- Status
In case you missed it,
People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml
..specifically those examples that your picture talks about.
But then,
no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other.
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml
People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml
..specifically those examples that your picture talks about.
But then,
no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other.
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml
Last edited:
Either you're trolling or your beliefs are clouding your vision. Everything already said is what I'd say again. You're misreading your information. Go over what we talked about and we can discuss it later when you finally realize you just lost this debate. My shift is over anyway. I'll hit this thread up again, though. Peace.
LOL....
I think you are a little too slow to comprehend this material during your "shift".......
So now that you have finished making fries, you might finally realize that you lost this debate twice.......
And then, as usual find another thread to spread your bullshit in.......
I think you are a little too slow to comprehend this material during your "shift".......
So now that you have finished making fries, you might finally realize that you lost this debate twice.......
And then, as usual find another thread to spread your bullshit in.......
Last edited:
Les walk step by step thru this so you can maybe have a better understanding.
1. We'll start with your picture since thats what you want to keep referring to. It says that people of different geographic regions share genetic similarities, accounting for the difference between people in different continents/locations.
2. Your article then goes on to say that people wrongly use genetics as a primary explanation for differences between people of different geographic regions. The article shows why people do that and gives the alternative answer. If you need help interpreting the article, let me know.
3. My article agrees and says that we do see small genetic differences, that 1 to 2% you keep talking about, in people who have lived in the same geographic region for a long time. However, DNA studies do not show that there are seperate classifiable subspecies in modern humans.
4. Basically, what your article is trying to tell you, and its soaring over your head, and my article puts down bluntly is that the differences in people of different geographic regions is not because of race, which technically does not exist but because of other influences. Remember that not everyone in africa is black and not everyone in asia is yellow.
1. We'll start with your picture since thats what you want to keep referring to. It says that people of different geographic regions share genetic similarities, accounting for the difference between people in different continents/locations.
2. Your article then goes on to say that people wrongly use genetics as a primary explanation for differences between people of different geographic regions. The article shows why people do that and gives the alternative answer. If you need help interpreting the article, let me know.
3. My article agrees and says that we do see small genetic differences, that 1 to 2% you keep talking about, in people who have lived in the same geographic region for a long time. However, DNA studies do not show that there are seperate classifiable subspecies in modern humans.
4. Basically, what your article is trying to tell you, and its soaring over your head, and my article puts down bluntly is that the differences in people of different geographic regions is not because of race, which technically does not exist but because of other influences. Remember that not everyone in africa is black and not everyone in asia is yellow.
And as far as speciation is concerned, you already admitted that evolution by way of change is undeniable. Just like anything else, changes can occur in genes and when this happens, it can prevent one group from interbreeding with another, unable to successfully produce fertile offspring. If that happens, they become seperate species and then as they continue to travel down their evolutionary pathways, one may physically become very different from the other, like lions and tigers, more recent examples being mojavensis and arizonae. So, the pics are indeed there. All that is left for you to do is look at them and study the scientific classifications and taxonomy.
thedesolateone
New member
god is a marketing and brainwashin tool and in the industry you start to realize it first hand
going over contracts and signing your literal life away
going over contracts and signing your literal life away
Last edited:
waterproof
New member
thedesolateone;5184488 said:
That's one of the most ignorant shit I ever heard those christian and Catholic churches got yall buggin
Roots Oceanic ;5182198 said:
In other words it illustrates new research that can classify humans by their country of origin / race through DNA....
Roots Oceanic ;5182198 said:
It also illustrates how this information could be dangerous if misused.....
“There are clear differences between people of different continental ancestries,” said Marcus W. Feldman, a professor of biological sciences at Stanford University. “It’s not there yet for things like I.Q., but I can see it coming. And it has the potential to spark a new era of racism if we do not start explaining it better.”
Roots Oceanic ;5182198 said:
Your article suggests that because humans are 99% genetically similar, there is no reason to classify different races....
Perhaps you should research into the 1% before assuming that it is not enough to classify human by their race or country of origin.....
Roots Oceanic ;5182198 said:
Basically, what you need to do is provide some type of evidence that the genetic information located in the 1% is not enough to classify humans by their country of origin / race......
And then provide some evidence for this incredible claim......
Roots Oceanic ;5182198 said:
Last edited:
The more I directly experience the spiritual realm and see undeniable physical effects, the funnier discussions like this become. Everybody reap what they sow, so if a nigga wanna step on toes... I'm cool with it...cause they aint my toes. 10 times out of 10 they kick themselves in the ass with that same foot. As far as framing the very real errant forms of esoteric knowledge i.e. the "Illuminati" vs Christianity.. that shit is the biggest joke of all. Classic example of Hegelian dialectic. Two sides of the same coin. I dont listen to nobody talking bullshit if theyre in my face so Ill be damned if I willingly download an album or buy a physical CD to hear it. 90% of popular rap doesn't need a nigga throwing up hand signs or using religious figures or books as the ass of their punchlines to be considered blasphemous. Most of the stuff is just negative...period. So I dont listen...... Fuck 'em. Its not like they have to answer to me for what they was big and bad enough to say. I know whats real and I put in my work to know. Most niggas dont...they just be riffing. Let the dead bury the dead I say....
For my real ones.. fuck arguing with these stupid ass meat bags. They cannon fodder. Go cop you some fulvic/humic acid drops, liquid zeolite and some of those Etherium ORMUS products. Discipline your mind in conjunction with the things I listed and see why I aint bothered to discuss anything on here for so long...
For my real ones.. fuck arguing with these stupid ass meat bags. They cannon fodder. Go cop you some fulvic/humic acid drops, liquid zeolite and some of those Etherium ORMUS products. Discipline your mind in conjunction with the things I listed and see why I aint bothered to discuss anything on here for so long...
Last edited:
thedesolateone
New member
get off the drugs immediately
dr. drew can help you
or are you gods drug dealer?
dr. drew can help you
or are you gods drug dealer?
Last edited:
bambu;5185671 said:
You're halfway there; not by race (because race doesn't exist) but by continental regions. Like my article says, people who have lived in the same area for long periods of time may have some alleles in common. But the danger in this is wrongly using continental regions as a basis for race and assuming that races themselves are inherently different when that is not the case. Your article and mine lays this out.
bambu;5185671 said:
The danger is misusing the information to assume that ethnicities and races across the globe are inherently different through genetics. Like your article says, people wrongly elevate genetics over other explanations.
bambu;5185671 said:
Exactly, there is no reason at all and there is no research that shows humans are classifiable by seperate subspecies. Like I told you earlier in another thread, all humans are the same species because they are able to interbreed regardless of race, ethnicity, origin, etc. Considering that all races are global and interbreeding, it is not logical to think that one race is any different from another. The differences are not in race, but in locations. Like my article says, "People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common, but no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other".
bambu;5185671 said:
Basically, the burden of proof lies on you alone. You are arguing that races are inherently different. So far, your "proof" does not hold much weight. Both your article and mine disagree with you.
Last edited:
- Status
