Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
blu197;4472874 said:@coop9889 do u know what team means nigga it's obvious heat has the better stars but Boston's team from 1-12 when 100% is better than heat they have more consistent scoring options and have a better coach
blu197;4472885 said:@coop9889 if that is true why did heat lose to mavs last year???
coop9889;4472855 said:), there IS no better team than the heat.
You can have all the depth in the world. If the other team has a superstar (much less, 2 1/2) playing at a high level, they win.
Truerap;4472879 said:A Kobetard's worst nightmare
Either LeBron gets his first of many rings.. OR Timmy gets his 5th thus confirming what we all know is the truth: Tim Duncan is greater than Kobe Bryant.
Duncan NCAA legacy. Kobe Bench warming legacy
Duncan 2 x NCAA player of the year. Kobe "shaq's little brother" of the year.
Duncan NBA Rookie of the year. Kobe "Shaq's 2nd fiddle" for next 7 yrs.
Duncan 2 x season MVP. Kobe 1
Duncan 3 x FMVP. Kobe 2
Duncan 0 x Finals losses. Kobe 2 x finals losses
Duncan 1 x MVP sweep (2003). Kobe 0
Sucks being a Kobetard.
ghost!;4472893 said:coop9889;4472855 said:), there IS no better team than the heat.
You can have all the depth in the world. If the other team has a superstar (much less, 2 1/2) playing at a high level, they win.
how are you the best team, and you havent won a ring, how are you the best team, when there's a team in the west whose won 21 (or 20) str8 games and played better competition then you, the heat have??????
blu197;4472909 said:@coop9889 your logic only makes sense if the heat superstars play every minute and never get tired and they take every single shot but since this is reality and not nba2k that shit ain't happening a real Team beats superstar talent everytime your witnessing it right now with this sas/okc series and saw it last year in the finals
ocelot;4472911 said:@kacee139
We don't need back to backs when you're a winning franchise for 15 years straight... If Spurs go 16-0 its over for Bean....
ocelot;4472911 said:@kacee139
We don't need back to backs when you're a winning franchise for 15 years straight... If Spurs go 16-0 its over for Bean....
kacee139;4472918 said:ocelot;4472911 said:@kacee139
We don't need back to backs when you're a winning franchise for 15 years straight... If Spurs go 16-0 its over for Bean....
try winning for 60 years my nigga, we been a factor every decade, 16 rings >>> 4 maybe 5
![]()
coop9889;4472923 said:kacee139;4472918 said:ocelot;4472911 said:@kacee139
We don't need back to backs when you're a winning franchise for 15 years straight... If Spurs go 16-0 its over for Bean....
try winning for 60 years my nigga, we been a factor every decade, 16 rings >>> 4 maybe 5
![]()
60s 70s and 90s lookin kinda empty lol