Trillfate;7357796 said:that vid "proved" nothing breh...
the building collapsed at free fall speed, consistent with controlled demo
VIBE;7357671 said:you guys don't think of this shit![]()
lol @ Lucky Larry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trillfate;7357796 said:that vid "proved" nothing breh...
the building collapsed at free fall speed, consistent with controlled demo
VIBE;7357671 said:you guys don't think of this shit![]()
blackamerica;7359435 said:VIBE;7359016 said:you want it not to be a plane so bad you're ignoring actual evidence yet providing nothing to support your side..
realize this, the ones who make the claim that a plane didn't hit the pentagon, the burden of proof lies on you..
"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, prove one did" - silly
"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, here's the proof ___" - what you should be doing..
you're just following hearsay..
The evidence SOMETHING hit the pentagon is there. Just not a 747. I mean this isn't even rocket science lol. This is pure common sense. Where is plane? Did it disintegrate into thin air? Show me ONE pic of the 747 after it hit the Pentagon. One pic?
blackamerica;7359435 said:VIBE;7359016 said:you want it not to be a plane so bad you're ignoring actual evidence yet providing nothing to support your side..
realize this, the ones who make the claim that a plane didn't hit the pentagon, the burden of proof lies on you..
"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, prove one did" - silly
"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, here's the proof ___" - what you should be doing..
you're just following hearsay..
The evidence SOMETHING hit the pentagon is there. Just not a 747. I mean this isn't even rocket science lol. This is pure common sense. Where is plane? Did it disintegrate into thin air? Show me ONE pic of the 747 after it hit the Pentagon. One pic?
CracceR;7359561 said:blackamerica;7359435 said:VIBE;7359016 said:you want it not to be a plane so bad you're ignoring actual evidence yet providing nothing to support your side..
realize this, the ones who make the claim that a plane didn't hit the pentagon, the burden of proof lies on you..
"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, prove one did" - silly
"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, here's the proof ___" - what you should be doing..
you're just following hearsay..
The evidence SOMETHING hit the pentagon is there. Just not a 747. I mean this isn't even rocket science lol. This is pure common sense. Where is plane? Did it disintegrate into thin air? Show me ONE pic of the 747 after it hit the Pentagon. One pic?
even if it was a 757, why would a plane with a few arabs with carpet knifes get that close to the pentagon?
Dirty Sanchez;7359459 said:VIBE;7357675 said:Shizlansky;7357670 said:All I know is a building don't fall like that unless expert demonlation planned it to.
And we know damn well OBL didn't say let's knock down the twin towers and be carful not to fuck up the other buildings.
nope..
there's other buildings that have fallen to fire alone..
never had there been two jets going hundreds of mph, slamming into a building..
never
so you can't say this could never happen, bc it did.. u have nothing to compare it to..
Well there was a plane who crashed into a building in my city.. shit didnt collapse at all
![]()
VIBE;7358921 said:here's a pretty well done animation that gives you a general idea of how it flew in..
Iheart~Cali;7360310 said:Not exactly a fair comparison. The construction of this building and the WTC buildings are vastly different.
But to answer the question, I'm inclined to say yes. The collapse of WTC 7 raises alot of questions. Particularly since the other WTC buildings 2-6 that were much closer to the twin towers and were pummeled with much more fire-laden debris did not collapse at all. Much less implode on themselves. It's highly suspicious being that WTC 7 also housed Add to that it's scientifically impossible for a building to implode layer by layer as fast as it did without any assistance (such as a detonation). I believe a physicist was quoted as saying that a building of that height, with x amount of floors, would take MINIMUM 15 seconds to freefall with absolutely no resistance. And of course there was resistance as these were steel beams, the vast majority of which were not even touched by the jet fuel fire. At best the beams from the surrounding floors would have been weakened. The fire was not hot enough to melt them. So having floor after floor collapse such as it did in under 10 seconds is just not possible. Too many physicists and structural engineers have spoken out about this, so I'm definitely going to believe them over any government official.
VIBE;7361008 said:the wings, the thinnest and weakest part of the plane, were destroyed on impact...
do any of you guys do research?
blackamerica;7361511 said:VIBE;7361008 said:the wings, the thinnest and weakest part of the plane, were destroyed on impact...
do any of you guys do research?
Where is the fuckin plane? You come in here acting as if you got all the answers, as if everybody else is crazy. Yet simple questions aren't answered. Show me one pic of the plane that hit the Pentagon
blackamerica;7361511 said:VIBE;7361008 said:the wings, the thinnest and weakest part of the plane, were destroyed on impact...
do any of you guys do research?
Where is the fuckin plane? You come in here acting as if you got all the answers, as if everybody else is crazy. Yet simple questions aren't answered. Show me one pic of the plane that hit the Pentagon