Since when did blasphemy become the standard in hip hop?

[waterproof]

this shit been beating to death in the Race and Religion section by @Bambu, @Judahxulu @Thetrueflesh, and others this shit was shut down already.... west chattanooga you know about it the thread where your feelings got crush

Anti-Creationists......time to speak your clouthttp://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/474161/anti-creationists-time-to-speak-your-clout/p5

 

[Bodhi]

DAVID R. STEELE the fucking athesist NO wonder

AGAIN fucking man try to explain something greater then himself, how do they know how the body supposed to work when they are not the creator.....

If you know any better or are so enlightened by your creator, make a case against it.

 

[Bodhi]

this shit been beating to death in the Race and Religion section by @Bambu, @Judahxulu @Thetrueflesh, and others this shit was shut down already.... west chattanooga you know about it the thread where your feelings got crush

Anti-Creationists......time to speak your clouthttp://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/474161/anti-creationists-time-to-speak-your-clout/p5

My feelings have never been crushed by any of you. You all lost that debate and anybody who reads it without any creationist bias will know that. Pull up the thread all you want, but it's clear to me and everybody else in here that you aren't mentally equipped to defend your beliefs.

 

[waterproof]

this shit been beating to death in the Race and Religion section by @Bambu, @Judahxulu @Thetrueflesh, and others this shit was shut down already.... west chattanooga you know about it the thread where your feelings got crush

Anti-Creationists......time to speak your clouthttp://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/474161/anti-creationists-time-to-speak-your-clout/p5

My feelings have never been crushed by any of you. You all lost that debate and anybody who reads it without any creationist bias will know that. Pull up the thread all you want, but it's clear to me and everybody else in here that you aren't mentally equipped to defend your beliefs.

man please you cant answer simple question on what came first the heating or cooling system first, one have to evolve first according to evolution and we know that we cant leave with out both operating at the same time, so there is no way Man could of lived with having just one system working they wouldnt get the chance to EVOLVE because death will happen in the matter of hours.

again that's all i need to know that there is a creator.

 

[ohhhla]

this shit been beating to death in the Race and Religion section by @Bambu, @Judahxulu @Thetrueflesh, and others this shit was shut down already.... west chattanooga you know about it the thread where your feelings got crush

Anti-Creationists......time to speak your clouthttp://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/474161/anti-creationists-time-to-speak-your-clout/p5

My feelings have never been crushed by any of you. You all lost that debate and anybody who reads it without any creationist bias will know that. Pull up the thread all you want, but it's clear to me and everybody else in here that you aren't mentally equipped to defend your beliefs.

man please you cant answer simple question on what came first the heating or cooling system first, one have to evolve first according to evolution and we know that we cant leave with out both operating at the same time, so there is no way Man could of lived with having just one system working they wouldnt get the chance to EVOLVE because death will happen in the matter of hours.

again that's all i need to know that there is a creator.

Who created your creator? *Waits for special pleading to kick in*

 

[contemplate]

I was wondering the same shit but its always been that way. Makes you know there is a God because so many people try to bring Him down.

lmao

that's genuinely a reason you hold on to your belief?

 

[SHAYDEEEE]

ahhhh watchin atheists who think theyre deep thinkers because theyve seen a bill maher movie argue with die hard believers, who are very shallow thinkers. im not too pretentious to think someone who believes in god is stupid, the people who say that are bigots and not very smart themselves. im not too pretentious to think that there cant possibly be a god or afterlife.

but if there is a power so high that he created this entire elaborate thing we call the universe, with all its intricacy in so many forms, what the fuck makes the religious people think they could even get a grasp on how that deity thinks, and judge other people for not feeling the same way. anything that powerful probably doesnt care if you believe it exists or talk bad about him or anything like that.

and until proven otherwise, the bible is no more non fiction than harry potter so stop using quotes from it to justify your fear mongering

 

[blackrain]

ahhhh watchin atheists who think theyre deep thinkers because theyve seen a bill maher movie argue with die hard believers, who are very shallow thinkers. im not too pretentious to think someone who believes in god is stupid, the people who say that are bigots and not very smart themselves. im not too pretentious to think that there cant possibly be a god or afterlife.

but if there is a power so high that he created this entire elaborate thing we call the universe, with all its intricacy in so many forms, what the fuck makes the religious people think they could even get a grasp on how that deity thinks, and judge other people for not feeling the same way. anything that powerful probably doesnt care if you believe it exists or talk bad about him or anything like that.

and until proven otherwise, the bible is no more non fiction than harry potter so stop using quotes from it to justify your fear mongering

That's always been my #1 issue with religion, whether it's Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc, is that God is supposed to be the creator of life and above petty emotions, yet God reacts to emotions all the time. The very basis of "God being a jealous God" has always been confusing

 

[bambu]

LOL @ Jaded Righteousness West AlabamaRoots Oceanic

This nigga just goes from thread to thread spitting the same bullshit...

You niggas know better than to bring this weak shit in the R&R........

HOTEP...

 

[Bodhi]

That's always been my #1 issue with religion, whether it's Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc, is that God is supposed to be the creator of life and above petty emotions, yet God reacts to emotions all the time. The very basis of "God being a jealous God" has always been confusing

Cosign. That's what I was trying to get across to GoingToHeaven. The idea of being "all-wise" would conflict with being swayed and subject to such emotions.

 

[bambu]

The examples of human vestigiality are numerous, including the anatomical (such as the human appendix, tailbone, wisdom teeth, and inside corner of the eye), the behavioral (goose bumps and palmar grasp reflex), sensory (decreased olfaction), and molecular (junk DNA). Many human characteristics are also vestigial in other primates and related animals.

The coccyx, or tailbone, is the remnant of a lost tail
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coccyx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_vestigiality#Coccyx

Murder a bombaclot for fun.....

As far as human vestigiality goes....

The pineal gland was originally believed to be a "vestigial remnant" of a larger organ. In 1917 it was known that extract of cow pineals lightened frog skin. Dermatology professor Aaron B. Lerner and colleagues at Yale University, hoping that a substance from the pineal might be useful in treating skin diseases, isolated and named the hormone melatonin in 1958.....

Furthermore.....

“This concept of ‘junk DNA’ is really not accurate. It is an outdated metaphor,” said Richard Myers of the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology in Alabama.

‘Junk DNA’ concept debunked by new analysis of human genome.

 

[Bodhi]

1. We weren't discussing the pineal gland

2. The other examples still stand

Try again, son

 

[ohhhla]

I swear these are the black people that makes me not want to claim my race.

How fuckin dumb y'all niggas are is sickening.

 

[bambu]

1. We weren't discussing the pineal gland

2. The other examples still stand

Try again, son

LOL...

Ol' "we werent talking bout that" HEAD ASS NIGGA....

You were discussing human vestigiality & junk DNA tho......

Again the pineal gland was once promoted as a shining example of evolution by European scientists and dumb niggas worldwide.....

The pineal gland is now known as the "third eye" and proves that your science is ass.....

The pineal gland was originally believed to be a "vestigial remnant" of a larger organ. In 1917 it was known that extract of cow pineals lightened frog skin. Dermatology professor Aaron B. Lerner and colleagues at Yale University, hoping that a substance from the pineal might be useful in treating skin diseases, isolated and named the hormone melatonin in 1958.[15] The substance did not prove to be helpful as intended, but its discovery helped solve several mysteries such as why removing the rat's pineal accelerated ovary growth, why keeping rats in constant light decreased the weight of their pineals, and why pinealectomy and constant light affect ovary growth to an equal extent; this knowledge gave a boost to the then new field of chronobiology.

 

[Bodhi]

It once was but I didn't list it as an example so it doesn't matter in this debate. Scientists are humans; they make mistakes. If something was once thought to be a vestigial remnant but is now known not to be, that doesn't make vestigiality untrue and it would be reaching to think so. Pluto was once considered a planet. Now that it is no longer thought of as a planet, that does not mean planets do not exist. Your logic is flawed. And even if you want to dispute DNA, the other examples listed are still there for you to debunk. If you can't debunk vestigiality as a whole, kindly have a seat.

 

[bambu]

It once was but I didn't list it as an example so it doesn't matter in this debate. Scientists are humans; they make mistakes. If something was once thought to be a vestigial remnant but is now known not to be, that doesn't make vestigiality untrue and it would be reaching to think so. Pluto was once considered a planet. Now that it is no longer thought of as a planet, that does not mean planets do not exist. Your logic is flawed. And even if you want to dispute DNA, the other examples listed are still there for you to debunk. If you can't debunk everything, kindly have a seat.

Junk DNA = Debunked

Human vestigiality = Debunked

Pineal gland = Debunked

And now for your viewing pleasure.....

The human appendix = Debunked

In The Descent of Man, Darwin cited the human appendix as an example of a vestigial organ. But Darwin was mistaken: The appendix is now known to be an important source of antibody-producing blood cells and thus an integral part of the human immune system. It may also serve as a compartment for beneficial bacteria that are needed for normal digestion. So the appendix is not useless at all.

Who's next.....

I got milk baby....

 

[Bodhi]

Still waiting on you to debunk human vestigiality as a whole and not just one or two things that were thought to be vestigial at one point.

You're jumping the gun, bambu. You're smarter than this.

What you're saying = "Scientists said pluto was a planet, now they know it's not, so planets don't exist. Fuck scientists and their bullshit science"

 

[bambu]

Junk DNA = Debunked

Human vestigiality = Debunked

Pineal gland = Debunked

The human appendix = Debunked

And now for your viewing pleasure.....

Wisdom teeth & human tailbones = Debunked....

Teeth???

It is stated that at one time in our alleged evolution we had more room in our mouths. It also has been suggested that we had to chew more than we do today. Both of these statements may be plausible, however they do not prove or even suggest that we are evolving. These teeth still function for chewing and are by no means useless or vestigial. The lack of space in the mouths of certain people – and by no means all people – is a consequence of the degeneration of the human race in regard to both genetics and lifestyles. This is quite contrary to the concept of evolution, which implies that we are improving and adding features.

Tailbones???

Note that even if there occurs or has occurred a case of a person having a movable tail-like caudal appendage containing bone, that does not mean the appendage is vestigial. And even if human caudal appendages were vestigial (which they are not) this would constitute degenerative change (loss of an organ) whereas evolution requires generative change, producing new types of organs that did not exist before.

Next???

Caveat: I am in rare form nigga.....

 

[Bodhi]

Anthropologists believe wisdom teeth, or the third set of molars, were the evolutionary answer to our ancestor’s early diet of coarse, rough food – like leaves, roots, nuts and meats – which required more chewing power and resulted in excessive wear of the teeth. The modern diet with its softer foods, along with marvels of modern technologies such as forks, spoons and knives, has made the need for wisdom teeth nonexistent. As a result, evolutionary biologists now classify wisdom teeth as vestigial organs, or body parts that have become functionless due to evolution.

Why do wisdom teeth wait to erupt long after the tooth fairy has stopped leaving change under your pillow? Tooth development, from baby primary teeth to permanent teeth, takes place in an organized fashion, over a course of years, with the first molar erupting around the age of six and the second molar erupting around the age of 12. Wisdom teeth, which begin forming around your tenth birthday, are the last set of molars on the tooth-development timeline, so they usually don’t erupt until you are between the ages of 17 and 25. Because this is the age that people are said to become wiser, the set of third molars has been nicknamed “wisdom teeth.”

Some people never get wisdom teeth, but for those who do, the number may be anywhere from one to four – and, on very rare occasions, more than four, according to a study published in the Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. Scientific literature has yet to be able to explain why the number of teeth per individual varies, but for those who do get these extraneous, or supernumerary, teeth, it can lead to all sorts of problems.

Because human jaws have become smaller throughout evolutionary history, when wisdom teeth form they often become impacted, or blocked, by the other teeth around them. Also, if the tooth partially erupts, food can get trapped in the gum tissue surrounding it, which can lead to bacteria growth and, possibly, a serious infection.

Wisdom teeth that do not erupt but remain tucked away can also lead to oral problems, such as crowding or displacement of permanent teeth. On very rare occasions, a cyst (fluid filled sac) can form in the soft tissue surrounding the impacted wisdom tooth. These cysts can lead to bone destruction, jaw expansion, or damage to the surrounding teeth. Even more uncommonly, tumors can develop in the cysts, which can lead to the jaw spontaneously breaking if the tumor or cyst grows too much.

There are patients that develop wisdom teeth that function just as well as every other tooth in the mouth, and as a result they do not need to go under the knife. But no one can predict when third molar complications will occur, and the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons estimates that about 85 percent of wisdom teeth will eventually need to be removed.
http://scienceline.org/2007/02/ask-cooper-wisdomteeth/

 

[Bodhi]

This is quite contrary to the concept of evolution, which implies that we are improving and adding features.

MISCONCEPTION: Evolution results in progress; organisms are always getting better through evolution.

CORRECTION: One important mechanism of evolution, natural selection, does result in the evolution of improved abilities to survive and reproduce; however, this does not mean that evolution is progressive — for several reasons. First, as described in a misconception below (link to "Natural selection produces organisms perfectly suited to their environments"), natural selection does not produce organisms perfectly suited to their environments. It often allows the survival of individuals with a range of traits — individuals that are "good enough" to survive. Hence, evolutionary change is not always necessary for species to persist. Many taxa (like some mosses, fungi, sharks, opossums, and crayfish) have changed little physically over great expanses of time. Second, there are other mechanisms of evolution that don't cause adaptive change. Mutation, migration, and genetic drift may cause populations to evolve in ways that are actually harmful overall or make them less suitable for their environments. For example, the Afrikaner population of South Africa has an unusually high frequency of the gene responsible for Huntington's disease because the gene version drifted to high frequency as the population grew from a small starting population. Finally, the whole idea of "progress" doesn't make sense when it comes to evolution. Climates change, rivers shift course, new competitors invade — and an organism with traits that are beneficial in one situation may be poorly equipped for survival when the environment changes. And even if we focus on a single environment and habitat, the idea of how to measure "progress" is skewed by the perspective of the observer. From a plant's perspective, the best measure of progress might be photosynthetic ability; from a spider's it might be the efficiency of a venom delivery system; from a human's, cognitive ability. It is tempting to see evolution as a grand progressive ladder with Homo sapiens emerging at the top. But evolution produces a tree, not a ladder — and we are just one of many twigs on the tree.
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_teacherfaq.php#a3