The Official 2013-2014 College Football Thread

[Livefromclayco]

one of recruits got caught with 200 grams and a weapon, straight felony charge....was with 3 others so hopefully he can skate out with probation

Somebody was supposed to tell him you commit a felony and then go to Auburn

This nigga fucking up the system

Nah, he just hurr'd-up and flipped his signing bonus into some work from his connect.

Can't knock the young brotha's hustle game.

I can see that. This just gives him more time for his eventual transition to QB anyway

 

[G.Avant]

Smh at ESPN trying to big up Saben for giving a scholarship to a player that won't play.

Like the nigga ain't over signed and gotta cut someone else scholarship.

Damn bruh u on ur Schoolboy Q huh

I dont get it bruh

 

[G.Avant]

Fuck it avi/sig bet with all you niggas on the schedule next year. If yo squad play Florida and you trying to bet come see me.

 

[G.Avant]

Only a few months to wait before the hype starts again.

 

[south4life]

Smh at ESPN trying to big up Saben for giving a scholarship to a player that won't play.

Like the nigga ain't over signed and gotta cut someone else scholarship.

Damn bruh u on ur Schoolboy Q huh

I dont get it bruh

Lol he got a song called Hatin Joint

 

[Livefromclayco]

The NCAA Football Rules Committee has proposed changing its targeting rule so a penalty can be reversed in some cases when replay overturns a player ejection.

Last year, college football implemented the targeting rule in which any player committing the penalty would be ejected and his team assessed a 15-yard penalty. The problem for many critics: The penalty still stood even if the ejection got overturned.

Now, the rules committee is recommending that if replay officials rule that an ejection should not have happened, and if the targeting foul is not accompanied by another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty should not be enforced. If the targeting foul is committed with another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty remains.

 

[HustleThaDon]

Defensive Substitutions

The committee also recommended a rules change that will allow defensive units to substitute within the first 10 seconds of the 40-second play clock, with the exception of the final two minutes of each half, starting with the 2014 season.

“This rules change is being made to enhance student-athlete safety by guaranteeing a small window for both teams to substitute,” said Calhoun. “As the average number of plays per game has increased, this issue has been discussed with greater frequency by the committee in recent years and we felt like it was time to act in the interests of protecting our student-athletes.”

Under this rule proposal, the offense will not be allowed to snap the ball until the play clock reaches 29 seconds or less. If the offense snaps the ball before the play clock reaches 29 seconds, a 5-yard, delay-of-game penalty will be assessed. Under current rules, defensive players are not guaranteed an opportunity to substitute unless the offense substitutes first. This part of the rule will remain in place in scenarios where the play clock starts at 25 seconds.

 

[greenwood1921]

Defensive Substitutions

The committee also recommended a rules change that will allow defensive units to substitute within the first 10 seconds of the 40-second play clock, with the exception of the final two minutes of each half, starting with the 2014 season.

“This rules change is being made to enhance student-athlete safety by guaranteeing a small window for both teams to substitute,” said Calhoun. “As the average number of plays per game has increased, this issue has been discussed with greater frequency by the committee in recent years and we felt like it was time to act in the interests of protecting our student-athletes.”

Under this rule proposal, the offense will not be allowed to snap the ball until the play clock reaches 29 seconds or less. If the offense snaps the ball before the play clock reaches 29 seconds, a 5-yard, delay-of-game penalty will be assessed. Under current rules, defensive players are not guaranteed an opportunity to substitute unless the offense substitutes first. This part of the rule will remain in place in scenarios where the play clock starts at 25 seconds.

The Sugar Bowl Saban Rule. lol

 

[CottonCitySlim]

thats a fuck nigga rule if it passes

 

[Livefromclayco]

@CoachGundy: The 10-second rule is like asking basketball to take away the shot clock - Boring!. It’s like asking a blitzing linebacker to raise his hand

Lol at the feels coming from coaches

 

[BDBIID]

That shit is a cop out. Only coaches complaining is the mofos who can't stop it through X and O's and game planning.

 

[infamous114]

It is a wack rule though

 

[BeleeDatPleighboy]

Defensive Substitutions

The committee also recommended a rules change that will allow defensive units to substitute within the first 10 seconds of the 40-second play clock, with the exception of the final two minutes of each half, starting with the 2014 season.

“This rules change is being made to enhance student-athlete safety by guaranteeing a small window for both teams to substitute,” said Calhoun. “As the average number of plays per game has increased, this issue has been discussed with greater frequency by the committee in recent years and we felt like it was time to act in the interests of protecting our student-athletes.”

Under this rule proposal, the offense will not be allowed to snap the ball until the play clock reaches 29 seconds or less. If the offense snaps the ball before the play clock reaches 29 seconds, a 5-yard, delay-of-game penalty will be assessed. Under current rules, defensive players are not guaranteed an opportunity to substitute unless the offense substitutes first. This part of the rule will remain in place in scenarios where the play clock starts at 25 seconds.

They been talking about this change for a couple years now...

eh...i see why some teams (mainly the HUNH offenses) will bitch about it if passed...IMO it shouldnt make that much of a difference. Good coaches will find a way to work around this rule.

at the same time....im kinda happy they are finally considering making rule changes that FAVOR the defensive side of the ball after all the years of the rule changes going in the offenses favor. (The five yard contact rule, QB protection, pass interference rules, QBs having more leeway to throw the ball away, etc.)

*the NFL is also considering a similar rule change*

 

[BeleeDatPleighboy]

That shit is a cop out. Only coaches complaining is the mofos who can't stop it through X and O's and game planning.

eh.... you can say the same thing about all the rules passed that favor the offense in the name of "player safety"

 

[Livefromclayco]

If you system is good this rule won't affect you

The fastest offenses snap it around 30 seconds anyway

 

[BeleeDatPleighboy]

If you system is good this rule won't affect you

The fastest offenses snap it around 30 seconds anyway

I was just about the post this

the good coaches and systems wont be phased much, they will adjust accordingly and continue to dominate

 

[BDBIID]

That shit is a cop out. Only coaches complaining is the mofos who can't stop it through X and O's and game planning.

eh.... you can say the same thing about all the rules passed that favor the offense in the name of "player safety"

But those player safety rules (garbage or not) benefits every team. This rule on the other hand is benefiting some teams and hindering others.

Saban only complaining because his last three losses came to no huddle teams. Had he been 3-0 vs them he wouldn't be this vocal. It's BS.

 

[BeleeDatPleighboy]

The meltdown and feels from barners is hilarious....homerism at its finest

*remember this is a PROPOSED rule change.... PROPOSED*

 

[BeleeDatPleighboy]

That shit is a cop out. Only coaches complaining is the mofos who can't stop it through X and O's and game planning.

eh.... you can say the same thing about all the rules passed that favor the offense in the name of "player safety"

But those player safety rules (garbage or not) benefits every team. This rule on the other hand is benefiting some teams and hindering others.

Saban only complaining because his last three losses came to no huddle teams. Had he been 3-0 vs them he wouldn't be this vocal. It's BS.

false...its benefiting ALL DEFENSES of ALL TEAMS the rule doesnt state "Only Alabama can utilize this rule"

just like the wack offensive favored rules benefit ALL OFFENSES of ALL TEAMS

cmon son....

stop the Bama hate breh and be objective

 

[greenwood1921]

Funny how the several conferences that have majority uptempo offenses never complained about this. Even when Mike Leach was trolling the whole Big XII with that shit, nobody said shit.

Nobody in any of Boise State's wack conferences ever said shit.

But now after a couple skulldraggs -- it's a problem.

Mm-hm.

Time for my man Bob Stoops to get back on the mic and spit some more ether. Like...

"How bout teams stop paying players and over-signing."

lol