Racially Motivated Threads of the Social Lounge...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
MC The Rapper;2729858 said:
i don't understand why black people don't understand the concept of ethnicity or tribalism warring tribes would sell their defeated enemies into slavery , white people would buy

the slaves simple concept . So you can blame white folk for the conditions that the slaves were put threw during there transport and slavery but other africans were selling the

slaves to the white man to began with. So what I take from that is no matter the race,color,creed,etc. people can be fucked up and lets not mention what the winning faction of a

tribe war would do to the women and children

Thank you!! And suffice it to say that most people have no clue that up until the partition of the continent, Africa was predominantly ethnically grouped. History has shown that, the spoils of war are the ones mostly sold as slaves. It happens throughout history.
 
Last edited:
ether-i-am;2729909 said:
Africa had that good slavery huh?

Saerch for endenchered slaves bruh!! you pay off your debts (after a period of service to your captives) and are allowed to return to your tribe/ethnic group.
 
Last edited:
ether-i-am;2729639 said:
Why do you think Africans were mostly chosen to enslave anyway? Do we just make good ass slaves as oppose to any other race?

Would we be the number one candidate today as well? If not Black People then who?

They tried natives, but they kept dying from all the hard work and couldn't do as much work during the day. Blacks have always been physically superior, that's why we were slaves. I'm not making this up either, it's a huge part of Jamaican history to talk about why they chose black slaves and the impact it had on society. It's a part of the curriculum starting in 1st grade.

I would imagine it was the same in America.
 
Last edited:
DreadlockRasta;2729951 said:
Saerch for endenchered slaves bruh!! you pay off your debts (after a period of service to your captives) and are allowed to return to your tribe/ethnic group.

*dead at endenchered*

But bruh, serfs were slaves in Europe. Same thing with Feudalism in china and Europe. It's not that big of a deal, bruh. There were slaves EVERYWHERE. It's as simple as this. There's a reason these niggas ain't get swole on northern Africa. West Africa was pretty much untouched. They had neither the understanding nor the technology to win a battle against the whties. Some of them said fuck it and made a deal with the devil so they would stay alive. Others fought. Either way, that's how shit was back then. I don't even get that mad about slavery anymore, because if Africans had the know-how they would've done the same shit back then. But back then the world pretty much consisted of Eurasia and Africa after having been sonned by Alexander the Great never fully recovered. The salt trade died, and well, you get where I'm going.
 
Last edited:
Native Americans knew the land to well,so they kept running away

and then would bring the tribes back and kill the owners.

but there was a big difference between african and european slavery so its not really

comparable.
 
Last edited:
Lorenzo de Medici;2729985 said:
*dead at endenchered*

But bruh, serfs were slaves in Europe. Same thing with Feudalism in china and Europe. It's not that big of a deal, bruh. There were slaves EVERYWHERE. It's as simple as this. There's a reason these niggas ain't get swole on northern Africa. West Africa was pretty much untouched. They had neither the understanding nor the technology to win a battle against the whties. Some of them said fuck it and made a deal with the devil so they would stay alive. Others fought. Either way, that's how shit was back then. I don't even get that mad about slavery anymore, because if Africans had the know-how they would've done the same shit back then. But back then the world pretty much consisted of Eurasia and Africa after having been sonned by Alexander the Great never fully recovered. The salt trade died, and well, you get where I'm going.

good post ....
 
Last edited:
An entire race cannot take the blame for the rape of Africa. Even calling it Africa is a dishonor because that name is derived from Leo Africanus, a Roman. That name has been so ingrained within our consciousness that we simply accept it. The Arabs had their hand in the slave trade, which is why you have islam in africa. a perfect example is in sudan, you have a lot of arab muslims who run roughshod over native blacks. A lot of these blacks coincidentally refer to themselves as the tribe of Judah. Blame the various coastal tribes that kidnapped and sold enemies to the europeans for various forms of profit such as guns and alcohol.

That was the only thing that the europeans could offer because that continent is has such a large abundance of resources. Outside of amerikkka, africa is the largest continent to be put through a constant state of pillaging and raping whether it be land, resources or people. It is a mistake to lump all of africa together as it would be to lump all of asia together or europe. the politics of each tribe or nation were varied as any other people. China is now in nigeria pumping those people for their oil at a ripped off price. Basically the whole world has had a hand in abusing that continents resources and its people. however, global cooperation between these other nations has conspired to keep african nations from fully recovering and become self reliant.
 
Last edited:
Lorenzo de Medici;2729985 said:
*dead at endenchered*

But bruh, serfs were slaves in Europe. Same thing with Feudalism in china and Europe. It's not that big of a deal, bruh. There were slaves EVERYWHERE. It's as simple as this. There's a reason these niggas ain't get swole on northern Africa. West Africa was pretty much untouched. They had neither the understanding nor the technology to win a battle against the whties. Some of them said fuck it and made a deal with the devil so they would stay alive. Others fought. Either way, that's how shit was back then. I don't even get that mad about slavery anymore, because if Africans had the know-how they would've done the same shit back then. But back then the world pretty much consisted of Eurasia and Africa after having been sonned by Alexander the Great never fully recovered. The salt trade died, and well, you get where I'm going.

Not really theres been periods in history where Africans have been technically more advance than Europeans, yet did this not lead to Africans taking Europeans as slaves and destabilizing the already fucked up continent they lived on.
 
Last edited:
garv;2732645 said:
Not really theres been periods in history where Africans have been technically more advance than Europeans, yet did this not lead to Africans taking Europeans as slaves and destabilizing the already fucked up continent they lived on.

Then them niggas should have been dreaming bigger then.

And with regard to weapons and warfare, Africa has never been better than Eurasia(I'm counting both continents in this). With the exceptions of the Nubians, but they were so far south that no one fucked with 'em.
 
Last edited:
Lorenzo de Medici;2732832 said:
Then them niggas should have been dreaming bigger then.

And with regard to weapons and warfare, Africa has never been better than Eurasia(I'm counting both continents in this). With the exceptions of the Nubians, but they were so far south that no one fucked with 'em.

My man fifty grand, perhaps you need to stop smokin those white girls (crack) Have you heard of the Ethiopian Empire. It was the only empire that resisted being colonized by Europe in the 19th century. That empire goes all the way back to 980 B.C.

Hannibal of Carthage would have rewritten the entire make up of the European continent had he been able to pass his elephants over into Rome. However he did rewrite Sicily's makeup which is why Italians that come form there have olive skin and dark hair as opposed to blond hair and blue eyes of northern italians.

You can take it all the way back to the egyptian kingdom. this was the hub for knowledge and riches through out the Mediterranean world. In fact rich greek socialites sent their sons to learn in its libraries. mathematical system known as geometry was invented in egypt. Also, if anyone wanted gold, they had to go to egypt, no one else had, especially in europe.

You also have the black presence in the americas long before columbus. the olmac heads in mesoamerica display unique afro features in the lips and nose. there are also the aztec pyramids.

The only advantage europeans ever had was the gun. they were never smarter than any one, better suited for survival, or tougher. they only had guns, which only is because they got salt peter aka gun powder from china. If it were not for this one invention, europeans would still be fighting each other over useless territories. instead they have the gun and simply become avatars of death as their greatest accomplishment. they kill and are ruthless with it, and the rest of the world drinks up that poison to become just like them.

before you go jocking european powers, i suggest that you study what they actually were. the only reason the east aka china and japan drank up that kool aid was that america france and england propped themselves up like they were somebody to be chasing after which they were not. these monarchies were nothing but an extension of the roman empire and they fall just like the roman empire by collapsing under the weight of their own decadence and pursuit of unnatural lusts. vomitoriums, orgies, gladiator games, seriously disgusting.
 
Last edited:
ether-i-am;2729639 said:
Why do you think Africans were mostly chosen to enslave anyway? Do we just make good ass slaves as oppose to any other race?

Would we be the number one candidate today as well? If not Black People then who?

European whites used their products to encourage powerful black leaders to sell alot of pre-existing slaves(at a higher rate than ever before in history), attack weaker tribes and europeans only did slave raids if a powerful black leaders allowed it

Slavery is not exclusive to Africans, yet modern(post 1500s) slavery was on a different and larger scale, whites werent the only ones getting rich......there were plenty of africans who , maybe blindsightedly so, benefitted from modern chattel slavery and the transatlantic slave trade

The Europeans decieved Africans yet the africans in power did not stop the slave trade while it was profitable

There are documents from 17th-20th century african leaders who regretted allowing europeans to deplete their own nations as well as africa in general
 
Last edited:
PPLSIntiative;2733555 said:
The only advantage europeans ever had was the gun.

Really? So how advanced was Africa's navy then? And why wasn't their agricultural product as robust? And their political cohesion?

C'mon, son.

You also have the black presence in the americas long before columbus. the olmac heads in mesoamerica display unique afro features in the lips and nose. there are also the aztec pyramids.
This has been debunked many times. Stop trying to steal cultural credit from the native Americans.
 
Last edited:
ether-i-am;2734032 said:
Are we still the prime candidates to be enslaved today?

We never were, so no. If white people woulda "won", there would be no black people, just whiteskin black people who could pass for white

Black people were very adamant about colonialism,slavery and its byproducts in general, rather than bow down to whites like asians or native americans did, black people(back then) stayed within our own and maintained solidarity for the most part, so white folks just gave up after the powers that be made enough money

The era of slavery that existed during european colonialism will most likely never be repeated but there are different forms of slavery today

Listen to the song,"They dont give a fuck about us" by Pac, it will help you understand the point im getting at about your question
 
Last edited:
i shouldnt be talking/typing about this because i dont never wanna teach on the IC. that sucks. and its annoying for yous guys.

Its because of the sickle cell gene. not the weak one that prodigy and t-boz has lol thats something different. thats a deficiency.

the sickle cell gene made west afrikans immune to the nasty diseases that white people carried. you know, the diseases that killed off the other races that encountered white people. So We were able to survive where the weaker humans died.

i only know that because of what i do.

(i read the thread, and nobody hit the nail on the coffin like i just did.)
(thats why i had to say something)
(and in the future, take this bullshit to the social lounge. this the g-n-s, leave that racial shit for them IC purists lol)
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
8,092
Views
4,295
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…