The Official DC Cinematic Universe thread - Now Showing - "The Justice League"

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Huey_C;c-10110065 said:
soul rattler;c-10109827 said:
Huey_C;c-10109648 said:
soul rattler;c-10109349 said:
Saying Steppenwolf was a shit villain is like saying Alfred was a shit butler or Detective Gordon was a shit cop.

ujfua45f5x1u.png


Your statement makes no sense

To someone with cognitive dissonance, I'm sure it does.

Imagine if I'm the biggest Gordon fan in the world. I'd be mad as hell saying they ruined his character by not devoting at least half an hour to him.

You're so emotional when it comes to this shit lol. You're too dense to process any type of negative critque of the film. Steppenwolf is the most generic and basic of villains so far in this universe, no debate.

Doomsday was a villain in this universe, so I think there's plenty to debate.
 
C da Night King;c-10110094 said:
Huey_C;c-10110065 said:
soul rattler;c-10109827 said:
Huey_C;c-10109648 said:
soul rattler;c-10109349 said:
Saying Steppenwolf was a shit villain is like saying Alfred was a shit butler or Detective Gordon was a shit cop.

ujfua45f5x1u.png


Your statement makes no sense

To someone with cognitive dissonance, I'm sure it does.

Imagine if I'm the biggest Gordon fan in the world. I'd be mad as hell saying they ruined his character by not devoting at least half an hour to him.

You're so emotional when it comes to this shit lol. You're too dense to process any type of negative critque of the film. Steppenwolf is the most generic and basic of villains so far in this universe, no debate.

Doomsday was a villain in this universe, so I think there's plenty to debate.

Lex Luthor was the main villain in BvS, doomsday was essentially Luthor's vessel of destruction. Doomsday didn't carry the movie.
 
Huey_C;c-10110180 said:
C da Night King;c-10110094 said:
Huey_C;c-10110065 said:
soul rattler;c-10109827 said:
Huey_C;c-10109648 said:
soul rattler;c-10109349 said:
Saying Steppenwolf was a shit villain is like saying Alfred was a shit butler or Detective Gordon was a shit cop.

ujfua45f5x1u.png


Your statement makes no sense

To someone with cognitive dissonance, I'm sure it does.

Imagine if I'm the biggest Gordon fan in the world. I'd be mad as hell saying they ruined his character by not devoting at least half an hour to him.

You're so emotional when it comes to this shit lol. You're too dense to process any type of negative critque of the film. Steppenwolf is the most generic and basic of villains so far in this universe, no debate.

Doomsday was a villain in this universe, so I think there's plenty to debate.

Lex Luthor was the main villain in BvS, doomsday was essentially Luthor's vessel of destruction. Doomsday didn't carry the movie.

Lex Luther being the villain isn't saying much either though. Steppenwolf is say is number 2 villain in this movie universe with Zod being number 1 by far.
 
Last edited:
Sion;c-10110193 said:
Broddie;c-10108006 said:
Sion;c-10107879 said:
sapp08_2001;c-10107433 said:
So i just watched Watchmen again and im confused. If Zack Snyder can do such a great job with the action scenes, tone, and beautiful visuals why is it his DC movies arent up to par? Watchmen>>>>

OXeOj.gif

Watchmen was almost verbatim to the graphic novel. It was essentially a storyboard already drafted for him. All he had to do was follow the script. Watchmen is hard to fuck up, all they did was change the ending.

It's not just that the ending was changed on the surface. It's entire point and purpose is completely different than that of the GN's ending. As are a lot of the character beats and motivations

A lot of the thematics and key parts of the GN's narrative in general were changed, removed or completely misinterpreted by Snyder's only faithful on the surface level adaptation.

This is why so many fans of the book completely hated it. I don't have time to break down the specifics but there are many articles or internet posts on comic book forums that take the film to task accordingly.

Watchmen adaptation was only really good to people who didn't know the story beforehand or only understood it on an extremely superficial level.

It's partly understandable because Watchmen's storytelling only truly works the way it does because of how that form of narrative execution was tailor made for the comic book format.

What the movie should've done was adapt the main themes and truly reinterpret them for a cinematic storytelling format. Not try to ape comic book storytelling in a medium not really built to serve it. Tell the story in a way that could only be told only with the film medium. Spiritually that would've been a more faithful approach. In that sense Terry Gilliam had the right idea.

Dayum @Broddie Watchmen "sucked" and so did Avengers ? LOLOLOLOL bro are there any movies you actually like ?? Watchmen was DOPE AF. They took out the scene with Rorschach too before the little girl but I think some of those scenes were unnecessary.

Bro just sharing common information for the sake of conversation since it's basically what damn near everybody who really dug the book felt about that Watchmen movie and the movie was brought up here.

Haven't watched either movie in years (when both were in theaters). Won't be seeing them anytime soon and no I don't really like modern superhero movies like that. I find a lot of them to be grossly overrrated.

My standards for them are higher than most people's I guess. I expect them to be just as good as any other type of movie and The Dark Knight was damn near 10 years ago. Not too many exceptional ones since then. Which of course is totally my opinion that I have a right to have.

I rarely see any and don't believe in giving a generic blockbuster a pass just cause it's a novelty (The Avengers) or based on a favorite comic book of mine. It is what it is. Everybody has genres they don't really fuck with. I love horror and action movies. Most people find them tasteless.

God forgive me for not operating within a think tank I guess but as any adult who can walk and chew gum at the same time knows. Opinions are like assholes.

 
Last edited:
Broddie;c-10110316 said:
Sion;c-10110193 said:
Broddie;c-10108006 said:
Sion;c-10107879 said:
sapp08_2001;c-10107433 said:
So i just watched Watchmen again and im confused. If Zack Snyder can do such a great job with the action scenes, tone, and beautiful visuals why is it his DC movies arent up to par? Watchmen>>>>

OXeOj.gif

Watchmen was almost verbatim to the graphic novel. It was essentially a storyboard already drafted for him. All he had to do was follow the script. Watchmen is hard to fuck up, all they did was change the ending.

It's not just that the ending was changed on the surface. It's entire point and purpose is completely different than that of the GN's ending. As are a lot of the character beats and motivations

A lot of the thematics and key parts of the GN's narrative in general were changed, removed or completely misinterpreted by Snyder's only faithful on the surface level adaptation.

This is why so many fans of the book completely hated it. I don't have time to break down the specifics but there are many articles or internet posts on comic book forums that take the film to task accordingly.

Watchmen adaptation was only really good to people who didn't know the story beforehand or only understood it on an extremely superficial level.

It's partly understandable because Watchmen's storytelling only truly works the way it does because of how that form of narrative execution was tailor made for the comic book format.

What the movie should've done was adapt the main themes and truly reinterpret them for a cinematic storytelling format. Not try to ape comic book storytelling in a medium not really built to serve it. Tell the story in a way that could only be told only with the film medium. Spiritually that would've been a more faithful approach. In that sense Terry Gilliam had the right idea.

Dayum @Broddie Watchmen "sucked" and so did Avengers ? LOLOLOLOL bro are there any movies you actually like ?? Watchmen was DOPE AF. They took out the scene with Rorschach too before the little girl but I think some of those scenes were unnecessary.

Bro just sharing common information for the sake of conversation since it's basically what damn near everybody who really dug the book felt about that Watchmen movie and the movie was brought up here.

Haven't watched either movie in years (when both were in theaters). Won't be seeing them anytime soon and no I don't really like modern superhero movies like that. I find a lot of them to be grossly overrrated.

My standards for them are higher than most people's I guess. I expect them to be just as good as any other type of movie and The Dark Knight was damn near 10 years ago. Not too many exceptional ones since then. Which of course is totally my opinion that I have a right to have.

I rarely see any and don't believe in giving a generic blockbuster a pass just cause it's a novelty (The Avengers) or based on a favorite comic book of mine. It is what it is. Everybody has genres they don't really fuck with. I love horror and action movies. Most people find them tasteless.

God forgive me for not operating within a think tank I guess but as any adult who can walk and chew gum at the same time knows. Opinions are like assholes.

No doubt about that. I agree with you on the Watchmen movie. Complete ass to me. That was the point where I hopped of the Snyder bandwagon. Still can't believe Warner Bros gave this dude the keys to the Ferrari and he crashed it into the wall. I honestly think most fans just accept this mediocrity now. They just want a couple of references and dumb action with no context and they're fine. Doesn't matter that the film is trash. I still don't understand how Star Wars fans could watch the Force Awakens and think that trash was good but more power to them.
 
Sion;c-10110193 said:
Broddie;c-10108006 said:
Sion;c-10107879 said:
sapp08_2001;c-10107433 said:
So i just watched Watchmen again and im confused. If Zack Snyder can do such a great job with the action scenes, tone, and beautiful visuals why is it his DC movies arent up to par? Watchmen>>>>

OXeOj.gif

Watchmen was almost verbatim to the graphic novel. It was essentially a storyboard already drafted for him. All he had to do was follow the script. Watchmen is hard to fuck up, all they did was change the ending.

It's not just that the ending was changed on the surface. It's entire point and purpose is completely different than that of the GN's ending. As are a lot of the character beats and motivations.

A lot of the thematics and key parts of the GN's narrative in general were changed, removed or completely misinterpreted by Snyder's only faithful on the surface level adaptation.

This is why so many fans of the book completely hated it. I don't have time to break down the specifics but there are many articles or internet posts on comic book forums that take the film to task accordingly.

Watchmen adaptation was only really good to people who didn't know the story beforehand or only understood it on an extremely superficial level.

It's partly understandable because Watchmen's storytelling only truly works the way it does because of how that form of narrative execution was tailor made for the comic book format.

What the movie should've done was adapt the main themes and truly reinterpret them for a cinematic storytelling format. Not try to ape comic book storytelling in a medium not really built to serve it. Tell the story in a way that could only be told only with the film medium. Spiritually that would've been a more faithful approach. In that sense Terry Gilliam had the right idea.

Dayum @Broddie Watchmen "sucked" and so did Avengers ? LOLOLOLOL bro are there any movies you actually like ?? Watchmen was DOPE AF. They took out the scene with Rorschach too before the little girl but I think some of those scenes were unnecessary.

manigga do you know who you are talking to ? dont try...

bp9q4l7zie0i.png


 
C da Night King;c-10110259 said:
Huey_C;c-10110180 said:
C da Night King;c-10110094 said:
Huey_C;c-10110065 said:
soul rattler;c-10109827 said:
Huey_C;c-10109648 said:
soul rattler;c-10109349 said:
Saying Steppenwolf was a shit villain is like saying Alfred was a shit butler or Detective Gordon was a shit cop.

ujfua45f5x1u.png


Your statement makes no sense

To someone with cognitive dissonance, I'm sure it does.

Imagine if I'm the biggest Gordon fan in the world. I'd be mad as hell saying they ruined his character by not devoting at least half an hour to him.

You're so emotional when it comes to this shit lol. You're too dense to process any type of negative critque of the film. Steppenwolf is the most generic and basic of villains so far in this universe, no debate.

Doomsday was a villain in this universe, so I think there's plenty to debate.

Lex Luthor was the main villain in BvS, doomsday was essentially Luthor's vessel of destruction. Doomsday didn't carry the movie.

Lex Luther being the villain isn't saying much either though. Steppenwolf is say is number 2 villain in this movie universe with Zod being number 1 by far.

One of the many reasons DCEU is failing
 
Movie wasn't terrrible but was just meh.

Cgi was bad. It's wild how marvel can get this right but DC Can't.

I know batmans a dark character but all D.C. Movies lighting seem dark

Batman is flabby, always gettin his ass whooped or punked (superman,WW AND Aquaman shittin on Gotham) and disgusting at how bitch he gets when Superman is around he gets all googly eyes

Only thing he got is WW and him have alil sexual tension which is cool since Supes has LL

Aquaman is just for the bitches son was kinda powered down here

Flash a kid learning to be a superhero

WW carried this movie

Cyborg was cool

Was expect the Villian we got to be a warm up to what would come near the end or second half of the movie but that ain't happen.

 
dalyricalbandit;c-10110468 said:
Movie wasn't terrrible but was just meh.

Cgi was bad. It's wild how marvel can get this right but DC Can't.

I know batmans a dark character but all D.C. Movies lighting seem dark

Batman is flabby, always gettin his ass whooped or punked (superman,WW AND Aquaman shittin on Gotham) and disgusting at how bitch he gets when Superman is around he gets all googly eyes

Only thing he got is WW and him have alil sexual tension which is cool since Supes has LL

Aquaman is just for the bitches son was kinda powered down here

Flash a kid learning to be a superhero

WW carried this movie

Cyborg was cool

Was expect the Villian we got to be a warm up to what would come near the end or second half of the movie but that ain't happen.

Exactly, Batman should be stoic, confident and hard to read not emotional and at times comedic. I feel like they dropped the ball with his character in that sense. I can probably blame wheedon for that.
 
Zack Snyder’s Justice League Reportedly 3 Hours Long

By Tom Chapman 2 hours ago 15 Comments

With Zack Snyder’s Justice League turning out to be one of this year’s most divisive movies, it has been revealed that the superhero spectacular was originally filmed at three hours long – but would an extended runtime have helped or hindered Snyder’s maligned masterpiece?

Uniting Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, Flash, Cyborg, and Aquaman for their first on-screen ensemble, there was a lot to pack into Justice League‘s stingy 120 minutes. Snyder had completed the lion’s share of the movie before he left for personal reasons, leaving The Avengers director Joss Whedon to take over. It is reported that Warner Bros. insisted on a shortened runtime and that Whedon’s involvement impacted around 33% of Justice League, which ultimately led to Snyder’s plans of a much grander affair falling by the wayside.

Beyond The Trailer‘s Grace Randolph gave her own honest review of Justice League and also spoke about her top-secret visit to the studio lot. When discussing the pros and cons of the movie, she revealed that yes, Snyder’s first draft ran at a hefty three hours. It’s a similar case to David Ayer’s Suicide Squad, which went under the knife and had arguably some of its best material slashed. Even from the Justice League trailer, there is a myriad of shots that didn’t make the finished product, meaning fans are begging to know what else was left on the cutting room floor. So, apart from Iris West and Lex Luthor, what did we miss out on?

As Randolph points out, an extended cut was shown to Warner Bros. execs before Justice League went on its cutting spree, and unlike Suicide Squad, an extended release of Justice League wouldn’t take a mountain of work to get there. The big question now is if the studio will relent and give superhero fans the movie they asked for. Snyder is a director that’s known for his “Ultimate Edition” cuts of films like Watchmen and Batman V Superman, but everyone involved seems to be playing down the chances of an extended Justice Leauge.

From Ben Affleck’s double to the movie’s cinematographer, the obvious horde of baying fans, and even a petition doing the round, it looks like everyone wants a Snyder cut to see the light of day. Only time will tell whether the powers that be decide to gift Justice League‘s original form to the world, which would hopefully allow fans to experience the conclusion of Snyder’s DC trilogy as it was intended to be seen.
 
Snyder son joined some movie review site and reviewed jleague. Said he enjoyed the movie but would love to see snyders version after "seeing all the WB studio meddling" done to the film
 
Man they did the exact same thing to BVS though. How haven't they learned their lesson by now. It's all an obvious money grab for DVD sales which if the movie was good at 3 hours long in the theater the DVDs would have sold themselves anyway based on it being a good movie
 
Why are you blaming WB? Who the fuck hands in a 3hr runtime for a blockbuster and expect it not to be significantly trimmed. Especially when you already have prior experience of what’s likely to happen if you do so.

I’m sure an expected runtime was communicated prior to filming and an adequate plot should have been storyboarded as such.
 
Zack Snyder's biggest downfall was always overshooting for the stars. Over ambitious. He has no restraint. He overcomplicated the shit for no reason. Always trying to throw 3 movies worth of material into one movie. Instead of making one movie at a time. Like he did with Man of Steel.
 
kinda agree. as a film maker you should be able to tell your story within 2 and a half hours. im sorry but i dont have 3 hours to set aside everytime i feel like watchin one of these movies on blu ray. I love bvs extended but rarely do i watch it cuz its just too damn long. 2 hours was too short but i aint want no 3 hour movie either.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
11,612
Views
4,803
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…