Science delivers another People's Elbow to creationism...T-Rex skull found in Montana

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Ajackson17;9281788 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281773 said:
Ajackson17;9281747 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281717 said:
Ajackson17;9281667 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281636 said:
Ajackson17;9281613 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281585 said:
Ajackson17;9281568 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281560 said:
Ajackson17;9281533 said:
This is why religious zealots are not moving the world into a better place, but a backwards place. He is just like the CEO's who were selling leaded gas and its effects were monstrous and went against the evidence to support that it was global issue and destroying the planet, but you know what, science will prevail due to the intelligent amongst us who have good character and will make sure we humans actually progress.

Where does character come from?

Creating harmonious positive effort with your world around you. Meaning you are going to create disharmony by killing people willy nilly, you are going to create a negative effect stealing from people, you are going to create issues with people by lying on them and so on. Before you say the bible had this, this was written in Egypt and in Africa who didn't have a Christian deity.

It's called self awareness, which we have in our frontal lobe.

What standard are you using to base harmony on?

Does it destroy or does it build. Do you destroy the natural world and a people for capital gain if so, then you are not harmonies you are disharmonious. Do people die so you can elevate your status, then you are destructive or if you elevate your status because you bring people together and for example every tree you cut down you plant another in it's place and know when it's time not to cut down and destroy for the sake of the enviroment that you live.

But whose standard are you basing what harmonious is and how one is to be harmonious?

What is your measuring stick?

My measuring stick is nature and cause and effect which are tools of science and reading history and observing the natural world and compiling a body of work which can be tested and retested and be falsifiable and peer reviewed. That's how we know if something works or not. I had my stuff stolen and been assaulted in a mugging, I personally know how that feels like and what it feels like to be robbed, but this is bigger than just myself, so if everyone stole from each other and robbed and assaulted each other, can we have a community, can we have a safe enviroment in which people can work, build, take care of the children, can we defend ourselves from outside invaders? Questions we must ask and understand logic to see a conclusion.

But who defines safety?

And who said robbery is wrong?

Why did you feel violated when you were robbed?

Where did these feelings of violation come from?

And who decided the standard for right and wrong?

Humans gave the standard of right and wrong. Based on cause and effect. Who created the laws that drunk driving should be illegal? Humans based on what, evidence that it was impairing their cognitive functions and causing accidents and deaths. Who made texting while driving illegal? Humans, why because we cannot multi-task while driving so it's fair in logic that man created the standard against robbery and safety. There are no definitions in the bible for robbery and safety. Did Hammurabi gain his laws from Yahweh? No. Did the Egyptians gain their laws from yahweh? No.

The Israelites were robbing, killing, thieving, raping, and pillaging in Canaan cause they said their God told them it's the right thing to do, but an observant human being wouldn't do such a thing because they know their ways were creating strife in that area in which created disharmonious setting.

Why do humans feel emotional when being robbed, because of the evolutionary cognitive process called flight or fight due to the fact organisms fighting to survive for reproductions when evolutionary pathways create other organisms desire to destroy for substance. In the case of the robber he is looking substance either for food, drugs, or recreational. An illogical man couldn't understand why Robbery is wrong without looking towards a religion.

1. Actually humans didn't give the standards of what is right and what is wrong.

2. God did.

3. Therefore you even saying that there is a wrong means that you are measuring that wrongness against a righteous standard.

4. That righteous standard doesn't come from humans, but from a higher source than humans.

5. That is why you have feelings inside of you. A conscience that condemns you when you do wrong and affirms you when you do right.

6. The conscience is something that transcendes the fleshly plane of our existence, since our conscience resides inside our souls.

7. You are measuring right and wrongness against an absolute standard my friend.

8. That absolute is the All Mighty, the LORD Jesus Christ.

9. That is why you are without excuse because your conscience bears witness against you.

10. Amen.

And this is psychosis, so god created the laws against drunk driving and texting?

Prove that consciousness transcends the biology of humans.

What particles is the soul made of?

1. God created moral laws.

2. He decided what is right and what is wrong.

3. Man didn't become a living soul until God breathed His breath into us. That is how the consciousness of man transcends humanity, for it came from God Himself!

4. Look around the graveyard if you want proof. A body without the soul/conscious is dead.

5. The soul goes to heaven or hell upon death.

6. The soul is made up of the breath of God who gave it.

7. Hallelujah!
 
Last edited:
Ajackson17;9281793 said:
Again religious try to rope a dope you and use philosophy as factual evidence and use god of the gaps. If we don't know something throw god on it, if we can confuse them to believe in god, throw god in it. This is why less intelligent people begin to believe in a deity because they do not understand philosophy versus factual evidence when they are making huge claims with no evidence and use god of the gaps argument.

There is no God of gaps. For behold even the heavens of heavens can not contain God! He fills all and is in all. There is no where He does not see, no where were He does not hear, no where were He is not present. He is God! Hallelujah.!
 
Ajackson17;9281799 said:
For number 5, explain psychopaths their inhibition towards empathy.

The conscience can be seared by continual willful rebellion and unbelief. God will give you over to a reprobate mind when you persist in sin. Amen.

 
Ajackson17;9281406 said:
2stepz_ahead;9281145 said:
babelipsss;9280909 said:
Archaeology equals real science. Creationism equals fairy tales.

im not sure about that......

they are more like people that find shit. the test for radio activity within the bones to determine the date still dont make you a scientist.

i can find bones where i think niggas are buried dont make me a scientist

me putting the bones on the machine an cutting it on for it to give me information that cant be verified....still dont make me a scientist.

There is a method and multiple ways to determine the age of something. A scientist is an investigator of natural phenomenon and goes by a methodology that can be falsifiable. Archaeology is a science and it is not like what it was 100 years ago, the methods have been refined.

exactly why nothing can be determined to be true.

we are still disproving method that been in place for centuries.

as technology grows and changes so does the theory of what we thought we know and whats proven to be true and false.

the cure to VD and many other infections started with old cheese ....think about that for a sec
 
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281805 said:
Ajackson17;9281788 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281773 said:
Ajackson17;9281747 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281717 said:
Ajackson17;9281667 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281636 said:
Ajackson17;9281613 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281585 said:
Ajackson17;9281568 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281560 said:
Ajackson17;9281533 said:
This is why religious zealots are not moving the world into a better place, but a backwards place. He is just like the CEO's who were selling leaded gas and its effects were monstrous and went against the evidence to support that it was global issue and destroying the planet, but you know what, science will prevail due to the intelligent amongst us who have good character and will make sure we humans actually progress.

Where does character come from?

Creating harmonious positive effort with your world around you. Meaning you are going to create disharmony by killing people willy nilly, you are going to create a negative effect stealing from people, you are going to create issues with people by lying on them and so on. Before you say the bible had this, this was written in Egypt and in Africa who didn't have a Christian deity.

It's called self awareness, which we have in our frontal lobe.

What standard are you using to base harmony on?

Does it destroy or does it build. Do you destroy the natural world and a people for capital gain if so, then you are not harmonies you are disharmonious. Do people die so you can elevate your status, then you are destructive or if you elevate your status because you bring people together and for example every tree you cut down you plant another in it's place and know when it's time not to cut down and destroy for the sake of the enviroment that you live.

But whose standard are you basing what harmonious is and how one is to be harmonious?

What is your measuring stick?

My measuring stick is nature and cause and effect which are tools of science and reading history and observing the natural world and compiling a body of work which can be tested and retested and be falsifiable and peer reviewed. That's how we know if something works or not. I had my stuff stolen and been assaulted in a mugging, I personally know how that feels like and what it feels like to be robbed, but this is bigger than just myself, so if everyone stole from each other and robbed and assaulted each other, can we have a community, can we have a safe enviroment in which people can work, build, take care of the children, can we defend ourselves from outside invaders? Questions we must ask and understand logic to see a conclusion.

But who defines safety?

And who said robbery is wrong?

Why did you feel violated when you were robbed?

Where did these feelings of violation come from?

And who decided the standard for right and wrong?

Humans gave the standard of right and wrong. Based on cause and effect. Who created the laws that drunk driving should be illegal? Humans based on what, evidence that it was impairing their cognitive functions and causing accidents and deaths. Who made texting while driving illegal? Humans, why because we cannot multi-task while driving so it's fair in logic that man created the standard against robbery and safety. There are no definitions in the bible for robbery and safety. Did Hammurabi gain his laws from Yahweh? No. Did the Egyptians gain their laws from yahweh? No.

The Israelites were robbing, killing, thieving, raping, and pillaging in Canaan cause they said their God told them it's the right thing to do, but an observant human being wouldn't do such a thing because they know their ways were creating strife in that area in which created disharmonious setting.

Why do humans feel emotional when being robbed, because of the evolutionary cognitive process called flight or fight due to the fact organisms fighting to survive for reproductions when evolutionary pathways create other organisms desire to destroy for substance. In the case of the robber he is looking substance either for food, drugs, or recreational. An illogical man couldn't understand why Robbery is wrong without looking towards a religion.

1. Actually humans didn't give the standards of what is right and what is wrong.

2. God did.

3. Therefore you even saying that there is a wrong means that you are measuring that wrongness against a righteous standard.

4. That righteous standard doesn't come from humans, but from a higher source than humans.

5. That is why you have feelings inside of you. A conscience that condemns you when you do wrong and affirms you when you do right.

6. The conscience is something that transcendes the fleshly plane of our existence, since our conscience resides inside our souls.

7. You are measuring right and wrongness against an absolute standard my friend.

8. That absolute is the All Mighty, the LORD Jesus Christ.

9. That is why you are without excuse because your conscience bears witness against you.

10. Amen.

And this is psychosis, so god created the laws against drunk driving and texting?

Prove that consciousness transcends the biology of humans.

What particles is the soul made of?

1. God created moral laws.

2. He decided what is right and what is wrong.

3. Man didn't become a living soul until God breathed His breath into us. That is how the consciousness of man transcends humanity, for it came from God Himself!

4. Look around the graveyard if you want proof. A body without the soul/conscious is dead.

5. The soul goes to heaven or hell upon death.

6. The soul is made up of the breath of God who gave it.

7. Hallelujah!

You are one crazy dude lol, we are biological organisms that can die from a spine injury, bacteria infection, virus infection, head injury and etc. So any number of ways we can die, does not in fact prove that we have a soul. This is called an Ad Hoc fallacy since you didn't actually give me any evidence for a soul to exist. So you basically gave me speculative answer.
 
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281812 said:
Ajackson17;9281799 said:
For number 5, explain psychopaths their inhibition towards empathy.

The conscience can be seared by continual willful rebellion and unbelief. God will give you over to a reprobate mind when you persist in sin. Amen.

So a child born has no empathy with due to low neurons connecting the neurological part of the brain that controls empathy. So the baby is constantly sinning in the womb then?
 
2stepz_ahead;9281818 said:
Ajackson17;9281406 said:
2stepz_ahead;9281145 said:
babelipsss;9280909 said:
Archaeology equals real science. Creationism equals fairy tales.

im not sure about that......

they are more like people that find shit. the test for radio activity within the bones to determine the date still dont make you a scientist.

i can find bones where i think niggas are buried dont make me a scientist

me putting the bones on the machine an cutting it on for it to give me information that cant be verified....still dont make me a scientist.

There is a method and multiple ways to determine the age of something. A scientist is an investigator of natural phenomenon and goes by a methodology that can be falsifiable. Archaeology is a science and it is not like what it was 100 years ago, the methods have been refined.

exactly why nothing can be determined to be true.

we are still disproving method that been in place for centuries.

as technology grows and changes so does the theory of what we thought we know and whats proven to be true and false.

the cure to VD and many other infections started with old cheese ....think about that for a sec

The only thing is we are getting more and more evidence that can be tested and qualified for evidence and getting a bigger and larger understanding of the world around us. The evidence that we currently have might not be the total explanation, but in Science we are still learning and have continually said we are and by no words is for you to be stucked like a religious paradigm.

When someone says and uses "science" it becomes psuedoscience. It sounds like it, acts like it, but it isn't it when you comparing the methodology. So the best things to understand science is through experimentation and can we create any new technology that can implement this understanding that we have.
 
Ajackson17;9281826 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281805 said:
Ajackson17;9281788 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281773 said:
Ajackson17;9281747 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281717 said:
Ajackson17;9281667 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281636 said:
Ajackson17;9281613 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281585 said:
Ajackson17;9281568 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281560 said:
Ajackson17;9281533 said:
This is why religious zealots are not moving the world into a better place, but a backwards place. He is just like the CEO's who were selling leaded gas and its effects were monstrous and went against the evidence to support that it was global issue and destroying the planet, but you know what, science will prevail due to the intelligent amongst us who have good character and will make sure we humans actually progress.

Where does character come from?

Creating harmonious positive effort with your world around you. Meaning you are going to create disharmony by killing people willy nilly, you are going to create a negative effect stealing from people, you are going to create issues with people by lying on them and so on. Before you say the bible had this, this was written in Egypt and in Africa who didn't have a Christian deity.

It's called self awareness, which we have in our frontal lobe.

What standard are you using to base harmony on?

Does it destroy or does it build. Do you destroy the natural world and a people for capital gain if so, then you are not harmonies you are disharmonious. Do people die so you can elevate your status, then you are destructive or if you elevate your status because you bring people together and for example every tree you cut down you plant another in it's place and know when it's time not to cut down and destroy for the sake of the enviroment that you live.

But whose standard are you basing what harmonious is and how one is to be harmonious?

What is your measuring stick?

My measuring stick is nature and cause and effect which are tools of science and reading history and observing the natural world and compiling a body of work which can be tested and retested and be falsifiable and peer reviewed. That's how we know if something works or not. I had my stuff stolen and been assaulted in a mugging, I personally know how that feels like and what it feels like to be robbed, but this is bigger than just myself, so if everyone stole from each other and robbed and assaulted each other, can we have a community, can we have a safe enviroment in which people can work, build, take care of the children, can we defend ourselves from outside invaders? Questions we must ask and understand logic to see a conclusion.

But who defines safety?

And who said robbery is wrong?

Why did you feel violated when you were robbed?

Where did these feelings of violation come from?

And who decided the standard for right and wrong?

Humans gave the standard of right and wrong. Based on cause and effect. Who created the laws that drunk driving should be illegal? Humans based on what, evidence that it was impairing their cognitive functions and causing accidents and deaths. Who made texting while driving illegal? Humans, why because we cannot multi-task while driving so it's fair in logic that man created the standard against robbery and safety. There are no definitions in the bible for robbery and safety. Did Hammurabi gain his laws from Yahweh? No. Did the Egyptians gain their laws from yahweh? No.

The Israelites were robbing, killing, thieving, raping, and pillaging in Canaan cause they said their God told them it's the right thing to do, but an observant human being wouldn't do such a thing because they know their ways were creating strife in that area in which created disharmonious setting.

Why do humans feel emotional when being robbed, because of the evolutionary cognitive process called flight or fight due to the fact organisms fighting to survive for reproductions when evolutionary pathways create other organisms desire to destroy for substance. In the case of the robber he is looking substance either for food, drugs, or recreational. An illogical man couldn't understand why Robbery is wrong without looking towards a religion.

1. Actually humans didn't give the standards of what is right and what is wrong.

2. God did.

3. Therefore you even saying that there is a wrong means that you are measuring that wrongness against a righteous standard.

4. That righteous standard doesn't come from humans, but from a higher source than humans.

5. That is why you have feelings inside of you. A conscience that condemns you when you do wrong and affirms you when you do right.

6. The conscience is something that transcendes the fleshly plane of our existence, since our conscience resides inside our souls.

7. You are measuring right and wrongness against an absolute standard my friend.

8. That absolute is the All Mighty, the LORD Jesus Christ.

9. That is why you are without excuse because your conscience bears witness against you.

10. Amen.

And this is psychosis, so god created the laws against drunk driving and texting?

Prove that consciousness transcends the biology of humans.

What particles is the soul made of?

1. God created moral laws.

2. He decided what is right and what is wrong.

3. Man didn't become a living soul until God breathed His breath into us. That is how the consciousness of man transcends humanity, for it came from God Himself!

4. Look around the graveyard if you want proof. A body without the soul/conscious is dead.

5. The soul goes to heaven or hell upon death.

6. The soul is made up of the breath of God who gave it.

7. Hallelujah!

You are one crazy dude lol, we are biological organisms that can die from a spine injury, bacteria infection, virus infection, head injury and etc. So any number of ways we can die, does not in fact prove that we have a soul. This is called an Ad Hoc fallacy since you didn't actually give me any evidence for a soul to exist. So you basically gave me speculative answer.

The soul is what gives life to your body. Without it, you die!

Go check the graveyard for proof!

But guess what? It's appointed unto man, once to die, and then the judgment!

Therefore you are guaranteed to have a date with King Jesus one day soon.

Amen.
 
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281840 said:
Ajackson17;9281826 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281805 said:
Ajackson17;9281788 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281773 said:
Ajackson17;9281747 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281717 said:
Ajackson17;9281667 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281636 said:
Ajackson17;9281613 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281585 said:
Ajackson17;9281568 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9281560 said:
Ajackson17;9281533 said:
This is why religious zealots are not moving the world into a better place, but a backwards place. He is just like the CEO's who were selling leaded gas and its effects were monstrous and went against the evidence to support that it was global issue and destroying the planet, but you know what, science will prevail due to the intelligent amongst us who have good character and will make sure we humans actually progress.

Where does character come from?

Creating harmonious positive effort with your world around you. Meaning you are going to create disharmony by killing people willy nilly, you are going to create a negative effect stealing from people, you are going to create issues with people by lying on them and so on. Before you say the bible had this, this was written in Egypt and in Africa who didn't have a Christian deity.

It's called self awareness, which we have in our frontal lobe.

What standard are you using to base harmony on?

Does it destroy or does it build. Do you destroy the natural world and a people for capital gain if so, then you are not harmonies you are disharmonious. Do people die so you can elevate your status, then you are destructive or if you elevate your status because you bring people together and for example every tree you cut down you plant another in it's place and know when it's time not to cut down and destroy for the sake of the enviroment that you live.

But whose standard are you basing what harmonious is and how one is to be harmonious?

What is your measuring stick?

My measuring stick is nature and cause and effect which are tools of science and reading history and observing the natural world and compiling a body of work which can be tested and retested and be falsifiable and peer reviewed. That's how we know if something works or not. I had my stuff stolen and been assaulted in a mugging, I personally know how that feels like and what it feels like to be robbed, but this is bigger than just myself, so if everyone stole from each other and robbed and assaulted each other, can we have a community, can we have a safe enviroment in which people can work, build, take care of the children, can we defend ourselves from outside invaders? Questions we must ask and understand logic to see a conclusion.

But who defines safety?

And who said robbery is wrong?

Why did you feel violated when you were robbed?

Where did these feelings of violation come from?

And who decided the standard for right and wrong?

Humans gave the standard of right and wrong. Based on cause and effect. Who created the laws that drunk driving should be illegal? Humans based on what, evidence that it was impairing their cognitive functions and causing accidents and deaths. Who made texting while driving illegal? Humans, why because we cannot multi-task while driving so it's fair in logic that man created the standard against robbery and safety. There are no definitions in the bible for robbery and safety. Did Hammurabi gain his laws from Yahweh? No. Did the Egyptians gain their laws from yahweh? No.

The Israelites were robbing, killing, thieving, raping, and pillaging in Canaan cause they said their God told them it's the right thing to do, but an observant human being wouldn't do such a thing because they know their ways were creating strife in that area in which created disharmonious setting.

Why do humans feel emotional when being robbed, because of the evolutionary cognitive process called flight or fight due to the fact organisms fighting to survive for reproductions when evolutionary pathways create other organisms desire to destroy for substance. In the case of the robber he is looking substance either for food, drugs, or recreational. An illogical man couldn't understand why Robbery is wrong without looking towards a religion.

1. Actually humans didn't give the standards of what is right and what is wrong.

2. God did.

3. Therefore you even saying that there is a wrong means that you are measuring that wrongness against a righteous standard.

4. That righteous standard doesn't come from humans, but from a higher source than humans.

5. That is why you have feelings inside of you. A conscience that condemns you when you do wrong and affirms you when you do right.

6. The conscience is something that transcendes the fleshly plane of our existence, since our conscience resides inside our souls.

7. You are measuring right and wrongness against an absolute standard my friend.

8. That absolute is the All Mighty, the LORD Jesus Christ.

9. That is why you are without excuse because your conscience bears witness against you.

10. Amen.

And this is psychosis, so god created the laws against drunk driving and texting?

Prove that consciousness transcends the biology of humans.

What particles is the soul made of?

1. God created moral laws.

2. He decided what is right and what is wrong.

3. Man didn't become a living soul until God breathed His breath into us. That is how the consciousness of man transcends humanity, for it came from God Himself!

4. Look around the graveyard if you want proof. A body without the soul/conscious is dead.

5. The soul goes to heaven or hell upon death.

6. The soul is made up of the breath of God who gave it.

7. Hallelujah!

You are one crazy dude lol, we are biological organisms that can die from a spine injury, bacteria infection, virus infection, head injury and etc. So any number of ways we can die, does not in fact prove that we have a soul. This is called an Ad Hoc fallacy since you didn't actually give me any evidence for a soul to exist. So you basically gave me speculative answer.

The soul is what gives life to your body. Without it, you die!

Go check the graveyard for proof!

But guess what? It's appointed unto man, once to die, and then the judgment!

Therefore you are guaranteed to have a date with King Jesus one day soon.

Amen.

Then it must have a natural explanation to the human body. That's why I say what particles, what is a soul in a natural understanding.
 
Do we have a soul??? define what a soul is??? is a soul the energy that animates the living body???

scientific fact: energy cannot be destroyed but it can be transmuted

maybe the human soul in just information??? although i think that would be closer to what i would describe as the human spirit
 
Last edited:
DoUwant2go2Heaven;9280859 said:
How does finding a t-rex skull damage creationism? God made all the beasts of the field on the 6th day.

There are followers that believe dinosaurs are fake cause they're not in the bible. So, he's probably talking to that crowd.

 
Dreams imagination and memory are scientific proof of a souls existence. Science consider these to be independent of the body.

Evolution does not disprove creation. There is an answer both ways for everything. Y'all going back and forth for no reason
 
semi-auto-mato;9281850 said:
Dreams imagination and memory are scientific proof of a souls existence. Science consider these to be independent of the body.

Evolution does not disprove creation. There is an answer both ways for everything. Y'all going back and forth for no reason

Find me a peer review scientific journal that imagination and memory are scientific proof a soul's existence. This can be falsifiable because what is a soul is made up of?
 
How can anyone be sure God is even interested in humans anymore? I mean he's been absent a long time and things have gone south. According to the Bible he used to come around all the time. He gave guided tours to Adam and Eve, he visited the Virgin Mary on some type of underhanded mission, he even came in the form of a burning bush at one time. Seems like he stopped paying visits right around the time photography was invented.
 
Ajackson17;9281857 said:
semi-auto-mato;9281850 said:
Dreams imagination and memory are scientific proof of a souls existence. Science consider these to be independent of the body.

Evolution does not disprove creation. There is an answer both ways for everything. Y'all going back and forth for no reason

Find me a peer review scientific journal that imagination and memory are scientific proof a soul's existence. This can be falsifiable because what is a soul is made up of?

Ok u want me to post a link to a scientific study u already said u will consider false?

Why?
 
zzombie;9281846 said:
Do we have a soul??? define what a soul is??? is a soul the energy that animates the living body???

scientific fact: energy cannot be destroyed but it can be transmuted

maybe the human soul in just information??? although i think that would be closer to what i would describe as the human spirit

I agree with this, but he is saying there is conclusive evidence that our emotions, thoughts, memory, ideas, and etc are embedded in this energy that cannot be defined by humans which is the makeup of humans.

We know there is electrical impulses in humans in which electrical impulses are basically the fourth state of matter which is plasma which is the sun and stars are made up of which is fusion energy. Thus we are made up of the universe like in evolution everything is interrelated to each other and existence is interrelated and we all come from the same source and through time and positive possibilities that life came into existence. Now, if this is guided by a hand then we truly don't know, I'm on the side we don't know and probably will never know, some say they think this is what happens. They are logical to say this is a possibility.
 
semi-auto-mato;9281868 said:
Ajackson17;9281857 said:
semi-auto-mato;9281850 said:
Dreams imagination and memory are scientific proof of a souls existence. Science consider these to be independent of the body.

Evolution does not disprove creation. There is an answer both ways for everything. Y'all going back and forth for no reason

Find me a peer review scientific journal that imagination and memory are scientific proof a soul's existence. This can be falsifiable because what is a soul is made up of?

Ok u want me to post a link to a scientific study u already said u will consider false?

Why?

Falsifiable means it can be tested and peer review with tangible evidence and information. Not saying it's false, but it can be proven false if the evidence doesn't hold out.

If a theory doesn’t make a testable prediction, it isn’t science.

It’s a basic axiom of the scientific method, dubbed “falsifiability” by the 20th century philosopher of science Karl Popper. General relativity passes the falsifiability test because, in addition to elegantly accounting for previously-observed phenomena like the precession of Mercury’s orbit, it also made predictions about as-yet-unseen effects—how light should bend around the Sun, the way clocks should seem to run slower in a strong gravitational field, and others that have since been borne out by experiment
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/02/falsifiability/
 
babelipsss;9281859 said:
How can anyone be sure God is even interested in humans anymore? I mean he's been absent a long time and things have gone south. According to the Bible he used to come around all the time. He gave guided tours to Adam and Eve, he visited the Virgin Mary on some type of underhanded mission, he even came in the form of a burning bush at one time. Seems like he stopped paying visits right around the time photography was invented.

How do you know he has been absent??? people claim to experience god all the time and the bold is false.

god only interacted with israel because he chose them as his people to accomplish his plan of salvation for all of us he had special protections for these people so he had to step into things
 
Ajackson17;9281889 said:
semi-auto-mato;9281868 said:
Ajackson17;9281857 said:
semi-auto-mato;9281850 said:
Dreams imagination and memory are scientific proof of a souls existence. Science consider these to be independent of the body.

Evolution does not disprove creation. There is an answer both ways for everything. Y'all going back and forth for no reason

Find me a peer review scientific journal that imagination and memory are scientific proof a soul's existence. This can be falsifiable because what is a soul is made up of?

Ok u want me to post a link to a scientific study u already said u will consider false?

Why?

Falsifiable means it can be tested and peer review with tangible evidence and information. Not saying it's false, but it can be proven false if the evidence doesn't hold out.

If a theory doesn’t make a testable prediction, it isn’t science.

It’s a basic axiom of the scientific method, dubbed “falsifiability” by the 20th century philosopher of science Karl Popper. General relativity passes the falsifiability test because, in addition to elegantly accounting for previously-observed phenomena like the precession of Mercury’s orbit, it also made predictions about as-yet-unseen effects—how light should bend around the Sun, the way clocks should seem to run slower in a strong gravitational field, and others that have since been borne out by experiment
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/02/falsifiability/

start here
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571064513001188
http://www.zmescience.com/science/science-explains-our-soul/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/biocentrism/201112/does-the-soul-exist-evidence-says-yes
http://humansarefree.com/2015/07/scientific-proof-of-reincarnation-yes.html

i wont ever try to make a person believe something they do not want to believe. im sure we can talk about these links all day and night for the next 20 years. im good with accepting what u believe in as best for u. the belief in God is what is best for me.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
219
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…