xxCivicxx;c-9553011 said:Peace_79;c-9553006 said:xxCivicxx;c-9552929 said:Peace_79;c-9552884 said:For example, if you were President, how would YOU go about constitutionally "punishing" a police officer who got into a fatal altercation with a citizen?
And how would this action immediately STOP all similar altercations from occurring in the future.
Be specific.
BTW, this exchange has been all about perceived negative aspects of Obama.
Regarding my original point, can you think of any positive contributions that Obama has made to the black community?
As you find it so easy to excuse the faults of TN and appreciate his contributions... I wonder if you can apply the same skill to another black figure that you happen to not be fond of.
I would tell the attorney general WHO I APPOINTED TO PROSECUTE
Oh I'm sorry, that makes too much sense smh
Ok President Civix.
Once the Attorney General prosecutes and finds this police officer NOT GUILTY ...
Smh pseudo-intellectual
You basically just said there's no point in attempting to seek justice because black people won't get it
But you think you're making sense
Are you implying that Obama did not want justice for those black people that died?
What a stupid thing to say.
What I did was give you an example of how the prosecution of someone does NOT stop the CRIME from being committed in the future.
It doesn't even garuntee the conviction of the accused.
But the slow and thankless process of re-shaping the culture and systemic conditions that lead to given outcomes ...
Doesn't look as Bad Ass as abusing your authority to punish a single individual for a single Crime.
I illustrated how a rash and emotional decision to "look like you are doing something for black people" could actually make things worse in the long term.
Your answer to the race violence in our community is to set the precedent of POTUS commanding his Attorney General to prosecute civilian cases.
While dong nothing to address the root causes of the issue.
And you don't see how that's problematic.
Last edited: