Racially Motivated Threads of the Social Lounge...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
its over: 2012!;1014326 said:
cease and desist now! ...lol...quit helping racists here, with their attempt to cloud reality. You know everyone is racist to some extent just like you know that that fact, is meaningless, when compared to how no one's racism matters except Whitefolk. At least, here in America.

Quit being deceitful, quit pretending like you don't comprehend the reality behind the fact that Blacks own no Industry, no Market, nor dictate any Culture. Quit pretending like you don't know how that fact, in a Democratic society, means your Racism is meaningless....unless it turns to violence

and even then, it's only meaningful for a day or a week or so, according to American History.

I think you just like banging on the keyboards. You're constantly typing but only drivel ever comes out.

I wasn't helping racists cloud anything. As you said yourself, everyone has a little racist in them, so this argument that blacks can't be racist is either an outright lie or comes down to semantics. What does blacks not owning industry or market have to do with black racism. That certainly would be a reason to hate the white power structure and establishment, but it certainly doesn't excuse a blanket hatred of all people just because of their skin tone. That's like a white person hating all blacks because he/she got robbed by one once. Distrusting all whites because of their potential for wrong doing is one thing, but outright hating them and wanting harm to come to them just because they are white is racist plain and simple.

And what do you mean Blacks don't dictate any Culture? I'd say about 50% of Americana or pop American Culture at any given time is dictated by what blacks do.
 
Last edited:
“lol, so he's not taken seriously.”

Whatever man that’s just your opinion and it’s based off of what Major Pain thinks, so basically it’s bullshit.


“yeah, people in my neighborhood are taken seriously and aren't on meds. maybe i should ask them.”

Accusing people of being on meds isn’t helping your argument either.


“I would probably save my fingers some exercise by not taking him seriously at all. I mean look at it this way, his stance is race does not exist. What educated person do you know says something like that?”

All of that talking and you have STILL failed to prove that race is real & used in the way Merriam Webster described it outside of white people. You are just making excuses for white people man. That’s all that you doing.

The problems in the world concerning complexion only comes in when whites are involved. Thats it. They are at the root of the color wars. No one else. All of the reactions to that are what U.S. Intelligence would term "blowback," because every action has a reaction. I thought u knew that?

Bottom line, WHITE'S ARE THE ONLY RACISTS.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1014156 said:
I'M PRETTY SURE THAT THEY LIVE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. GOOD NIGHT.

i never said you were on meds, i just said that my neighbors aren't. you know, those same neighbors that you apparently know.

bottom line, you're ridiculous and i'm done here.
 
Last edited:
theillestrator;1016430 said:
i never said you were on meds, i just said that my neighbors aren't. you know, those same neighbors that you apparently know.

bottom line, you're ridiculous and i'm done here.

gtfo with that sneak shit. don't come with your ridiculous questions and you won't have any problems. go ask the whites that u know for a more complete answer that will be to your liking.
 
Last edited:
DarcSkies777;1011310 said:
Well show my "dumb" ass some examples.

*waits.........

And your statistics dont specify if it was blacks who attacked whites nor are the put in context. Chances are the cracker got killed/attacked cuz of some shit he did and it blew up in his face. BLacks just plain dont have a "you're white so I hate you" mentality. We have a "you're white ass is evil so says common sense and history" mentality though. THats not hatred thats survival.

100% of anti-white crimes committed by blacks were justified self-defense? I don't believe in absolutes like that. We're human, we have our ignorant devils too. "NEVER" is a foolish word in my book.

I could provide some examples but.....fuck it. I don't feel like it. Most of the news stories would come from racist-ass websites that I just don't have the stomach for right now. And I'm in no mood to play "Captain Save A White" in this thread when Blacks are being threatened by a new populist wave of Racism that's got me browsing gun websites. Whites are in no real danger. BLACKS ARE. Racism against whites? Boo hoo, isolated incidents that cops won't ignore. Racism against blacks? Systematic, historical, could put us in fucking concentration camps. Fuck the false equivalency.

Just know that my dislike for absolutist rhetoric is grounded in survival. I truly believe such thinking hurts us in the long run. I think we as a race need to be strategic, play the shit like a chess game. If a nigga is actin a super-ignorant fool, he does us a disservice and is barely better than a Uncle Tom in my book. Fuck em. Of course, facts should be independently verified before such a conclusion is reached.....(LOOKIN AT YOU B. HUSSEIN)
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1012062 said:
before the Europeans enacted that system, there was no racism from anybody. white people are the only racists. that's how it was and how it is going to be until white supremacy is destroyed.

Indian Caste System. "the origins of racism"
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1012201 said:
what other ethnic group on the planet oppresses people based off of complexion?

Koreans? Shit, they say North Korea is racist as fuck. A black Cuban diplomat almost got lynched when he tried to tour North Korea's capital.

Arabs have a LONG history of racism against blacks. They actually did it before whites knew blacks existed.

And again, caste system. Skin color plays into that. Skin bleaching cream is being advertised on Indian TV for a reason.

[video=youtube;F-9tcXpW1DE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-9tcXpW1DE[/video]
 
Last edited:
KTULU IS BACK;1013671 said:
I don't think any president has had to put up with so many complaints from "his own people" though.

That's mostly coming from diehard liberals upset about Afghanistan and disappointed by the realities of any legislation that survives the Senate. Obama don't catch hate from the vast majority of blacks. The IC isn't an accurate representation of opinion.

Oh and all your race trolling threads makes it difficult for you to be taken seriously in a thread about race, btw. Just sayin'.
 
Last edited:
Swiffness!;1016625 said:
Koreans? Shit, they say North Korea is racist as fuck. A black Cuban diplomat almost got lynched when he tried to tour North Korea's capital.

Arabs have a LONG history of racism against blacks. They actually did it before whites knew blacks existed.

And again, caste system. Skin color plays into that. Skin bleaching cream is being advertised on Indian TV for a reason.

[video=youtube;F-9tcXpW1DE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-9tcXpW1DE[/video]

the Indian issue can be linked to the Caucasoid invasions.

the Arab issue can be linked to the Caucasoid invasions as well (both are areas that whites went to before they were even in Europe as a developed people.) they eventually disappeared as a distinguishable ethnic group in Asia but came back with force in late Greece, Rome and the Germanic invasions. they been racists since day one b. *the original Arabs were and are still black. they been low key ever since they got kicked out of Spain, but u can still find them in Oman, Yemen, Saudi Arabia (the homeland) Sudan, Chad, Mali, Niger, Algeria, Libya Morocco and especially, Mauritania.

the Koreans are just trying to protect their country from outside influence. Africa fell & the people did with it. before that? Africa's trade with East Asia was second to none. black people are the poster children for what not to do. we put white people above our own self interests and the world has learned from that.
 
Last edited:
DarcSkies777;1013787 said:
As for Asians they've always hated blacks. What's new?

SILENCE COON, ASIANS AREN'T WHITE

lol, but seriously, I don't get the huge argument with over nomenclature. Fuck ya'll definitions of racism. What matters is the real world effects, not the wording. You can call the crack sentencing laws ASDF;ZXist for all I care.

Ya'll niggas gettin heated over ASCII characters lol
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1016702 said:
the Indian issue can be linked to the Caucasoid invasions.

the Arab issue can be linked to the Caucasoid invasions as well (both are areas that whites went to before they were even in Europe as a developed people.) they eventually disappeared as a distinguishable ethnic group in Asia but came back with force in late Greece, Rome and the Germanic invasions. they been racists since day one b. *the original Arabs were and are still black. they been low key ever since they got kicked out of Spain, but u can still find them in Oman, Yemen, Saudi Arabia (the homeland) Sudan, Chad, Mali, Niger, Algeria, Libya Morocco and especially, Mauritania.

the Koreans are just trying to protect their country from outside influence. Africa fell & the people did with it. before that? Africa's trade with East Asia was second to none. black people are the poster children for what not to do. we put white people above our own self interests and the world has learned from that.

aiight homie.....

just, please, never doubt the fact that other races have persecuted Blacks.

The Sudan conflict is typically characterized as between the predominately Arab/Muslim North and the non-Arab/Muslim "African" South.[16] Dr Deng (Sudanese known journalist) explains that Northerners' identification with Arabism, "is the result of a process in which races and religions were ranked, with Arabs and Muslims respected as free, superior and a race of slave masters, while Negroes and heathens were viewed as legitimate target of slavery, if they were not in fact already slaves." [17] from a conference on North-South relations: "Northern intellectuals look at Southerners as 'tribes-men', while they refer to the Northerners as 'people'. Even those Northerners who are considered to be leftist think in the same way!" [18] The government has built anti-Dinka militias to fight the war by proxy. To persuade Arab Sudanese to join militias, the old Sudanese ideas of racial cleavage between the north and the south were deployed. Southerners were characterized as abid [slaves].[19] The prosecutor at Omar al-Bashir's trial, being accused of genocide, charged the Arab-led government with a genocidal strategy against Darfur's black African ethnic groups. [20].

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Darfur

The 1st Genocide of the 21st Century targeted blacks.

Sadly, it won't be the last time.
 
Last edited:
Swiffness!;1016813 said:
aiight homie.....

just, please, never doubt the fact that other races have persecuted Blacks.

The Sudan conflict is typically characterized as between the predominately Arab/Muslim North and the non-Arab/Muslim "African" South.[16] Dr Deng (Sudanese known journalist) explains that Northerners' identification with Arabism, "is the result of a process in which races and religions were ranked, with Arabs and Muslims respected as free, superior and a race of slave masters, while Negroes and heathens were viewed as legitimate target of slavery, if they were not in fact already slaves." [17] from a conference on North-South relations: "Northern intellectuals look at Southerners as 'tribes-men', while they refer to the Northerners as 'people'. Even those Northerners who are considered to be leftist think in the same way!" [18] The government has built anti-Dinka militias to fight the war by proxy. To persuade Arab Sudanese to join militias, the old Sudanese ideas of racial cleavage between the north and the south were deployed. Southerners were characterized as abid [slaves].[19] The prosecutor at Omar al-Bashir's trial, being accused of genocide, charged the Arab-led government with a genocidal strategy against Darfur's black African ethnic groups. [20].

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Darfur

The 1st Genocide of the 21st Century targeted blacks.

Sadly, it won't be the last time.

the Northern and Southern Sudanese are both "BLACK."

that dispute is strictly based on ethnic (Nubian Vs. Dinka), cultural (Islam Vs. Christianity and African traditional Spirituality), financial (oil reserves in the south) & Geopolitical (the demarcation lines that the European Berlin conference drew & Chinese resource needs).

It has nothing to do with complexion outside of the pale Arabs (Caucasoid) historically telling northern Sudanese that they are better than southern Sudanese. the same shit that their Spanish cousins did with the Dominicans and Haitians. wicked shit man.

white people are always at the root of racism. other ethnicities do what they do for reasons outside of complexion.
 
Last edited:
independentsoundlab;1014406 said:
If someone who can stand up (CHE GUEVARA) and fight for the people...
well, Che fought for the people if they were the people he approved of
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1012108 said:
"racism only exists when whites are involved in the equation?"

YOU DAMN RIGHT.
let me know when you can explain how racism works between non-white groups then. or when you're coming back to the whole "why do you think the definition of "racism" somehow lets white racism off the hook?"

anyone, of any race, can be racist.

musicology1985;1012494 said:
the definition that you brought is bullshit because race doesn't exist as a viable ethnic classification in regards to humans.
it's actually bullshit to insist the definition that covers ALL racism is inaccurate simply because you want to give certain groups a pass.

musicology1985;1013282 said:
again, the only version of racism that EXISTS WAS AND IS WHITE PEOPLE VS. Everybody else. that's it. Everything else can be appropriately classified as an ethnic, financial or national dispute. case in point.
so how is it that a white-versus-black conflict can't be classified as an ethnic conflict? also...

musicology1985;1013282 said:
Japan Vs. China=ethnic & national conflict.
ask the Japanese involved in that debate if they were the same race as those Chinese

DarcSkies777;1013718 said:
The fact that these idiots (cuz it's not just him) like to reduce racism to the fucking "R" section of a dictionary is proof that they dont really care to see the truth and like the race problem in this country the way it is. Cuz they benefit.
you know full well that the argument is often that claiming non-whites can't be racist is counter-productive. and as always, it doesn't say white racism doesn't exist, or that it doesn't need to be addressed, to say ALL races can be racist

DarcSkies777;1013872 said:
]Where's the racism? I guess blacks just randomly beat the shit out whites and call them names for no reason now huh? WHites lie all the time I'm sure they provoked it and when they lost the fight they instigated in the first place they lied their cracker asses off when it was time to write out the police report. And like all pigs they took the white side. Sorry but I'm going to need some CREDIBLE examples of black racism (which you'll never find because it doesnt exist).
if this is your argument, then it's pointless because as far as you're concerned, ANY example you're given can be dismissed with "the white people lied." and i know you're a legitimate poster, so this is sort of disappointing
 
Last edited:
janklow;1018865 said:
let me know when you can explain how racism works between non-white groups then. or when you're coming back to the whole "why do you think the definition of "racism" somehow lets white racism off the hook?"

anyone, of any race, can be racist.

Bullshit. You have nothing to stand on because race doesn't exists. Your just trying to defend your people who created this political science.

it's actually bullshit to insist the definition that covers ALL racism is inaccurate simply because you want to give certain groups a pass.

No such thing as ALL RACISM. Just white supremacy racism, that's it.

so how is it that a white-versus-black conflict can't be classified as an ethnic conflict? also...


Because whites warred with EVERYONE in order to make a clear difference between them and everyone else. why? white supremacy racism, that's why. when we share the same nationality like in jena 6, it can be considered ethnic conflict as well, but it's still racism at the root when western whites are involved.


ask the Japanese involved in that debate if they were the same race as those Chinese

bullshit. there is no proof of race. it was a cultural and national conflict.
 
Last edited:
musicology1985;1018940 said:
bullshit. there is no proof of race. it was a cultural and national conflict.

In the early 20th Century, Social Darwinism, runaway Nationalism, and the invention of things like Eugenics and IQ tests contributed to the rise of the idea that the population of a nationstate constituted not just a population and a culture, but its own "race". This is really the backstory to all the evil shit that went down in WW2. It's why Hitler would always talk about "the German race" "the Jewish race" "the Polish race" "the Slavic (russian) race", etc. And of course, "the Aryan race". He talks about this non-stop in Mein Kampf. (of course, he also wrote a 2nd book where he co-signed America's "racial policies", but that's another thread for another day)

Nazi (and Imperial Japan to a lesser degree) ideology all revolved around the idea that they were "RACIALLY SUPERIOR" to their neighbors and that "inferior" races were the cause of all their problems....including WW2 LOL.

You can state YOUR beliefs, but its historical fact that this is how it was from about 1910 to 1930. The world was OBSESSING about "race". Its no coincidence that lynching, race riots, and the KKK all reached their peak in America during this timeframe.

Now, if you wanna talk about how Nationalism and Social Darwinism - the 2 concepts that started all this - was invented by Whites.....well, go right ahead because the shit was invented by Whites, cuzz! In fact, Imperial Japan was all about imitating the Western (White) Imperialist powers. Where do you think those silly-ass Japanese "Sailor" School Uniforms come from? They were based off of the British Royal Navy uniforms and were introduced in 1920.
 
Last edited:
Swiffness!;1019147 said:
In the early 20th Century, Social Darwinism, runaway Nationalism, and the invention of things like Eugenics and IQ tests contributed to the rise of the idea that the population of a nationstate constituted not just a population and a culture, but its own "race". This is really the backstory to all the evil shit that went down in WW2. It's why Hitler would always talk about "the German race" "the Jewish race" "the Polish race" "the Slavic (russian) race", etc. And of course, "the Aryan race". He talks about this non-stop in Mein Kampf. (of course, he also wrote a 2nd book where he co-signed America's "racial policies", but that's another thread for another day)

Nazi (and Imperial Japan to a lesser degree) ideology all revolved around the idea that they were "RACIALLY SUPERIOR" to their neighbors and that "inferior" races were the cause of all their problems....including WW2 LOL.

You can state YOUR beliefs, but its historical fact that this is how it was from about 1910 to 1930. The world was OBSESSING about "race". Its no coincidence that lynching, race riots, and the KKK all reached their peak in America during this timeframe.

Now, if you wanna talk about how Nationalism and Social Darwinism - the 2 concepts that started all this - was invented by Whites.....well, go right ahead because the shit was invented by Whites, cuzz! In fact, Imperial Japan was all about imitating the Western (White) Imperialist powers. Where do you think those silly-ass Japanese "Sailor" School Uniforms come from? They were based off of the British Royal Navy uniforms and were introduced in 1920.

none of what u wrote proves that RACE IS REAL AND CAN BE SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN. Japan can copy whites all day, but that still does not mean that race is real. what u did was prove my point that racism is white supremacy ideology/political science used to take out all darker peoples. japan followed whites and got nuked for it... lmao. u see they ain't nuke shit in Europe. it's them against everybody else. they manipulate darker & poor peoples and throw em' away.

race ain't real.

you can't prove it.

janklow can't prove it.

major pain can't prove it.

the lonious monk can't prove it.

the illustrator can't prove it.

most of all, Darwin can't prove it.

it's white supremacy racism. all that other shit is blow back reactionism that white apologists and white people use to deflect the reality of white's own actions. not happenin' man. nope.
 
Last edited:
independentsoundlab;1014406 said:
You see why Cuba chose its path.. You cant become dependent on one nation..

LOL, you're a dumbass.

Cuba was heavily dependent on Soviet trade (especially for grain), like all the USSR's military allies. And when the USSR fell, Cuba's economy had a major crisis for most of the 90s that included shit like food shortages. Hell, the only reason Castro's regime survived is because he was way smarter than Kim Jung Il & his daddy and acted quickly to make Cuba self-sufficient agriculturally. North Korea didn't do that and 3 MILLION people starved to death. Cuba had to radically reform its society to be sustainable.

This era in Cuban history is known as the "Special Period". Read up on it sometime.

Of course, knowing you IC laptop guerrillas, you'll probably just deny everything I just typed, say it never happened, and catch feelings.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
8,092
Views
2,967
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…