Racially Motivated Threads of the Social Lounge...

[major pain]

don't try to front. u tried to make it seem like black on black conflict is racially based. gtfoh. only whites move like that b.

No, I said black people will fuck you over. I didnt say what it was based on, YOU did. Stop inferring things from my words. I posted exactly what I meant.

 

[major pain]

don't try to front. u tried to make it seem like black on black conflict is racially based. gtfoh. only whites move like that b.

No, I said black people will fuck you over. I didnt say what it was based on, YOU did. Stop inferring things from my words. I posted exactly what I meant.

 

[theillestrator]

again, the only version of racism that EXISTS WAS AND IS WHITE PEOPLE VS. Everybody else. that's it. Everything else can be appropriately classified as an ethnic, financial or national dispute. case in point.

Japan Vs. China=ethnic & national conflict.

China Vs. Taiwan=national conflict.

Sri Lanka Vs. Tamil Tigers=ethnic & national conflict.

Dafur Arabs Vs. themselves & Christians=ethnic, financial conflict with national boundaries.

Ethiopia Vs. Somalia=national Conflict.

Hausa Vs. Yoruba & Igbo=ethnic, national & financial conflict and sometimes religous.

the entire Balkan Peninsula=ethnic conflict.

NONE OF THOSE AFOREMENTIONED CONFLICTS LISTED HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH SKIN COMPLEXION. only white people who subscribe to white supremacy racism fight others on the basis of complexion and not legitimate grievances.

i didn't ask you that. i asked, and I quote myself, "what is it called when you just hate another race/other race?"

 

[musicology1985]

i didn't ask you that. i asked, and I quote myself, "what is it called when you just hate another race/other race?"

ain't no other race to hate so what are u talking about? the people on this planet have conflicts that are mainly not based on looks, but many other factors.

ask white people about hating others based on looks because no one else will know how to answer your question to your standards, because the question is flawed to begin with.

 

[DarcSkies777]

Define what is credible then?

You know damn well if this situation was reversed, then you would be screaming about racist white people.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

Credible = black people just attacking whites JUST FOR BEING WHITE AND THATS IT. Just blacks saying "hey lets go kill some crackers because they were born white....thats it nothing more."

Doesnt happen. Cant say the same for whites. Cant say blacks have discriminated against whites. Cant say blacks have denied loans that would have started businesses for economic empowerment. Cant say blacks have murdered the best white minds in the community. Cant say any of that shit. Cuz it doesnt happen.

And yes if it happened I would be screaming about racist crackers. The difference is...I'D BE RIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF RACE IN AMERICA. YOU ARE NOT. Very easy to understand really.

 

[major pain]

White kids beat a Black kid = racism

Black kids beat a White kid = "word that shall not be named"

 

[musicology1985]

No, I said black people will fuck you over. I didnt say what it was based on, YOU did. Stop inferring things from my words. I posted exactly what I meant.

"Newsflash, I dont care about someone's race. I'm not "capin" for anyone. White, black, asian, or hispanic. It does not matter to me. I've been around the block enough to know black people will fuck you over just as soon as white people."

that is what u said, and it was in the context of insinuating that everyone can be racist, which was false to begin with and another way for u to defend whites (because u never defend blacks.) so yeah, u coonin.'

 

[major pain]

Credible = black people just attacking whites JUST FOR BEING WHITE AND THATS IT. Just blacks saying "hey lets go kill some crackers because they were born white....thats it nothing more."

Doesnt happen. Cant say the same for whites. Cant say blacks have discriminated against whites. Cant say blacks have denied loans that would have started businesses for economic empowerment. Cant say blacks have murdered the best white minds in the community. Cant say any of that shit. Cuz it doesnt happen.

And yes if it happened I would be screaming about racist crackers. The difference is...I'D BE RIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF RACE IN AMERICA. YOU ARE NOT. Very easy to understand really.

So, in the example I posted, you deduced that it wasnt racially motivated....how exactly? You even made an excuse for it with "I'm sure they provoked it". Have an open mind on this.

http://www.loompanics.com/Articles/hatecrimes.html

 

[major pain]

"Newsflash, I dont care about someone's race. I'm not "capin" for anyone. White, black, asian, or hispanic. It does not matter to me. I've been around the block enough to know black people will fuck you over just as soon as white people."

that is what u said, and it was in the context of insinuating that everyone is racist, which was false to begin with and another way for u to defend whites (because u never defend blacks.) so yeah, u coonin.'

Yes, by saying I'm not defending any race, I'm defending white people. Great use of logical thinking there.

 

[theillestrator]

ain't no other race to hate so what are u talking about? the people on this planet have conflicts that are mainly not based on looks, but many other factors.

ask white people about hating others based on looks because no one else will know how to answer your question to your standards, because the question is flawed to begin with.

really? so we're just going to go that route? let me take a wild guess, you aren't taken seriously much, eh?

 

[musicology1985]

Yes, by saying I'm not defending any race, I'm defending white people. Great use of logical thinking there.

blah blah blah. yeah whateva man, say what u want. but the stance that u TAKE towers over that.

*goodnight to all the posters.*

 

[major pain]

really? so we're just going to go that route? let me take a wild guess, you aren't taken seriously much, eh?

Careful, you are disagreeing with him. You will be a coon soon enough.

 

[musicology1985]

really? so we're just going to go that route? let me take a wild guess, you aren't taken seriously much, eh?

I am taken seriously very much man. I'm just being honest with you.

YOUR QUESTION IS FLAWED. ASK THOSE WHO CREATED AND BENEFIT FROM RACISM TO ANSWER IT FOR YOU. I'M PRETTY SURE THAT THEY LIVE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. GOOD NIGHT.

 

[BethlehemBill]

lol this thread still going on?

 

[theillestrator]

Careful, you are disagreeing with him. You will be a coon soon enough.

lol, so he's not taken seriously.

 

[theillestrator]

I am taken seriously very much man. I'm just being honest with you.

YOUR QUESTION IS FLAWED. ASK THOSE WHO CREATED AND BENEFIT FROM RACISM TO ANSWER IT FOR YOU. I'M PRETTY SURE THAT THEY LIVE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. GOOD NIGHT.

yeah, people in my neighborhood are taken seriously and aren't on meds. maybe i should ask them.

 

[major pain]

lol, so he's not taken seriously.

I would probably save my fingers some exercise by not taking him seriously at all. I mean look at it this way, his stance is race does not exist. What educated person do you know says something like that?

 

[The Lonious Monk]

White kids beat a Black kid = racism

Black kids beat a White kid = "word that shall not be named"

I think you're missing the point. Neither of those two options are automatically racist.

White kids beating a black kid for not other reason than him being black = racism

Likewise a black kidd beating a white kid for no other reason than him being white = racism also

The issue is that Darc doesn't believe that second case ever happens. That is incorrect though. Hell, I've grown up with people that basically fiended for any reason to slap a white person because they just wanted to slap a white person. I don't see how you can not admit that is racism without being a hypocrite. Hell, the people who acted like that proudly proclaimed they were racist against whites.

 

[major pain]

I think you're missing the point. Neither of those two options are automatically racist.

White kids beating a black kid for not other reason than him being black = racism
Likewise a black kidd beating a white kid for no other reason than him being white = racism also

The issue is that Darc doesn't believe that second case ever happens. That is incorrect though. Hell, I've grown up with people that basically fiended for any reason to slap a white person because they just wanted to slap a white person. I don't see how you can not admit that is racism without being a hypocrite. Hell, the people who acted like that proudly proclaimed they were racist against whites.

I also agree that neither option is automatically racist.

That was precisely my point. I was being sarcastic with "word that shall not be named".

 

[independentsoundlab]

This is a perfect example of how America and countries of the like can drain a nation of its resources and give nothing but more poverty.. Only ones making money are the top officials.. If someone who can stand up (CHE GUEVARA) and fight for the people.. Haiti would be in a such better state.. You cant tell me that an island in the Caribbean doesnt have value.. its complete bullshit.. You see why Cuba chose its path.. You cant become dependent on one nation.. your guaranteed to get fucked..

Mrs. Trouillot was successful in overthrowing an asshole but in office for only a year.. even she was filled with corruption as well.. Anywho, a year doesn't accomplish anything.. Haiti still needs schools, still needs hospitals.. If politicians stop vacationing with peoples money, then maybe Haiti would be a better place..

If I was Haitian, in Haiti.. i would vote for Wyclef.. how worse can it get?? Dude is successful and unlike many.. he helps his country..

people probably fear since he's a hip hop head.. every Haitian will be wearing black tees and gangbanging..