So would you really not marry a woman who is perfect for you?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Shuffington;1966005 said:
(*anti-marriage rebuttal)

if she was the perfect girl she wouldnt worry about marriage and titles

Lol. OK, let's say that she's perfect for you except that she wants to get married.
 
Last edited:
allreasoned_out;1965937 said:
I can understand the desire to not rush into something, but if a woman shows herself to be trustworthy and perfect for you, I don't see why you wouldn't want to put a ring on her finger.

This is for the anti-marriage fellas.

Marriage isn't something you rush into, and it isn't something to be done on a whim.

It's not like going to Best Buy and deciding to cop that 50" LED screen. Too many people think it IS, and this is why we have a 50 percent divorce rate in the US.

It's a commitment, and if you aren't ready for that from a financial, intellectual, and emotional standpoint, you don't need to get married. There's a lot more to being married than that license.
 
Last edited:
allreasoned_out;1965937 said:
I can understand the desire to not rush into something, but if a woman shows herself to be trustworthy and perfect for you, I don't see why you wouldn't want to put a ring on her finger.

This is for the anti-marriage fellas.

people,change, and ive learned that u never really know somebody
 
Last edited:
Yung_Souf_Money;1966100 said:
marriage doesnt seem to be about love anymore only a money thang now

the whole concept of marrying for love is a recent phenomenon...people need to find out why marriage was created
 
Last edited:
truth spitter;1982866 said:
the whole concept of marrying for love is a recent phenomenon...people need to find out why marriage was created

thats why most marriages fail.

love fades, attraction fades, people grow apart instead of together.

thats how affairs start, withholding sex/money and blah blah
 
Last edited:
allreasoned_out;1965937 said:
I can understand the desire to not rush into something, but if a woman shows herself to be trustworthy and perfect for you, I don't see why you wouldn't want to put a ring on her finger.

This is for the anti-marriage fellas.

I'm all for people who are about getting married, but truth be told, the government looks at marriage like a business contract.To marry for "love" is a fairly recent concept. Every time someone gets divorced its literally like they are closing their business. And in closing businesses there are tons of legalities paperwork, etc as we all know. I'd tell anyone if you are considering getting married you'd better be prepared for a long term contract or just not do it. If two people are truly committed, I believe they can be together a live comfortably/peacefully/happily whether they are married or not. I personally know women who could care less about the wedding as long as their partner is committed and they get the ring. Screw the legal ish!
 
Last edited:
allreasoned_out;1965937 said:
if a woman shows herself to be trustworthy and perfect for you, I don't see why you wouldn't want to put a ring on her finger.

And gain what exactly? To me it makes perfect sense to not put a ring on her finger. That ring can't stop her from sleeping with the next man. Now you out $500 + dollars. But lets say everything goes perfectly. What exactly did you gain? Nothing. What did you lose? At least $500 and counting. Whether you realize it or not you in the red.
 
Last edited:
nope because men arent focused on marriage we focused on fucking and eating and being comfortable...not having a naggin woman for life
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
24
Views
17
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…