Ajackson17
New member
Judah Back;8528885 said:Studying objects with no life in them is not gonna help you understand life
You keep bring up mathematics, bro you clearly don't know mathematics. If I give you a true parable, I'm talking mathematics. High science. Its deeper than that shyt you learn in public school
mathematic (n.)
late 14c. as singular noun, replaced by early 17c. by mathematics, from Latin mathematica (plural), from Greek mathematike tekhne "mathematical science," feminine singular of mathematikos (adj.) "relating to mathematics, scientific, astronomical; disposed to learn," from mathema (genitive mathematos) "science, knowledge, mathematical knowledge; a lesson," literally "that which is learnt;" related to manthanein "to learn," from PIE root *mendh- "to learn" (cognates: Greek menthere "to care," Lithuanian mandras "wide-awake," Old Church Slavonic madru "wise, sage," Gothic mundonsis "to look at," German munter "awake, lively"). As an adjective, 1540s, from French mathématique or directly from Latin mathematicus.
Its consciousness. If you wanna talk mathematics let's get into the "LESSONS". let's talk that reeeeeeal shyt, that MA'AT shyt, that 5%er gods and earths shyt, that wisdom of Solomon, that masonic, half Islamic shyt
METAPHYSICS.
Dude, why are insinuating at objects when I gave an example that gives a object functionality. So first and foremost stop that silliness. Second, everything is an ecology and it affects everything and that's what we mean by studying the natural world or realm. From the stars, to the dark matter back to the smallest atoms and sub-atomic particles. That's studying everything. What I'm talking about is shit you can't prove and can't test and can't observe like harry potter's magic like some of these christian, islam, and etc believe in.