So, uhh.. was 9/11 an inside job or nah?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Trillfate;7357796 said:
that vid "proved" nothing breh...

the building collapsed at free fall speed, consistent with controlled demo

VIBE;7357671 said:
you guys don't think of this shit
BxRnmuUIYAAKcHl.jpg

lol @ Lucky Larry
 
blackamerica;7359435 said:
VIBE;7359016 said:
you want it not to be a plane so bad you're ignoring actual evidence yet providing nothing to support your side..

realize this, the ones who make the claim that a plane didn't hit the pentagon, the burden of proof lies on you..

"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, prove one did" - silly

"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, here's the proof ___" - what you should be doing..

you're just following hearsay..

The evidence SOMETHING hit the pentagon is there. Just not a 747. I mean this isn't even rocket science lol. This is pure common sense. Where is plane? Did it disintegrate into thin air? Show me ONE pic of the 747 after it hit the Pentagon. One pic?

even if it was a 757, why would a plane with a few arabs with carpet knifes get that close to the pentagon?

 
blackamerica;7359435 said:
VIBE;7359016 said:
you want it not to be a plane so bad you're ignoring actual evidence yet providing nothing to support your side..

realize this, the ones who make the claim that a plane didn't hit the pentagon, the burden of proof lies on you..

"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, prove one did" - silly

"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, here's the proof ___" - what you should be doing..

you're just following hearsay..

The evidence SOMETHING hit the pentagon is there. Just not a 747. I mean this isn't even rocket science lol. This is pure common sense. Where is plane? Did it disintegrate into thin air? Show me ONE pic of the 747 after it hit the Pentagon. One pic?

one pic?

fuck you.. there's plenty of shit posted, even video of the debris... bet you wouldn't even know there's pics of bodies that were still in their seats burning inside the pentagon.. nah, you don't know because you've never researched..

but since I've posted enough, what about you? where's your evidence that something other than American Airlines hit the pentagon?

I'm still waiting for you to post that evidence rather than say "omg your posts aren't enough to convince me!"

 
CracceR;7359561 said:
blackamerica;7359435 said:
VIBE;7359016 said:
you want it not to be a plane so bad you're ignoring actual evidence yet providing nothing to support your side..

realize this, the ones who make the claim that a plane didn't hit the pentagon, the burden of proof lies on you..

"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, prove one did" - silly

"a plane didn't hit the pentagon, here's the proof ___" - what you should be doing..

you're just following hearsay..

The evidence SOMETHING hit the pentagon is there. Just not a 747. I mean this isn't even rocket science lol. This is pure common sense. Where is plane? Did it disintegrate into thin air? Show me ONE pic of the 747 after it hit the Pentagon. One pic?

even if it was a 757, why would a plane with a few arabs with carpet knifes get that close to the pentagon?

Remember, this is pre-9/11...

Now, this would be a lot more difficult for them to pull off...

 
Something just occurred to me for all those saying that a plane didnt hit the pentagon then what the hell exploded missles dont explode in a fuel like explosion of fire..
 
Dirty Sanchez;7359459 said:
VIBE;7357675 said:
Shizlansky;7357670 said:
All I know is a building don't fall like that unless expert demonlation planned it to.

And we know damn well OBL didn't say let's knock down the twin towers and be carful not to fuck up the other buildings.

nope..

there's other buildings that have fallen to fire alone..

never had there been two jets going hundreds of mph, slamming into a building..

never

so you can't say this could never happen, bc it did.. u have nothing to compare it to..

Well there was a plane who crashed into a building in my city.. shit didnt collapse at all

album_large_1376969.jpg

Not exactly a fair comparison. The construction of this building and the WTC buildings are vastly different.

But to answer the question, I'm inclined to say yes. The collapse of WTC 7 raises alot of questions. Particularly since the other WTC buildings 2-6 that were much closer to the twin towers and were pummeled with much more fire-laden debris did not collapse at all. Much less implode on themselves. It's highly suspicious being that WTC 7 also housed Add to that it's scientifically impossible for a building to implode layer by layer as fast as it did without any assistance (such as a detonation). I believe a physicist was quoted as saying that a building of that height, with x amount of floors, would take MINIMUM 15 seconds to freefall with absolutely no resistance. And of course there was resistance as these were steel beams, the vast majority of which were not even touched by the jet fuel fire. At best the beams from the surrounding floors would have been weakened. The fire was not hot enough to melt them. So having floor after floor collapse such as it did in under 10 seconds is just not possible. Too many physicists and structural engineers have spoken out about this, so I'm definitely going to believe them over any government official.
 
Our government, I'm sure, had some sort of knowledge that an attack was going to happen. Just not sure whether they knew commercial jetliners would be used along with when and how.

BTW I'll never get tired of talking about 9/11 and all the conspiracy shit that comes along with it.
 
Last edited:
VIBE;7358921 said:
here's a pretty well done animation that gives you a general idea of how it flew in..


"it."

yes the vid shows u how "it" flew in nicely... what is "it" tho?...there was still no explanation of the wings

therefore "it" wasnt a plane.

what happened to the wings? @Vibe
 
The pentagon shit still baffels me.........so many cameras at one of the most secure buildings in DC and all we have is a grainy footage on 911 pentagon. ......I call bullshit
 
the wings, the thinnest and weakest part of the plane, were destroyed on impact...

do any of you guys do research?
 
A plane hit the pentagon y'all. It don't makes sense to use planes in all the other attacks & then say a plane hit the Pentagon too but actually use a missile.

Iheart~Cali;7360310 said:
Not exactly a fair comparison. The construction of this building and the WTC buildings are vastly different.

But to answer the question, I'm inclined to say yes. The collapse of WTC 7 raises alot of questions. Particularly since the other WTC buildings 2-6 that were much closer to the twin towers and were pummeled with much more fire-laden debris did not collapse at all. Much less implode on themselves. It's highly suspicious being that WTC 7 also housed Add to that it's scientifically impossible for a building to implode layer by layer as fast as it did without any assistance (such as a detonation). I believe a physicist was quoted as saying that a building of that height, with x amount of floors, would take MINIMUM 15 seconds to freefall with absolutely no resistance. And of course there was resistance as these were steel beams, the vast majority of which were not even touched by the jet fuel fire. At best the beams from the surrounding floors would have been weakened. The fire was not hot enough to melt them. So having floor after floor collapse such as it did in under 10 seconds is just not possible. Too many physicists and structural engineers have spoken out about this, so I'm definitely going to believe them over any government official.

Building 7 is a weird case. those other buildings should have collapsed too.

 
VIBE;7361008 said:
the wings, the thinnest and weakest part of the plane, were destroyed on impact...

do any of you guys do research?

Where is the fuckin plane? You come in here acting as if you got all the answers, as if everybody else is crazy. Yet simple questions aren't answered. Show me one pic of the plane that hit the Pentagon
 
blackamerica;7361511 said:
VIBE;7361008 said:
the wings, the thinnest and weakest part of the plane, were destroyed on impact...

do any of you guys do research?

Where is the fuckin plane? You come in here acting as if you got all the answers, as if everybody else is crazy. Yet simple questions aren't answered. Show me one pic of the plane that hit the Pentagon

Show proof it was a missile
 
blackamerica;7361511 said:
VIBE;7361008 said:
the wings, the thinnest and weakest part of the plane, were destroyed on impact...

do any of you guys do research?

Where is the fuckin plane? You come in here acting as if you got all the answers, as if everybody else is crazy. Yet simple questions aren't answered. Show me one pic of the plane that hit the Pentagon

bruh, I'm c
 
9/11 was our Segway into putting our foot in the Middle East. It doesn't matter if the planes brought down the buildings or if it the buildings were blown up from the inside when the planes hit. If the US government didn't do it directly, I believe they knew it was going to happen, who did it, and precisely when.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
840
Views
191
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…