ether-i-am;2735486 said:do you know what the question was?
So Africans strong immune system made them victims? That it? White peoples diseases didn't kill off white people. They sick ass still took over. How? How the fuck do you take over a people that is healthier than you on their own land?
Gtfoh!
ether-i-am;2729639 said:Why do you think Africans were mostly chosen to enslave anyway? Do we just make good ass slaves as oppose to any other race?
Would we be the number one candidate today as well? If not Black People then who?
Lorenzo de Medici;2729962 said:They tried natives, but they kept dying from all the hard work and couldn't do as much work during the day. Blacks have always been physically superior, that's why we were slaves. I'm not making this up either, it's a huge part of Jamaican history to talk about why they chose black slaves and the impact it had on society. It's a part of the curriculum starting in 1st grade.
I would imagine it was the same in America.
Kushington;2733969 said:European whites used their products to encourage powerful black leaders to sell alot of pre-existing slaves(at a higher rate than ever before in history), attack weaker tribes and europeans only did slave raids if a powerful black leaders allowed it
Slavery is not exclusive to Africans, yet modern(post 1500s) slavery was on a different and larger scale, whites werent the only ones getting rich......there were plenty of africans who , maybe blindsightedly so, benefitted from modern chattel slavery and the transatlantic slave trade
The Europeans decieved Africans yet the africans in power did not stop the slave trade while it was profitable
There are documents from 17th-20th century african leaders who regretted allowing europeans to deplete their own nations as well as africa in general
i keep forgetting that you one of those people who like to disagree just for the sake of it. i know now.
dont be mad cuz a my post made sum kinda cents.
i answered the question and you still ask why?
lol
Last edited: