So is Lebron James Stomach turning or what ? (i know he is feeling sick)

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
knightryder;3867637 said:
Kevin Garnett, Ray Allen and Paul Peirce wasnt in there prime.......them niggaz was washed up, and already put in an ample amount of years

on there previous teams, before they all went to boston.... well paul was always on boston putting in work........paul was in his prime when he was playing with Antonie walkers, they were once one of the best duo in the league during that time

ray allen put in work on, the bucks, as part of the original big 3, with sam cassell, and glenn robinson,

than he went to seattle with rashard lewis, when he came to boston, he was on the downside of his career....

and kevin garnett, did so much for the timberwolves organization it was the least minnesota could do was trade him during his downside ........

miami on the other hand is different

lebron is only 26 and had to team up with the 2nd best player in the league during his era....

lebron and wade is like 1 and 2 in the nba, shit is equivalent, to Kobe and A.I joining in there prime, or Kobe and T-mac.....in there prime

Dumb Shit niggas say in the cheap seats.
 
Last edited:
The Boston Big 3 is not comparable. If that's the case you might as well say it was all started by Houston when they had Olajuwon, Drexler, and Barkley.

Within the next 5 years, they are going to need to condense the NBA to 5 teams because those are the only ones that will have any talent and make any money.
 
Last edited:
playmaker88;3868507 said:
Do you even know what a copout is.?

I was merely stating what was the impetous thats not cop out.. stfu or come correct

It is a bullshit cop out. Boston laid the blueprint for this shit (getting 3 superstars together) saying its different because the players were washed up, or the they didn't discuss it in the preseason is a bullshit cop out.
 
Last edited:
The Lonious Monk;3868518 said:
The Boston Big 3 is not comparable. If that's the case you might as well say it was all started by Houston when they had Olajuwon, Drexler, and Barkley.

Within the next 5 years, they are going to need to condense the NBA to 5 teams because those are the only ones that will have any talent and make any money.

If you want to go back to that...sure I can see the argument. The point is teams have been stacking up on great players long before Bron, Wade and Bosh.
 
Last edited:
nycest_1;3867694 said:
lol why are people acting like this is some new shit?

i suppose grant hill and mcgrady in orlando wasn't an attempt at this?

2 is different than 3

just like 3 is different than 4 , ya clown
 
Last edited:
Only people who had a problem with what Lebron did are small market team fans, like they even stood a chance of landing any of these dudes. Who the fuck is trying to play for the Bobcats and Pacers? smh
 
Last edited:
usmarin3;3869077 said:
Only people who had a problem with what Lebron did are small market team fans, like they even stood a chance of landing any of these dudes. Who the fuck is trying to play for the Bobcats and Pacers? smh

Or you know...fans of actual competition. Most of us could see what the Heat did turning into a trend. Consolidating all the talent on a few specific teams in a league that's already pretty diluted is not a good thing.
 
Last edited:
The Lonious Monk;3869149 said:
Or you know...fans of actual competition. Most of us could see what the Heat did turning into a trend. Consolidating all the talent on a few specific teams in a league that's already pretty diluted is not a good thing.

This is also bullshit, the best form of competition is the best going against the best. Bron, Wade, Bosh, vs Amare/Melo/whoever vs Paul/Howard/Kobe....watching AI struggle his entire career playing with scrubs playing against Bron with a bunch of scrubs or KG, Howard, Paul whoever isnt better competition than the best of the best playing against the best of the best. The league was at its peak when you had The Bulls of the 90s, the Lakers of 2000s, the old Celts teams vs the old Lake show...thats when the league was at its height.
 
Last edited:
playmaker88;3869374 said:
Lol.. im not even gonna bother..

Cuz you niggas dont have anything aside from the same tired cop out "It was different because they were past their primes, they didnt talk in the off season" Like that somehow makes a difference as to what happens on the court.
 
Last edited:
rage;3869294 said:
This is also bullshit, the best form of competition is the best going against the best. Bron, Wade, Bosh, vs Amare/Melo/whoever vs Paul/Howard/Kobe....watching AI struggle his entire career playing with scrubs playing against Bron with a bunch of scrubs or KG, Howard, Paul whoever isnt better competition than the best of the best playing against the best of the best. The league was at its peak when you had The Bulls of the 90s, the Lakers of 2000s, the old Celts teams vs the old Lake show...thats when the league was at its height.

The Bulls of the 90s, the Lakers of the 00s, and all those teams were not composed of all the leagues Allstars. What the hell are you talking about? The league was at its peak during those times because those teams actually had competition and opposition. That's the exact opposite of what's happening now. What you're talking about will amount to 82 game seasons with essentially 20 All-Star games and 62 fluff games that no one wants to see. This idea that teams have to be jam packed with All-stars is ridiculous. The league has never been like that, even during the periods you just mentioned. It's absolutely ridiculous that you try to defend this nonsense using teams from eras where bullshit like this would have never gone down. As you stated it was the old Celts vs the old Lake show. It wasn't Bird joining the Lakers because he knew championships would be guaranteed then. It was the Bulls of the 90s not Barkley and Drexler going to the Bulls to lock down the league for years to come. The Lakers of the 00s, not the Lakers plus Tim Duncan and Kevin Garnet. Come on man, your argument defeats itself.

rage;3869400 said:
Cuz you niggas dont have anything aside from the same tired cop out "It was different because they were past their primes, they didnt talk in the off season" Like that somehow makes a difference as to what happens on the court.

lol So you don't think that making moves in your prime vs making moves when you're on the way out the door makes a difference to what happens on the court. Just stop man. You're killing yourself.
 
Last edited:
The Lonious Monk;3869442 said:
The Bulls of the 90s, the Lakers of the 00s, and all those teams were not composed of all the leagues Allstars. What the hell are you talking about? The league was at its peak during those times because those teams actually had competition and opposition. That's the exact opposite of what's happening now. What you're talking about will amount to 82 game seasons with essentially 20 All-Star games and 62 fluff games that no one wants to see. This idea that teams have to be jam packed with All-stars is ridiculous. The league has never been like that, even during the periods you just mentioned. It's absolutely ridiculous that you try to defend this nonsense using teams from eras where bullshit like this would have never gone down. As you stated it was the old Celts vs the old Lake show. It wasn't Bird joining the Lakers because he knew championships would be guaranteed then. It was the Bulls of the 90s not Barkley and Drexler going to the Bulls to lock down the league for years to come. The Lakers of the 00s, not the Lakers plus Tim Duncan and Kevin Garnet. Come on man, your argument defeats itself.

co-sign and close thread..
 
Last edited:
knightryder;3867594 said:
i bet he didnt realize what type of impact his decision was gonna cause in the long run........

i remember back when he made the decision some of us fans already knew that him doing that was

gonna cause other players to follow the same lead........

but its obvious he didnt realize that, cause he joined miami so he can have a easy road to the finals

(thinking boston was gonna be the only team out east he would have to compete with)

and even though he had a chance to succeed last year he still fucked up

but now, his easy road to the finals, is gonna be even bumpier because not only he gotta deal with

old ass

boston

but now he gotta deal

with the bulls

also the knicks, (especially if they get chandler or even chris paul)

the nj nets, (if they get dwight howard)

and there is no need for me to even mention the teams out west, because we all know the west obviously the stronger conference....

so my questioning to u guys is

IS lebron stomach turning right now as he hear all these transactions go down

knowing that he made it difficult on himself to get to the finals ? or even win a title now

(by the way its obvious that when lebron stated he wasn't only gonna win 1, but 2, 3,4,5,6, champions, that he thought miami

was gonna be a dynasty and no other team would be able to compete)

oh boy was he sadly mistaken

If ur competitor it doesnt matter what moves anybody is making. Despite all the moves thats made or hasnt been made the Heat is still betta than anybody in the East at the moment
 
Last edited:
That nigga is a fucking idiot..
He actin like those champion teams from 91 -2004

were comprised of a bevy of superstars.. Lakers were two deep, Chicago were two deep so on and so forth with players who played their role to a T.. they were great TEAMS
 
Last edited:
playmaker88;3869527 said:
That nigga is a fucking idiot..

He actin like those champion teams from 91 -2004

were comprised of a bevy of superstars.. Lakers were two deep, Chicago were two deep so on and so forth with players who played their role to a T.. they were great TEAMS

And let's make it clear, in both of those cases the number 2 was developed over time to be in the discussion. Yeah both MJ and Shaq were known stars on those respective teams, but neither Pippen nor Kobe came to those teams as stars. They developed into stars as part of the team. Again that's completely different than nowadays where Top 10 players who should be leading their own teams are joining to create supersquads and circumventing the process of having to play real competition night in and night out.
 
Last edited:
The Lonious Monk;3869710 said:
And let's make it clear, in both of those cases the number 2 was developed over time to be in the discussion. Yeah both MJ and Shaq were known stars on those respective teams, but neither Pippen nor Kobe came to those teams as stars. They developed into stars as part of the team. Again that's completely different than nowadays where Top 10 players who should be leading their own teams are joining to create supersquads and circumventing the process of having to play real competition night in and night out.

Signed..... i think we are done here
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
71
Views
5
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…