
Nigga said "fuk Camel....im out"...>LMFAO
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.wsj.com/articles/boss-of-jay-zs-music-streaming-service-tidal-quits-1435063203&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CCsQ-AsoADAD&sig2=y6JNp_DlO7EbZTgKRFZ11w&usg=AFQjCNG0BmtGTVaZ2oWvN6Y4K36G-w3oig
deeeaaaddd
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://gizmodo.com/jay-zs-troubled-tidal-music-service-loses-another-ceo-1713343320&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CCwQ-AsoATAD&sig2=r7AnRdI78ndZ_yVdUKY_XA&usg=AFQjCNEdMHhC-xjiBl_H66NwifMBUO-LQg
hold this L's fuk nigga CameL
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/06/24/jay-zs-troubled-tidal-loses-interim-ceo/&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CC0Q-AsoAjAD&sig2=i8DRDwpTMuk0Knyk6RMhow&usg=AFQjCNHkhgB0qGh2jz8o1nQBms6fHC4g2g
hold
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.businessinsider.com/jay-z-music-streaming-service-tidal-peter-tonstad-ceo-let-go-2015-6&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CCkQqQIoADAD&sig2=Q7Q0w-9wxd_2_fsIoE128A&usg=AFQjCNF28MR8Lpk6ebWfxXQfU0lWPWf8pw
Nigga said "fuk Camel....im out"...>LMFAO
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.wsj.com/articles/boss-of-jay-zs-music-streaming-service-tidal-quits-1435063203&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CCsQ-AsoADAD&sig2=y6JNp_DlO7EbZTgKRFZ11w&usg=AFQjCNG0BmtGTVaZ2oWvN6Y4K36G-w3oig
deeeaaaddd
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://gizmodo.com/jay-zs-troubled-tidal-music-service-loses-another-ceo-1713343320&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CCwQ-AsoATAD&sig2=r7AnRdI78ndZ_yVdUKY_XA&usg=AFQjCNEdMHhC-xjiBl_H66NwifMBUO-LQg
hold this L's fuk nigga CameL
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/06/24/jay-zs-troubled-tidal-loses-interim-ceo/&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CC0Q-AsoAjAD&sig2=i8DRDwpTMuk0Knyk6RMhow&usg=AFQjCNHkhgB0qGh2jz8o1nQBms6fHC4g2g
hold
fuck gay-z
New member
nigga can stop pickin up L's.....DEAD
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://hanfordsentinel.com/ap/entertainment/jay-z-s-streaming-service-tidal-loses-another-ceo/article_528a4891-4473-5477-b372-1822db291a59.html&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CD0QqQIoADAH&sig2=V_S6e4nhy1Y-d6ETBpTJsA&usg=AFQjCNG9jdw_maplr1el9U4IJXdbDMxtGg
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.theroot.com/blogs/the_grapevine/2015/06/jay_z_s_tidal_loses_the_interim_president_it_just_appointed_2_months_ago.html%3Fwpisrc%3Dnewstories&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CDsQqQIoADAG&sig2=aZWzQCEeuPaf8Bv0YHp9IQ&usg=AFQjCNEo325o9WZ56rCo-RExruijLP1EOg
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://hanfordsentinel.com/ap/entertainment/jay-z-s-streaming-service-tidal-loses-another-ceo/article_528a4891-4473-5477-b372-1822db291a59.html&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CD0QqQIoADAH&sig2=V_S6e4nhy1Y-d6ETBpTJsA&usg=AFQjCNG9jdw_maplr1el9U4IJXdbDMxtGg
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.theroot.com/blogs/the_grapevine/2015/06/jay_z_s_tidal_loses_the_interim_president_it_just_appointed_2_months_ago.html%3Fwpisrc%3Dnewstories&sa=U&ei=QQiMVbXcDYKG-QHe2IDwDg&ved=0CDsQqQIoADAG&sig2=aZWzQCEeuPaf8Bv0YHp9IQ&usg=AFQjCNEo325o9WZ56rCo-RExruijLP1EOg
