questions about the terminator franchise...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

CracceR

New member
i said this in another thread and ima say it again

terminator salvation is aight as a movie but not good enough for a terminator movie imo

200.gif


t2 is one of my favourite movies ever and these other directors just cant do it like jim thus far, they dont even get close

t2>>>terminator>>> and then im not sure

ima try to stay open minded with this new movie but it doesnt look that good

 
Max.;8048163 said:
I'm watchn salvation rn,,,I like the way it looks visually

there were some good ideas with the big robots, bikes etc., but its just not violent enough. terminators are killing machines, i wanna see blood and body parts.

i prefered jims version of the future

200.gif


it looked cooler

 
The Terminator

Terminator 2

Terminator 3

Terminator Salvation doesn't even rank with me on account of it being hot garbage.
 
I liked salvation cuz we got to fully see the aftermath after the machines took over. I didn't like the fact that it was rated pg13
 
T3 got a lot of hate but i loved the ending. Judgement day! T4 was the weakest. Even the Sarah Conner Chronicles made more sense than T4.
 
I loved the first two Terminators, I consider them classics. It's hard to choose between them but if I have to I'll go with T2. I also liked Terminator Salvation but it wasn't a classic (in my subjective opinion) and I didn't expect it to be. I don't think I'll ever like another Terminator movie as much as T2.

In order, I guess I'd rate them T2>T1>T3>T4

Even the Sarah Conner Chronicles made more sense than T4.

I liked the Sarah Connor chronicles, Thomas Dekker and Lena Headey did a good job. I also liked Terminator 2029-1984 (graphic novel).
 
JokerKing;8053753 said:
I thought this was a nerdy time travel paradox question.

I had a hell of a response

@JokerKing explain how John Connor is in the future if Kyle Reese hadn't went back in the past to impregnate Sarah Connor yet. I've always wondered that shit
 
Chi-Town Bully;8055021 said:
JokerKing;8053753 said:
I thought this was a nerdy time travel paradox question.

I had a hell of a response

@JokerKing explain how John Connor is in the future if Kyle Reese hadn't went back in the past to impregnate Sarah Connor yet. I've always wondered that shit

Simple, Kyle Reese going back to 1984 the first time created a new time-line. We don't know who John Connors father actually is. Just like we don't know who originally invented Skynet, since the original T-800 that was sent back to 1984 was the inspiration for Skynet (think about T2, when homeboy had the arm and cpu locked up, saying that technology helped create their company that would eventually create Skynet)

Obviously, Kyle Reese isn't John Connor's original father, but he became Johns father by taking his original father's place. The events of the first Terminator led Sara Connor away from Johns original father and onto a path where Kyle Reese is Johns father. Kyle Reese inadvertently creates a time paradox where John simply cannot exist, and the universe fixes it by creating a brand new time-line of events and completely erasing the original.
 
Broddie;8049086 said:
The Terminator

Terminator 2

Terminator 3

Terminator Salvation doesn't even rank with me on account of it being hot garbage.

This. None of them are fucking with the first one.
 
Terminator salvation was way better than tx3 its only sin is that it could have used more Arnold. Terminator 3 was wack except for the last 30 minutes when judgment day started to jump off. I felt that the tx terminatrix was bland and couldn't hold a candle to the shape changing T-1000
 
Last edited:
One other thing Anton yelchin played the role of a young Kyle Reese to a "t" in salvation . I don't like the guy they chose for Reese in this upcoming film.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
40
Views
1
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…