Perspective

[Sour-Cream]

I dunno, all I know is that according to this article, the Hebrews were lightskinned and the Egyptians were darkskinned so they were hating on us lightskinned niggas for being more advanced than them.
http://sarabe3.tripod.com/israeliteimages.html

With the exception of Drake, lightskins won. :-D

 

[Premeer]

I dunno, all I know is that according to this article, the Hebrews were lightskinned and the Egyptians were darkskinned so they were hating on us lightskinned niggas for being more advanced than them.
http://sarabe3.tripod.com/israeliteimages.html

With the exception of Drake, lightskins won. :-D

this picture is approx. 3,453 years old... not a bad picture considering the time and what they had to draw on...

this pic is approx. 3,890 years old..

sure look like "todays version of humans".. just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish .... or something...

i understand it supposedly, by theory, takes a couple million years for these type a things to happen.. but you would think 3.5 & 3.9 thousand years, there would be some obvious changes..

damn... evolution, once again, triumphed by common sense.

 

[whar]

"this pic is approx. 3,890 years old.."

"just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish"

Massive misunderstanding of evolution revealed. The picture is only 155 or so generation removed from today. Since we diverged from apes ~6,000,000 years ago they should look .06% more apeish. (This assume evolutionary changes occur at an even speed over time.) In other words people from 4,000 years ago should look just like us.

Only someone stunningly ignorant in the process of evolution would expect something else.

 

[bambu]

"this pic is approx. 3,890 years old.."

"just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish"

Massive misunderstanding of evolution revealed. The picture is only 155 or so generation removed from today. Since we diverged from apes ~6,000,000 years ago they should look .06% more apeish. (This assume evolutionary changes occur at an even speed over time.) In other words people from 4,000 years ago should look just like us.

Only someone stunningly ignorant in the process of evolution would expect something else.

Kindof like this??????

 

[whar]

Also in 99.99999999999999999999% of this universe a human would die almost instantly.

In Chad, Mali, Congo, and Sierra-Leone, along with a half dozen other African countries, 1 in 5 children will die before the age of 5. The leading causes are Malaria, Dysentery, respiratory infections, measles, and malnutrition. Only the last can be laid at the feet of mankind all the rest are God's responsibility. Yet believers never seem to question this massacre of life.

God, why did you create Malaria?

Why did you create Measles?

Why do you disproportional kill the poor?

 

[Premeer]

"this pic is approx. 3,890 years old.."

"just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish"

Massive misunderstanding of evolution revealed. The picture is only 155 or so generation removed from today. Since we diverged from apes ~6,000,000 years ago they should look .06% more apeish. (This assume evolutionary changes occur at an even speed over time.) In other words people from 4,000 years ago should look just like us.

Only someone stunningly ignorant in the process of evolution would expect something else.

your evolution theory is constructed funny.... dont you think?

 

[Premeer]

"this pic is approx. 3,890 years old.."

"just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish"

Massive misunderstanding of evolution revealed. The picture is only 155 or so generation removed from today. Since we diverged from apes ~6,000,000 years ago they should look .06% more apeish. (This assume evolutionary changes occur at an even speed over time.) In other words people from 4,000 years ago should look just like us.

Only someone stunningly ignorant in the process of evolution would expect something else.

you dont understand so ill put it like this,

evolution is under the belief that we evolved from an ape breed.. so if evolution is real, that would mean everything would have to constantly be changing.

for instance if, a childs birth date is the 1st human of the ape tree, and a 40 year old is to the humans we have today... then that means we are growing and changing every day... and the 155 generations would be PLENTY of time for evolution to be seen.. but there IS NO changes...

a child doesnt go from a day old to 40 years old over night... theres growth every day in his life....

so how does a ape grow to a human without growing at all during the 155 generations? if theres not growth / change, then that right there, logically, proves evolution is not real.

im sorry, but you believe a elaborated lie.

@whar

 

[whar]

Its construct is quite sound.

 

[Premeer]

Its construct is quite sound.

all good lies are if you really get into the heart of it. thats where lies are sold.

@whar

 

[Premeer]

"this pic is approx. 3,890 years old.."

"just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish"

Massive misunderstanding of evolution revealed. The picture is only 155 or so generation removed from today. Since we diverged from apes ~6,000,000 years ago they should look .06% more apeish. (This assume evolutionary changes occur at an even speed over time.) In other words people from 4,000 years ago should look just like us.

Only someone stunningly ignorant in the process of evolution would expect something else.

you dont understand so ill put it like this,

evolution is under the belief that we evolved from an ape breed.. so if evolution is real, that would mean everything would have to constantly be changing.

for instance if, a childs birth date is the 1st human of the ape tree, and a 40 year old is to the humans we have today... then that means we are growing and changing every day... and the 155 generations would be PLENTY of time for evolution to be seen.. but there IS NO changes...

a child doesnt go from a day old to 40 years old over night... theres growth every day in his life....

so how does a ape grow to a human without growing at all during the 155 generations? if theres not growth / change, then that right there, logically, proves evolution is not real.

im sorry, but you believe a elaborated lie.

@whar

@whar

@whar

@whar

@whar

@whar

@whar

@whar

@whar

 

[Premeer]

@whar.. dont act like you dont know or see what im saying. dont come in here with that trash.

 

[whar]

"your evolution theory is constructed funny.... dont you think?" - Premeer

"Its construct is quite sound. " - Whar

"all good lies are if you really get into the heart of it. thats where lies are sold." - Premeer

Either it is constructed oddly or it is not. Pick one and stick with it.

 

[whar]

"this pic is approx. 3,890 years old.."

"just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish"

Massive misunderstanding of evolution revealed. The picture is only 155 or so generation removed from today. Since we diverged from apes ~6,000,000 years ago they should look .06% more apeish. (This assume evolutionary changes occur at an even speed over time.) In other words people from 4,000 years ago should look just like us.

Only someone stunningly ignorant in the process of evolution would expect something else.

you dont understand so ill put it like this,

evolution is under the belief that we evolved from an ape breed.. so if evolution is real, that would mean everything would have to constantly be changing.

for instance if, a childs birth date is the 1st human of the ape tree, and a 40 year old is to the humans we have today... then that means we are growing and changing every day... and the 155 generations would be PLENTY of time for evolution to be seen.. but there IS NO changes...

a child doesnt go from a day old to 40 years old over night... theres growth every day in his life....

so how does a ape grow to a human without growing at all during the 155 generations? if theres not growth / change, then that right there, logically, proves evolution is not real.

im sorry, but you believe a elaborated lie.

@whar

If a child's birth is the first divergence from the ape tree and a 40 year old is today then the folks from 3900 years should look like the 40 year old .... 8.76 days ago.

 

[Premeer]

"your evolution theory is constructed funny.... dont you think?" - Premeer

"Its construct is quite sound. " - Whar

"all good lies are if you really get into the heart of it. thats where lies are sold." - Premeer

Either it is constructed oddly or it is not. Pick one and stick with it.

its constructed funny because it makes sure the "evolution" goes back before any type of documentation to prevent from being "debunked". its a method to protect itself. thats what i mean by constructed funny.. conveniently goes back too far on purpose. lies are easy to pass off if you claim the lie took place a long enough time ago. maybe you should ask why i say its funny before drawing conclusions.

"this pic is approx. 3,890 years old.."

"just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish"

Massive misunderstanding of evolution revealed. The picture is only 155 or so generation removed from today. Since we diverged from apes ~6,000,000 years ago they should look .06% more apeish. (This assume evolutionary changes occur at an even speed over time.) In other words people from 4,000 years ago should look just like us.

Only someone stunningly ignorant in the process of evolution would expect something else.

you dont understand so ill put it like this,

evolution is under the belief that we evolved from an ape breed.. so if evolution is real, that would mean everything would have to constantly be changing.

for instance if, a childs birth date is the 1st human of the ape tree, and a 40 year old is to the humans we have today... then that means we are growing and changing every day... and the 155 generations would be PLENTY of time for evolution to be seen.. but there IS NO changes...

a child doesnt go from a day old to 40 years old over night... theres growth every day in his life....

so how does a ape grow to a human without growing at all during the 155 generations? if theres not growth / change, then that right there, logically, proves evolution is not real.

im sorry, but you believe a elaborated lie.

@whar

If a child's birth is the first divergence from the ape tree and a 40 year old is today then the folks from 3900 years should look like the 40 year old .... 8.76 days ago.

you dont get it. obviously.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

I dunno, all I know is that according to this article, the Hebrews were lightskinned and the Egyptians were darkskinned so they were hating on us lightskinned niggas for being more advanced than them.
http://sarabe3.tripod.com/israeliteimages.html

With the exception of Drake, lightskins won. :-D

this picture is approx. 3,453 years old... not a bad picture considering the time and what they had to draw on...

this pic is approx. 3,890 years old..

sure look like "todays version of humans".. just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish .... or something...

i understand it supposedly, by theory, takes a couple million years for these type a things to happen.. but you would think 3.5 & 3.9 thousand years, there would be some obvious changes..

damn... evolution, once again, triumphed by common sense.

Common sense goes out the window when you talk to people who actually believe that intelligence can come from non-intelligence. I mean these folks believe that all of life originated in some primordial ooze billions of years ago. How senseless can you be?

If it takes intelligence to design and make a car, a computer, a plane, a refrigerator, a space shuttle, etc., than how can it be possible for some primordial ooze to suddenly pop out of nowhere and start to make living creatures who are all far more complex than even the most advanced super computer? Riddle me that please!

That is why I refer to the scriptures when dealing with people who believe in Macro-Evolution. God calls them all FOOLS! Yeah, let God be true and all men Liars. Amen.

"The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God." Psalm 14:1

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

"this pic is approx. 3,890 years old.."

"just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish"

Massive misunderstanding of evolution revealed. The picture is only 155 or so generation removed from today. Since we diverged from apes ~6,000,000 years ago they should look .06% more apeish. (This assume evolutionary changes occur at an even speed over time.) In other words people from 4,000 years ago should look just like us.

Only someone stunningly ignorant in the process of evolution would expect something else.

Who saw the humans "diverge from apes ~6,000,000 years ago"? Who was there to observe the phenomenon take place? Please enlighten me all knowing one!

 

[Premeer]

I dunno, all I know is that according to this article, the Hebrews were lightskinned and the Egyptians were darkskinned so they were hating on us lightskinned niggas for being more advanced than them.
http://sarabe3.tripod.com/israeliteimages.html

With the exception of Drake, lightskins won. :-D

this picture is approx. 3,453 years old... not a bad picture considering the time and what they had to draw on...

this pic is approx. 3,890 years old..

sure look like "todays version of humans".. just thought that, maybe, if evolution was real, that maybe, these humans would look more ape-ish .... or something...

i understand it supposedly, by theory, takes a couple million years for these type a things to happen.. but you would think 3.5 & 3.9 thousand years, there would be some obvious changes..

damn... evolution, once again, triumphed by common sense.

Common sense goes out the window when you talk to people who actually believe that intelligence can come from non-intelligence. I mean these folks believe that all of life originated in some primordial ooze billions of years ago. How senseless can you be?

If it takes intelligence to design and make a car, a computer, a plane, a refrigerator, a space shuttle, etc., than how can it be possible for some primordial ooze to suddenly pop out of nowhere and start to make living creatures who are all far more complex than even the most advanced super computer? Riddle me that please!

That is why I refer to the scriptures when dealing with people who believe in Macro-Evolution. God calls them all FOOLS! Yeah, let God be true and all men Liars. Amen.

"The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God." Psalm 14:1

they dont hear you tho.

 

[zombie]

evolution does not disprove god so i don't see what the problem is, if evolution is real then god created it.

 

[bambu]

evolution does not disprove god so i don't see what the problem is, if evolution is real then god created it.

God disproves evolution.....

Man was created.....

By a creator......

Not from a coincidental gene split that diverged from apes.....

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

evolution does not disprove god so i don't see what the problem is, if evolution is real then god created it.

How do you explain Jesus words in Matthew 19? When discussing the issues of divorce, Jesus plainly states that God created man and woman in the beginning.

"Haven’t you read the Scriptures?” Jesus replied. “They record that from the beginning ‘God made them male and female." Matthew 19:4

This is God in human flesh asking you if you have read the scriptures. If you have, Jesus says that they record that in the beginning God made male and female. This account is recorded in Genesis 1 and 2.

You either have to deny what Jesus is saying, therefore calling God a liar or your going to have to accept what Jesus is saying, therefore believing that God is true. Amen.