The Official Fox Comicbook Cinematic Universe Thread - Coming Soon (Deadpool 2 June 2018)

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
What a stupid question.

Anyway the FF doesn't need to be playing 2nd fiddle to Tony Stark and his pals in order to have a great movie. They have strong enough material on their own.
 
Broddie;c-9667341 said:
What a stupid question.

Anyway the FF doesn't need to be playing 2nd fiddle to Tony Stark and his pals in order to have a great movie. They have strong enough material on their own.

Whats you think should be done ?
 
nj2089;c-9667558 said:
Broddie;c-9667341 said:
What a stupid question.

Anyway the FF doesn't need to be playing 2nd fiddle to Tony Stark and his pals in order to have a great movie. They have strong enough material on their own.

Whats you think should be done ?

Get somebody who's willing to do the proper research and embrace the FF lore to be the creative mind behind any new movie and give them the same freedom awarded to the X-Men filmmakers. That's a start.
 
tumblr_om6xm6LBBO1qd4rf5o1_1280.jpg
 
texas409;c-9651152 said:
Marvel really needs to give Blade its props for opening so many opportunities for the studio

I seen Blade in the movies like 3 times when it came out cause it was so good

Man Blade kick started this whole shit
 
Broddie;c-9667593 said:
nj2089;c-9667558 said:
Broddie;c-9667341 said:
What a stupid question.

Anyway the FF doesn't need to be playing 2nd fiddle to Tony Stark and his pals in order to have a great movie. They have strong enough material on their own.

Whats you think should be done ?

Get somebody who's willing to do the proper research and embrace the FF lore to be the creative mind behind any new movie and give them the same freedom awarded to the X-Men filmmakers. That's a start.

If someone did the proper research it would be clear as day how important it is to have them in the mcu.
 
nickel-us P;c-9669697 said:
Broddie;c-9667593 said:
nj2089;c-9667558 said:
Broddie;c-9667341 said:
What a stupid question.

Anyway the FF doesn't need to be playing 2nd fiddle to Tony Stark and his pals in order to have a great movie. They have strong enough material on their own.

Whats you think should be done ?

Get somebody who's willing to do the proper research and embrace the FF lore to be the creative mind behind any new movie and give them the same freedom awarded to the X-Men filmmakers. That's a start.

If someone did the proper research it would be clear as day how important it is to have them in the mcu.

Yes because all the important FF stories involved the greater Marvel Universe. Oh wait they didn't. Fact is if somebody really knew about the Fantastic Four they'd know the MCU inclusion isn't even necessary.

The only reason they'd even be needed is to do justice to the true origins of the Inhumans or Black Panther and Marvel Studios already found some work arounds when it comes to that.

Like you don't need the MCU for the Galactus/Silver Surfer saga or the Nathaniel Richards epic and you could easily mine multiple movies out of both.
 
Mr.LV;c-9669922 said:
This was damn good,I wish Marvel made more Rated R movies.

It's not Marvel.

They're a licenser that gets 2% of the box office at most. Give the credit where it's actually due: Fox.
 
BlackNeji971;c-9668143 said:
OK, Logan is pretty boring. I'm waiting for people to see it to discuss and to be able to spoil about it

If you considered that boring then I'm gonna need Fox to go ahead and produce some more boring X-Men shit cause Logan was damn near Dark Knight status.
 
Last edited:
Broddie;c-9670287 said:
Mr.LV;c-9669922 said:
This was damn good,I wish Marvel made more Rated R movies.

It's not Marvel.

They're a licenser that gets 2% of the box office at most. Give the credit where it's actually due: Fox.

It's still Marvel they are using Marvel characters are they not? Like what I said I wish Marvel did more Rated R movies.
 
Mr.LV;c-9670350 said:
Broddie;c-9670287 said:
Mr.LV;c-9669922 said:
This was damn good,I wish Marvel made more Rated R movies.

It's not Marvel.

They're a licenser that gets 2% of the box office at most. Give the credit where it's actually due: Fox.

It's still Marvel they are using Marvel characters are they not? Like what I said I wish Marvel did more Rated R movies.

No. Once again the Marvel characters are licensed. Marvel themselves (Marvel Studios) had as much to do with the creation of this movie as you and I did. Why do you think Disney is so salty with Fox? They make peanuts off the X-Men movie revenue and have 0 creative input.
 
I'm also seeing people saying it's the best comic book movie since dark knight lol polarizing movie . I guess people saying it's boring are the ones that wanted jokes and shit
 
My brother in law said it was decent, i value his opinion highly (kid knows his shit) so it's dampened my expectations slightly.

His main complaint was that it's too slow and the villan really didn't do much.
 
Last edited:
I'm not too damn analytical like some on here, I take movies as they are. I think Logan was ok, like 7.5 out of 10. It does have plenty of action in it but I think people say it's boring because of not fully understanding the storyline or that it was just a long movie.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
3,054
Views
1,050
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…