Since when did blasphemy become the standard in hip hop?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You couldn't even absorb my theory in practice fella....

Niggas round here claiming true to Darwinism.......

I simply illustrate how the theory fails.......

Drop white Jesus all you want, I have no associations with the religion......


Actually, you would be better off putting your faith in him......

Than blindly following evolutionary science..........................

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg
 
Last edited:
But i don't agree that one creature can evolve into another, i don't blindly follow ANYTHING.

Evolution is adjustment, it is minor and happens over time; not overnight.

The way that submarine creatures over time stopped having eyeballs, or the way rhinos in certain parts of Africa have stopped growing tusks, that is evolution. And it is apparent and real.

 
Those are genetic mutations.....

Easily observable. However no proof for the theory of evolution or the origins of species....

images
 
Last edited:
Genetic mutation is the driving force behind evolution....

Though i don't subscribe directly to Darwin's ideas, it was a primitive but great start to understanding evolution and the reasons for it.

Ill take Darwin's stab at making sense of our relation to other animals over the idea of some conscious entity creating everything with the snap of his finger though.

I am not one that believes every creature directly evolved into another, so save those comedy charts for someone else brother.

We're done here.
 
Genetic mutation occurs regardless of the theory of evolution.....

Evolution = change over time..... undeniable...

The theory or evolution or Darwinism = false and unproven......

You are done here, but I'm just getting started.....

You might want to check this video out, it illustrates the damaging effects of Darwinism on African and indigenous people across the globe...

HOTEP...


 
bambu;5175180 said:
My point is that you act like your theory answers any of the questions that you asked me.......

Your theory does not explain shit, except for scientific racism......

Evolution answers plenty of questions that your theory does not; for example, the fossil record. We can clearly see, with hard evidence, flora and fauna evolving and changing over time. There has to be an explanation and that explanation is evolution. Without it, there is really no logical way to explain what we see going on. Let's, for arguments sake, say that your theory is correct and there really is an intelligent designer. The fact that we see various lifeforms coming into existence, going extinct and replaced does not point to any intelligence behind the scenes.

The "scientific racism" was proven to be based off of false information; I have no clue as to why you insist on peddling that argument. Add on to that the fact that the scientific community is global, consists of all peoples; not just some small cult. To believe that every single scientist is playing a role in some grand scheme to deceive the world into believing in evolution (and to have them stray away from the true reality, which is.... theism, lol) is simply put, a conspiracy theory and a ridiculous one at that.
 
Last edited:
bambu;5176225 said:
Evolution = change over time..... undeniable...

The theory of evolution or Darwinism = false and unproven......

What's the difference??

Evolution: The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth

Darwinism: The theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin

Natural Selection: The process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution
 
bambu;5175806 said:
Here is your theory in practice nigga, enjoy................

380.c.92.36_frontis.jpg

DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity. People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common, but no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other.
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml

 
bambu;5176225 said:
Genetic mutation EVOLUTION occurs regardless of the theory of evolution.....

Evolution = change over time..... undeniable...

The theory or evolution or Darwinism = false and unproven......

You are done here, but I'm just getting started.....

You might want to check this video out, it illustrates the damaging effects of Darwinism on African and indigenous people across the globe...

HOTEP...


True.
 
Roots Oceanic ;5179536 said:
bambu;5176225 said:
Evolution = change over time..... undeniable...

The theory of evolution or Darwinism = false and unproven......

What's the difference??

Evolution: The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth

Darwinism: The theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin

Natural Selection: The process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution

Nigga please.....

You out here trying to fool niggas that dont know any better....

All that fossil record shit has been properly dealt with in the Anti-Creationists thread......

For clarity and to eliminate the bullshit, we are dealing with the biological definition of evolution #3....

1. Any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.

2. A product of such development; something evolved: The exploration of space is the evolution of decades of research.

3.Biology . change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.

Roots Oceanic ;5179522 said:
bambu;5175180 said:
My point is that you act like your theory answers any of the questions that you asked me.......

Your theory does not explain shit, except for scientific racism......

Evolution answers plenty of questions that your theory does not; for example, the fossil record. We can clearly see, with hard evidence, flora and fauna evolving and changing over time. There has to be an explanation and that explanation is evolution. Without it, there is really no logical way to explain what we see going on. Let's, for arguments sake, say that your theory is correct and there really is an intelligent designer. The fact that we see various lifeforms coming into existence, going extinct and replaced does not point to any intelligence behind the scenes.

The "scientific racism" was proven to be based off of false information; I have no clue as to why you insist on peddling that argument. Add on to that the fact that the scientific community is global, consists of all peoples; not just some small cult. To believe that every single scientist is playing a role in some grand scheme to deceive the world into believing in evolution (and to have them stray away from the true reality, which is.... theism, lol) is simply put, a conspiracy theory and a ridiculous one at that.

Public Service Announcement for dumb niggas......

Your theory answers no questions relating to the biological definition of evolution #3.......

However the development of this universe can be described as evolution # 2......

The fossil record argument has already been lost in the other thread by @Whar, a discussion you bailed out on.......

So if you can prove how "flora and fauna evolving and changing over time" in relationship to definition #3 and not the obvious connection to #1 & 2......

Feel free, but all of that fossil shit is not "proven" or "factual" and is old news in the realm of creation and evolution research.....

A more definitive way to understand these processes is through DNA evidence......

Fossils is played the fuck out with new technology B.......

What your feeble-minded ass cannot fathom is that new technology will eventually unlock these questions that we all seek about mankind and if we approach it with a Neo-Darwinist mindset......

Various populations of the world will be at risk of the same dangers associated with Darwinism....

“There are clear differences between people of different continental ancestries,” said Marcus W. Feldman, a professor of biological sciences at Stanford University. “It’s not there yet for things like I.Q., but I can see it coming. And it has the potential to spark a new era of racism if we do not start explaining it better.”

1110-nat-subDNAb.gif

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all

ShiveDreadz ;5179522 said:

Word nigga....

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg


 
Last edited:
bambu;5180222 said:
For clarity and to eliminate the bullshit, we are dealing with the biological definition of evolution #3....

3. Biology . change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.

Exactly. As stated previously:

Natural Selection: The process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution

BTW, It's well known that speciation occurs by way of genetic changes.

new species can emerge if genetic change occurs, as by mutation or gradual accumulation of the "right" genes that make the descendants fit for an available niche.
http://peer.tamu.edu/curriculum_modules/ecosystems/module_1/whyitmatters2.htm

So,

Darwinism: The theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin

Evolution: The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth

bambu;5175180 said:
Your theory answers no questions relating to the biological definition of evolution #3.......

So if you can prove how "flora and fauna evolving and changing over time" in relationship to definition #3 and not the obvious connection to #1 & 2......

Feel free, but all of that fossil shit is not "proven" or "factual" and is old news in the realm of creation and evolution research.....

You cannot say that it has not been proven by simply denying hard evidence. Evolution answers the questions posed in relation to the definition of number 3; I'm not seeing how you would think otherwise.

bambu;5180222 said:
“There are clear differences between people of different continental ancestries,” said Marcus W. Feldman, a professor of biological sciences at Stanford University. “It’s not there yet for things like I.Q., but I can see it coming. And it has the potential to spark a new era of racism if we do not start explaining it better.”

DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity. People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common, but no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other.
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml

In the same article you posted:

The authority that DNA has earned through its use in freeing falsely convicted inmates, preventing disease and reconstructing family ties leads people to wrongly elevate genetics over other explanations for differences between groups.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 
Last edited:
So.....

Evolution is the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth, formulated by Charles Darwin aka Darwinism.....

As I stated eariler....

"all of that fossil shit is not "proven" or "factual" and is old news in the realm of creation and evolution research"

You keep posting that old ass blanket statement from the human genome project

Get with the new shit nigga.....

Typical Darwinist response.....

If the research does not correspond with the theory.....

Ignore it or call it junk....

My research contradicts your assumption that " no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another"......

So address the info or stop posting your old ass links.......

“There are clear differences between people of different continental ancestries,” said Marcus W. Feldman, a professor of biological sciences at Stanford University. “It’s not there yet for things like I.Q., but I can see it coming. And it has the potential to spark a new era of racism if we do not start explaining it better.”

1110-nat-subDNAb.gif

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all

ShiveDreadz ;5179522 said:

Word nigga....

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg


 
Last edited:
I didn't ignore anything. I posted that again to prove to you the opposite and I read your article and posted an exerpt from it. Here it is again:

The authority that DNA has earned through its use in freeing falsely convicted inmates, preventing disease and reconstructing family ties leads people to wrongly elevate genetics over other explanations for differences between groups.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Basically, you read the article wrong. And I provided that link that you keep ignoring so you can see clearly and hopefully get the shit straight. You gon have to find a new angle, brother man cuz yo shit don't add up.
 
Last edited:
bambu;5180352 said:
If the research does not correspond with the theory.....

Ignore it or call it junk....

Which is what you creationists do with fossil evidence that is very factual and is in fact proven.

bambu;5180352 said:

So.... we agree to what evolution is and we agree that it is true and factual, just as your man True Flesh stated:

The True Flesh;474161 said:
I see evolution for what it is, adaptations and mutations are very observable thus making "evolution" as a whole true and scientific.

The only hangup you have is with racists using the theory of evolution against you but the problem is, they are basing their racist ideas off of falsehoods.

 
Last edited:
That is one snippet of the article......

The gif I posted illustrates how large the 1% difference is between humans......

And I already explained how large the 2% difference is between humans and chimps.......

You just have a limited understanding of genetics and DNA research......

I see why you cling to the broken fossil record....

So in layman's terms.....

just because genetic structures can be nearly identical.....

Does not mean that they are.......

1110-nat-subDNAb.gif

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg


 
Last edited:
bambu;5180374 said:
That is one snippet of the article......

The gif I posted illustrates how large the 1% difference is between humans......

And I already explained how large the 2% difference is between humans and chimps.......

Yeah, that's one snippet of the article but like you say, a small percentage can make a big difference.

Let's say I author an autobiography. It's a completely false account of my life. People may believe it to be true if I don't write somewhere in the book: Everything stated in this book is not true, or something to that effect. One sentence in a book regardless of size can make all the difference.

Your own article agrees with me and is showing how

people wrongly elevate genetics over other explanations for differences between groups.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Context, my brother, context.

The truth is that

DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity. People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common, but no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other.
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml

That 1% you continue to harp on explains, like your picture says, things like the production of skin pigments and the reduced ability to sweat and corresponds with the article I posted that says that people who live in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common. Like I've been trying to tell you this entire time I've known you online, "NO ALLELE WILL BE FOUND IN ALL MEMBERS OF ONE POPULATION AND IN NO MEMBERS OF ANY OTHER". All humans are the same species
 
Last edited:
Nigga please......

That snippet does not even prove shit except the dangers of using genetic research for social issues.......aka. Social Darwinism

Don't put words in my mouth nigga....

I stated that the universe could be described as in the definition for evolution #1 & 2.....

Not # 3....

1. Any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.

2. A product of such development; something evolved: The exploration of space is the evolution of decades of research.

3.Biology . change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.

 
We're talking about biological evolution, which was #3

bambu;5180222 said:
For clarity and to eliminate the bullshit, we are dealing with the biological definition of evolution #3....

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
576
Views
391
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…