Tariq Nasheed: Slavery Wasn't That Bad For Black Women

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Maybe not explicitly said,but one can reasonably surmise his tone & "cadence" suggests that black women were complicit........
 
blackrain;9538436 said:
5th Letter;9538401 said:
blackrain;9538358 said:
tittyman;9538150 said:
The funny thing is, he doesn't say anything about "slavery was better for black women" in that video. This was click bait, but no one here seemed to bother to actual watch the video. The title is fake and it's troll material click bait.

Literally within the first 3 minutes of the video he says there's never been a successful revolt in this country because black women would sell out black men because "master fed them clothed and fucked them every now and again which wasn't so bad" then says a few of them had it easy. He actually said black women didn't mind being raped by slave masters...I know this nigga is some of y'all Savior but your boy K Flexx aka Tariq is on some bullshit with this one

You're sounding like a damn white supremacist with you purposely ignoring logic. He said black people in general used to snitch on black people during slave revolts. This is some click bait bullshit I thought you were better than this.

The main focus of the part is black women. Yes he said black men would too, but I'm not talking about that so how about stick to the thread topic itself instead of trying to go off kilter. You hear him say it, and even if you want to say he's talking about all black people that don't make what he said about black women any less fucked up. If you're not gonna actually talk about the topic ain't no point in you posting because you can't ignore what he said

I did stick to the topic. I said that he never said that about black women. You're putting out misleading information bruh.
 
Malcolm X dated white women, did coke, and was a (hustler)

Malcolm X said and did x, y and z to black women

Martin Luther King was a cheater (alleged)

Let's see if we can find some things on Dr. Fancis (RIP) or Tony Browner, Dr. Henry Clarke, Nas, Killer Mike, Dick Gregory, Eric Sheppard, Jason Black.

They all speak on black empowerment, let's pull up things on them...I don't understand the attraction to this nigga Tariq lol...nigga aint nobody's leader. Nigga makes movies...he's a movie guy..and folks going at dude like he's the second coming of Christ..smh

Shid if we go drag out and point out faults let's do it for all Lol...

 
Last edited:
I wonder if y'all would be defending it, if that same exact video was put out by this guy ...

kevop342486r.jpg


 
Peace_79;9538463 said:
I wonder if y'all would be defending it, if that same exact video was put out by this guy ...

kevop342486r.jpg

What would that prove? That's equivalent to a black dude calling you nigga, in contrast to a white dude calling you nigga. It completely changes the context of the statement.
 
The same niggas that want you to ignore Hillary's racism are the same ones shitting on a black man trying to give black people good information

2BAF666A00000578-0-image-a-1_1440618491320.jpg
 
Lol..

That's right these the same niggas that campaigned for Hillary racist ass...the motherfucker that shitted on black ppl more than anybody (president wise)

smh

Carry on...

I'll continue to support dude and others dropping knowledge, I gotta remind myself these niggas campaigned for Hillary
 
Last edited:
AZTG;9538447 said:
I am not qualified to talk on this but I just cant understand why you would even say that.

Even if it was true, which even simple minded folk would agree its not, but even if its true, how does this help with the struggle in 2016?

If you're not qualified, why give your opinion?

It relates to 2016 because black people are still being oppressed, just with newer tactics, and black women and men still rat out their own in the same manner for a pat on the back from the US majority race.

If you know your history, you know how to counter these sell-outs and how to move when placed in comparable situations.
 
Last edited:
Maximus Rex;9538034 said:
R0mp;9537970 said:
He's one of those types that downplays black womens' struggles, eh? Not surprising...

What struggles are those? The ability to lie about getting raped with impunity? In addition to not only taking a man's freedom, but ruining a man's reputation on a mere allegation. How about being able to get a muthafuckas shit simply for being married to him? Or the struggle of being awarded custody of children 80% of the time. Of course there's the ardous task of unilaterally deciding upon whether or not to end a pregnancy. The only thing a bitch has to struggle with is her gag relax.

This chunky Fred from Scooby Doo looking ass mf really hates women huh? Your pudgy ass Ascot wearing, fruity in the booty, gay swishing ass really got a chip on your shoulder huh?

Some of you he man woman haters club ass niggas sound like y'all wish you were women with the hate and envy you spew. I'm sorry your mother was a despicable cunt that taught you how attract only despicable cunts to you, don't put that on all women

Oh another reason women might be playing you is cuz you look gayer and softer than a bunch of rainbow toilet paper, so the only hoes fucking with you are the opportunistic type. You are the essence of making pussies dry and shrivel up

The nerve of you ugly ass mfs to hold such opinions like women are beating your door down to be with you, nigga please

 
Last edited:
I tried watching Hidden Colors, but I couldn't really get into it. Maybe it's just the academic to me, but they way they presented the information was dubious. Typically, when a documentary makes claims, it references sources or explains how those claims can be verified. With Hidden Colors, it just seemed like he got a bunch of "experts" to say some stuff, but very few of them gave you any way of knowing any of what was said was true.

I appreciate the motive, but sometimes afrocentrists and woke people pass on half-truths or exaggerations as sort of a overdone response to the way racists whites have put out lies. As a result, if there isn't solid factual basis for claims made, there should be skepticism regardless of which side is making the claim. I only watched about half of the first movie though, so it could have gotten better or there could have been like a works cited type list that I didn't see.
 
StoneColdMikey;9538483 said:
5th Letter;9538478 said:
The same niggas that want you to ignore Hillary's racism are the same ones shitting on a black man trying to give black people good information

2BAF666A00000578-0-image-a-1_1440618491320.jpg

Fuck outta here with the delfection

This entire thread is one big deflection. blackrain lied about something that Tariq never said. Why not address that?
 
The Lonious Monk;9538487 said:
I tried watching Hidden Colors, but I couldn't really get into it. Maybe it's just the academic to me, but they way they presented the information was dubious. Typically, when a documentary makes claims, it references sources or explains how those claims can be verified. With Hidden Colors, it just seemed like he got a bunch of "experts" to say some stuff, but very few of them gave you any way of knowing any of what was said was true.

I appreciate the motive, but sometimes afrocentrists and woke people pass on half-truths or exaggerations as sort of a overdone response to the way racists whites have put out lies. As a result, if there isn't solid factual basis for claims made, there should be skepticism regardless of which side is making the claim. I only watched about half of the first movie though, so it could have gotten better or there could have been like a works cited type list that I didn't see.

I can't say what you did or what you didn't do, but I can say when I watched Hidden Colors everything they discussed, they provided documentations, books, pictures and gave you a visual outlay of what they were talking about. Maybe you didn't watch the Hidden Colors that dude produced.

The "experts" that you mentioned that were speaking provided docs, books, pics, and even gave you dates to go and research what they were stating.

What part in the movie had you confused or you thought was false? Half of the 1st movie, what part or statement was made that you thought was false?

Maybe it is false, I want to make sure I'm not in taking false information.

 
Last edited:
NothingButTheTruth;9538476 said:
Peace_79;9538463 said:
I wonder if y'all would be defending it, if that same exact video was put out by this guy ...

kevop342486r.jpg

What would that prove? That's equivalent to a black dude calling you nigga, in contrast to a white dude calling you nigga. It completely changes the context of the statement.

Not equivalent at all.

It does not scale.

Someone using a single isolated term to either evoke Endearment ... OR evoke Racism

DOES NOT EQUAL

Someone making several generalizations and coveying a sentiment invalidating the experience of a whole demographic of people.

Are you implying that Tariq was conveying a sentiment of endearment towards Black Women by claiming that they enjoyed getting raped by their slave masters?? ...

Please explain that to me...

 
StoneColdMikey;9538484 said:
I'm not trying to measure struggles but to say black women don't have it worst than us is just a plain lie

It's not

You're wrong and should chill
 
The Lonious Monk;9538487 said:
I tried watching Hidden Colors, but I couldn't really get into it. Maybe it's just the academic to me, but they way they presented the information was dubious. Typically, when a documentary makes claims, it references sources or explains how those claims can be verified. With Hidden Colors, it just seemed like he got a bunch of "experts" to say some stuff, but very few of them gave you any way of knowing any of what was said was true.

I appreciate the motive, but sometimes afrocentrists and woke people pass on half-truths or exaggerations as sort of a overdone response to the way racists whites have put out lies. As a result, if there isn't solid factual basis for claims made, there should be skepticism regardless of which side is making the claim. I only watched about half of the first movie though, so it could have gotten better or there could have been like a works cited type list that I didn't see.

Your opinion is your opinion and I can't criticize that

But saying you watched half of 1/4 movies and then typing this for sure invalidates your opinion

You can't even make an informed statement on what you're talking about
 
R.D.;9538514 said:
The Lonious Monk;9538487 said:
I tried watching Hidden Colors, but I couldn't really get into it. Maybe it's just the academic to me, but they way they presented the information was dubious. Typically, when a documentary makes claims, it references sources or explains how those claims can be verified. With Hidden Colors, it just seemed like he got a bunch of "experts" to say some stuff, but very few of them gave you any way of knowing any of what was said was true.

I appreciate the motive, but sometimes afrocentrists and woke people pass on half-truths or exaggerations as sort of a overdone response to the way racists whites have put out lies. As a result, if there isn't solid factual basis for claims made, there should be skepticism regardless of which side is making the claim. I only watched about half of the first movie though, so it could have gotten better or there could have been like a works cited type list that I didn't see.

Your opinion is your opinion and I can't criticize that

But saying you watched half of 1/4 movies and then typing this for sure invalidates your opinion

You can't even make an informed statement on what you're talking about

This statement doesn't make a lot of sense. What opinion did my statement invalidate. I didn't say Hidden Colors was a bad documentary or a bad series. I said I couldn't get into it. I tried watching it and it just seemed like people talking about things from a casual standpoint the way we do on here and not addressing any of the issues from an academic standpoint. Now @Knock_Twice says the sourcing and academic rigor was there. I already acknowledged that was a possibility. I just didn't see it. This is what I watched:
http://123movies.is/film/hidden-colors-6243/watching.html

Is that not the same Hidden Colors, you guys are talking about? Where is the sourcing. They are just making a bunch of claims from what I see. For example, they talk about blacks in Asia and flash a few statues and say blacks must have been prominent in Asia because the statues look black, which in itself is a pretty weak argument. Then Umar Johnson makes the claim that the first Samurai and the ninja system were started by blacks. He gives absolutely no source for that. It's like he just pulled it out of thin air. Then Tariq talks about Bodhidharma creating martial arts and taking it to China to become what we know as Kung Fu. That much is true. Again, Tariq didn't source or give an example of where that information came from, but you can easily enough verify it yourself. That's fine, but he makes the claim that Bodhidharma was black. Where did he get that from? Is there some reference that describes him as black, because the image that he flashed in the documentary would not be considered black in India or the modern world. Hell, the Indians that are actually dark skinned like Black Africans aren't considered "Black" in the modern world for the most part.

Again, I'm not saying the info is wrong. I'm not saying anyone is wrong for liking the series. If nothing else, you can probably watch it and then use it to guide your own research. I just said couldn't get into it because I don't typically like documentaries that consist of people making a bunch of unsourced or unsupported claims and that goes for any subject matter or creator.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
217
Views
307
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…