Since when did blasphemy become the standard in hip hop?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And for all you niggas on the sidelines cosigning evolution.....

The theory fails without the acceptance of Junk DNA.....

So until you or your European science reformulates the theory to work without Junk DNA....

You cannot honestly make the claim that evolution is a fact or been proven.....

However, I am sure y'all niggas will duck this shit and continue spreading false witness for the theory of evolution.....

bambu;5174281 said:
West Florida;4909692 said:
The examples of human vestigiality are numerous, including the anatomical (such as the human appendix, tailbone, wisdom teeth, and inside corner of the eye), the behavioral (goose bumps and palmar grasp reflex), sensory (decreased olfaction), and molecular (junk DNA). Many human characteristics are also vestigial in other primates and related animals.

Human vestigiality = Debunked

Pineal gland = Debunked

The human appendix = Debunked

Wisdom teeth = Debunked

human tailbones = Debunked....

And now for your viewing pleasure.....

Junk DNA = Debunked

bambu;4909692 said:
“This concept of ‘junk DNA’ is really not accurate. It is an outdated metaphor,” said Richard Myers of the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology in Alabama.

‘Junk DNA’ concept debunked by new analysis of human genome.

JunkDNA.jpg

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg

 
bambu;5174869 said:
The theory fails without the acceptance of Junk DNA.....

This is false. Even if junk DNA is not actual "junk", that does not disprove evolution nor stop it from happening in any way.
 
bambu;5174789 said:
Have you seen a creature evolve into another, or a life evolve from nothing???

Not in real time, and the theory of evolution does not say that you will be able to, but we are able to conclude that it happens based off of what we have available to us, the facts. You can only make speculations about theism and your god creating things ex nihilo because not only have you never observed it in real time, you have no real reason or hard evidence of that creation ever taking place. That's the difference.

 
Last edited:
bambu;5174678 said:
ohhhla;5174650 said:
bambu;5174636 said:
bambu;5174636 said:
ohhhla;5174609 said:
@Bambu

Have you seen shit being created?

arnold_not_sure_if_serious_gif.gif


However, if I ever ran across the little pudgee mush face broad in your sig.....

I could illustrate the creation of a human.....

I'm not talking about that.

I'm talking about species being created out of nothing and coming to an existence.

This is what your evolution theory claims to have observed...

However, it has not been proven.....

So no I have not witnessed it, and neither has any other person on this planet.....

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg

Fruit flies.

Evolution is the Science's best work.

 
Roots Oceanic ;5174894 said:
bambu;5174869 said:
The theory fails without the acceptance of Junk DNA.....

This is false. Even if junk DNA is not actual "junk", that does not disprove evolution nor stop it from happening in any way.

O.K. just another case where evolution fails....

Add it to the files with the pineal gland, and the appendix right????

"Only a small portion of a creature's DNA is protein-coding genes (around 3% in humans). In the 1970s, evolutionists began calling the rest of it "junk DNA", saying this collection of useless evolutionary debris showed there was no intelligent design involved. Decades later, researchers are finding that the "junk" does vital work. Some of this DNA plays a role in turning genes on and off at the right moments in a developing embryo."

Lowe, Craig B., Gill Bejerano, David Haussler. May 8, 2007. Thousands of human mobile element fragments undergo strong purifying selection near developmental genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 104, No. 19, pp. 8005-8010.

Roots Oceanic ;5174882 said:
bambu;5174789 said:
How & Why the All created what is in existence is none of your fucking business .....

How convenient. In other words, you don't know.

And you do???

Please enlighten us Sir.......

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg
 
Last edited:
Those scientist have to be creationist scientists.

Most Biological scientists disagrees with you, Bambu

Better yet, they don't address you creationists.
 
Man those are historical facts duke......

When European scientists cant find an evolutionary function of something they call it a "vestigial remnant" or "junk"....

Just like.....

Pineal gland = Debunked

The human appendix = Debunked

Wisdom teeth = Debunked

human tailbones = Debunked....

Add Junk DNA in the mix.......

Regardless of how many times they are proven wrong.....

They keep up the bullshit with no evidence.......

And you bought it.....

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg
 
bambu;5174978 said:
"Only a small portion of a creature's DNA is protein-coding genes (around 3% in humans). In the 1970s, evolutionists began calling the rest of it "junk DNA", saying this collection of useless evolutionary debris showed there was no intelligent design involved. Decades later, researchers are finding that the "junk" does vital work. Some of this DNA plays a role in turning genes on and off at the right moments in a developing embryo."

Finding out that "junk" DNA does vital work does not disprove evolution. I'd like to know how you've come to that conclusion and ascertained that intelligent design is then true.

bambu;5174978 said:
And you do???

Please enlighten us Sir.......

I don't know anything about any god creating the universe because I don't believe your god(s) exists. I don't understand what your point is with this question.

bambu;5175024 said:
When European scientists cant find an evolutionary function of something they call it a "vestigial remnant" or "junk"....

Just like.....

Wisdom teeth = Debunked

human tailbones = Debunked....

Add Junk DNA in the mix.......

More false information from @bambu. Your so called "debunking" was not actually debunking anything. It was false info from a biased Christian website. Are you going to continue to ignore that? The only thing you've "debunked" was the pineal gland and no one listed that as evidence for evolution or as vestigial. You still haven't found any information from reputable scientists regarding the matter.

bambu;5175024 said:
The human appendix = Debunked
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/vestiges/appendix.html#disproof
 
Last edited:
ohhhla;5174988 said:
Those scientist have to be creationist scientists.

Most Biological scientists disagrees with you, Bambu

Better yet, they don't address you creationists.

NAS is assumed to be non-biased....

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is a private, non-profit society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the public good.

An Act of Congress, signed by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863 at the height of the Civil War, calls upon the NAS to provide independent advice to the government on matters related to science and technology. The National Research Council was created under the NAS charter in 1916 to extend the scope of the NAS in its advisory role. The National Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine were organized under the NAS charter in 1964 and 1970, respectively.

Since 1863, the nation's leaders have turned to the National Academy of Sciences for advice on the scientific and technological issues that frequently affect policy decisions. Most of the institution's science policy and technical work is conducted by the National Research Council (NRC), which was created expressly for this purpose and which provides a public service by working outside the framework of government to ensure independent advice on matters of science, technology, and medicine. The NRC enlists the nation's top scientists, engineers, and other experts, who volunteer their time to study specific issues. The reports that result from their deliberations have led to some of the most significant and lasting improvements in the health, education, and welfare of all Americans. The Academy's service to government has become so essential that Congress and the White House have issued legislation and executive orders over the years that reaffirm its unique role.

 
bambu;5175024 said:
Man those are historical facts duke......

When European scientists cant find an evolutionary function of something they call it a "vestigial remnant" or "junk"....

Just like.....

Pineal gland = Debunked

The human appendix = Debunked

Wisdom teeth = Debunked

human tailbones = Debunked....

Add Junk DNA in the mix.......

Regardless of how many times they are proven wrong.....

They keep up the bullshit with no evidence.......

And you bought it.....

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg

Evolution passes all tests for 150 plus year.

Like why this arguing still going??


 
@Bambu

How is medicine effective without evolution???

How did we get here without common descent?

Why we share 98.4% DNA with Chimpanzees?

Why do humans have most of features with other primates?

Like c'mon. You can be a theist and still know Evolution is a fact.
 
@Ohhhla.....

1.Bacteria mutates and forms resistance to certain forms of medication, it does not evolve and form new or different species.....


2.The All created all living creatures after their own kind....

3.We share genetic structures with apes. However, the 2% is more than enough to exclude common decent...

"The DNA molecule found in the nucleus of all cells can hold more information in a cubic centimeter than a trillion music Cd's. A spoonful of Shapiro's "computer soup" contains 15,000 trillion computers. And its energy-efficiency is more than a million times that of a PC.

How big is 2%?

2% of 75 trillion cells

2% of 46,500,000,000 miles of DNA

2% of a trillion music Cd's( each CD holds 700 megs of data).If "one" music cd can hold 700 megs, 2% of that would be 14 megs(the 2% of one cd). So 14 megs times 1 trillion = 14 trillion megs! This is how much information 1 DNA molecule holds at the 2% level. And since there are 75 trillion cells, average, in the human body to get the total DNA information, it would be 14 trillion(information on one DNA molecule) times 75 trillion molecules(average DNA molecules in a human body). So 14 trillion times 75 trillion = 1050 trillion megs of DNA information through out your whole body. 2% of that is 21 trillion megs. Get the picture?

The 2% that science speaks of is so big that science has very well hidden it. What I have told you is why the watermelon, the cloud and the jelly fish really are not related and neither are we when it comes to chimpanzees. But this story goes even further.

Since science makes The "2%" claim. Then why is it we cannot use organs or tissue from the chimpanzees for different things that medical science use tissue for.

Like the heart valve. Doctors don't use a chimp's tissue to make a heart valve. They use either a pig or a cow for it's tissue to make the valve. Why? Because it's tissue is very close to a human and will not be rejected like the Chimpanzees will be. Maybe they should look into whether we came from a pig or cow? But then again, we don't even resemble either one of those animals. And that would make it even harder for science to explain evolution.

Did you know that the DNA of a child will only have 94% of it's parents DNA? There's a 6% difference! But yet an organ transplant can be done between them. But not with the chimpanzee, that supposedly, is a closer match to humans than even the human offspring(according to science). This makes me wonder if this 98.3 percent DNA thing has been doctored up a little to help science explain and push the idea of evolution. How would they Get away with it? Think about it for a second. DNA is a specialized field of work. Most DNA workers are in the medical field. The rest are scientist. And there is not many in this field doing this kind of work. So how hard would it be to doctor up DNA reports and keep someone from checking them? Very easy! How many people you know actually can test DNA, have free run of the machine used to do this so that tests between humans and chimps can be thoroughly tested? So in this field of science you or me or most everyone else has no way to check what is found.

Then we have where a few years ago they (the scientists) tried to prove the relationship between humans and baboons by transplanting a baboon heart in a human. They did this more than once. Everyone they tried it on died in less than a year. Some within days or hours. People dying at the expense of science trying to prove something? Funny how science never uses this mistake as an example. It's not used because it totally goes against evolution. But just think if it had worked, you'd never hear the end of it."

4.Eyes are typically used to see, a nose to breathe, ect. most animals share these traits...

5. A theist that believes in the theory of evolution is a fool.....

@Roots Oceanic...

Roots Oceanic ;5174646 said:
ohhhla;5174609 said:
@Bambu

Have you seen shit being created?

Of course he hasn't. These creationists don't know what's going on in the world. Their only answer is that a god created it but they don't know how when or why. Their sole purpose is to attempt to debunk evolution and that's it. They don't have any new ideas, theories or explanations for anything that exists or happens.

I don't know anything about any god creating the universe because I don't believe your god(s) exists. I don't understand what your point is with this question.

My point is that you act like your theory answers any of the questions that you asked me.......

Your theory does not explain shit, except for scientific racism......

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg


 
Last edited:
bambu;5175180 said:
@Ohhhla.....

1.Bacteria mutates and forms resistance to certain forms of medication, it does not evolve and form new or different species.....


2.The All created all living creatures after their own kind....

3.We share genetic structures with apes. However, the 2% is more than enough to exclude common decent...

"The DNA molecule found in the nucleus of all cells can hold more information in a cubic centimeter than a trillion music Cd's. A spoonful of Shapiro's "computer soup" contains 15,000 trillion computers. And its energy-efficiency is more than a million times that of a PC.

How big is 2%?

2% of 75 trillion cells

2% of 46,500,000,000 miles of DNA

2% of a trillion music Cd's( each CD holds 700 megs of data).If "one" music cd can hold 700 megs, 2% of that would be 14 megs(the 2% of one cd). So 14 megs times 1 trillion = 14 trillion megs! This is how much information 1 DNA molecule holds at the 2% level. And since there are 75 trillion cells, average, in the human body to get the total DNA information, it would be 14 trillion(information on one DNA molecule) times 75 trillion molecules(average DNA molecules in a human body). So 14 trillion times 75 trillion = 1050 trillion megs of DNA information through out your whole body. 2% of that is 21 trillion megs. Get the picture?

The 2% that science speaks of is so big that science has very well hidden it. What I have told you is why the watermelon, the cloud and the jelly fish really are not related and neither are we when it comes to chimpanzees. But this story goes even further.

Since science makes The "2%" claim. Then why is it we cannot use organs or tissue from the chimpanzees for different things that medical science use tissue for.

Like the heart valve. Doctors don't use a chimp's tissue to make a heart valve. They use either a pig or a cow for it's tissue to make the valve. Why? Because it's tissue is very close to a human and will not be rejected like the Chimpanzees will be. Maybe they should look into whether we came from a pig or cow? But then again, we don't even resemble either one of those animals. And that would make it even harder for science to explain evolution.

Did you know that the DNA of a child will only have 94% of it's parents DNA? There's a 6% difference! But yet an organ transplant can be done between them. But not with the chimpanzee, that supposedly, is a closer match to humans than even the human offspring(according to science). This makes me wonder if this 98.3 percent DNA thing has been doctored up a little to help science explain and push the idea of evolution. How would they Get away with it? Think about it for a second. DNA is a specialized field of work. Most DNA workers are in the medical field. The rest are scientist. And there is not many in this field doing this kind of work. So how hard would it be to doctor up DNA reports and keep someone from checking them? Very easy! How many people you know actually can test DNA, have free run of the machine used to do this so that tests between humans and chimps can be thoroughly tested? So in this field of science you or me or most everyone else has no way to check what is found.

Then we have where a few years ago they (the scientists) tried to prove the relationship between humans and baboons by transplanting a baboon heart in a human. They did this more than once. Everyone they tried it on died in less than a year. Some within days or hours. People dying at the expense of science trying to prove something? Funny how science never uses this mistake as an example. It's not used because it totally goes against evolution. But just think if it had worked, you'd never hear the end of it."

4.Eyes are typically used to see, a nose to breathe, ect. most animals share these traits...

5. A theist that believes in the theory of evolution is a fool.....

@Roots Oceanic...

Roots Oceanic ;5174646 said:
ohhhla;5174609 said:
@Bambu

Have you seen shit being created?

Of course he hasn't. These creationists don't know what's going on in the world. Their only answer is that a god created it but they don't know how when or why. Their sole purpose is to attempt to debunk evolution and that's it. They don't have any new ideas, theories or explanations for anything that exists or happens.

I don't know anything about any god creating the universe because I don't believe your god(s) exists. I don't understand what your point is with this question.

My point is that you act like your theory answers any of the questions that you asked me.......

Your theory does not explain shit, except for racism......

6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg


MOD'S CLOSE THIS THREAD Brother @Bambu just put the nail in the coffin with this Darwinsim bullshit and i put them in that coffin when they couldnt tell me what came first the heating system or the cooling system in the human body in evolution, niggas minds is bleached the factory system of these schools have done a great job
 
=bf_prev&list=UUbayqGzflTXyBTMvnSe6a4A

LMAO, creation doesn't even have a model.

Creationists are just mad because the evolutionist poke holes in their nonsensical ideas.
 
Ya'll must be bored in here entertaining this nonsense.

As a dude already pointed out, the "lambs" continue to ask and site evidence, yet they are so set they don't need evidence that a conscious being not only created everything, but continues to watch over every thing we do and every thought we think...

Yet freely allows the atrocities of the world...

But but but..."he loves us"????

I mean the field of science, and the followers of it are still TRYING to figure not only our being, but OUR WORLD out. Yet you come in here and KNOW "god" did all of this? You KNOW something....that you can't prove??!?!??!

But you have the nerve to call someone else arrogant?

How can a motherfucker that can think some shit like "oh thank god i didn't forget that milk, so that i can cook this macaroni and cheese for thanksgiving" while children are out there starving, people dying from illness, women getting raped...but believe "god" had time to come help you with your petty life problems in your petty life?

Its HILARIOUSLY sad.
 
ShiveDreadz;5175625 said:
I mean the field of science, and the followers of it are still TRYING to figure not only our being, but OUR WORLD out. Yet you come in here and KNOW "god" did all of this? You KNOW something....that you can't prove??!?!??!

But you have the nerve to call someone else arrogant?

Nigga Please....

You don't know my degree or what type of shit I'm on.......

So the field of science is only composed of atheists and non-believers????

You sound stupid as fuck B.......

And none of you Darwinists can prove your theory......

But yet evolution is a fact????

So yes....

Y'all niggas is mad arrogant and stupid to boot.......

Here is your theory in practice nigga, enjoy................

380.c.92.36_frontis.jpg


6bb61e3b7bce0931da574d19d1d82c88-1624.jpg


 
Last edited:
Question.. If i was to "post your theory in practice" and drop a pic of white jesus would i look cool or would i look like an idiot.

Now imagine what you look like right now

I could post a whole lot of shit but it would be a waste of time to entertain an insect who feels he already has it all figured out.

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
576
Views
391
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…