Friday the 13th Questions...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

Rampage12

New member
1. This was not supposed to be a franchise, but when it grossed a ton of money on a shoestring budget they decided to keep it going so that explains why they brought Jason in since his mom had already gotten decapitated.

2. The sequence at the end of the original with Jason grabbing the girl in the boat was a dream if I'm remembering right. So technically since you never saw Jason in the original it makes sense that he's around 33 during Part 2.

3. The original begins in 1958 with the two camp counselors getting killed (who were presumably responsible for Jason's death) and then flashes to "present day" (1980) when the camp is re-opening which pisses Mommy off so she decides to resume her murderous rampage.

4. This franchise was a cash cow and passed through so many directors, producers, actors, writers etc. they basically just freestyled shit as to the way Jason looked, especially after Tom Savini quit after Part 4.

 
Yea i forgot the Friday the 13th series wasn't suppose to be solely about the Jason just like Halloween with Michael Myers which i guess explains why both have their share of plot holes and starts to get all over the place with the story
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
1
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…